Terramaster F6-424 NAS Review

Last updated on 31 Jan 2025 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – LET’S GET SERIOUS?
1.1 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Quick Conclusion
1.2 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Hardware TL;DR
1.3 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Chassis Design
1.4 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Ports and Connections
1.5 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Internal Hardware and PCIe Lanes
1.6 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – TOS Software
1.7 TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Conclusion and Verdict
2 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – LET’S GET SERIOUS?

Update – The Terramaster F6-424 Max NAS is NOW Available HERE on Amazon for $999

TerraMaster continues to redefine the balance between affordability and high-performance in the NAS market, with the F6-424 Max emerging as a flagship model tailored for power users, small businesses, and home lab enthusiasts. Released in September 2024 at a competitive price of $999.99, this NAS expands on TerraMaster’s legacy of delivering powerful hardware at a more accessible price compared to premium brands like Synology and QNAP. With a strong emphasis on both storage and computational power, the F6-424 Max is engineered to meet the demands of users who require more than just network-attached storage—it’s a versatile powerhouse capable of handling intensive workloads.

At its core, the F6-424 Max is powered by an Intel Core i5-1235U, a 10-core, 12-thread processor that excels in multitasking, making it well-suited for applications such as virtualization, containerized environments, and media transcoding. This CPU ensures smooth performance for users running multiple services simultaneously, whether it be a Plex media server, a self-hosted cloud storage solution, or a business-oriented data management system. The processing power, combined with TerraMaster’s optimized TOS operating system, allows the NAS to function as an efficient, all-in-one solution for both storage and computation.

Beyond its robust CPU, the F6-424 Max is equipped with hardware designed to maximize speed and expandability. It features dual M.2 NVMe slots, which can be used for caching or high-speed storage, significantly improving performance for demanding workloads. Additionally, two 10GbE network ports ensure high-speed data transfers, making it an excellent choice for users working with large files, such as video editors and creative professionals. The NAS also supports up to 64GB of DDR5 memory, allowing users to scale their system’s capabilities for resource-intensive applications.

With a strong balance of affordability, raw power, and high-speed networking, the TerraMaster F6-424 Max is positioned as a compelling alternative to more expensive NAS solutions.

Before diving into the detailed review of the F6-424 Max, it’s essential to understand how this model compares to its siblings, the smaller capacity F6-424, F4-424 and the F4-424 Pro. Each of these NAS units targets different segments of the market, from home users and enthusiasts to businesses requiring more power. Let’s take a closer look at the key differences between the F6-424, F6-424 Pro, and F6-424 Max.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Quick Conclusion

The TerraMaster F6-424 Max is a robust 6-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F6-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $999, the F6-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

SOFTWARE - 6/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 9/10


8.0
PROS
👍🏻Powerful Hardware: Intel i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads for resource-heavy tasks.
👍🏻Dual 10GbE Ports: High-speed networking capabilities with link aggregation for up to 20Gbps, ideal for large file transfers.
👍🏻PCIe Gen 4 NVMe Support: Two M.2 NVMe slots offering exceptional performance for caching or additional high-speed storage.
👍🏻Efficient Cooling: The large 120mm fan ensures quiet and effective cooling, making it suitable for home and office environments.
👍🏻Improved TOS 6 Software: Enhancements in GUI, backup tools, and overall security bring TOS closer to its competitors.
CONS
👎🏻Higher Price Tag: At just under $1K, it’s more expensive than TerraMaster’s other models, which may deter budget-conscious buyers.
👎🏻No PCIe Expansion: Lack of a PCIe slot limits potential for future upgrades, such as adding 10GbE cards or more M.2 drives.
👎🏻Presentation: The software has improved a lot, but still feels inconsistent in places compared with alternatives from brands such as Synology and QNAP.



Where to Buy?

