Review of the WD Black SN850X PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD
Before you sink your teeth into the review of the WD Black SN850X SSD, it is important to understand that this is not the same as the widely available and industry applauded SN850 SSD. On the face of it, the difference is simply the ‘X’ prefix – Is that really much of a difference? I think it would be pretty fair to say that when the PCIe 4 generation of SSDs hit the consumer market, the one that made the BIGGEST (and earliest) splash was the WD Black SN850. Originally released in Autumn 2020, although it wasn’t the first PCIe4 M.2 SSD, it WAS the first commercially available drive to hit 7,000MB/s (followed incredibly closely by Samsung’s 980 Pro). Now, 2020 was quite a while ago now (give or take a pandemic or two) and in that time a wide variety of top tier (and indeed mid-low tier) brands have expanded in the PCIe 4 SSD tier, challenging the WD Black SSD in terms of performance, durability and price. The 2020 released WD Black SN850, although still hot in the basket of buyers of PS5 storage and regularly on sale during Black Friday and the like, is no longer the groundbreaking drive that it once was. And THIS with where the WD Black SN850X comes in. Now, the SN850X is NOT designed to be a replacement to the SN850. In fact, in recent months, we saw Western Digital roll out the WD Black SN770, a DRAMless, more efficient and more affordable alternative. The SN850X is designed to complete the product family in the PCIe4 M.2 NVMe tier and whereas the SN850 gains notoriety and licencing with the Sony PS5, the WD Black SN850X has its sights squarely on the Premium PC Gamer and Premium Performance tier exclusively (content creators, professional streamers and eSports). But is the WD Black SN850X really that much different? Is this a cash grab or is this a legitimate answer by WD to challengers in the PCIe4 SSD tier? Let’s find out.
Note – Now that the WD Black SN850X SSD has been released, is the 2020 released WD Black SN850 SSD Still Worth Your Money in 2022/2023? Find out HERE on the blog or in 4mins HERE on YouTube, or the full performance test HERE.
WD Black SN850X SSD Review – Quick Conclusion
The WD Black SN850X is a great SSD – If you came to this review wondering whether it is a good drive, I can unquestionably say it 100% is. You are getting a much more evolved and current upgrade on the already popular SN850 and a drive that is a much more comparable drive to recent releases from the likes of Seagate Firecuda 530, whilst also throwing significant shade at the Samsung 980 Pro into the bargain. Digging a little deeper into the specs of the SN850X itself shows that a handful of strategic (and of course more recently developed improvements at the WD R&D level) are what push this drive much further along in the food chain that then2020 released SN850. That said, some areas of the SN850X have seen little or no change since the SN850, such as near identical durability ratings (TBW/DWPD) and the drive still running a little hotter than it’s competitors. Had WD released the SN850X at the tail end of 2021 (when information of the X version of the WD Black SSD first emerged), then I think it would have made a considerably bigger impact! Nonetheless, WD is riding something of a hot streak with their WD Black PCIe4 series right now (the release of the more affordable HMB built SN770 and the SN850 getting official PS5 Compatibility by Sony), so releasing the WD Black SN850X right now, as the PCIe5 generation drags its feet commercially due to hardware shortages and the pandemic affecting the supply chain) makes alot of sense too. The SN850X arrives with a price point that, when stacked up against the 2yr available SN850, may seem a pinch high, but it won’t be long till we see this newly established PCIe4 WD Black family more organically tier its pricing. Bottom line, if you were considering the SN850 SSD for your gaming or content creation setup (or indeed any other setup that will leverage ‘write’ activity) I would strongly recommend stretching your budget a pinch further and opting for the WD Black SN850X SSD. It is worth remembering though that unless you are running a particularly powerful setup, you will only see improvements in the SN850X over the SN850 in write performance, with only marginally improvements in read rates.
Where to Buy a Product | |||
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
|
|
|
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
WD Black SN850X SSD Review – Packaging
The external packaging of the WD Black SN850X SSD is near enough identical to that of the WD Black SN850 and SN770, with Western Digtial’s stylized branding for the series out in full force. With the recent official support of the WD Black SN850 by Sony for the PS5, this should mean that the external packaging of the older drive will change to blue/white, but for now this new drive blends into the same design choices as the rest of the WD Black series.
