UniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 NAS

Last updated on 18 Sep 2025 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 UniFi MASSIVELY Scale up their NAS Portfolio with the UNAS Pro 8, UNAS Pro 4, UNAS 4 and UNAS 2
2 The UNAS Pro 8 NAS
3 The UNAS 2 NAS
4 The UNAS Pro 4 NAS
5 The UNAS 4 NAS
5.1 UniFi Drive 3.3 Update?
6 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
6.1 Share this:
6.2 Like this:
6.3 Related
6.4 Discover more from NAS Compares

UniFi MASSIVELY Scale up their NAS Portfolio with the UNAS Pro 8, UNAS Pro 4, UNAS 4 and UNAS 2

Note, the UNAS Pro 2 is NOW LIVE on the UniFi Store . The UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 are now in the site, but are not available till October.

Ubiquiti is preparing to significantly broaden its NAS product line in late 2025 with the introduction of four new systems under the UNAS branding. The new lineup follows the launch of the original UNAS Pro in 2024, which gained attention as a low-cost, seven-bay rackmount appliance that introduced UniFi into the NAS sector. With the release of the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8, the company is moving into what it describes as its “phase two” of NAS development, aiming to cover both desktop and rackmount form factors while integrating closely with the wider UniFi ecosystem. This expansion arrives at a time when established NAS vendors are tightening drive compatibility and raising prices, leaving a gap for alternatives that emphasise affordability, simplified deployment, and ecosystem consistency.

The UNAS Pro 8 NAS

4-Core ARM, 16GB RAM, 3x 10GbE, 8x SATA Bays, 2x M.2 Bays (trays required), Redundant PSU (2nd Sold Seperately) $799 – HERE

The UNAS Pro 8 will serve as the top-end model of the range, positioned in a 2U rackmount chassis and built to deliver higher capacity and redundancy. It features eight front-facing 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays alongside two rear-mounted M.2 NVMe slots, accessible through modular trays.

The Pro 8 is powered by a quad-core ARM Cortex-A57 processor running at 1.7 GHz and paired with 16 GB of LPDDR4 memory. Unlike many entry-level ARM systems, the Pro 8 includes three 10-gigabit network interfaces: two SFP+ and one RJ45 supporting multi-gig speeds down to 100 MbE. Redundant hot-swappable 550W PSUs are supported, though only one is included by default, with seamless failover tested successfully under load.

Category Specification
Form Factor Rackmount NAS (2U)
Dimensions 442.4 x 480 x 87.4 mm (44.24 x 48.0 x 8.74 cm)
Weight 11.5 kg (25.35 lb)
Enclosure Material SGCC steel
Mounting Rack rails included
Drive Bays 8 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA HDD/SSD
M.2 Support 2 x M.2 NVMe slots (2280/22110) via rear tray modules (sold separately)
RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, clustered RAID, Single Disk
Hot Swap Supported
Max Drive Capacity Tested up to 30 TB HDDs; UniFi-branded and third-party drives supported
CPU Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz
Memory 16 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable)
System Storage ~25.2 GB internal flash (likely 32 GB with over-provisioning)
Network Interfaces 2 x 10G SFP+, 1 x 10GbE RJ45 (multi-gig fallback to 5G/2.5G/1G/100M)
USB / Expansion None
Power Method Dual PSU bays, hot-swappable modules
Power Supply 2 x 550W AC/DC hot-swappable PSUs (1 included by default)
Max Power Budget 175W for drives
Max Consumption 200W
Cooling Multiple system fans with active fan control
Management UniFi OS web interface; Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 for setup
Software File System Btrfs with snapshot support
Certifications FCC, CE, IC; NDAA Compliant

The system uses SGCC steel for the enclosure, weighs 11.5 kg, and includes rack rails in the box, a detail rarely seen in turnkey solutions. Performance tests have demonstrated sequential reads close to 850 MB/s on HDDs in RAID 5, with expectations of saturating a 10GbE link when using SSDs or RAID 0.

The UNAS 2 NAS

4-Core ARM, 4GB RAM, 1X 2.5GbE PoE+++, 2x SATA Bays, Power Over Ethernet delivery (PoE+++ Adapter Included) $199 – HERE

At the opposite end of the spectrum is the UNAS 2, UniFi’s smallest NAS to date. This desktop unit measures just 13.5 x 12.9 x 22.37 cm and weighs 1.3 kg, with a polycarbonate chassis designed to keep cost and weight down.

The device supports two 3.5″ SATA drives housed in a shared tray, a design that requires both drives to be removed together and does not permit hot-swapping. This approach raises concerns about handling healthy drives during replacement but reduces the mechanical complexity of the system.

Category Specification
Form Factor Desktop NAS
Dimensions 135 x 129 x 223.7 mm (13.5 x 12.9 x 22.37 cm)
Weight 1.3 kg (2.85 lb)
Enclosure Material Polycarbonate
Drive Bays 2 x 3.5″ SATA HDD
RAID Support RAID 0, RAID 1, Single Disk
Hot Swap Not supported (shared tray for both drives)
Max Drive Capacity Confirmed support up to 30 TB HDDs
CPU Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz
Memory 4 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable)
System Storage Internal flash for operating system
Network Interface 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 (PoE++ power + data)
USB Ports 1 x USB-C (5 Gbps, storage devices only)
Power Method PoE++ (via 2.5 GbE port)
Power Supply 60W PoE++ injector included
Max Power Budget 52W for drives, 60W maximum system consumption
Cooling Rear cooling fan with bottom intake vents, software fan control
Display 1.47″ colour LCM (status only, non-touch)
Noise Levels ~31–32 dBA idle, up to ~38 dBA under load
Thermal Range CPU ~75–80°C under stress, 50–60°C idle/light use
Management UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 for setup
Certifications FCC, CE, IC; NDAA Compliant

The UNAS 2 runs on a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 at 1.7 GHz with 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory. Networking is provided by a single 2.5 GbE RJ45 port, which also delivers PoE++ power, with a maximum system budget of 60W (52W for drives). A 60W PoE++ injector is included for users without a suitable switch. A 1.47-inch colour LCM display on the front provides status updates, though it is non-interactive. A USB-C port rated at 5 Gbps adds external storage capability, addressing an omission noted in the original UNAS Pro, but it does not support UPS integration or networking adapters.