Terramaster F6-424 Max ($899 Amazon) – HERETerramaster F6-424 Max ($799 Aliexpress) – HERE

 

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Hardware TL;DR

The F6-424 Max is equipped with some of the most powerful hardware seen in a domestic 6-bay NAS from TerraMaster. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the key hardware components:

Component Specification
Processor Intel i5-1235U (10 cores, 12 threads, 1.3GHz base, 4.4GHz boost)
Memory 8GB DDR5 (expandable up to 64GB)
Drive Bays 6x 3.5”/2.5” SATA (hot-swappable, up to 144TB total)
M.2 NVMe Slots 2x PCIe Gen 4 x4 (for caching or additional storage)
Networking 2x 10GbE RJ45 (supports link aggregation)
USB Ports 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.0 (4K at 60Hz)
Cooling 1x 120mm fan (smart cooling system with multiple speeds)
Power Consumption 35W (idle), 70W (under full load)
Chassis Dimensions 222 x 179 x 154 mm
Weight 3.6 kg

The Intel i5-1235U is the real powerhouse of the F6-424 Max, combining two performance cores with eight efficiency cores for excellent multi-threaded performance. Whether you’re running virtual machines, AI workloads, or 4K Plex streams, this processor handles it all with ease. The 8GB of DDR5 memory is a solid starting point, but the system can support up to 64GB for users with more demanding needs.

Another key hardware feature is the dual 10GbE network ports, which offer more than just fast networking—they enable link aggregation to provide up to 20Gbps of network throughput. This makes the F6-424 Max perfect for video editing teams, large backups, or any environment requiring high-speed network transfers.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Chassis Design

The F6-424 Max arrives in a sleek, modern chassis that is not only visually appealing but also highly functional. The design has evolved significantly from TerraMaster’s older NAS models, taking cues from premium brands like Synology and QNAP. The brushed matte black plastic gives it a professional look while the ventilation design has been carefully optimized to improve airflow.

One of the standout features of the chassis is the dual 80mm fans at the rear of the unit. This fan works in tandem with the ventilated side panels, which are adorned with the TerraMaster logo, to ensure that the system remains cool even under heavy loads. The fans operate quietly, thanks to its smart cooling system, which adjusts fan speeds based on the internal temperature of the NAS.

The drive bays are hot-swappable and feature tool-less installation, making it incredibly easy to add or replace drives. The drive trays are constructed from durable plastic, and while they may feel a bit less premium compared to metal trays, they securely hold both 3.5” and 2.5” SATA drives. The trays slide effortlessly into the SATA connectors, and an intuitive push-to-lock mechanism prevents accidental ejection during operation.

On the front of the NAS, the LED indicators for system status, drive health, and network activity are discreet but easy to read. However, one minor complaint is the absence of a front-facing USB port, which could have made external drive backups or peripheral connections more convenient.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Ports and Connections

The F6-424 Max comes packed with a variety of ports that make it a versatile system for both high-speed networking and peripheral connections. The most significant feature is the dual 10GbE ports, which allow for link aggregation, effectively doubling your network bandwidth to 20Gbps when connected to a compatible switch. This level of networking is particularly useful for users handling large data transfers, 4K video editing, or multiple virtual machines.

In addition to the 10GbE ports, the NAS includes three USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, two of which are Type-A and one Type-C. These ports provide data transfer speeds of up to 10Gbps, making them perfect for connecting external storage devices or peripherals like printers or USB drives. One of the notable improvements in this model is the inclusion of the USB Type-C port, which adds an extra layer of versatility for modern devices.

The HDMI 2.0 port supports 4K video output at 60Hz, which is ideal for users who wish to use the NAS for multimedia purposes or need a direct console for diagnostics and maintenance. However, it’s important to note that TerraMaster still hasn’t implemented a local GUI platform like QNAP’s HD Station or Asustor Portal, so the HDMI port is mostly useful for users running third-party operating systems like UnRAID or TrueNAS.

Overall, the port layout of the F6-424 Max is well-suited for high-performance environments but lacks some of the extra features—such as PCIe expansion or additional USB ports—that would make it even more versatile for advanced users.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Internal Hardware and PCIe Lanes

Opening up the F6-424 Max reveals a well-organized internal layout with some serious hardware under the hood. One of the most impressive aspects of the design is the integration of PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which significantly boosts the performance potential of the system. The Intel i5-1235U processor comes equipped with 20 PCIe lanes, and TerraMaster has used these lanes effectively to ensure that the NAS delivers exceptional I/O performance.