The retail packaging also makes plenty of noise about the promised performance on the SN850X, with information on the front about the promised maximum 7300MB/s Seq Read and further details on the back regarding the durability, IOPS and further hardware specifications. Again, all this will be massively familiar to anyone who has purchased a WD Black SSD previously.
The contents of the retail package are pretty light, with the SN850X SSD arriving on its own in a plastic protective shell and just a document regarding the 5-year inclusive warranty. If you were to purchase the heatsink-equipped version (only available in 1-2TB models), that arrives pre-attached at the factory level.
On its own, the WD Black SN850X is quite a modest-looking drive and even in the 2TB capacity module that was featured for this review, only a single side of the SSD is occupied by chips/components on the PCB.
That is really all you can say about the packaging and presentation of the WD Black SN850X. It is quite a modest kit and most of the value/impression of this device is left to the hardware onboard and how that translates to performance. Let’s take a closer look at the drive itself.
WD Black SN850X SSD Review – Design
The WD Black SN850X SSD is a PCIe Gen 4×4 M.2 Key NVMe SSD that is completely backwards compatible with PCIe Gen 3×4 SSD slots where necessary (though crucially not M.2 SATA) that improves upon the architecture of the WD Black SN850 in a few key areas to produce a higher performance point in most of the key areas you want/need. Running on NVMe 1.4 architecture, the drive is reported to be the fastest PCIe m.2 SSD that Western Digital has ever produced and manages to saturate a maximum 7,300MB of the potential 8,000MB of PCIe 4×4 lanes.
The top of the SSD has the large ‘WD Black SN850X’ label that you do NOT need to remove when in operation (with or with a heatsink). Removing this label shows us a tightly packed arrangement of components/cells on the SSDs PCB. An SSD is not unlike a PC in it’s architecture, with a Controller (CPU), DRAM (Memory) and NAND (storage space). There are additional power/transistors in place to aid smooth operation, but ultimately these are the key components we need to focus on.
As mentioned earlier, if we flip the SSD over, we can see that this 2TB SSD is single-sided (i.e just a bare board on the back). The WD Black SN850X 4TB model IS double-sided, arriving with 4x 1TB NAND modules and an additional DDR4 Memory module, but this 2TB does an excellent job of keeping things nice and compact, whilst allowing much more direct, manageable and efficient heat dissipation. Something we will DEFINITELY touch on later.
The SN850X also benefits from being a completely first-party/in-house SSD. Many PCIe 4 SSDs that have arrived on the scene in the last two years can be broken down into two strict camps. The larger one is made up of brands such as Seagate, Sabrent, ADATA, Patriot and more who rely on 3rd party companies such as Phison and Innogrit to provide components (eg SSD controllers). The other smaller camp in the world of SSDs is comprised of brands such as Western Digital, Samsung and Crucial who tend to rely much more (often exclusively) on first-party controllers and NAND for their drives, allowing them to craft media that is much more precise in it’s execution, as well as allows them better quality control, supply and pricing. There are benefits to either approach in SSD design, but many users like the idea of a near complete or near enough completely in-house designed SSD.
So that is the physical design of the WD Black SN850X SSD. But what about the hardware components themselves? Does the WD Black SN850X SSD change things up much from the SN850? Let’s find out.
WD Black SN850X SSD Review – Hardware Specifications
The WD Black SN850X SSD is highly comparable to the older WD Black SN850, but with a few improvements along the way. Here is how the two SSDs stack up in initial hardware specifications:
Brand/Series |
WD Black SN850X |
WD Black SN850 |
PCIe Generation | PCIe Gen 4×4 | PCIe Gen 4×4 |
NVMe Rev | NVMe 1.4 | NVMe 1.4 |
NAND | 3D TLC NAND (Layer Count TBC) | Sandisk/Kioxia BiCS4 96L 3D TLC NAND |
Max Capacity | 4TB | 2TB |
Controller | WD Black G2 (TBC) | WD_BLACK G2 |
Warranty | 5yr | 5yr |
I know the above might seem needlessly technical, so below we can bring the most important considerations into sharper focus.