The UNAS Pro 4 NAS

4-Core ARM, 16GB RAM, 10GbE, 4x SATA Bays, 2x M.2 Bays (trays required), Redundant PSU (2nd Sold Seperately) $499 – HERE

Between these two extremes sits the UNAS Pro 4, a 1U rackmount unit designed for users who want the resilience of redundant PSUs and NVMe support without committing to an eight-bay chassis.

It includes four SATA bays and two M.2 NVMe slots, sharing the same ARM Cortex-A57 CPU and 16 GB of memory as the Pro 8. Like its larger counterpart, it is built for rack environments where redundancy and compact form factor are key priorities.

While exact dimensions and weight have not yet been confirmed (with the UNAS 2 and UNAS Pro 8 being the main focus of this new launch), the design is expected to follow Ubiquiti’s established rackmount conventions. Its specification profile makes it an option for smaller businesses or branch offices that need rack integration but do not require the capacity of an eight-bay system.

Category Specification
Form Factor Rackmount NAS (1U)
Drive Bays 4 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA HDD/SSD
M.2 Support 2 x M.2 NVMe slots
RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, clustered RAID, Single Disk
Hot Swap Supported
CPU Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz
Memory 16 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable)
System Storage Internal flash for operating system
Network Interfaces Expected 2 x 10G SFP+, 1 x 10GbE RJ45 (matching UNAS Pro 8, TBC)
Power Method Dual PSU bays, hot-swappable modules
Power Supply 2 x hot-swappable AC/DC PSUs (1 included by default)
Cooling Multiple system fans with front-to-rear airflow
Management UniFi OS web interface; Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 for setup
Positioning Compact 1U rackmount, same CPU/RAM as Pro 8, with redundancy support

The UNAS 4 NAS

4-Core ARM, 4GB RAM, 1X 2.5GbE PoE+++ (TBC), 4x SATA Bays, 2x M.2 Bays (trays required), Power Over Ethernet delivery (PoE+++ Adapter Included) $379 – HERE

The UNAS 4, meanwhile, extends the desktop line and mirrors the design philosophy of the UNAS 2 but doubles the bay count.

It provides four 3.5″ SATA bays along with two M.2 slots, making it the only desktop model in the range to support NVMe caching or tiered storage.

It retains the same ARM Cortex-A55 CPU and 4 GB of fixed memory as the UNAS 2, positioning it as a modest but slightly more versatile desktop option.

Like the smaller model, it uses PoE+++ for power delivery and 2.5 GbE for connectivity, though it remains unconfirmed whether it will also include a secondary network interface for failover or link aggregation. As with other desktop models, the chassis is constructed from polycarbonate, with compact dimensions intended for office or home use rather than data centre deployment.

Category Specification
Form Factor Desktop NAS
Enclosure Material Polycarbonate
Drive Bays 4 x 3.5″ SATA HDD
M.2 Support 2 x M.2 NVMe slots (for caching/tiered storage)
RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5 (dependent on bay usage)
Hot Swap Not confirmed (likely similar tray design to UNAS 2)
CPU Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz
Memory 4 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable)
Network Interface 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 (PoE+++ power + data), possible secondary port (TBC)
USB Ports 1 x USB-C (5 Gbps, storage devices only)
Power Method PoE+++
System Storage Internal flash for operating system
Cooling Rear fan with bottom intake, adjustable via UniFi OS
Management UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 for setup
Positioning Desktop equivalent to UNAS 2, scaled up with four bays and M.2 support

UniFi Drive 3.3 Update?

Alongside the hardware announcements, UniFi will also release UniFi Drive 3.3, a major update to its NAS management software.

This version introduces expanded RAID configuration options, broader support for third-party cloud platforms, enhanced fan control, and improved analytical tools for monitoring system health and performance.

Snapshots and backups remain central features, with cloud and LAN targets supported, while the update also improves scheduling flexibility and introduces additional reporting features.

Although iSCSI remains absent, UniFi Drive continues to mature from the limited platform released with the first UNAS Pro, and the 3.3 update is expected to improve usability across the entire new range.

The introduction of these four models demonstrates Ubiquiti’s intent to build a full family of NAS solutions rather than rely on a single experimental release. By offering both rackmount and desktop systems at varying capacities, the company is positioning itself to compete more directly with established NAS vendors, albeit with a more streamlined and ecosystem-focused approach. The UNAS 2 and UNAS 4 are targeted primarily at existing UniFi users seeking simple storage that integrates seamlessly with PoE switches, while the Pro 4 and Pro 8 are built to appeal to businesses looking for redundancy, higher bay counts, and greater throughput. The use of ARM processors across the line reflects UniFi’s efficiency-first design, even though it places limits on heavy workloads such as virtualisation or multimedia transcoding.

Detailed performance reviews and comparisons of the new models are expected in the weeks ahead, assessing how each device performs within its target segment. Particular attention will focus on how the Pro units handle sustained 10GbE workloads with HDD and SSD configurations, how the PoE-driven desktop models cope with thermal and power constraints, and how UniFi Drive 3.3 stacks up against more mature operating systems. With Ubiquiti steadily fleshing out its NAS portfolio one year on from the first UNAS Pro, the company’s ability to deliver consistent updates and address early hardware and software limitations will determine whether it can establish a lasting position in the NAS market.