The two M.2 NVMe slots are directly connected via PCIe Gen 4 x4, which means that each slot can support full Gen 4 speeds of up to 8GB/s per drive. This is a massive improvement over the previous Gen 3 models, which were limited to 4GB/s. These NVMe slots can be used for caching, allowing users to speed up read/write operations when using slower mechanical drives in the main six bays, or they can be used as standalone storage pools for data-intensive tasks.

However, TerraMaster could have taken the hardware to the next level by offering a PCIe expansion slot. Many competitors in this price range, such as QNAP and Asustor, include a PCIe slot for adding additional network cards, SSDs, or Thunderbolt expansion cards. While the F6-424 Max is already a strong performer, the lack of expansion options could be a limiting factor for users who require more versatility from their NAS.

In terms of power efficiency, the F6-424 Max is highly optimized for its hardware class. Under full load, it draws around 70W, which is impressive considering the performance it delivers. The passive cooling on the Intel i5 CPU, combined with the large rear fan, ensures that the system remains cool without excessive noise or power consumption.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – TOS Software

Review of the TOS 6 software (in Beta) HERE

With the release of TOS 6, TerraMaster has made great strides in enhancing the functionality and usability of its NAS systems. TOS 6 offers improved snapshot capabilities, better backup management, and enhanced support for cloud synchronization services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and Amazon S3. This means users can seamlessly synchronize their local NAS data with cloud storage, providing a layer of protection against data loss.

Another notable feature of TOS 6 is TRAID, TerraMaster’s flexible RAID configuration system, which allows users to combine disks of different sizes while still benefiting from redundancy. This is comparable to Synology’s Hybrid RAID (SHR), making it easier to expand storage in the future without being tied to identical drives. Additionally, TOS 6 supports AES 256-bit encryption, ensuring that sensitive data is protected both in transit and at rest.

However, while TOS 6 has seen significant improvements, it still lacks some of the advanced features found in Synology DSM or QNAP QTS. For example, TerraMaster’s photo management app (Terra Photos) is still in its beta phase and lacks the advanced AI-driven organization features of Synology Moments or QNAP QuMagie. Additionally, while Plex Media Server runs smoothly on the F6-424 Max, TerraMaster’s native multimedia tools are not as polished, making it less appealing for users who rely heavily on NAS-based multimedia management.

TerraMaster F6-424 Max NAS Review – Conclusion and Verdict

The TerraMaster F6-424 Max is a standout NAS system in TerraMaster’s lineup, offering impressive hardware specifications and solid performance at a price point of $999.99. For users who need high-speed data transfers, intensive compute power, and flexibility in storage configurations, the F6-424 Max is an excellent option. The combination of the Intel i5-1235U CPU, dual 10GbE ports, and PCIe Gen 4 NVMe support ensures that the NAS can handle even the most demanding tasks, whether it’s virtualization, media transcoding, or large-scale backups.

That said, when compared to the F4-424 Max, which is priced at $799.99, the Max model offers significantly more networking power and potential for speed. However, the Pro model still provides fantastic performance for most home and small office users, making it a more budget-friendly alternative for those who don’t require 10GbE or advanced NVMe functionality.

In terms of software, Synology DSM and QNAP QTS are still more evolved, offering richer multimedia experiences and better integration for business applications. However, TOS 6 continues to improve with every iteration, closing the gap between TerraMaster and these larger players. With new features like TRAID, cloud sync, and improved snapshot management, TOS is becoming more user-friendly and robust. For users prioritizing performance, flexibility, and future-proofing, the F6-424 Max is a strong contender and offers excellent value for money. While there are areas where TerraMaster could improve, such as the lack of PCIe expansion and front-facing USB ports, the F6-424 Max delivers on its promise of high performance and scalable storage solutions.