Hardware Focus of the WD Black SN850X SSD
The onboard SSD controller of the WD Black SN850X is a little bit of a mystery (at least at the time of writing this article). Arriving with the Sandisk model ID ’20-82-20035-B2′, this is practically no information online currently about this component. This is not unusual, as Western Digital are famously secretive about the make-up of its components (compared with the bulk of SSD brands that rely on controllers developed by Phison or Innogrit). At best guess, this SSD controller is an improvement/variation of WD G2 NVMe Controller found in the SN770 and SN850 (the 20-82-10035-A1 or 20-82-10081-A1). Almost certainly further information on this controller will arrive as this SSD enters circulation and I will update this area of the review with more (with references etc). In terms of performance (covered in more detail later) it still maintained a similar level of sustained Read activity as the SN850 throughout testing, but with a clear and substantial increase in write performance in our modest test machine.
This controller is also accompanied by Micron IFB75D9XPG DDR4 DRAM that scales alongside the storage capacity (i.e 1GB DDR4 > 1TB Capacity, 2GB DDR4 > 2TB Capacity). This already puts it at a tremendous advantage over the WD Black SN770 released a short while ago that required increased cooperation with the host system with the use of host memory buffer (HMB). This combined with an improved controller likely results in this drive providing the best sustained performance possible in a WD Black m.2 NVMe SSD yet
The storage NAND used by the SN850X is Sandisk 006761-1T00, BiCS 3D TLC. The layer depth of this memory is still being investigated (once again, WD being remarkably secretive) but based on the performance capabilities, is almost certainly 112-layer or 162-layer depth. The older SN850 arrived at 96L and the recently released SN770 arrived with 001397 1T00 112-layer BiCS 3D TLC memory). I’ll revisit this area o the review later and update as more details on this are revealed.
The 2TB model of the WD Black SN850X that was used for this review arrived with two 1TB blocks and this is what allowed this good-sized capacity drive to remain single-sided. The 4TB model unsurprisingly needs to spread itself out a bit and also is the only capacity in the SN850X not to include the optional official LED-equipped heatsink. So, how does this SSD compare with the current and more popular PCIe4 M.2 NVMe SSDs in the market right now?
WD Black SN850X vs Seagate Firecuda 530 vs Samsung 980 Pro SSD
Before we conduct our own testing on this SSD, Let’s take a closer look at the reported specifications and benchmarks first. The WD Black SN850X SSD arrives in multiple capacities (below). The Prices currently are a little inconsistent (with each higher capacity tier actually having a higher price per GB – quite unusual) likely due to the continued global hardware shortages, the Pandemic’s effect on the supply chain, the effects of Chia crypto has on SSD availability in 2021 and almost certainly the ongoing issues surrounding Taiwan and China! Below is a breakdown of how each SSD from Seagate and Samsung compares with the WD Black SN850X:
Brand/Series | WD Black SN850X
|
Seagate Firecuda 530
500GB – $119.99, 1TB – $159.99, 2TB – $299.99, 4TB – $729.99 |
Samsung 980 Pro
|
PCIe Generation | PCIe Gen 4 | PCIe Gen 4 | PCIe Gen 4 |
NVMe Rev | NVMe 1.4 | NVMe 1.4 | NVMe 1.3c |
NAND | 112/164L* BiCS 3D TLC | 3D TLC Micron B47R 176L | Samsung 128L 3D TLC |
Max Capacity | 4TB – Double Sided | 4TB – Double Sided | 2TB |
Controller | WD Black G2* | Phison E18-PS5018 | Custom Elpis |
Warranty | 5yr | 5yr | 5yr |
500GB Model | N/A | ZP500GM3A013 |
MZ-V8P500BW |
Price in $ and $ | N/A | $119 / £119 | $119 / £109 |
1TB Model | WDS100T2X0E | ZP1000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P1T0BW |
Price in $ and $ | $159 / £159** | $159 / £199 | $179 / £169 |
2TB Model | WDS200T2X0E | ZP2000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P2T0BW |
Price in $ and $ | $289 / £309** | $299 / £279 | $299 / £264 |
4TB Model | WDS400T2X0E | ZP4000GM3A013 | N/A |
Price in $ and $ | $699 / £749** | $729 / £700 | N/A |
500GB Model | N/A | ZP500GM3A013 |
MZ-V8P500BW |
Total Terabytes Written (TBW) | N/A | 640TB | 300TB |
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours) | N/A | 1,800,000 | 1,500,000 |