Feature UNAS Pro (2024) UNAS 2 UNAS 4 UNAS Pro 4 UNAS Pro 8
Price $499 $199 $379 $499 $799
Form Factor Rackmount (2U) Desktop Desktop Rackmount (1U) Rackmount (2U)
Dimensions Not confirmed 135 x 129 x 223.7 mm (13.5 x 12.9 x 22.37 cm) TBC (similar scale, polycarbonate) TBC (compact 1U rack) 442.4 x 480 x 87.4 mm (44.24 x 48.0 x 8.74 cm)
Weight Not confirmed 1.3 kg TBC (slightly heavier than UNAS 2) TBC 11.5 kg
Enclosure Material Metal (likely steel) Polycarbonate Polycarbonate SGCC steel SGCC steel
Drive Bays 7 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA 2 x 3.5″ SATA 4 x 3.5″ SATA 4 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA 8 x 2.5″/3.5″ SATA
M.2 NVMe Support None None 2 x M.2 NVMe 2 x M.2 NVMe 2 x M.2 NVMe
Hot Swap Supported Not supported (shared tray) Likely limited (TBC) Supported Supported
Max Drive Capacity > 20 TB confirmed Up to 30 TB confirmed Up to 30 TB expected Up to 30 TB expected Up to 30 TB confirmed
CPU Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz
Memory 8 GB (early models) 4 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable) 4 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable) 16 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable) 16 GB LPDDR4 (non-upgradeable)
System Storage Internal flash (size not disclosed) Internal flash Internal flash Internal flash ~25.2 GB internal flash (likely 32 GB with OP)
Network Interfaces 1 x 10GbE RJ45 (front-mounted) 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 (PoE++) 1 x 2.5 GbE RJ45 (PoE+++), possible 2nd port (TBC) Expected: 2 x 10G SFP+, 1 x 10GbE RJ45 2 x 10G SFP+, 1 x 10GbE RJ45
USB Ports None 1 x USB-C (5 Gbps, storage only) 1 x USB-C (5 Gbps, storage only) None None
Power Method AC PSU (non-redundant) PoE++ (via 2.5 GbE) PoE+++ Dual PSU bays (hot-swappable) Dual PSU bays (hot-swappable)
Power Supply Integrated AC PSU 60W PoE++ injector included PoE+++ injector/switch required 2 x hot-swappable PSUs (1 included) 2 x 550W hot-swappable PSUs (1 included)
Max Power Budget Not published 52W for drives, 60W total TBC (expected ~80–100W) ~150W (TBC) 175W for drives, 200W total
Cooling Passive vents + fans, limited fan control (later patched) Rear fan, bottom vents, fan control via OS Rear fan with bottom intake, fan control Front-to-rear airflow, multiple fans Front-to-rear airflow, multiple fans
Display Small LCD panel with system info 1.47″ colour LCM (status only) TBC (likely same as UNAS 2) None None
Noise Levels Moderate (rackmount fans) ~31–32 dBA idle, up to ~38 dBA load Slightly higher than UNAS 2 (TBC) Typical 1U fan noise Adjustable, depends on drive/fan profile
Thermal Range CPU ~70–80°C under load CPU ~75–80°C stress, ~50–60°C idle Similar to UNAS 2 (TBC) ~70–80°C CPU under load CPU ~74–80°C, drives 38–47°C
Management UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1 UniFi OS web interface, Ethernet, Bluetooth 4.1
Software File System Btrfs, snapshots (basic) Btrfs, snapshots, backups Btrfs, snapshots, backups Btrfs, snapshots, clustered RAID Btrfs, snapshots, clustered RAID
Certifications FCC, CE (NDAA not confirmed) FCC, CE, IC; NDAA compliant FCC, CE, IC; NDAA compliant FCC, CE, IC; NDAA compliant FCC, CE, IC; NDAA compliant

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       

      If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
      We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE   If you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver   Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
           

      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      Discover more from NAS Compares

      Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      Leave a Reply to @StevenLynnCancel reply

      311 thoughts on “UniFi Launch the New UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 NAS”

      1. re: new UNAS 4 and UNAS pro 4 and 8

        can these new UNAS take full advantage of the gen 5 M.2 four lane NVME cards eg. Samsung 9100 Pro and Crucial T705?

        also, will the Samsung 9100 Pro heart sink variation fit in the SSD trays?

        thanks in advance
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      2. What I want is a M.2 NVME, 4 or more bays, with dual 10GB SFP+, and a form factor similar to the minisforum MS-A2. My current HDD NAS sucks as it takes almost a minute to spin-up when you try to access anything.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      3. Pretty good review overall, a bit disappointed that you are still so concerned about cpu and nvme temps like its 1999. The hdds are cool that is the only thing that matters. You sadly completely misunderstood unifi indentity and the unifi client apps
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      7. A few quick questions: Does it offer a feature similar to Synology Drive?. Can it perform local USB backups?. Is there a dedicated photo app included?. Great video as usual
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      8. A few quick questions: Does it offer a feature similar to Synology Drive?. Can it perform local USB backups?. Is there a dedicated photo app included?. Great video as usual
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      13. I really need a nas. I am currently on truenas homebrew, but there is a lot of comfort that comes from an integrated device (as long as it is stable unlike the readynas line was) if I am able to buy one I will use your link ???? still dunno about the 7 bay or the new 8, decisions!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      14. I really need a nas. I am currently on truenas homebrew, but there is a lot of comfort that comes from an integrated device (as long as it is stable unlike the readynas line was) if I am able to buy one I will use your link ???? still dunno about the 7 bay or the new 8, decisions!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      15. I was just thinking, outside of QNAP and their Q-Tier, I’m not aware of anybody offering tiered storage outside of expensive enterprise systems. What has been the experience of Q-Tier, who are using it and does it work well?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      16. I was just thinking, outside of QNAP and their Q-Tier, I’m not aware of anybody offering tiered storage outside of expensive enterprise systems. What has been the experience of Q-Tier, who are using it and does it work well?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      21. Please stop saying “not bad for an Arm” processor. I’m being a bit pedantic here, but the issue is they’re running an ancient Cortex processor designed and released in 2012. Frankly the fact a 12 year old processor still being used and getting the performance it is getting here is extraordinary, especially when you factor in the cost of electricity for running a device like this. There are newer processors just as efficient and more than capable of pushing beyond the performance envelope of this device, but is it necessary for something designed to have 8 spinning slow HDDs?