PROS CONS
  • Powerful Hardware: Intel i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads for resource-heavy tasks.
  • Dual 10GbE Ports: High-speed networking capabilities with link aggregation for up to 20Gbps, ideal for large file transfers.
  • PCIe Gen 4 NVMe Support: Two M.2 NVMe slots offering exceptional performance for caching or additional high-speed storage.
  • Efficient Cooling: The large 120mm fan ensures quiet and effective cooling, making it suitable for home and office environments.
  • Improved TOS 6 Software: Enhancements in GUI, backup tools, and overall security bring TOS closer to its competitors.
  • Higher Price Tag: At just under $1K, it’s more expensive than TerraMaster’s other models, which may deter budget-conscious buyers.
  • No PCIe Expansion: Lack of a PCIe slot limits potential for future upgrades, such as adding 10GbE cards or more M.2 drives.
  • Presentation: The software has improved a lot, but still feels inconsistent in places compared with alternatives from brands such as Synology and QNAP.

Click the link below to take you to your local Amazon store and where to buy the terramaster F6-424 Max NAS.

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe
      Summary
      Review Date
      Reviewed Item
      Terramaster F6-424 MAX NAS

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      ASK YOUR QUESTIONS HERE!

      111 thoughts on “Terramaster F6-424 NAS Review”

      2. One thing about DDR5, it does have on chip ECC, so it is somewhat better than non-ECC DDR4. They definitely missed the boat on Thunderbolt 4. the CPU and BIOS even support Thunderbolt 4, even if they raised the price $100, they would have had a price point catagory killer.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      3. I own the F6-424 non Max with the N97 processor running TrueNAS. I am satisfied with it and the price was excellent. I believe if Aoostar offered their WTR Pro with 6 bays, they’d charge a similar enough price.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      5. Read the official forums before buying it. The bios is locked, they support the devices only for 2 years. And this particular model is made of thin plastic with lots of ugly supports on the inside. Not the quality for the price
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      7. Highly recommend this NAS, great hardware at a small & quiet form factor. I haven’t used the TOS software, I immediately booted using Unraid instead which I also recommend. I run Plex (with impressive transcoding leveraging the integrated graphics of this Intel CPU), HomeAssistant, etc, this thing can handle it without breaking a sweat. Synology seems to be moving away from Intel CPUs, from a hardware spec perspective at this form factor size I think this is the best option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      15. Using a f4 pro with n305. Just for exploring all i am learning:
        Installed proxmox and indeed using the hdmi for a mate-desktop over it.
        Only downside, It has 2 different raid-controllers (2×2) so use virtual truenas with 2 zfs-pools.
        So far a really good allrounder for learning. Speed is not that important at moment and later-on will probably end up with truenas baremetal or Tos for only NAS. Curious how those raid-controllers will function.
        As substitute for a self-made, time wasting N305-motherboard with all it’s pittfalls (also raid 5+1 , nvme shared with Pci-slots) this Terramaster works great so far.
        Will probably use this as backup NAS in future and end up with a P520 to go a step up with more horsepower.
        Great videos Rob (every July being attacked by seagulls when putting clothes to dry) greetings from Spain.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      16. im very very close to getting their new 12 bay unit because of synology dragging their feet and hybrid raid being so important to me, im just worried about software glitches/security holes, this is the only thing im worried about
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      18. I think, I might be the target audience of that NAS and maybe can help some others decide:
        TL;DR: If you can afford it, like a pre-built solution for a NAS, have no need for virtualization on a NAS and have a reliability over features mindset, you might want to buy it.

        I bought this NAS some months ago and can say that most of the negative points were a positive for me:
        – 6 instead of 4 bays for 100 is fine for me and most other vendors ask for more for that upgrade
        – The “old” CPU was the main reason I chose Terramaster and not some other vendor, since it is still a series where Intel had no degradation issues
        – Intel was chosen should I decide in the future to re-purpose it as a jellyfin server for transcoding
        – The HDMI port is exactly what it should be (for me) on a device like this: a console (for TrueNAS in my case) and nothing else.