DWPD | N/A | 0.7DWPD | 0.3DWPD |
1TB Model | WDS100T2X0E | ZP1000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P1T0BW |
Total Terabytes Written (TBW) | 600TB | 1275TB | 600TB |
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours) | 1,750,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,500,000 |
DWPD | 0.3DWPD | 0.7DWPD | 0.3DWPD |
2TB Model | WDS200T2X0E | ZP2000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P2T0BW |
Total Terabytes Written (TBW) | 1200TB | 2550TB | 1200TB |
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours) | 1,750,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,500,000 |
DWPD | 0.3DWPD | 0.7DWPD | 0.3DWPD |
4TB Model | WDS400T2X0E | ZP4000GM3A013 | N/A |
Total Terabytes Written (TBW) | 2400TB | 5100TB | N/A |
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF, hours) | 1,750,000 | 1,800,000 | N/A |
DWPD | 0.3DWPD | 0.7DWPD | N/A |
*TBC at the time of writing and will be addressed/confirmed later. The video below will break down the definitions and meaning of the terms used throughout this review and the comparison tables
** Pricing for the SN850X is quite varied online at launch and regardless of tax and currency exchange rates, the pricing here (taken from the official WD store) seems a bit uneven. This will hopefully even out soon.
So, first up we can discuss the available capacities. The Samsung 980 Pro still continues to stick at the maximum 2TB capacity line, whilst also being available in the smallest capacity in the lineup (in a 250GB form). Seagate and the Firecuda 530 arrive in the most well-spread range, starting at 500GB and ending at 4TB. This leaves the WD Black SN850X somewhere in the middle with the 1TB, 2TB and 4TB options. All this said, in terms of pricing, the WD Black SN850X overall arrives at the best Price per TB of the three – though pricing at the launch of the SN850X has been a little inconsistent depending on where you are in the world. Next there is the subject of durability and the WD SN850X still has the same DWPD/TBW/MTBF rating of the 2020 released SN850 (matching the TBW of the Samsung 980 Pro), which although pretty good, is still less than half that of the Seagate Firecuda 530 – Still the more high endurance PCIe4 M.2 SSD in the 7K performance bracket even a year since release. Let’s compare the three drives in terms of maximum rated performance. These are the quoted performance figures provided by each brand and in single drive test environments, with exceptionally high-end CPU+Memory combos that can be referenced on their own resource pages.
Brand/Series | WD Black SN850X
|
Seagate Firecuda 530
500GB – $119.99, 1TB – $159.99, 2TB – $299.99, 4TB – $729.99 |
Samsung 980 Pro
|
500GB Model | N/A | ZP500GM3A013 |
MZ-V8P500BW |
Sequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | N/A | 7000MB | 6900MB |
Sequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | N/A | 3000MB | 5000MB |
1TB Model | WDS100T2X0E | ZP1000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P1T0BW |
Sequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 7300MB | 7300MB | 7000MB |
Sequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 6300MB | 6000MB | 5000MB |
2TB Model | WDS200T2X0E | ZP2000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P2T0BW |
Sequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 7300MB | 7300MB | 7000MB |
Sequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 6600MB | 6900MB | 5100MB |
4TB Model | WDS400T2X0E | ZP4000GM3A013 | N/A |
Sequential Read (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 7300MB | 7300MB | N/A |
Sequential Write (Max, MB/s), 128 KB | 6600MB | 6900MB | N/A |
Brand/Series | WD Black SN850X | Seagate Firecuda 530 | WD Black SN850 H/S |
500GB Model | N/A | ZP500GM3A013 |
MZ-V8P500BW |
Random Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | N/A | 400,000 | 800,000 |
Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | N/A | 700,000 | 1,000,000 |
1TB Model | WDS100T2X0E | ZP1000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P1T0BW |
Random Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 800,000 | 800000 | 1000000 |
Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 1,100,000 | 1000000 | 1000000 |
2TB Model | WDS200T2X0E | ZP2000GM3A013 | MZ-V8P2T0BW |
