Best NVMe M.2 SSD for caching
Hello, so I have a DS1821+ that I use for my Plex file station, I use a pc for the server itself. I do know my metadata folder is closer to 800 GB. I am looking to install a NVMe SSD for cache. I do not know if the models that are not listed on Synology’s capable list will work. Furthermore, I do not know the recommended size to get, I was thinking 1 TBx2. Can you please advise.
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 NVMe Internal Solid State Drive (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM)
Samsung 980 1TB NVMe PCI-e Internal Solid State Drive (MZ-V8V1T0B/AM)
Silicon Power 1TB PCIe Internal Solid State Drive (P34A80 NVMe PCIe SSD)
WD_BLACK 1TB PCIe Gen4 x4 Internal Solid State Drive (WDBAUY0010BNC-WRSN)
When choosing NVMe for caching you need to look at reliability ratings such as DWPD/MTBF. Here are a few on the list
https://nascompares.com/answer/nvme-m-2-list-with-endurance-dwpd-mtbf/
Caching means a lot of read and write operations, unlike regular storage situation.
You would need to look at models with 0.5DWPD and above
970 pro – 0.66DWPD
990pro – 0.68 DWPD
Synology SNV3400 – 0.68DWPD
Seagate FireCuda 510 – 0.7 DWPD
Seagate IronWolf 525 – 0.7 DWPD
Seagate Firecuda 530 – 0.7 DWPD
Seagate PS5 Game drive – 0.7 DWPD
Seagate FireCuda 520 -0.9 DWPD
WD Red SN700 – 1.0DWPD
MODEL | CAPACITIES | INTERFACE | CONTROLLER | READ SPEED | WRITE SPEED | READ IOPS | WRITE IOPS | TBW | MTBF | DWPD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synology NVMe | 400GB, 800GB | NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4 | NVMe 1.3 | 3,000 MB/s | 750-1,000 MB/s | 225,000-400,000 | 45,000-70,000 | 491-1,022 TB | 1.8 million hours | 0.68 DWPD |
Samsung 990 Pro | 1TB, 2TB | PCIe Gen 4.0 x4 | NVMe 2.0 | Up to 7,450 MB/s | Up to 6,900 MB/s | Up to 22,000 | Up to 1,550,000 | N/A | 1.5 million hours | 0.68 DWPD |
FireCuda 530 SSD | 500GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | PCIe Gen4 ×4 NVMe 1.4 | NVMe 1.4 3D TLC | 7,250-7,300 MB/s | 3,000-6,900 MB/s | 400,000-1,000,000 | 700,000-1,000,000 | 640-5,100 TBW | 1.8 million hours | 0.7 DWPD |
FireCuda 520 | 500GB, 1TB, 2TB | PCIe Gen4 ×4 | NVMe 1.3 3D TLC | 5,000 MB/s | 2,500-4,400 MB/s | 430,000-760,000 | 630,000-700,000 | 850-3,600 TBW | 1.8 million hours | 0.9 DWPD |
WD Red SN700 | 250GB-4TB | PCIe Gen3 x4 8 Gb/s | NVMe 1.3 Sandisk 3D TLC | 3,100-3,430 MB/s | 1,600-3,100 MB/s | 220K-550K | 180K-560K | 500-5,100 TBW | 1.75 million hours | 1.0 DWPD |
I hope this helps.
Where to Buy a Product | |||
VISIT RETAILER ➤ | |||
VISIT RETAILER ➤ | |||
VISIT RETAILER ➤ | |||
VISIT RETAILER ➤ |
We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE If you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here
(Early Access) Lockerstor Gen 3 Series - SHOULD YOU BUY ONE?
(Early Access) Asustor ADM 5 Software Review - Should Synology Be Worried?
(Early Access) Best 8-Bay NAS of 2024
(Early Access) Best 4-Bay NAS of 2024
(Early Access) Best 2-Bay NAS of 2024
(Early Access) Best Value NAS of 2024 - SAVE SOME MONEY!
(Early Access) Lockerstor 4 Gen3 Review - GO HOME EVERYONE
(Early Access) eufyCam S3 Pro Review
(Early Access) Addlink G55 Gen5 SSD Review - Best DRAMLESS SSD EVER?
(Early Access) Terramaster T9-500 PRO Max NAS - Should You Buy (Review)
(Early Access) DEADBOLT - 3 Years Later
(Early Access) UniFi UNAS Pro - COMPLETE SETUP GUIDE
Access content via Patreon or KO-FI
Why is IronWolf 525 that has less DWPD (0.7) and TBW (2800TB) selling for more than DOUBLE the price of FireCuda 520 (DWPD 0.9 and TBW 3600TB <= according to NewEgg)? What does IronWolf 525 have that gets it this premium? ($396.19 on Amazon for IronWolf 525, vs $169 on NewEgg FireCuda at the time of writing.)
It is simply the marketing and sometimes availability that determines the price. Always trust endurance numbers.