        The other two negatives I can kinda agree with or at least am ambivalent about. Yes, I upgraded to 64GB of RAM just to be on the safe side and hate to waste a perfecctly fine 8GB stick. For me, and I can only speak for me, this is a good solution. As an IT guy, I don’t like to combine too many features in one device – especially a NAS – and for that this device is kinda perfect. I have old HP Microservers with TrueNAS on them running for about 10 years now – with Intel G2020T and AMD N40L. And they do what they are there for: Being NASs. Reliability over features. And I hope this NAS will do the same and give me 10 years plus of storage service. If you want an all-in-one device, the newer ASUS or UGREEN stuff might be more interesting for you.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      21. I am currently torn between the F4-424 and building my own NAS, and your 5 Reasons Not To are very helpful. I may end up spending a little more, but I think now I’m edging towards having a newer CPU and USB 4.0 connectivity. Terramaster produce great compact NAS at an affordable price, but for my tinkering I think I prefer the old school rack storage case with my own choice of (upgradable) CPU and motherboard in the back. It will cost me more power and space, but I’m okay with that – others mileage may vary.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      25. It looks nice, and it should be a call for Synology. QNAP has the QNAP TS-h973AX with 10gbit, it has far less CPU but more bays and with 8GB is a little bit cheaper. The QNAP also is not built by a company that has a review board of the CCP inside the company having the last call about every single decision made. The QNAP also supports two U.2 bays and has a fall better OS. synology has the Synology DiskStation DS1621+ has less RAM and one has to add the 10gbit ethernet.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      26. it just seems like the Unas and installing your own OS on it may be the best all the road if you wish to stay away from Synlogy. The hardware on that Ugreen is just awesome. Terramaster seems like it as well. .. Hmm decisions, decisions.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      27. Thank you for a good preview of this Terramaster NAS. I got this for about a week ago after some comparing between different Synology as I had 213j and 718p before. I got mine from Amazon and did not see the difference in price between the k4 and 6 bay that big but I would rather prefer to have an option to have it without memory. That 4GB usb memory have I removed because I choose to install Truenas scale on it. Must say as a user of Synology so it very different and not that easy to get everything to work as I’m used to on the Synology 718+

        I think Truenas have made a good open system with decent hardware. Would have been nice to be able to use ECC memory but that is as I understand it only available on AMD based system.

        Dust filter have been good to have but I haven’t seen any NAS with that future.

        Don’t remember the name of the YouTube channel but there is one guy who is part L1 tech that used this Terramaster with 2 pics of 48GB memory to a total of 96GB of memory. Might be overkill but I might test it if I see someone else report successes on that. To much ain’t enough ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      30. Initially it looks great *but* that CPU represents a huge red flag, it’s age plus the limit of 64GB when more modern CPS give 192GB? Not good. I can understand why but this more of a Plus than a Max model compare to the standard. You gain 64GB vs 32 GB, 2 x 10 Gb vs 2 x 2.5Gb and 2 x PCIe 4 x4 vs 2 x PCIe 3 x1 plus more cores, with the problem that you can really use them. (VMs limited by memory)
        If they did a barebones 14th gen with an extra 2 x 2.5 SATA bays, for boot OS it becomes a real game changer
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      33. Many thanks for this vid, Rob. I’ve been looking at buying this as I’m upgrading my network to 10gbe, so need a NAS with 10gbe capability, and this fits my needs perfectly. I just need to find a vid on migrating Plex settings from one NASto another ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      36. I have problems with the price, the old processor, lack of ram, and that it os made in China. Makes me worry they built in a backdoor for hacking by the ccp. I am looking at building my own server rack nas using a 14th gen intel processor.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      41. This setup is rather nuts than useful!

        First: Dont install the OS on freaking 4TB, those drives are for your Data. What a huge waste

        second: You can use every port for booting, but its smart to keep the front USB free for Keyboard/Mouse or a USB-Backup drive etc.

        third: Use the USB inside as OS. You have at least 5yrs before a pendrive USB wears off. You can also use a usb-to-sata and use a sata drive. (In the Terramaster-Case use a 99degree Angle USB-Cable as there is tiny space)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      42. This is really a shitty video. Did exactly what described. Terramaster F2-423. Trunas installed on 32gb bootdisk with rufus. Tried diverse bootmethods.. Booting from nvme. Boot tos disabled in bios. But the system never booted in TNAS. It stucks in de TNAS menu. Reinstalled the original TOS usb disk. After changing de bootdisk to BIOS, the system boots into the shell.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      43. Terranas boots up in GRUB and not TRUENAS. Removed de usb stick. Changed bootorder to NVMSE2. But keeps booting in Grub and keeps saying Tos boot USB storage not found. This is not as expected. Really disappointing.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      48. Thank you for this overview of TOS6. Since you released this video you may probably be aware TOS6 just released along with their fall 2024 lineup of new products. Notably, one I am very interested in is their just announced 8-bay all SSD NAS device. Suuper compact! I wonder if this product will support or work with OpenVPN.

        I am curious to know, sd a general comparison of NAS devices and thinking in terms of NAS OSes, ease of understanding, operation, etc., would you regard ASUSTOR’s Flashstor 6-bay / 12-bay devices based on ADM or Terramaster with TOS 6 as the better NAS OS choice? I am thinking from the perspective of a relative newbie to NAS devices, having some knowledge of NAS functionality but limited exposure and experience with them. Thanks.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      52. The first thing I do with amy NAS is test data recovery. With TOS 5 I created an array of 8 TB, 4 TB, 1TB, and 500 GB. Deliberately extreme differences in sizes to test. My test swapping out the 4TB worked great. Recovery took 10 hours, but the system remained alive and fast the full time. However, attempting to swap the 500 GB resulted in a non-recoverable volume. I upgraded to TOS 6, but that could not recover the volume either. I need to test though to see if TOS 6 will actually create the non-recoverable volume.

        Pitty. Because I think I prefer TOS to unpaid. But if it cannot reliably serve it’s primary purpose of protecting my files, what is the point?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      53. Honestly, I’m a total noob to this nas stuff but comparing the f4-424 to everything else available in it’s price range has me quite interested in terramaster. The underdog aspect definitely helps too. You guys rock for nas info btw, I’ve been devouring your website for the past couple of days. Much thanks from Maryland, USA.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      55. Can you compare Terramaster directly with Asustor. Newer NAS OSs but great hardware for price. See how each has developed the software over the years and if its worth buying into either ecosystem.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      56. I’d be very cautious about using the 6 Beta. Seems like it corrupted my USB Boot Chip and they are sending me a new one. Comment was made at first that I should pay for it ????. Seems they will send it for free now. Perhaps I should have paid extra in the beginning for a Synology as my Terramaster has been a pain since I bought it ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      57. Upgraded to 6. All looked good until I realised all my folders had disappeared. Tried creating a shared folder but it wouldn’t have it. Tried good old turn it off and on again by signing out and then it kindly permanently locked me out. The NAS shows up on TNAS Uninitialised but it won’t fire up to the sign in page/boot/initialisation ????. Tried all I know so having to let Terramaster remotely control my PC/ NAS tomorrow as I don’t know anything about getting into its brain via terminal mode etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      60. would love to hear your thoughts on a comparison between TRAID with mixed sized drives and SHR/SHR2 with mixed drives, does terramaster do data scrubbing too?, also heard some of the big terramasters (12 bay) have metal caddies, is this dangerous for the bare PCB on drives?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      61. Is raid 5 work for any drives number, like it will use 1 drive for even 20 drive in the raid?

        Or is it a ratio, like every 4 drives, 1 drive is parity/ redundancy or whatever they call it?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      67. Well, TRAID+ was my motivation for getting a TerraMaster system, and they’ve finally removed all references to TRAID+ in their documentation… the hardware is fine, but I definitely feel that I experienced a ‘bait-and-switch’.
        If TRAID+ was included in TOS 6 Final, that would help, but I suspect that TRAID+ won’t appear until TOS 10 at the earliest…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      69. Thank you for making my life easier ????

        Please may we have a list of NASs that you can load your own OS onto?

        Maybe it would make an interesting video?

        I have a Terramaster F2-423 running Proxmox and it is solid.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      71. I am still waiting for the day when a NAS brand doesn’t spend unnecessary development time on useless features that much worse than open-source counterparts… (Yes, I am looking at Synology, and that horrible abomination they created as a “docker” manager…)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      73. Yeah, for beta, it looks good IMO. Also of note Ugreen has some interesting NAS hardware on the horizon. Like with other NAS offerings that are not Synology the Ugreen software and OS is a bit S#!t but it’s still worth a look.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      75. They have hdd icons for ssds. That shows lack of attention to detail. Since might say it’s not important, but for me it’s a red flag. Lack of attention to detail in one area may signal similar lack in other, less visible places.
        Also, we need a list of shame for ui designers that make small dialog windows which require scrolling when there’s a lot of free screen real estate
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      76. Lets have a look what they got

        Currently have their 6bay running unraid （ like how unraid work as it got less drive spinning when access )

        And a teramaster 6bay usb DAS connected to it

        Consider get one more unit if their TOS got interesting function added in new version
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      78. Hello !
        Lately I’ve been carefully following your channel and blog about NAS systems.
        At this time, the question arose of choosing between Synology DS423+ or Terramaster F4-423 NAS.
        Before your reviews, I checked a lot of information about Terramaster and just like you, I came to the conclusion that Terramaster is much better in hardware than Synology.
        Until the moment when the need arose to use something more compact and less energy-consuming than a PC with True Nas installed, I did not explore the market for compact NAS systems.
        With Terramaster, new horizons and opportunities have opened up.
        Great video review!
        Still, I discovered one point in the video: it is not necessary to insert the installation/bootable USB flash drive from TrueNAS inside the Terramaster.
        We only need it at the stage of system installation. Upon completion of the installation, it is advisable to remove the USB flash drive and put it aside so as not to occupy the USB ports and not create confusion in the boot devices.
        TrueNAS can install the system on a separate disk or soft raid (if you select 2 identical disks during installation – for example, 2 SSDs)
        Therefore, keeping the TrueNAS installation flash drive in the device simply does not make sense.
        I will also say that if you install the system on a disk, it can no longer be used as part of a RAID array – RAID1 mirror, for example – this is at least what I know from personal experience.
        To avoid such problems and inappropriate use of the disk (of course, you can separate the partition with the system and use the free space, but RAID will still not be available for creation), you need to install TrueNas on a separate physical disk – an SSD, for example, or better yet, 2 disks in software RAID mirror.
        That way, if the system drive fails, our data in the storage pool will not be affected.
        This still makes sense for replacing disks – the system remains the same as it was, but we only change the disks and create an array from them. All settings will be saved.
        Perhaps I missed something or I don’t know from either side the whole TrueNas mechanism, but the general concept is this: the disk is separate for the system and the disks for the data pool are separate.

        Thanks for the review! Good luck!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      81. I’m running this on a F2-423 and I completed the hardware process. When I did the bootup however, I got a message ‘grub_fshelp_find_file_lookup’ not found…any idea what I did wrong?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      84. I am looking at getting the F4-423 and x4 16TB in one go and want to run TRUNAS rather than the original OS from the start. What size of nvme would you recommend for the terramaster running for TRUNAS? I am thinking of WD Red SN700 1TB drives or Intel Optane nvme H10 for durability, one for OS and one for cache or would you recommend a different NVME config or brands? Later i think i would like to setup a second identical system as a second tier of backup, but the debit card can only take so much wear at one time after all.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      91. CRITICAL NOTE: This isn’t really viable for all Terramaster units!!!! 2/3 into the video a critical point is made. This should only be done on models that allow for a NVMe drive or if you plan to give up a drive bay for a drive to host the TRUENAS OS.

        I saw these walk-throughs and went out and bought a F5-422. The F5-422 does not have a NVMe slot. And giving up a drive slot means forgoing the NAS configuration I planned on.