Random Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 1,200,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 1,100,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
4TB Model | WDS400T2X0E | ZP4000GM3A013 | N/A |
Random Read (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 1,200,000 | 1,000,000 | N/A |
Random Write (Max, IOPS), 4 KB QD32 | 1,100,000 | 1,000,000 | N/A |
The first thing we need to immediately highlight is that despite the WD Black SN850X certainly improving on the performance provided by the 1 years older SN850 and 2 months older SN770, it is still not the fastest PCIe4 M.2 NVMe SSD in the consumer market right now, arriving just a few hundred MB under the Seagate Firecuda (which arrives with 176L NAND that allows a pinch more in terms of traditional transfer rates). In terms of the IOPS though, the WD Black SN850X absolutely STORMS IT, with a higher 4K random read and write at every single capacity tier. The Samsung 980 Pro ends up looking increasingly overshadowed, unfortunately, leaving many to wonder if Samsung is going to challenge this with a Samsung 990 Pro, EVO or Plus, or go ahead and concentrate on making a bigger splash on Day 1 for the PCIe5 generation (as they did in the PCIe4 gen in 2020). It is also worth remembering that these reported performance figures are based on exceptional high-end PCs and configurations, that only a small % of users in the consumer section will have in place. So what about in more common setups? How does the WD Black SN850X perform in a relatively pedestrian Intel i5 Windows 10 PC Configuration? Let’s find out.
Testing the WD Black SN850X m.2 PCIE4 NVMe SSD
The WD Black SN850X 2TB was provided by WD for this test and it was tested using multiple benchmark tools, from a cold boot, in the 2nd storage slot (i.e not the OS drive). Each test was conducted three times (full details of this are shown in the YouTube Review of the WD Black SN850X over on NASCompares):
Test Machine:
- Windows 10 Pro Desktop System
- Intel i5 11400 Rocket Lake – 6-Core 2.6/4.4Ghz
- 16GB DDR4 2666MHz Memory
- Intel B560M mATX Motherboard
- OS Storage, Seagate Firecuda 120 SSD
- Test SSD connected to Secondary PCIe Gen 4 M.2 Slot
Here is the Video Review of the WD Black SN850X SSD and PC Benchmarks:
Using CrystalDisk, we got a good measure of the drive and verified that this PCIe Gen 4 x4 SSD was indeed using the 4×4 lane. Additionally, the temp averaged out around 48C between each test being conducted, with the drive being encased in a regular Eluteng M.2 $10 heatsink. Much like the WD Black SN850, this new entry into the WD Black series certainly ran quite hot.
The first tests were conducted using the ATTO disk benchmark software. The first was a 256MB test file size and below is a breakdown of the transfer rates and IOPS. The 2nd Test was a 1GB test file and finally, the last test was with a 4GB test file. The system was given 1-minute cool downtime between tests, no screen recording software was used (remove overhead) and a heatsink was used throughout (no reboots). Write performance continued to impress throughout, but the read performance was a pinch lower than expected, likely down to the i5 in the system compared with the Xeon/Ryzens that many Manf brands choose to max-benchmark their drives with
ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #1
256MB File PEAK Read Throughput = 6.41GB/s
256MB File PEAK Write Throughput = 6.22GB/s
ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #2
1GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 6.42GB/s
1GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 6.21GB/s
ATTO Disk Benchmark Test #3
4GB File PEAK Read Throughput = 6.41GB/s
4GB File PEAK Write Throughput = 6.21GB/s
Next, although the ATTO tests were quite good, I moved on to the Crystal Disk Mark testing to see how well it would handle our next barrage of tests. The first test was the 1GB file testing, which measured both sequential and random, as well as the read and write IOPS. Test were conducted on a 1GB, 4GB and 16GB Test File. I also included a mixed 70/30 read and write task to give a little bit more of a realistic balanced workload. These tests were conducted with 1-minute cooling break in between. The WD Black SN850X did not crack the 7,000MB/s threshold on the mid-range test PC, but once again, the Write performance was very impressive indeed!
CRYSTALDISK MARK 1GB TEST
CRYSTALDISK MARK 4GB TEST
CRYSTALDISK MARK 16GB TEST
Next, I switched to AS SSD benchmark. A much more thorough test through, I used 1GB, 3GB and 5GB test files. Each test includes throughput benchmarks and IOPS that are respective to the larger file sizes (important, if you are reading this and trying to compare against the reported 4K IOPS from the manufacturer).
AS SSD Benchmark Test #1
AS SSD Benchmark Test #2
AS SSD Benchmark Test #3
Ordinarily, I would introduce tests like BlackMagic and AJA into the mix here, but even a short burst of testing on an NVMe like this would over saturate the cache memory on board. Nevertheless, in the short term we still could ascertain the reported performance on 1GB, 4GB and 16GB file testing was:
1GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 5894MB/s Read &5721MB/s Write
4GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 5861MB/s Read & 5759MB/s Write
16GB AJA File Test Results (Peak) = 6008MB/s Read & 5734MB/s Write
Overall, the WD Black SN850X was certainly able to provide some solid performance, as well as potentially exceed the test figures here on a more powerful machine. Given the reported Read and Write statistics that the brand has stated publically, I think there is enough evidence here to back up those claims. IOPs were a little lower than I expected, but again, we were testing very large file types, so this would have to be taken in context. I do wish most SSD brands provided benchmarks for different tiers of systems, rather than only stating the systems at the very, VERY top end. It makes sense, to run the drive in a system without any potential bottlenecks, but a 2nd or even 3rd round of test results that cover more mid-range or domestic systems would give users better scope of the drive’s potential in their own setup. Nevertheless, the peak performance of the WD Black SN850X was still exceptionally high AND sustained in my mid tier test machine and certainly a great indication that this drive will consistently live in the 6,500MB/s+ area in read/write in even the most modest setups.
WD Black SN850X SSD Review – Conclusion
The WD Black SN850X is a great SSD – If you came to this review wondering whether it is a good drive, I can unquestionably say it 100% is. You are getting a much more evolved and current upgrade on the already popular SN850 and a drive that is a much more comparable drive to recent releases from the likes of Seagate Firecuda 530, whilst also throwing significant shade at the Samsung 980 Pro into the bargain. Digging a little deeper into the specs of the SN850X itself shows that a handful of strategic (and of course more recently developed improvements at the WD R&D level) are what push this drive much further along in the food chain that then2020 released SN850. That said, some areas of the SN850X have seen little or no change since the SN850, such as near identical durability ratings (TBW/DWPD) and the drive still running a little hotter than it’s competitors. Had WD released the SN850X at the tail end of 2021 (when information of the X version of the WD Black SSD first emerged), then I think it would have made a considerably bigger impact! Nonetheless, WD is riding something of a hot streak with their WD Black PCIe4 series right now (the release of the more affordable HMB built SN770 and the SN850 getting official PS5 Compatibility by Sony), so releasing the WD Black SN850X right now, as the PCIe5 generation drags its feet commercially due to hardware shortages and the pandemic affecting the supply chain) makes alot of sense too. The SN850X arrives with a price point that, when stacked up against the 2yr available SN850, may seem a pinch high, but it won’t be long till we see this newly established PCIe4 WD Black family more organically tier its pricing. Bottom line, if you were considering the SN850 SSD for your gaming or content creation setup (or indeed any other setup that will leverage ‘write’ activity) I would strongly recommend stretching your budget a pinch further and opting for the WD Black SN850X SSD. It is worth remembering though that unless you are running a particularly powerful setup, you will only see improvements in the SN850X over the SN850 in write performance, with only marginally improvements in read rates.
PROs of the WD Black SN850X SSD | CONs of the WD Black SN850X SSD |
|
|
🔒 Join Inner Circle
Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.(EARLY) The Problem (and the solution) with Oculink eGPUs (GMKtec AD-GP1 Review)
(Early Access) MINISFORUM MS-A2 vs MS-01 - Which Is BEST?
UGREEN vs QNAP - LET'S HAVE AN ARGUMENT.....
Synology BeeStation Plus 8TB - A Real Easy PLEX NAS?
(Early Access) 45Drives Has Entered the Chat... (HL8 Review)
(Early Access) Synology DS1825+ NAS Released
Access content via Patreon or KO-FI