        Arm processors are just as fast or faster than Intel/AMD equivalents. Look at AWS Graviton/Azure Cobalt/GCP Axion/Apple Silicon.

        Saying “not bad for an Arm CPU” here should be replaced by “not bad for a 12+ year old CPU”.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      22. Please stop saying “not bad for an Arm” processor. I’m being a bit pedantic here, but the issue is they’re running an ancient Cortex processor designed and released in 2012. Frankly the fact a 12 year old processor still being used and getting the performance it is getting here is extraordinary, especially when you factor in the cost of electricity for running a device like this. There are newer processors just as efficient and more than capable of pushing beyond the performance envelope of this device, but is it necessary for something designed to have 8 spinning slow HDDs?

        Arm processors are just as fast or faster than Intel/AMD equivalents. Look at AWS Graviton/Azure Cobalt/GCP Axion/Apple Silicon.

        Saying “not bad for an Arm CPU” here should be replaced by “not bad for a 12+ year old CPU”.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      32. A cool feature for the UNAS 2 and 4. If they allowed the you to configure a share to be mounted as a USB drive over the USB-C port. The idea being having it connected to network as a NAS, but you also have it connected to your video editing machine over USB-C for ultra fast edits.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      34. Would this unit fit in the 12U Slim Rack Cabinet which is 560 m deep? If it does not, it would be a major problem.
        Also, how noisy are the fans? Would they be disturbing in a quiet office environment? No one ssems to hvae measured the sound pressure with a dB meter placed at 1 m in front to the unit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      36. This sound like a really good product if the could add the few things like sad trays and a version that comes with the Dual psu preinstalled. Would be interesting to see what a version with a more solid 8 core X86 processor would cost
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      38. One thing no one seems to be highlighting is the rack depth requirement.. Original UNAS Pro was a very workable 325mm, UNAS Pro 4 is 400mm and the Pro 8 is a chunky 480mm deep.. it’s a worthy consideration for anyone thinking this will slot nicely into an existing wall mounted rack where even a 550mm deep rack will have a somewhat limited actual working depth nearer 400mm!!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      40. If given the choice to do things again, I would have never moved off TrueNAS to Synology & UNas Pro. The lack of subnet level access via NFS is the biggest pain for me. Most of my NFS clients are DHCP. Thus I would have to setup 250-ish permissions in UNas Pro. Yuck. And don’t get me started on lack of VLAN support for the device. Plus, why is routing required in the device if both UNAS Pro ports are used?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      41. Just the other day got me the 7 bay UNAS Pro purely as a backup target. I don’t need anything this box has to offer. For my use case I would make the same purchase any day.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      43. Still waiting for the 12 bay… but agreed, this is a move in the right direction. By the way what was the power usage like? I will be replacing 4 x MD1200 NAS shelves, so i am excited.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      46. I’m waiting for the 4-bay UNAS Pro, which is the one for me. I’m going to save up to get one from my home rack. I have a NAS, but it’s slow & I don’t like how it does my photo backups.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      51. I enjoy the UNAS Pro. The biggest show stopper for me is the lack of NFS authirozation via subnet mask. When I have NFS clients via DHCP it makes asignment of permissions a pain.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      59. Would you recommend Unifi Nas instead of Synology or QNAP seeing the progress they done in just one year? if you looking for a long term solution for file storage? (not for me, I bought 1821+ two years ago… 🙁 )
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      61. Your right that the networking is unusually excessive. However, to be brutally fair to Ubiquiti it is the year 2025 and for a copper port we expect 10 GbE, and for SFP+ we expect two for LAPC redundancy. So in fact, this configuration is the bare minimum correct setup for modern hardware. As for the 8 bays and I/O saturation, your probably correct that the network hardware is probably not going to be the bottleneck, and once again…. It’s 2025, and the network simply should not be the bottleneck in any situation. You can get a theoretical 1,190 MiB through a single SFP+ port in both directions, and the eight SATA drive going 200 MB/s (note MB not MiB) you will find that the network is still the bottleneck for a single TCP/IP steam going no faster that 1,600 MB/s. The LACP network redundancy will not aggregate the TCP/IP network connections, rather it will distribute traffic streams equally across both links yet below the capacity of the slowest link in the LAG. So really we need an upgrade to 25 GbE to get beyond the theoretical bottleneck.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      68. I learned about this unit looking into the new smaller Ubiquity NAS releases yesterday (UNAS 2 & 4). I’m glad I’ve held off on the original UNAS Pro while they’ve finally added fan control. M.2 trays should have been included.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      73. You did somewhat bury the lede when you talked about the CPU as just a 4 core ARM. Because I checked and its a 4 core A57, which is about what you’d get in a low-end smartphone circa 2018. Not that you can’t run a basic NAS on that, Synology’s DS423 runs a slightly lower than that A55 setup and mine did a very basic job just fine. This is after all an efficiency NAS and that Synology pulls only 5W in idle, but you’d have hoped they would’ve at least matched the (2019) Raspberry PI 4 with its far mor performant 4xA72 setup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      74. 1. to bad they didn’t make it SATA/SAS compatible.
        2. i have big doubts about its cooling performance since its intake is almost non existing. can you give us hdd temperatures under heavy load for example 5 min big file read/write?
        3. its nice to have same NVME tray for all line up but for that price it should be included.
        4. as you sad, wtf with all that plastic
        5. as software side, it can be better with time passing but yes, lack of iSCSI if kind of problem
        6. price is strange. personally i think its too expansive with current hardware. only thing that make it better then others for now is 3x10Gb.
        7. better cpu could make better performance. in theory it should be around 1000-1200MBs
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      77. I only need iscsi and this beautiful nas will join me. 799 8 bay? That’s a steal since I don’t really need ugreen powerful HW just for storage need. Worse HW is better for electricity cost, but definitely not synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      82. I know this is a big ask, but a tower version for us home users (with my limited experience it is much easier to quiet the fan noise on a tower, and sometimes a tower just fits in the office a bit better….years ago I made a nice mahogany rack for rack mounted kit but it got repurposed into the sitting room…..gah!).

        More CPU choices would be nice since we’re spit balling…..and more memory and make it ECC while we’re at it. :^)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      84. They could have just as easily gone with a bezel for locking the drives and have a screen. Just like the Enterprise NVR. It always baffles me how Unifi always seems to miss the obvious solutions right in front of their faces.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      91. Not sure who this is really aimed at – small business perhaps, the dual PSU would be minimum for business use, connectivity good, use the NVMe for caching. It’s like a very cheap HPE MSA, but without the redundancy and expandability needed for enterprise use. MSA would have dual controllers, dual connection drives, expandability to add other shelves. Typically true enterprise level requires two redundant NICs, through two separate HBA switches. For a small business this could be suitable. Weird that you get the HDD caddies but not the NVMe ones. Note, when you have two independent controllers you get 100% uptime since each controller can be f/w updated independently. No downtime.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      93. I’d be interested to use this for backing up my docker host, so just file storage is perfect.
        However does it spam you with crap messages about using some cloud services, like Synology crap does these days?
        The Synology nagging is driving me insane and is the primary reason I typically build my own nas systems and just use base Linux OS’s on them. I don’t really need a nice ui for a NAS, but for a backup destination it could be fine.
        And I like tinkering with new equipment.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      104. Great video about the new NAS, unfortunately I have already bought mine, but would have considered the unas8, because of the m.2 slots, at the same time it is quite a pricebump though 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      109. Hey, wondering if you could check if NFS shares are supported and if you can toggle between NFS versions? I have a OPPO 203 and it’s only supporting old SMB v1 which I don’t want to use and NFS, I think up to v3 only so would be great to know if the options are there.

        Documentation it is limited.

        Thank you! 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      110. Cooling is not done probably, I think. Bottom clearance minimum, as is top ventilation. Disk bays closed on all sides. No wonder this device runs hot. 45 degrees is too hot for a harddisk. Don’t understand why, because doing it better does not cost anything more! Unifi equipment always has a tendency to run on high temps.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      111. How do you shutdown the unit upon power fail from a UPS? Previously we would either support NUT (preferred) or a USB input from the UPS directly. Does this have any support for that?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      112. I don’t have any Unifi products but paying Nest/Google $200 a year for camera storage is making me look their way.

        Maybe a full stack video with basic network then add ons like cameras/doorbell/NVR, NAS, and network upgrade options would be cool series or single video.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      113. I was waiting for the 4 bay pro, but ended up ordering this one to see if I like the features first, then if I go for the pro 4 as well this can make the perfect offsite backup NAS!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      114. Looks extremely trivial to just 3D print a dual drive sled for this. If you’re super clever, you could probably even print in some TPU or have inserts for o-rings that would really eliminate the vibration/swap problem.

        Undoubtedly Ubiquiti thought about this, and decided not to because they’re chasing a rock bottom BOM cost here.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      116. I like that it has PoE, I love that it comes with an injector. Not everyone has PoE infra, however including an injector makes it good for the end user and Ubiquit as they can save on a second power solution on the board while offering AC power options to the end user.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      118. i was looking for a docking station whare i have had a lot of disk over the years, and want to put thme in and clear them off….. this would be great for that role, once done i can use it as a back up drive to keep my on site backups from my server on as a low cost Nas…. now when will you have the 4 bay one one ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      122. The upright rectangular form with white color seems to borrow a trick from mesh routers that aim for a more ‘living room/den-friend’ look (rather than giant black spider with legs sticking up like some stand-alone routers), a welcome improvement over some competitor stand-alone NAS units. Their 1st NAS was noted to be an excellent value in a 7-bay NAS, but be mostly ‘just’ a NAS, without some of the server functions competitors have (such as I imagine led to the scrutiny UGreen faced ramping up application offerings their 1st year+ out). It’ll be interesting to see if Ubiquiti branches out into more ‘beyond the NAS’ functionality.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      125. I was very sceptical about the NAS Pro when it launched. I’m glad the software is improving. I recall the backup options ware limited to other NAS Pros and Google Drive. Adding S3 and B2 options goes a long way.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      130. Would be nice to be able to have it backup to another Unas (eg. over a VPN connection).
        That would solve my backup issue with some of my elder family members, where I could put one of these into their homes for them to store their photos etc. on and then backup to my Unas Pro.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      135. At this price point this is a superb offer. I was looking to replace my aging Synology DS716+ with a Synology UNAS pro and keep the DS716+ as second backup. However at this price point I might well buy the 4 or even 8 bay plus (let’s see what those offer over the current UNAS pro 7 bay machine) this one as second backup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      136. It’s a neat device, I had not expected a POE+ NAS. The design is clean, it does remind me a bit of an air purifier so definitely not something that would stand out in a reception or living room.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      141. UPi. UNAS looking rack device that the bays can have RasberyPi mounted in them and the Unifi software can control firewall rules into the network, power control, remote keyboard input and USB/HDMI interface. Maybe USB/HDMI connections over ethernet for video to monitors and USB drives for zigbee antennas. Just the ultimate tinkering rack mounted chassis.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      144. This time they have a black version. The pure white design always looked to me (similar to Apple devices) like it belongs to a bathroom or a clean room in a medical establishment.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      147. Please excuse my noob question but can I create a multi-version backup from Synology Hyper Backup to UNas2 in SMB partition? Looks like yes, but I want to be sure about it. I am currently backing up everything to usb drive and want to change it something more robust. Huge thanks!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      148. Ubiquiti make good products, but you can build something small on top of techologies well known for NAS setups. Users need a NAS to be rock solid and the same company that released the dream machine machine routers I wouldn’t trust with my data.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      151. I hope they will also stick to just pure storage in the future and just make a dedicated “host” device or lineup for docker and VMs. If they gonna make there NAS systems run these, they a: need way better Hardware and this makes them more expensive or b: they will run so extreamly slow that they will be unusable.