        I tried installing TRUENAS on a flash drive (even though it isn’t recommended). The install fails.
        I tried installing TRUENAS on the internal flash drive port (I put the ISO file on a different flash drive plugged into an external USB port). Booting off a flash drive mounted externally worked. In fact the external USB ports are super fast (at least 400MB/s) compared to the internal one (40MB/s). So the installer and OS load goes really quickly (but actual OS launching would be slow if this worked since the internal port is slow). Again though, after the OS install happens it tries to read from the assigned OS drive and fails. The install self terminates when it sees this error.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      92. I have a F5-422 and am getting the following when I try to install: “mounting from ufs:/dev/md0.uzip failed with error 2”. It loops like this for about 3 minutes and then dies. The only other oddity is that I have to spam Esc on boot-up and select the USB drive as it insists on going to TOS otherwise. Any suggestions?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      93. Feel like the install process should have been to replace the internal USB key with a blank, boot TrueNAS a 2nd USB drive off one of the external USB ports and install it to the internal blank, was there a reason you didn’t do it the way you did? Are the external USB ports non-bootable or something? Like nvme/SSD would be quicker, but can’t imagine HDD would be a lot faster than USB.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      94. Can anybody confirm the Ram capacity on the F4-423? Docs say 32GB, chip seems to handle 16GB? Anybody tested this? Would like to save a few pennies if 16gb is the limit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      96. If I don’t already have a TerraMaster NAS and the intent is to use TrueNAS would there be better alternatives retailing NAS chassis with integrated motherboard/cpu to buy or is it that buying a TerraMaster NAS just for its chassis/mb/cpu is a bargain?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      98. To your knowledge, does this work with the Terramaster new T series NAS as well or only the F series NAS? Or do you even suggest not using the T series? Thank you in advance!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      99. Hello and welcome to my comment. And that is right. I have a quick question. 🙂

        I was just wondering why you got a USB drive specifically to fit inside when it didn’t need to stay there. I assumed that the software would be installed on the internal stick and it would remain inside but clearly not.

        To save pulling it apart twice (once to swap the drive, and again to remove it), wouldn’t it be easier to remove it the first time and then use an external USB port with any old stick we find kicking about the place? I assume there’s a specific reason why the internal USB port is the best (or only) choice here but I may have missed it. I was just thinking about missing a step and halving the potential for damage by only ripping the thing to bits one time.

        Also, a second question if I may: I was under the impression that TrueNAS required (or advised) the use of ECC memory. I’m not sure that Terramaster supports it, and the memory you selected didn’t appear to be ECC. I haven’t looked into either yet, by the way. Any thoughts on that?

        That’s all from me. I didn’t realise that was even possible, and I may consider getting a Terramaster NAS for use as a low-powered home Linux server on the back of your presentation. Thanks a lot for the video.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      106. Isn’t Terramaster one of the companies that has been hit with ransomware attacks relatively recently? Does installing TruNAS, instead of using the factory-installed OS, help to mitigate these attacks?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      107. Quick question: it’s a bit off topic to the video but it’s regarding replacing a wifi card in a laptop (I was watching a video from 2 months ago on this topic):

        Question: what would I do if the wifi card I’m replacing is the exact same model as the one I had? What would I do in terms of installing drivers?

        I have an Acer Nitro 5 AN517-51 with an Intel Ax200 wifi 6 card in my system. Recently I was doing a fan replacement and repaste of the heat sink, and I accidentally pulled the aux cable and the aux connector attached to my wifi card came off while trying to reattach the wire.

        I wasn’t sure if I should upgrade to AX210 (cause I’m scared of it not working, then I have no working laptop at all), so I was wondering whether I could just do a straight swap of AX200 for AX200 and would that require any driver installation beforehand, if the card is the same model as the old…?

        Or would upgrading to AX210 be better all round as a solution. I just want the least painful and quickest experience, which is why I thought AX200 for AX200 may be as I may not need to fiddle with driver updates
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      110. Ahh of course, when you don’t really know:

        You do not need a display output!
        Simply install on a PC and then move to this device, boot and simply find the IP address.

        Do not install on a regular USB drive as it will fail sooner or later. Spend a little more for an USB SSD, NVMe or a high endurance USB drive.

        Just make sure your device has an Intel CPU and NOT an ARM CPU!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply