Comparing the CWWK N100 and N305 Motherboards for NAS Builds

When choosing a motherboard for your next NAS (Network Attached Storage) build, finding the right balance between performance, efficiency, and cost can be challenging. The CWWK N100 and N305 motherboards are two popular options for compact, high-performance NAS setups. Both boards are designed to cater to home and small business users looking for flexibility and reliability. In this article, we will compare these two motherboards, highlight their differences, and address potential questions users might have.

Key Specifications Comparison

Processor (CPU)

• CWWK N100:
  • Intel N100 processor (4 cores, 4 threads)
  • Base clock: 3.40 GHz
  • Power-efficient architecture (6W TDP)
• CWWK N305:
  • Intel N305 processor (8 cores, 8 threads)
  • Base clock: 3.80 GHz
  • Higher performance, slightly higher power consumption (15W TDP)

Key Difference: The N305 offers double the core count and threads, making it better suited for multitasking and heavier workloads, such as Plex transcoding and running virtualized environments.

Connectivity and Networking

• Both motherboards feature:
  • 4x 2.5GbE LAN ports for high-speed networking and link aggregation (up to 10Gbps total).
  • Multiple USB ports for peripherals and external storage.

Key Difference: No differences here; both are equally equipped in networking capabilities.

Storage Options

• Shared Features:
  • 6x SATA 3.0 ports for traditional hard drives (HDDs).
  • 2x M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching or additional storage.

Key Difference: Both boards support the same storage configurations, but the N305’s additional CPU power makes it more efficient for handling caching and storage-heavy tasks.

Power Consumption

• CWWK N100:
  • Extremely power-efficient with a TDP of just 6W, ideal for 24/7 operation.
• CWWK N305:
  • Slightly higher TDP at 15W, but still efficient compared to traditional desktop processors.

Key Difference: The N100 is the better choice if minimizing energy costs is a priority, but the N305’s power increase is negligible for most users.

Use Cases

• CWWK N100:
  • Basic NAS setups.
  • File sharing, backups, and light media streaming (e.g., Plex without heavy transcoding).
• CWWK N305:
  • Advanced NAS setups.
  • Plex media server with transcoding for multiple devices.
  • Virtualization and more demanding applications.

Common Questions About the CWWK N100 and N305 Boards

1. Is the CWWK N305 worth the additional cost?

Yes, if you plan to use your NAS for Plex transcoding, virtualization, or running multiple concurrent tasks. The additional cores and threads of the N305 significantly improve performance for such workloads.

If you only need a simple NAS for file storage and backups, the N100 is sufficient and more cost-effective.

2. How much power will the N305 consume compared to the N100?

The N305 has a TDP of 15W versus the N100’s 6W. This difference is minimal in a NAS setup and will result in only slightly higher electricity costs. For example, running 24/7, the N305 might add a few dollars to your annual power bill.

3. Which NVMe SSD should I use for caching?

When choosing an NVMe SSD for caching, prioritize models with high DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day) and reliability ratings. Here are some recommended models:

• Samsung 970 Pro (0.66 DWPD)
• WD Red SN700 (1.0 DWPD)
• Seagate FireCuda 520 (0.9 DWPD)

These SSDs are designed to handle the high read/write operations typical in caching workloads.

4. Does the CWWK N305’s performance justify its higher power consumption?

For users running Plex with transcoding, hosting game servers, or using virtualization, the N305’s additional power is well worth it. The performance improvement far outweighs the slight increase in energy consumption.

5. Can I fit heatsinks on both NVMe SSDs on these boards?

The M.2 slots are close together, so adding heatsinks to both SSDs might be challenging. You can opt for compact heatsinks or a DIY cooling solution with a small fan to improve airflow.

6. Is the CWWK N100 suitable for Plex?

The N100 can handle Plex for direct play and light transcoding (1080p or lower). For 4K transcoding or multiple concurrent streams, the N305 is a better choice.

7. Which operating system (OS) is best for these boards?

• Unraid: Great for beginners and highly flexible for media servers.
• TrueNAS: Ideal for advanced users prioritizing data integrity (ZFS).
• OpenMediaVault (OMV): Lightweight and user-friendly for basic NAS setups.

For your first NAS, Unraid is a solid choice, especially if you plan to expand storage incrementally.

8. Can I run a game server like Valheim on these boards?

Yes, the N305 is capable of hosting lightweight game servers like Valheim. The N100 can also manage it but may struggle with additional concurrent tasks.

Conclusion

Choosing between the CWWK N100 and N305 motherboards depends on your specific needs:

• The N100 is perfect for energy-efficient, budget-friendly NAS setups focused on file storage and light media streaming.
• The N305 offers better performance for demanding tasks like Plex transcoding, virtualization, and game server hosting, with only a minor increase in power consumption.

Both motherboards provide excellent value for their respective use cases, ensuring flexibility and scalability for your NAS build. Consider your current and future needs to make the best choice!

Where to Buy a Product
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤
			VISIT RETAILER ➤

☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US