        I want cheap and fast expendable storage and not an all in one Product like Synology or QNAP that will run like ass.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      156. Well now! Looks like what was old is new again!

        Does anyone else remember the old Apple Timecapsule? Looks the same, fundamentally acts the same, and let’s face it, aimed at the same.

        Not for me, BUT….

        This is a smart move from ubiquiti.

        Forget the complex. Gimme something simple that a student can afford to make sure their book report or thesis gets backed up.

        Same core developers who developed the Apple Timecapsule, only to be shuttered by the evil empire.

        This is ironic, rich, and utterly hilarious/genius.

        I LOVE THIS!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      163. Only need thing they need before I fully invest is better software for the units. They need to add something like Active Backup For Business for these units That alone would get me on board 100%. An app store in general would be nice but thats much more further down the line.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      164. This would be perfect for deploying at relatives home’s for backups, alongside an unifi express/dream machine!

        Only thing it’s missing for family backups is 1) a phone photos backup app and 2) ability to turn the HDDs on/off on schedule, either to save electricity or reduce noise in the evening if it’s in the living room!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      166. Hi! I’m wondering if it’s possible to use the UNAS-2 as an offsite backup for my Synology NAS. Can I set up an automated backup from my Synology to the UNAS-2 and restore everything from it if needed?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      168. I hope it doesn’t have that horrible soft touch plastic they sometimes use. It falls apart in a few years and turns into a sticky mess. I’ll be passing on this because no nvme and 10gbe option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      169. I love Ubiquiti and recently traded my Synology NAS for a Green. At this price point I would recommend the DXP2800, it give you so much more value for your money compared to this UNAS 2.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      170. The single PoE port is a risk imho for an abrupt shutdown if you update or restart the switch and don’t use the adapter.. I wonder if they are considering that in their software.. Does a grace shutdown option exists?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      171. Seems a perfect replacement for the old Apple AirPort Time Capsule!

        Perfect timing as Apple are discontinuing support for Time Capsule in macOS27. And Apple Time Machine backups are already encrypted so the lack of disk encryption isn’t an issue luckily.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      176. PoE is an interesting twist.

        No DLNA functionality for multimedia streaming?

        Perhaps they’re avoiding iSCSI because of the additional tech support they’d need to provide.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      177. Love the desktop 4 bay unit. Will definitely get that for my home. Will you do a review of it? Test caching performance for small files and such? How large cache SSD makes sense to have? 2x 500GB? 2x2TB?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      178. Thanks for the review! I like their thinking with their NAS devices being for storage only. Mini PCs are so cheap now that anybody looking to do enthusiast level stuff with their NAS is better served by a low price NAS + MiniPC vs a high priced all in one device.

        I do think they are missing some key storage functionality from this though – especially for me, I would want some kind of cloud sync to “reverse backup” my Google Drive etc onto the NAS in case I lose access to my Google account. And encrypted backups? I didn’t see an option to encrypt the backup in the backup task creation screen.

        Hopefully they can add some of these things soonish.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      182. I heard about these coming about a month and a half ago. Was at a Unifi event LAST WEEK! They didn’t have these there even, but they mentioned that a desktop 4 bay was coming. Now then they are in the store we can discuss them.

        The 4 bay with m.2, is SSD only used for caching or can you have tiered storage pools?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      185. Very much looking forward to the 8 bay pro model with 2 caching drives. That needs iSCSI. I am unsure on the UNAS Pro (existing model) due to 7 bays. But 8 bays with caching drives, for a bit more $, will be a great simple NAS to back up to and use to store VM snapshots and software installers, backup of NVRs. Now here’s hoping the local importers put this on their pricelists, as I can’t buy from the US (the UI store just cancels orders to freight forwarders these days)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      187. They just need to update the CPU so we can run containers and it’s a done deal. Many turn key solutions, Qnap & Synology, already support this so it’s strange that this is pure purpose built.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      189. Imagine Synology 225+ is just around 280,-USD with zillions applications, docker and mainly Active Backup – the most important piece of software for NAS – as a backup device. You can backup physical machines, Windows, Mac, Linux servers and also Vmware and Hyper-V hypervisors. Thats insane for that price. I hate Synolog to the core – but that 280USD price is unbeatable. You populate it with 2x4TB original Synology drivers /99USD/, which are the only not-overpriced ones, and you have much much better system than this UNAS2. I think that smallest Synology NAS /225+/ is the only one which still is relevant even with vendor HDD lock-in. Bigger units are no-go and there I see the space for Ugreen/UNAS/TrueNAS competition.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      190. For me they lack two things:
        1) iPhone Photo Backup
        2) Synology Drive / OneDrive / Dropbox like Cloud Sync across devices
        For Both they should be able to use their existing Remote Access Network, Right?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      195. Thanks for your great reviews. I’m a newish Unifi user and am tempted by the 2 bay NAS. I have 2x 4TB HDDs I could use to storage my photos and mirror my 1TB OneDrive.
        Can I attach a 2TB SSD via USB-C and make it availe as another network share? Then I could use the fast and quiet SSD for most and the HDDs to archive stuff. Does seem possible and make sense?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      197. I really wish Ubiquiti would allow Docker and at least one m.2 for this device. However, I guess I can just install linux on a mini pc (to be a server) for Plex, immich, and other apps and then use this Ubiuiti NAS to hold all of the media for the mini pc?

        I really love Ubiquiti’s products but I may just pick up a Ugreen or similar for an all in one solution. Going to hold off on buying anything until I see reviews of the rest of Ubiquiti’s upcoming NAS lineup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      200. I bet someone could design a 3D printable split cage that would allow you to pull each drive individually – even if it’s not hot swappable. That should soothe the nerves when replacing one.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      204. Can you tell us when you are releasing the UNAS 4 review? I’m hoping the 4 will be fast to edit video from – depending on how the M.2 drives are used. I need to know!!! ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      207. 20:40 do you know how the backups appear in the remote storage? Is it just a straight copy of the source folder, where I could open the backup SMB or Google Drive folder and have a copy of the files? or does it package the data in some (possibly encrypted) format like Synology Hyper Backup?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      208. This is quite appealing for a simple TimeMachine backup solution for clients that aren’t too demanding of their networks. Perfect replacement for all those old Apple TimeCapsule devices that are collapsing after all these years.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      210. Good ideas and doing the upsell. This is a basic unit for set and forget type users who don’t need bells and whistles. The entry point is so good!

        UniFi can create their own version of SHR and its peak for Synology (not that it already isn’t)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      212. It’s a bit disappointing there’s no M.2 in the 2 Bay. UniFi seems to be looking at these as storage only, rather than a multimedia device like others. It’s a really good price though, might be a good backup for my UGreen NAS?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      216. Great video, thanks! Quick question: is it possible to encrypt the data stored on the hard drives? I don’t want anyone to be able to access my data if my NAS gets stolen.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      221. If it depends of cabled network to work, in order to be powered up, wireless, is not a redundant option… I see this both as a “future option” if they see that this becomes a very good selling product, as a “UNAS 2 Pro” or something.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      232. Dear … , is it true that the unas takes the smallest drive and defines all other drives to the same size? Like if I have a 8TB drive and a 20TB drive it works like two 8TB drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      235. I wish that writing, testing and releasing SAN firmware was as easy as producing YouTube videos . . . When it comes to storage – stability first, last and always.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      236. The CPU sticking at a constant temperature is actually ideal.
        You want the silicon to be at a as consistent as possible temperature , my guess is that it’s a pretty minor heat and their intentionally not spin up the fan so that even when it’s idling, it is at that specific constant temperature that prevents any thermal expansion or contraction.
        You do not want your CPU to be significantly cooler when idling for endurance.
        Yes, lower temperatures are always better , but anything under 90° is absolutely fine nowadays.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      237. Do you think, it will sometime be possible to make back-up to an UDM Pro / SE? I am using all flash configuration with my UNAS Pro with only 7TB of storage (RAID10)… I would love to put a 12 TB HDD in to my UDM SE to back-up the whole drive frequently… while not using any NVR funktionallity, the bay is not in use at this time…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      238. so they added raid 6 have they made it where I can add different sized drives like a Drobo or Synology? any chance they will? I know I can’t be the only one who can’t afford to buy all the same drives to propagate this. I have to buy what I can afford as I can afford them ands drives die I want to buy newer higher storage drives to replace them.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      242. Is it possible to share (sub-)folders to users now? Last I checked around Youtube videos I only saw it possible to share entire drives, not sub-folders.

        My situation: I take pictures of clients in a recurring fashion. I want them to login their account and they can see all the folders I’ve shared with them. These individual links are too primitive and having what should be sub-folders only be “Drives” would be way too unorganized.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      243. I got an old mini pc and turned it into an app server and using my nas as just a nas. Allows me to need a super powerful nas for my storage. If i want to upgrade my servers, i just swap servers. easy. I am running a headless linux with docker and using dockge as a way to manage the apps. Really any linux will work, depends on what you want to use.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      247. I wish they’d let you control the backup folder structure. It’s convoluted when I back it up to my other NAS and it’s 3 or 4 folders deep.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      248. Im a current UNAS Pro owner. My unit is RAID 5 with a hot spare. Thanks for the timely opinions and update on the new features. The changes made so far are great for the average user, especially RAID 6 and an “easy” conversion from Raid 5. I hope it is indeed as simple as disabling the hot spare to make it happen w/out data loss. Also Im glad to hear Time Machine on private drives is supported and Admins can control all backup settings. All the other features you wish for, (to me at least), can wait and I won’t miss them. Thanks again for the followup!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      249. A lesson I learned a long time ago and very much applies to Ubiquity, assume the product is complete when you purchase it and won’t get updates. Does it have everything you need? I’ve learned that I can take quite a bit of time (years) for features to be added to UniFi products and even then they are still somewhat incomplete.
        They are clearly a company in a growth phase so I’d imagine lots of projects in the works but they really need to concentrate a bit more on the software experience.
        How does a NAS ship feature incomplete? There was no consumer rush on it. It’s a very odd product line at this point.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      251. For me i would want an 8 bay system with atleast 2x 10Gbe sfp ports and 2x 2.5Gbe or 5Gbe ports for it to be worthwhile investing my hard earned into it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      252. Why the concern over the CPU temps? If it’s capping at around 70° C that feels well within safe operating temps for the hardware. If the drives were doing that I’d be concerned but on the socket?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      253. I have a unas pro, The one feature that frustrates me is snapshot access. Unless I am mistaken you have to go to the admin panel, go to the time you want to restore, restore then you can access then rather than windows previous versions like ive been able to do with other nas OS’s.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      254. I have SMB disabled along with shared links. This is a backup storage device to replace my DS418. However, I might go back to my DS418. The lack of NFS configration options is anoying. Subnet level access via NFS has been a thing since forever except when configured NFS on UNAS Pro. I should not have to enter every single individual IP address, and folder permissions, to the UNAS. Plus the fact that I am required to add a gateway and two DNS servers per network interface. Now, if DNS1 is my router, and my router goes down, what is the bonus of having a second DNS server in a NAS? Plus, what if I want to use 10Gbe as local link only and not route traffic? Why does a network mfg company require things that are not actually required? Filesystem snapshot recovery from the UI? Schedule snapshots, sure. Recovery snapshots. Nope.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      256. Raid 6 has slower write performance to Raid 5 due to calculating dual parity for the two disk redundancy.

        Raid 5 can survive only 1 disk failure but will rebuild array to fault tolerant with hot spare — The question then becomes how long to rebuild data from parity info. Obviously Raid 6 can survive 2 failures and still maintain data integrity- like all things it a compromise.

        Raid 10 gives best performance albeit at losing 50% of your aggregated disk capacity, but could in theory tolerate more than two drive failures. For example

        Best-case: 1 disk per mirror pair can fail — e.g., in an 8-drive RAID 10 (4 mirrored pairs), you could lose 4 disks if each failure is from a different pair.

        Key point: It’s not how many fail, but which ones.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      265. such temperatures on Unifi ARM CPU’s are normal. G2-Plus – same story, request to Unifi to give option to speed up funs are useless. Unifi thinks (same as apple) that users are stupid and less options is better.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      269. As a user of Unifi Protect I would line to see UNVR (Unifi NVR) Protect application on UNAS hardware, because should be able to run both on the same hardware at the same time.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      271. As much as I love hearing about Unifi entering the NAS market, especially with Synology major missteps, seeing its UI reminds me why I fell in love with Synology’s UI so much. I am surprised Unifi went the old school look rather than the modern GUI.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      272. I’ve had one for about three months and I’ve been very happy for the price.

        Seems silly, but I would like to be able to backup my android phone pictures automatically or at least easily to this device instead of some cloud service.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      274. With Synology suddenly off my list of vendors, this ridiculously primitive NAS might be slightly more appealing in a few years if their progress continues to improve.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      275. @11:20 looks like the system up time is being calculated from the UNIX Epoch of 1st Jan 1970… so it seems the startup time isn’t being updated from 0 when it boots up.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      277. As a Canadian living in the US with a British mother.. I’ll agree with the football thing and I drive a lot of people nuts around here, “Do you mean the game with the round ball with pentagons? Or do you mean glorified Rugby with padding?”.. chips/crisps not so much.

        Unfortunately.. As I would like to go more Unfi stuff.. I’ll stick to what I’ve built for now…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      280. I have an older Synology NAS and love it, but as they have turned into an evil corporation by charging extra for features already existing on a monthly subscription basis, I know I need to replace this while I can still copy data from it. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      282. I’m very happy with mine so far. One it’s pretty quick and the setup for net shares nfs is super easy. As a power user, this is honestly a breath of fresh air as far as upkeep goes. I wish it had a dedicated file sync app for PC/Android/IOS. I personally would love to see B2 backup and rsync capabilities. I don’t really care about running apps or VMs on a NAS, so Im happy on that front.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      283. My UNAS pro works flawlessly with my minisforum MS-01 UnRaid server. Serverpartdeals came through with great recertified drives. It’s almost like YouTube videos inspire me to spend money or something… ????. Keep up with the great content @NASCompares! Also… Synology is trying to be the IT equivalent of the AAA gaming industry over the past few years. Synology brass might want to forget the business advice they took from the swanky cigar club discussions with Ubisoft execs…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      289. Thank you so much for the time you take to make all these videos. I was so excited when I heard Synology was coming out with the 925+. but then they put too many conditions. However, I am deep into ubiquiti and I might just not bother with Synology and wait for Ubiquiti to come out with a more powerful processor based “Unas Pro 2” assuming it’s going to happen and that it will be built better based on their experience on the current gen. I can’t wait as my NAS really wants to retire, it’s a WD My cloud ex4 slow as molasse.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      290. What is the use case of scheduling on and off of Ethernet ports? If you are an SMB with a server rack?
        Is it expected that you network is occasionally insecure?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      293. Still debating adding a UNAS Pro into my Ubiquiti network infrastructure and then adding a server for my apps, or building my own NAS/Server combo. My long relationship with Synology has come to an end.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      294. Excellent presentation. Thank you. I am trying to better understand the internal NAS snapshots. I reviewed your previous reviews and see where snapshots seem to exists. I use BTRFS snapshots with my Synology unit and they are basically instanteous and take up no “extra space” initially. I can bring up a file explorere of sorts on the Synology and easily drill down to directories on each set of snapshots looking for the file I want to restore. Do the UniFi NAS snap work like this as well? I really only use my current NAS units for SMB file storage and that storage is mainly file copies from other systems as backups. I need my NAS to have solid network performance and snapshots like I described. The UniFi unit is “fair” on the performance side with you showing roughly 375-475mb/sec read and writes – so it does about half with the 10GbE port can support. At $500, it would be a pretty good unit versus a Synology 1821+ (which needs 10GbE added) if it has good snapshots.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      297. agree with fan control, iscsi – I wish there was a slightly better cpu in it and a 1U version would be nice – and when is an official unifi Drive app coming out?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      298. I have workflows built around FTP (one-way file transfer between two internal networks with no internet or cloud involved), and I really don’t want to have to hack the OS to get it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      299. Totally on point about the bags of chips

        … this channel for me pairs well with SpaceRex… The speed is night and day , but I get the info I need … And understanding
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      300. I can’t seem to find an answer – can I mix and match drive sizes the way Synology does, making the most of the mix? If not, what RIAD number am I waiting for?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      301. My UNAS Pro is working brilliantly and as I expected. I even store my Docker container data on it over NFS (since I already use separate computer for containers).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      304. Who needs a working radiator when we have networking, servers and UPS devices keeping us cozy!!

        I almost purchased a UNAS but held back. I’ll wait for their next iteration with a better GPU, form factor and more I/O
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      308. I would definitely pick this up if they added container support… but maybe given its arm the value isn’t there given less compatibility with out of the box containers people like to use
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      310. Synology needs to release a 4 / 6 / 8 bay desktop chassis version and take on Synology, Qnap, UGreen and the others in market. Time is perfect given Sinology’s recent moves.

        I just ordered a UGreen DXP4800 Plus because I can’t use the 2U form factor of the UniFi. Synology is dead to me and I have a UniFi network yet had to go UGreen .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply