UniFi UNAS – 1 Year Later. Should You Buy Now?

Last updated on 03 Nov 2025 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 UniFi UNAS Series of NAS Devices – 12 Months Later, Should You Buy One?
1.1 Unifi UNAS, 1 Year Later – THE TL;DR:
1.2 Software Features Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months
1.3 Hardware Products Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months
1.4 Fixes, Changes and Improvements in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months
1.5 Missing Features and Planned Features in UniFi UNAS in the Next 12 Months
1.6 Conclusion and Verdict – Is the UniFi UNAS Good Now?
2 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
2.1 Related
2.2 Discover more from NAS Compares

UniFi UNAS Series of NAS Devices – 12 Months Later, Should You Buy One?

It has now been one full year since Ubiquiti made its formal debut in the NAS market with the launch of the UniFi UNAS Pro, a 7-bay rackmount storage system designed to integrate seamlessly within the existing UniFi ecosystem. At launch, the device was seen as a bold but limited step into a space traditionally dominated by established brands such as Synology and QNAP, focusing more on straightforward network storage than application-heavy server functions. Over the following twelve months, the company has steadily expanded the UNAS lineup and rolled out numerous firmware and software updates, refining its NAS operating system, UniFi Drive, and addressing user feedback gathered through real-world testing. From introducing multiple new RAID configurations, encryption, fan control, and USB backup capabilities, to expanding cloud backup support and improving system responsiveness, UniFi has demonstrated a consistent approach to building out the platform incrementally rather than replacing hardware prematurely. Today, the UNAS family includes five systems spanning both desktop and rackmount designs, with capacity options ranging from 2-bay PoE-powered units to 8-bay multi-10GbE solutions. Taken together, these changes illustrate a deliberate evolution of UniFi’s NAS portfolio from a proof of concept into a structured, multi-tier ecosystem with increasing competitiveness in the storage market.

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices:
  • UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

Unifi UNAS, 1 Year Later – THE TL;DR:

In a rush and just want the cold facts? Here’s a clear TL;DR breakdown of all major UniFi UNAS product and software changes over the past 12 months, based entirely on your three video transcripts (3 months, 6 months, 1 year). It captures both software and hardware evolution, along with remaining limitations and future signals.

Initial Launch (UNAS Pro, Oct 2024)

  • First UniFi NAS, priced at $499, 7-bay rackmount, ARM CPU, 10GbE networking.

  • Marketed as “pure storage” for UniFi ecosystem integration, not an app-rich NAS.

  • Praised for value, build quality, and easy setup.

  • Criticized for missing features: iSCSI, RAID 6, multiple pools, containerization, USB ports, UniFi Protect integration, and limited cloud backup (Google Drive only).

  • Early software lacked advanced admin control, backup management, and multi-user oversight.

  • SMB performance and file integrity inconsistencies appeared during large data transfers.

  • Frequent backend updates released in first quarter, addressing GUI layout, alignment, and minor stability fixes.

3-Month Mark (Jan 2025)

  • Rapid patching cycle began: RAID 6 added, marking UniFi’s first major new feature.

  • Ongoing bugs fixed in the Drive OS interface and file manager.

  • Still missing key functionality like iSCSI and multiple pools.

  • Admin-level restrictions persisted; super admins could not manage user backups.

  • File browser inconsistencies fixed only partially (e.g., trash handling, SMB sync).

  • Backups limited to other UNAS or Google Drive, no AWS or S3 options yet.

  • Users frustrated by Safari bug (incomplete file downloads on iPhone, later acknowledged by UniFi).

  • Performance still below expectations on large SMB transfers; memory leaks and “skipped file” issues noted.

  • Despite flaws, praised for value and ongoing support rather than abandonment.

6-Month Mark (Apr 2025)

  • Software maturity improving, most updates focused on stability rather than new features.

  • RAID 6 officially released across all devices, with migration tools from RAID 5 + hot spare.

  • New cloud backup options: Dropbox and OneDrive added.

  • Admin control improved: super admins could now manage user backups and shared drives.

  • File sharing responsiveness and accuracy improved significantly in the GUI.

  • New file activity monitor added, showing per-folder change history.

  • Apple Time Machine backups now officially supported.

  • Fixed .exe execution issue when accessed via SMB.

  • Ongoing quality-of-life improvements: faster interface, better consistency, fewer sync issues.

  • Remaining issues:

    • Still no iSCSI, no fan control, no scheduled power management, and occasional temperature irregularities.

    • GUI bug showed 20,000 days uptime (fixed later).

  • System temperatures remained high (~68–72°C CPU under light load), highlighting poor thermal automation.

  • No new NAS hardware yet announced at this point.

1-Year Mark (Oct 2025)

  • Major expansion: full UNAS lineup introduced.

    • UNAS 2: 2-bay PoE++ desktop ($199).

    • UNAS 4: 4-bay desktop with M.2 slots.

    • UNAS Pro 4: 1U rackmount, 4-bay, dual PSU support.

    • UNAS Pro 8: 8-bay, 3x10GbE ports, 2x M.2 slots ($799).

  • Core software improvements across all models:

    • Multiple RAID levels and hot-spare support expanded.

    • Multiple pools and clustered RAID pools introduced (first time UniFi allowed split or mixed pools).

    • M.2 NVMe caching added on larger models (read/write caching only).

    • Encrypted volumes now supported and integrated into backup routines.

    • Fan control added, both manual and automatic.

    • USB-C mounting and backup support for desktop models (UNAS 2, UNAS 4).

    • Expanded cloud backup integration (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive).

    • Snapshot performance improved, faster rollback and lower latency.

    • SMB and NFS protocols optimized for better throughput and reduced latency.

    • Improved admin tools for shared drives and user management.

Software Features Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

In the twelve months since the release of the original UNAS Pro, UniFi Drive OS has developed from a relatively simple file server interface into a more complete NAS management platform. Early releases of the Drive software offered only basic storage creation and sharing options, limited to single-pool RAID 5 or mirror configurations with few administrative tools. Over time, multiple key features have been introduced, including support for RAID 6, multiple storage pools, clustered RAID pools, and hot spare functionality, each of which was implemented through system firmware updates and confirmed through beta and public release candidates. The platform now supports encrypted volumes, user-defined snapshots, and restoration features, offering greater resilience and improved recovery options after system events or accidental deletions. These updates collectively mark a notable improvement in fault tolerance and customization, allowing the UNAS range to better serve both small business and advanced home deployments that require multiple storage tiers or redundancy strategies.

Beyond storage structure, UniFi Drive has also introduced new tools for day-to-day administration and external connectivity. Cloud backup support has expanded to include Dropbox, OneDrive, and Google Drive, replacing the early limitation to only local or UNAS-to-UNAS replication. Shared drive management now includes central administrative oversight, allowing super admins to configure and monitor user-level backup routines across all profiles. The graphical interface itself has become more responsive, adding a file activity monitor that provides timeline-based access logs for folders and files. Support for Apple Time Machine has been added, as well as improved handling of executable files via SMB, and overall network protocol efficiency has increased through back-end adjustments to Samba and NFS. With these refinements, UniFi Drive OS now feels less like an experimental branch and more like a unified part of the broader UniFi management ecosystem, with greater parity across its networking, surveillance, and storage products.
Feature Category Initial State (Oct 2024) Current State (Oct 2025) Improvement Summary
RAID Configurations Single RAID 5 / 1 RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, clustered pools Major redundancy and performance improvements
Storage Pools Single unified pool only Multiple pools with clustering Hot/cold data separation, flexible tiering
Encryption None Volume encryption supported Improved data protection and compliance
Snapshots Basic rollback Full timeline management Faster recovery and rollback precision
Backup Options Local & Google Drive Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive Wider offsite backup compatibility
Admin Control User-limited backups Central admin management Full oversight of shared and user drives
File Monitoring Absent Folder-based activity tracking Improved audit trail visibility
Time Machine Support Absent Full support Expanded Mac OS compatibility
SMB/NFS Performance Unoptimized Tuned with caching improvements Higher throughput, lower latency

Hardware Products Added/Improved in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

Since the launch of the original UniFi UNAS Pro in late 2024, Ubiquiti has expanded the UNAS product line into a full hardware family, each model tailored for different deployment scales and power requirements. The first expansion arrived with the compact UNAS 2, a two-bay desktop NAS powered by PoE++, marking the brand’s first use of Power-over-Ethernet as a primary power source for network storage. This device, built around a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 CPU and 4 GB of LPDDR4 memory, aimed to serve as a lightweight edge storage unit for small offices or UniFi network environments that rely on central power distribution. Its 2.5GbE connection and USB-C port (5 Gbps) provided moderate performance for local transfers and basic backup operations, while its non-hot-swappable dual-drive cage emphasized affordability over convenience. This smaller system demonstrated UniFi’s intent to create entry-level options that could still operate within their ecosystem while maintaining core integration with UniFi Drive OS and cloud management via ui.com.

The next step up in the product family is the UNAS 4, a four-bay desktop NAS that builds directly on the UNAS 2’s design but adds more flexibility. It retains the same ARM Cortex-A55 processor and 4 GB RAM, but introduces dual M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching or storage expansion and four 3.5-inch SATA bays for larger arrays. It still uses 2.5GbE with PoE+++ as its main power and data input, though at the time of writing, UniFi has not confirmed if the final retail version will include a secondary Ethernet port for redundancy or faster link aggregation. This model brings the UniFi storage ecosystem closer to small business-level performance, allowing for RAID 6 redundancy and improved cooling through a refined chassis design. While compact, the inclusion of NVMe caching and full integration into UniFi Drive 3.3 makes it a practical choice for users who want local storage with minimal cabling and higher data throughput.

At the higher end, the UNAS Pro 4 and UNAS Pro 8 extend the lineup into the rackmount segment, reinforcing UniFi’s move toward professional and enterprise environments. The UNAS Pro 4 adopts a 1U form factor, supporting four 3.5-inch SATA drives and two M.2 NVMe slots, while maintaining the same ARM Cortex-A57 CPU and 16 GB LPDDR4 memory as its larger sibling. It also supports dual hot-swappable PSUs for redundancy and arrives with improved thermal airflow optimized for data center racks. The flagship UNAS Pro 8 offers eight 3.5-inch bays, two rear M.2 NVMe bays, and three 10GbE ports (one RJ45 and two SFP+), making it the highest-performing UniFi NAS to date. The system consumes up to 200W under load, uses Btrfs as the primary file system, and integrates the most comprehensive cooling and failover options in the UniFi NAS lineup. Together, these models illustrate UniFi’s full-tier hardware strategy: from PoE-powered desktop storage to rackmount systems supporting multi-gigabit networking and dual redundant power.

Model Form Factor Drive Bays CPU Memory Network Interface NVMe Support Power Method Key Features
UNAS 2 Desktop 2 x SATA (3.5″) Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz 4 GB LPDDR4 1 x 2.5GbE (PoE++) None PoE++ / 60W Compact PoE NAS, USB-C 5Gbps, LCD panel
UNAS 4 Desktop 4 x SATA (3.5″) Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A55, 1.7 GHz 4 GB LPDDR4 1 x 2.5GbE (PoE+++) 2 x M.2 NVMe PoE+++ Dual M.2, compact 4-bay, UniFi Drive 3.3 ready
UNAS Pro 4 1U Rackmount 4 x SATA (3.5″) Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz 16 GB LPDDR4 2 x 10GbE (RJ45 + SFP+) 2 x M.2 NVMe Dual PSU Redundant PSU, RAID 6, enterprise airflow
UNAS Pro 8 2U Rackmount 8 x SATA (3.5″) Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz 16 GB LPDDR4 3 x 10GbE (1 RJ45, 2 SFP+) 2 x M.2 NVMe Dual PSU 8-bay, clustered RAID, high throughput
UNAS Pro (2024) 2U Rackmount 7 x SATA (3.5″) Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57, 1.7 GHz 16 GB LPDDR4 2 x 10GbE None Single PSU

Fixes, Changes and Improvements in UniFi UNAS in 12 Months

Over the past year, UniFi has steadily refined the UNAS operating environment, addressing a number of software and usability issues identified by early adopters of the original UNAS Pro. Many of these improvements were released through incremental firmware updates across both the Drive OS and UniFi Controller platforms. Among the most significant early fixes was the resolution of file handling inconsistencies between the built-in web file manager and SMB-based network access, which previously caused discrepancies when deleting or restoring data.

This issue, which affected synchronization between the NAS GUI and mapped network shares, has now been corrected. Similarly, early memory leak and permission errors during large-scale SMB transfers have been resolved through back-end optimization, reducing skipped files and improving overall data reliability. Updates to the system logs and storage integrity checks also brought clearer reporting of failed transfers and RAID rebuild activity, ensuring that users now receive consistent system notifications and warnings.

Another key focus for UniFi’s development team over the last twelve months has been user management, network integration, and environmental control. Earlier versions of Drive OS restricted backup operations to individual users, preventing the super admin from managing backups or schedules across the system. This has since been rectified, allowing full central backup management, while user permission hierarchies have been expanded to distinguish between local-only accounts, remote accounts, and enterprise identity-linked users.

Environmental improvements include the long-requested fan control interface, which gives users the option to manually adjust fan speeds or keep automatic control active depending on temperature thresholds. The addition of real-time thermal monitoring, more accurate CPU and drive temperature reporting, and improved resource graphs now make it easier to track system health. The Drive 3.3 release also introduced a refined GUI with more responsive dashboard elements, consistent data updates in the system console, and a correction to the long-standing uptime reporting bug that falsely displayed “20,000 days active.”

Area of Improvement Previous Limitation Current Status / Fix Impact
File Handling (SMB vs GUI) Files deleted via GUI not matching SMB state Unified file operations between interfaces Consistent data management
Memory & Transfer Errors Large SMB jobs skipped files, memory overflow Memory optimization and error logging fixes Improved reliability in large transfers
Admin Backup Control Admins could not manage user-level backups Centralized backup control added Easier global administration
Thermal & Fan Controls No manual fan speed control Manual and auto fan profiles integrated Better system cooling management
Temperature Accuracy Inconsistent CPU and drive readings Updated sensors and calibration More reliable thermal data
GUI Responsiveness Lag when creating shares or users Streamlined front-end caching Faster configuration changes
Uptime Reporting Displayed exaggerated uptime values Corrected uptime counter logic Accurate monitoring metrics
System Logs Limited data visibility Extended log detail for transfers and RAID rebuilds Clearer diagnostic insights

 

Missing Features and Planned Features in UniFi UNAS in the Next 12 Months

Despite significant progress since the launch of the original UNAS Pro, several key features are still missing from the UniFi Drive OS ecosystem. The most frequently requested addition from users continues to be iSCSI target and initiator support, a capability that would allow direct block-level storage mapping for virtual machines and professional applications. Its absence limits the UNAS series to traditional network file protocols such as SMB and NFS, which are less efficient for tasks requiring raw storage access or integration with virtualization platforms. Equally, the continued lack of RAID 0 support restricts high-performance users who are willing to trade redundancy for speed. While RAID 6 and clustered pools have been introduced, there is still no configuration option that prioritizes sequential throughput over redundancy. Another omission is a native UniFi Drive client tool for Windows, macOS, or Linux that would allow direct desktop synchronization, local file pinning, and on-demand streaming similar to Synology Drive or Dropbox. At present, users must rely on the web interface or manually mapped drives, which limits productivity and offline access.

Looking forward, UniFi has hinted through developer notes and recent firmware structure that the ENAS (Enterprise NAS) line will introduce ZFS file system support, marking a major shift toward high-end storage with data integrity and snapshot efficiency beyond Btrfs. This aligns with the observed trend of UniFi testing ZFS integration within their enterprise roadmap, possibly extending limited functionality to future revisions of the Pro 4 and Pro 8. The upcoming UniFi Drive 3.3 and 3.4 updates are also expected to expand fan and power scheduling, allowing users to define specific system on/off cycles and control Ethernet port activation schedules, effectively creating customizable air-gap routines. Additionally, UniFi’s roadmap includes exploring expansion connectivity, potentially leveraging unused 10GbE interfaces for network-based expansion enclosures or storage clustering between UNAS units. This would mirror the high-availability (HA) or expansion behavior of established NAS brands, though implemented entirely over the UniFi network layer.

UniFi is also expected to refine NVMe handling, particularly the ability to use installed M.2 drives as standalone storage pools rather than just as cache devices. The introduction of pool-level tiering and dynamic storage balancing could allow users to automatically assign workloads between SSD and HDD pools, improving I/O efficiency without manual adjustment. Beyond hardware-level improvements, there is ongoing demand for the integration of UniFi Protect within the NAS family, allowing video surveillance to run on the same physical storage units rather than on separate NVRs. Although UniFi has historically separated its Protect and Drive ecosystems, internal hardware similarities between the UNAS Pro and UNVR Pro systems suggest eventual compatibility is possible. Finally, more advanced backup filters, bandwidth scheduling, and automated snapshot policies are likely to appear in the next major OS iteration as part of UniFi’s effort to close the gap with traditional NAS brands while maintaining its minimalist network-first design approach.

Feature / Function Current Status Planned / Proposed Update Expected Benefit
iSCSI Support Not available Under evaluation for enterprise roadmap Block-level access for VMs and servers
RAID 0 Unsupported Potential inclusion in Drive 3.4+ High-speed sequential workloads
UniFi Drive Client App Not available Planned for 2026 Desktop sync and offline access
ZFS File System (ENAS) In development Expected on ENAS and future Pro models Greater data integrity and snapshot efficiency
Fan & Power Scheduling Manual control only Scheduled automation (Drive 3.3+) Energy savings, thermal management
10GbE Expansion Support Not implemented Proposed network-based expansion option Scale-out storage via UniFi network
NVMe as Storage Pool Cache-only Drive 3.4+ feature under testing SSD-only pools and tiering
UniFi Protect Integration Not supported Possible future overlap Unified surveillance and storage system
Backup Filters & Scheduling Basic inclusion/exclusion Enhanced filters and timed backups Greater control and efficiency

Conclusion and Verdict – Is the UniFi UNAS Good Now?

One year after the launch of the original UniFi UNAS Pro, the UniFi NAS platform has evolved from a single experimental product into a diversified ecosystem that spans both desktop and rackmount storage. The introduction of the UNAS 2, UNAS 4, UNAS Pro 4, and UNAS Pro 8 demonstrates that Ubiquiti is committed to building a scalable product range capable of serving both home users and small business environments. On the software side, the development of UniFi Drive OS has been steady and deliberate, with a focus on improving reliability, expanding RAID options, and tightening cloud and local backup integration. These changes, combined with improved temperature management, admin-level control, and performance tuning for SMB and NFS, have resulted in a more mature and dependable NAS experience than the early versions from 2024. However, the range remains deliberately streamlined, prioritizing simplicity and ecosystem integration over third-party app support or virtualization features.

Looking ahead, the next phase of the UniFi NAS roadmap appears to focus on deeper enterprise integration and feature parity with long-standing NAS brands. The likely addition of iSCSI, ZFS, and network-based expansion options will determine how far UniFi can move beyond entry and mid-range use cases. The hardware continues to rely on ARM processors rather than x86, which reinforces UniFi’s focus on efficiency and security but limits advanced workloads such as containerization and VM hosting. Even so, the value proposition remains strong, particularly given the aggressive pricing across the entire UNAS range and its seamless compatibility with the existing UniFi infrastructure. Overall, UniFi’s NAS systems are no longer a novelty—they represent a serious and rapidly developing branch of the company’s portfolio that has gained stability, utility, and confidence within just one year.

You can buy the UniFi UNAS Pro 8 NAS via the link below – doing so will result in a small commission coming to me and Eddie at NASCompares, and allows us to keep doing what we do! 

Here are all the current UniFi NAS Solutions & Prices:
  • UniFi UNAS 2 (2 Bay, $199) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS 4  (4 Bay + 2x M2, $379) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro 4 (4 Bay + 2x M.2, $499) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro (7 Bay, $499) – HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro 8 (8-Bay + 2x M.2, $799) HERE

 

 

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      Discover more from NAS Compares

      Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      332 thoughts on “UniFi UNAS – 1 Year Later. Should You Buy Now?”

      3. My ex did our network before and now I got accustomed to having home server stuff. I’m slowly learning and creating my own stuff, but I’m having trouble with torrents and plex.
        We used to have a torrent downloader we could just paste magnet links into and the downloaded content would end up on plex instantly when it was done.

        Could this (the 2 bay one) be setup as a storage my separate plex server could work from? (its on a optiplex if it helps)

        Hope this makes sense, Im still learning
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      5. If they can roll out zfs to these older units I will definitely think of grabbing one. The 8 Bay would be perfect for a raid z2 array with m.2 caching.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. waiting for a 8/16 bay unas with 100gig connectivity, cpu and ram that can handle it. dosen’t matter if it costs 5,000$ im still getting it. Love unifis echo system. But making a 10gig nas that can’t handle 10gig is just stupid
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. Loved the video and the content! At first, I was thinking, “Are we ever satisfied?” But the last minute of the video really tied it all together. Great purchase, solid system, and still more work ahead — absolutely! Perfect way to wrap it up.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. I would prefer a NAS that fits the depth of a standard wall-mounted rack outside length of 60 cm rack for home use. The length of the UNAS-8 might be fine in a server hall, but in a home or small office it becomes a problem. I’d rather have a rack mount that is 1U higher but with less depth.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      18. Appreciate the follow up review! Mine has been running a a week now and my nas choice was based on your reviews after initial release. However it seems controlling system fan speeds to keep temp down is still a bit of a hot topic….pun intended. The system just runs too hot and the cooling fan speeds are default 0%, 15% or 100% (Jet Engine Mode). There is a work around using SSH to access the Unas Pro system and a GitHub script to run…..have you messed with this? Thoughts? Can you please help us noobs with this option until we get a bit more fan control options from Unifi firmware updates. Cheers
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. 11:28 it would be a waste to try to use the NVMe drives as a pool “for speed” since the system isn’t able to saturate a single 10Gb link let alone two.

        This, for me is one of the biggest disappointments. I appreciate a nice power efficient Cortex processor but if you have 4-8 HDDs using 8-10W each in use, then the overhead of driving 20Gb/s is negligible.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. You’ve definitely made some good points. Especially, when it comes to the protect product. The native app is going to become a “must have” at some point.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      27. Really interested in buying one. Just really missing the native app because that is the functionality I need to get rid of my cloud subscriptions.
        The other thing, maybe already possible to link my unas with a friend to make offsite backup’s. Dreaming of having it with failover so when my home network goes down I use my friends. So when they both connect they sync up…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. Need iSCSI support and something like Synology’s SHR to mix and match drives and easily upgrade to larger ones. Then I will ditch my 2 Syno NAS for a big ass UNAS
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      29. i hope they continue to stick to focus on being storage and data delivery speed centered, and not decide to turn this into a consumer device that is a do-it-all. I have a proxmox setup in the office that takes care of all the none-storage tasks already.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      30. I picked up a UNAS2 for €99 a few months ago to give it a shot has I had two 6TB HDD spare so figured for a hundred euro I would give it a shot. I knew the limitations and it would be “just” storage and its been great. It’s reliable, has enough functionality for a true “NAS” appliance. I respect it isn’t trying to be a whole storage and application platform. Not that there is anything wrong with that but I do quite like how it is “just” storage tbh. I point a Jellyfin server at it and it works as the backend media storage well. It’s also a nice backup point for my Synology and another Time Machine target. For the price I am quite happy with it. The one thing I quite like is because it is “just” storage means it has been a realy “set it up and forget about it” device. I don’t get tempted to tweak around with things like I do on Synology and it’s suite of apps. Sometimes simple is all you need. I don’t think it is suited to everyone though as you do get “more bang for your buck” picking up a UGREEN if you want an all-in-one storage and application server but if you just want storage it is a really solid option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      32. What I’d like to do with the 8-bay NAS is direct connect it to my existing unRAID server where I run various dockerised things and then also connect the UniFi NAS into a switch using a second DAC 10Gb port so that other machines on the network also get access without traffic having to go through my unRAID
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. they should just make ceph easy branch it, unify it, i know the cost sounds shocking but literally 7 of these 8 bays with the nvme, it would be a perfect saturation of the networking combine with 24-26TB HDD and you have finally a user friendly way to give you a petabyte of enterprise grade s3 storage.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      36. While my Pro 8 is still expanding then storage pool, Might I ask is NFS still the best for Linux client or SMB is a better choice?

        From what I learnt NFS in UNAS did not work as good as SMB
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      37. backup sucks badly on large datasets. I have nothing but trouble getting backups to complete to smb or to another unas. never complete, only ever partial success. small datasets are fine. I’m 100% on unifi and really hoping unas improves faster. Snaphots, external sharing basic function is fine. Also needs cloud sync like Synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. I currently have an old Synology DS214play. I am torn between the UNAS 2 and UNAS 4. I know it was long ago, but the DS214play was a good lesson in having storage be storage and use something else for compute. With drive sizes these days, I don’t need more than 2 bays. However, I would like an NVME cache so UNAS 4 seems like the way to go for that. However, how useful is an NVME cache on a device with only one 2.5 GbE interface? At $200, the UNAS 2 seems like a pretty low risk investment. I could always use it as a backup target in the future.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      39. Wake on Lan …. I need a simple way to power on a NAS … I can (probably) solve the shutdown … but not the power on … and I want to power on the NAS using a simple script/command on MacOS and Windows 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. why is terramaster the only hybrid raid competitor to synology? i dont understand why hybrid raid isnt more common, I expected unas to roll out with proper hybrid raid, mix and match various sizes not this half ass attempt at it, especially on a 16 bay unit, I dont get how people live their lives needing to replace an entire pack of drives to add some space, sounds like a nightmare
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. I’m probably going to go with the UNAS Pro. The UNAS Pro 4 looks enticing but it does nothing my home network would need. I back up my Macs and some other random stuff. I may venture into Plex with a NUC but I’m not sure. Not to mention, the mounting depth of the Pro 4 would be pushing the limits of my home rack. UDMP, Pro Max 24, UNVR, various cameras, etc already installed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      47. I don’t know much about Unifi. Can you get a unit with Protect where you have large storage pools? Does their NVR have a large storage pool for video storage? It makes no sense to me to be limited to be limited to a single SdCard or even multiple NVMes. Video storage requires large pools
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. Good Video, thanks Man. I guess sinolgy is not yet interested in home small office users. Which sinde ChatGpt have gotten a lot of information to helped them sesrve their network needs. I will move there once they give us the Plex, Docekr Jellyfin integration.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      49. Given their 1 pane of glass presentation of Networking, I expect transparent clustering, redundancy, etc. using multiple units rather than the “expansion” options of other vendors. A NAS fabric rather than NAS devices. When it comes to iSCSI, these can become network complex, another area they can simplify by central choke point in a controller based solution rather than individual device configuration that can easily conflict. Having personally managed an iSCSI based farm with multiple (hundreds of servers) and thousands of clients, not for the feint of heart add multi channel and redundancy, if UI pulls it off, it would be glory days.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      51. For those saying “This is Storage, if you want Virtual Containers, get a mini PC or something”… yeah, that would be great if this supported iSCSI so you could use it as storage for those containers !
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      52. Great video. Is there support sub interfaces at all, or link aggregation? Ie, 2xSFP+ interfaces aggregated, and a few different IP addresses behind that? I want to serve different networks without having to send traffic via a router, something I do easily with TrueNAS currently.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      53. As I bought the original 7-bay UNAS Pro, I wish they would add the capability to use at least one of the disks as a cache (similar to the M.2 drives on the 8), so I could slot in one SSD disk; they’ve already developed the software so it should “just” be a matter of enabling it on any chosen disk — with a bit of extra work for the UI.
        Of course it would still be slower than M.2 because of the SATA interface, but it would hopefully make the overall experience much faster than HD-only pools.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      55. 7:30 now TrueNAS wants us to move past iSCSI and use NVMe-oF. Maybe by the time Ubiquiti gets on the remote block storage bus they can start with new hotness.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      56. MY biggest issue with the newest units is rack depth. My rack just barely holds the 4 bar UNVR, which is 325mm deep. Coincidentally, the UNAS Pro is also exactly 325mm deep. (12.8″ for the metric-challenged among us). But the UNAS Pro 4 is a whopping 400mm deep (15.75″), which is way deeper than my rack can handle, and the UNAS Pro 8 is 480mm deep (18.9″!!). I guess I sort of get with with the 8, since it’s using standard removable power supplies. But the Pro 4 isn’t, so why soooo much extra space needed? The drive bays themselves are all at the front on all of these, and don’t take up that much room… I can’t imagine the 2 M.2 cache slots really need THAT much extra space?

        But sadly, while I would have been content buying TWO 4-bay Pros, just for the better connectivity and caching, it’s just too big without buying a considerably larger rack. So I have what I have.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      57. It is where look at the UNAS as part of the EcoSystem that starts to make more sense then just as a NAS on its own.

        With the new UPS doing pairing with UNAS and UNVR to shutdown and a NUT Server for 3rd Party then Network is where they are at so makes sense that they more network orientated as such.

        In terms of a drive access from desktop/laptop then Endpoint Identity which also works with VPN, Wifi, then part of that overall system where not a standalone NAS. Can link to Directories ie AD, Entra, etc for User Synch so no need to define users seperately.

        When you look at the UNAS and then UNVR range then if could run Protect on UNAS then the UNVR becomes redundant, so unlikely to happen.
        The Enterprise UNVR 16 bay Rack Mount could make the basis for a new larger UNAS Pro 16 as expand.

        I cannot see them expanding the UNAS into the mini-server style that has become prevalent and if look at Synology then the Storage as opposed to mini server is where they seem to be going as well. Want to run apps then get a mini pc.

        With Broadcom releasing the free ESXi hypervisor, usual single server only style, no vcentre etc then an iSCSI target would be great
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      58. Good points to be developed in the future. I’m waiting for ability to use hostname instead of IP @ SMB. Already bought Unas Pro 7bay as a cheap toy to test but TVS-H1288X (my main fileserver) wins. Anyway, nice to see such clear and detailed thoughts man. Thanks for your job!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      59. Bought the 7 bay version a couple of months ago, and haven’t regretted it for one second. It fits my needs perfectly, so absolutely no buyer’s remorse here!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      60. @nascompares Can you pls make a video, for those of us who have Synology or Qnap systems, and how UNAS can be used as an off-site backup for those systems. I understand it’s possible, but requires a bit more expertise.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      62. Crazy its been a year now. Great job with this video. I definitely agree with all the points you made on the good, bad, and missing. Thank you for continuing to follow these across the product life. This is some real in depth reviewing
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      63. For an 8-bay that cannot saturate a 10g link, why does it have x3 of them? I guess x2 of them would be for LAG use-case but I think you’ve got a good point there about future expansion.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      65. I grabbed the 8 bay. I do really like it. NFS leaves a bit to be desired, as the only form of access control is via network policy, and you can’t chmod or chown anything over it, but it’s workable for what it is. I also populated both cache drives, and am running into an issue with it. I get an error about adding the cache to the pool (RAID1 for R/W caching). The drive list shows the SSDs added as cache to Storage Pool 1, but then clicking those drives is prompting me to add them to the pool, like they aren’t already, which of course, trying again, it fails. My assumption is they ARE attached to the storage pool but it’s not clear to me how to actually verify this. I tried to ssh in, and I do see an mdadm device mirror for the cache pool, but that’s as far as I got.

        Otherwise, this is a baller NAS for the price. RAID6 8x8TB, and my 2.5gig clients can saturate their NICs with it fairly easily.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      66. The RAID 0 issue is easily fixed by putting up a warning and making the user accept the risk. I personally wouldn’t use it, but any option added is good in my opinion.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      67. Something that is missing for me is a true backup software like Synology Hyper Backup (Deduplication & Versionning & Compression) ! So i had to installed Duplicati and mount source & target network share to make backup the way i like …
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      69. Haven’t bough just yet but will before year end buy mine. Just not sure whether that will be a pro, pro 8 or pro 4.
        The pro and pro 8 will serve my volume needs very easily, the pro 4 is actually already enough. The SSD caches as in most other brands do not seem to add that much in my use case (regular file server and a few data only storages for Proxmox). The big question is does the 16 GB ram of the pro 8 make a difference worth the money? or shall I just go with the old pro after all. I have not seen good performance comparisons just yet to decide.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      70. Great video, thank you. Does anyone know if the Unas2 supports wake on lan? So that I could power it on from the UniFi app on my phone or something like that.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      72. What is also missing on the NAS Pro 4 and NAS Pro 8 is an USB Port connectivity to allow soft shutdown of the NAS in case of power failure via signal sent from the UPS to the NAS, like it is implemented on Synology NAS. Do you have any idea if/when it will be implemented?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      73. I love Ubiquiti products, got a Rack Mount UDM Pro/Switch/Acces Points/Cameras etc. However no such thing as Synology Drive for syncing was a dealbreaker, that was the bare minimum I needed. Went with Ugreen NAS and it really is fantastic, not only does it serves as a NAS, but expandability is great and It can also be used as a server.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      74. Am meisten stört mich aktuell, das das UNAS auch nach einem Shutdown immer noch mindestens 18..20W verbraucht. Bei mir mit 5x 16TB sind es 24W. Was ist daran “shutdown”? Hier in Deutschland bezahlen wir 0,3…0,4€ pro kWh. Und damit das UNAS wieder startet, muss es einmal komplett spannungslos gemacht werden. Für Homeuser ist das eigentlich indiskutabel, Firmen werden das NAS mit dessen eingeschränkten Funktionsumfang kaum kaufen. Grüße aus Deutschland.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      75. Man, I just want a 1u rackmount NAS that can handle photo’s, phone backups, and Jellyfin/Plex. Think I will prolly go QNap, as I just can’t justify the price of a Synology for what I’m looking for.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      76. i have 2 UNAS Pro (original 7 bay) and my big gripe is Snapshots on user personal-drives. I can enable snapshot with no issue. BUT as the super admin or owner logging into the UNAS… I can’t go into the personl-drive to be able to REVERT back to a snapshot. Ticket with Ubiquiti they told me that is by design as personal-drive is just for that user. ok.. fine.. but then Why allow me to enable snapshot on them if I can’t revert? They said they will kick over to the developers.

        but i did also point out… I can backup the personal-drives to another unas drive via smb/cifs and then as super admin I can see all the files and so snapshots there and revert there. Just a stupid way to do it.

        also no data scrubbing on a unas.

        i like the 499 price tag for what they are. But i think would have been better choice to go Ugreen and installing TrueNAS on it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      78. Building out my UNAS Pro 8 as I’m watching this. I held off until Ubiquiti added UNAS Pro fan control, and I’m glad I waited because the UNAS Pro 8 with the M.2 cache is what I was really hoping for. It’s taking an eternity to copy my Plex library off my old Synology due to the 1 Gbps interface, and they’re still handicapping throughput on their new models. Synology lost me when they pulled their initial lock-in maneuver. I’ve offloaded my compute to a separate system rather than combined on a server based NAS. Looking forward to more improvements in the future. Not sure why NASCompares saw such high temps on the M.2 cache drives. My 2 Samsung 990 Pro 2TB cache drives haven’t gone higher than 42C with the fans set at Balanced.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      79. Held out on the UNAS Pro to see where they would take it, but now very tempted by the UNAS Pro 4..would have been tempted by the 8, but it’s just too damn deep to fit in any rack I’d entertain having in my house!!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      82. If the 4-bay was available, I would have ordered it. I think it might be a good little NAS for me, but I’m still not fully confident in long-term security and ease of use. Now I’m seriously considering going back to Synology as I have much more confidence in the software and hardware, plus I’m already familiar with it. I’ve tried Unraid for a year and like it, but it’s still a bit too much maintenance for me. Still, I’ll keep my Unraid system for playing with containers and VMs. Thanks for all these honest detailed reviews!????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      90. I like to see shr features in this and 10 gbe r45 port. Its so close to totally replacing synology. For a 7 bay its half the price of synology nas
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      91. As a recent UniFi adopter (December of 2024, UDM Pro Max, USW Pro Max 16, USW Pro Max 16 PoE, USW Aggregation 8 port along with 4 Wifi 7 access points and 6 cameras) I can say they release updates faster than anyone I’ve ever worked with. The updates address customers concerns and vastly increase the usability of the devices.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      92. Dear … , is it true that the unas takes the smallest drive and defines all other drives to the same size? Like if I have a 8TB drive and a 20TB drive it works like two 8TB drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      94. drive temps on the unas are pretty rough especially if you have all 7 drives in those non vented drive cages are not doing them favors. I had to find a script that increased the fan speed. now my drive temps sit in the 35-40c but before they would touch 50c during heavy use which was not great. They really need to expose some level of fan control at least a basic quiet or performance option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      96. I wish that writing, testing and releasing SAN firmware was as easy as producing YouTube videos . . . When it comes to storage – stability first, last and always.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      97. The CPU sticking at a constant temperature is actually ideal.
        You want the silicon to be at a as consistent as possible temperature , my guess is that it’s a pretty minor heat and their intentionally not spin up the fan so that even when it’s idling, it is at that specific constant temperature that prevents any thermal expansion or contraction.
        You do not want your CPU to be significantly cooler when idling for endurance.
        Yes, lower temperatures are always better , but anything under 90° is absolutely fine nowadays.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      98. Do you think, it will sometime be possible to make back-up to an UDM Pro / SE? I am using all flash configuration with my UNAS Pro with only 7TB of storage (RAID10)… I would love to put a 12 TB HDD in to my UDM SE to back-up the whole drive frequently… while not using any NVR funktionallity, the bay is not in use at this time…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      99. so they added raid 6 have they made it where I can add different sized drives like a Drobo or Synology? any chance they will? I know I can’t be the only one who can’t afford to buy all the same drives to propagate this. I have to buy what I can afford as I can afford them ands drives die I want to buy newer higher storage drives to replace them.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      103. Is it possible to share (sub-)folders to users now? Last I checked around Youtube videos I only saw it possible to share entire drives, not sub-folders.

        My situation: I take pictures of clients in a recurring fashion. I want them to login their account and they can see all the folders I’ve shared with them. These individual links are too primitive and having what should be sub-folders only be “Drives” would be way too unorganized.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      104. I got an old mini pc and turned it into an app server and using my nas as just a nas. Allows me to need a super powerful nas for my storage. If i want to upgrade my servers, i just swap servers. easy. I am running a headless linux with docker and using dockge as a way to manage the apps. Really any linux will work, depends on what you want to use.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      108. So this thing has one job – and it can’t even do that? Speaking about the missing files when trying to copy from the Synology to the UNAS. Admins can’t back up their users data? Typical for Ubiquiti, they release an under powered product full of bugs that can’t be trusted. Hell, their network app is on version 9.x and it’s still half baked. This is a hard pass for me, this thing should still be alpha testing in their lab. I’d trust my data to a shucked refurb drive attached to an old laptop before this thing.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      110. The problem with files not downloading completely on an iPhone is an Apple problem and has nothing to do with the UNAS. Downloading large files from Google Drive or even WhatsApp does exactly the same. You have to keep the screen active for the whole copy process for it to maybe work
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      111. I wish they’d let you control the backup folder structure. It’s convoluted when I back it up to my other NAS and it’s 3 or 4 folders deep.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      112. Im a current UNAS Pro owner. My unit is RAID 5 with a hot spare. Thanks for the timely opinions and update on the new features. The changes made so far are great for the average user, especially RAID 6 and an “easy” conversion from Raid 5. I hope it is indeed as simple as disabling the hot spare to make it happen w/out data loss. Also Im glad to hear Time Machine on private drives is supported and Admins can control all backup settings. All the other features you wish for, (to me at least), can wait and I won’t miss them. Thanks again for the followup!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      113. A lesson I learned a long time ago and very much applies to Ubiquity, assume the product is complete when you purchase it and won’t get updates. Does it have everything you need? I’ve learned that I can take quite a bit of time (years) for features to be added to UniFi products and even then they are still somewhat incomplete.
        They are clearly a company in a growth phase so I’d imagine lots of projects in the works but they really need to concentrate a bit more on the software experience.
        How does a NAS ship feature incomplete? There was no consumer rush on it. It’s a very odd product line at this point.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      116. For me i would want an 8 bay system with atleast 2x 10Gbe sfp ports and 2x 2.5Gbe or 5Gbe ports for it to be worthwhile investing my hard earned into it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      117. Why the concern over the CPU temps? If it’s capping at around 70° C that feels well within safe operating temps for the hardware. If the drives were doing that I’d be concerned but on the socket?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      118. I have a unas pro, The one feature that frustrates me is snapshot access. Unless I am mistaken you have to go to the admin panel, go to the time you want to restore, restore then you can access then rather than windows previous versions like ive been able to do with other nas OS’s.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      119. I have SMB disabled along with shared links. This is a backup storage device to replace my DS418. However, I might go back to my DS418. The lack of NFS configration options is anoying. Subnet level access via NFS has been a thing since forever except when configured NFS on UNAS Pro. I should not have to enter every single individual IP address, and folder permissions, to the UNAS. Plus the fact that I am required to add a gateway and two DNS servers per network interface. Now, if DNS1 is my router, and my router goes down, what is the bonus of having a second DNS server in a NAS? Plus, what if I want to use 10Gbe as local link only and not route traffic? Why does a network mfg company require things that are not actually required? Filesystem snapshot recovery from the UI? Schedule snapshots, sure. Recovery snapshots. Nope.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      121. Raid 6 has slower write performance to Raid 5 due to calculating dual parity for the two disk redundancy.

        Raid 5 can survive only 1 disk failure but will rebuild array to fault tolerant with hot spare — The question then becomes how long to rebuild data from parity info. Obviously Raid 6 can survive 2 failures and still maintain data integrity- like all things it a compromise.

        Raid 10 gives best performance albeit at losing 50% of your aggregated disk capacity, but could in theory tolerate more than two drive failures. For example

        Best-case: 1 disk per mirror pair can fail — e.g., in an 8-drive RAID 10 (4 mirrored pairs), you could lose 4 disks if each failure is from a different pair.

        Key point: It’s not how many fail, but which ones.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      122. It’s awesome, but going from Synology, I think the right path for me is either QNAP or DIY with either Unraid or TrueNAS both with dockers ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      130. such temperatures on Unifi ARM CPU’s are normal. G2-Plus – same story, request to Unifi to give option to speed up funs are useless. Unifi thinks (same as apple) that users are stupid and less options is better.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      134. As a user of Unifi Protect I would line to see UNVR (Unifi NVR) Protect application on UNAS hardware, because should be able to run both on the same hardware at the same time.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      136. As much as I love hearing about Unifi entering the NAS market, especially with Synology major missteps, seeing its UI reminds me why I fell in love with Synology’s UI so much. I am surprised Unifi went the old school look rather than the modern GUI.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      137. I’ve had one for about three months and I’ve been very happy for the price.

        Seems silly, but I would like to be able to backup my android phone pictures automatically or at least easily to this device instead of some cloud service.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      139. With Synology suddenly off my list of vendors, this ridiculously primitive NAS might be slightly more appealing in a few years if their progress continues to improve.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      140. @11:20 looks like the system up time is being calculated from the UNIX Epoch of 1st Jan 1970… so it seems the startup time isn’t being updated from 0 when it boots up.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      142. As a Canadian living in the US with a British mother.. I’ll agree with the football thing and I drive a lot of people nuts around here, “Do you mean the game with the round ball with pentagons? Or do you mean glorified Rugby with padding?”.. chips/crisps not so much.

        Unfortunately.. As I would like to go more Unfi stuff.. I’ll stick to what I’ve built for now…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      145. I have an older Synology NAS and love it, but as they have turned into an evil corporation by charging extra for features already existing on a monthly subscription basis, I know I need to replace this while I can still copy data from it. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      147. I’m very happy with mine so far. One it’s pretty quick and the setup for net shares nfs is super easy. As a power user, this is honestly a breath of fresh air as far as upkeep goes. I wish it had a dedicated file sync app for PC/Android/IOS. I personally would love to see B2 backup and rsync capabilities. I don’t really care about running apps or VMs on a NAS, so Im happy on that front.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      148. My UNAS pro works flawlessly with my minisforum MS-01 UnRaid server. Serverpartdeals came through with great recertified drives. It’s almost like YouTube videos inspire me to spend money or something… ????. Keep up with the great content @NASCompares! Also… Synology is trying to be the IT equivalent of the AAA gaming industry over the past few years. Synology brass might want to forget the business advice they took from the swanky cigar club discussions with Ubisoft execs…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      154. Thank you so much for the time you take to make all these videos. I was so excited when I heard Synology was coming out with the 925+. but then they put too many conditions. However, I am deep into ubiquiti and I might just not bother with Synology and wait for Ubiquiti to come out with a more powerful processor based “Unas Pro 2” assuming it’s going to happen and that it will be built better based on their experience on the current gen. I can’t wait as my NAS really wants to retire, it’s a WD My cloud ex4 slow as molasse.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      155. What is the use case of scheduling on and off of Ethernet ports? If you are an SMB with a server rack?
        Is it expected that you network is occasionally insecure?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      158. Still debating adding a UNAS Pro into my Ubiquiti network infrastructure and then adding a server for my apps, or building my own NAS/Server combo. My long relationship with Synology has come to an end.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      159. Excellent presentation. Thank you. I am trying to better understand the internal NAS snapshots. I reviewed your previous reviews and see where snapshots seem to exists. I use BTRFS snapshots with my Synology unit and they are basically instanteous and take up no “extra space” initially. I can bring up a file explorere of sorts on the Synology and easily drill down to directories on each set of snapshots looking for the file I want to restore. Do the UniFi NAS snap work like this as well? I really only use my current NAS units for SMB file storage and that storage is mainly file copies from other systems as backups. I need my NAS to have solid network performance and snapshots like I described. The UniFi unit is “fair” on the performance side with you showing roughly 375-475mb/sec read and writes – so it does about half with the 10GbE port can support. At $500, it would be a pretty good unit versus a Synology 1821+ (which needs 10GbE added) if it has good snapshots.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      162. agree with fan control, iscsi – I wish there was a slightly better cpu in it and a 1U version would be nice – and when is an official unifi Drive app coming out?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      163. I have workflows built around FTP (one-way file transfer between two internal networks with no internet or cloud involved), and I really don’t want to have to hack the OS to get it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      164. Totally on point about the bags of chips

        … this channel for me pairs well with SpaceRex… The speed is night and day , but I get the info I need … And understanding
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      165. I can’t seem to find an answer – can I mix and match drive sizes the way Synology does, making the most of the mix? If not, what RIAD number am I waiting for?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      166. My UNAS Pro is working brilliantly and as I expected. I even store my Docker container data on it over NFS (since I already use separate computer for containers).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      169. Who needs a working radiator when we have networking, servers and UPS devices keeping us cozy!!

        I almost purchased a UNAS but held back. I’ll wait for their next iteration with a better GPU, form factor and more I/O
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      173. I would definitely pick this up if they added container support… but maybe given its arm the value isn’t there given less compatibility with out of the box containers people like to use
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      175. Synology needs to release a 4 / 6 / 8 bay desktop chassis version and take on Synology, Qnap, UGreen and the others in market. Time is perfect given Sinology’s recent moves.

        I just ordered a UGreen DXP4800 Plus because I can’t use the 2U form factor of the UniFi. Synology is dead to me and I have a UniFi network yet had to go UGreen .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      181. I’m so torn with this device. I have an ancient 2-bay Synology now that has to get replaced. Since a nicer one would be around the same price as this, and I have other Unifi equipment, I”m giving this a look. I don’t need it to do anything other than store files, but I need it to just work since it would get attached to my wife’s laptop for her photography files. I could just get a new 2-bay synology and a couple decent size drives as my other option. such decisions…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      186. Instead of downloading files from Safari on the iPhone, as an alternative you could just mount the drive or share in the files app. It supports SMB and other protocols. In the files app, go to the 3 dots in the upper right corner, then Connect to Server, here you can provide your URI or URL. (example – smb://)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      188. A pro version with nvme cache and 10gb nicfor $100 more would make this the runaway leader. For $150 more then could make it have a connection to add more external drives in a UVR 1U chassis and upgradable ram people would pay that and drive more sales of those.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      189. I am fairly happy with as it does the basic job of backup that i need. I only bought it because my Qnap before would click and cluck away all night long when not being used for anything, I just decided that I trust the Unifi brand more with my data. Yes I know I’m just a basic user!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      190. I have a very specific question that I hope you answer that I think a lot of people would love to know I have a Synology Nas with plex on it i use for my movie theater can you copy your own movies on onto a unas and on the synology use plex to create a pathway to the unas where your movies are strored to pull the movies from to watch from plex, I think this would be a great video for you to do, hope ypo like my idea and do a video on it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      192. I just hate that Synology would take for instance running a VoIP server like asterisk. They had a one click install and then done away with it. I think this has upset many of us that have run Synology for years. I have brought this up several times due to the fact we have two Synology units and we love them, but we would also like to be able to run our voip on one unit. I don’t know if the unify will allow it or not.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      193. i wish they would make an app or add to one of their apps to auto sync our phone photos no matter where we are without requiring VPN or SMB. Even an app for auto sync files from windows and mac etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      198. Great follow up Robbie. I’m waiting on them to support iSCSI before I look at migrating from Synology.
        P.S. it’s soccer –with love from the US.
        PPS: when is that teal hoodie I’ve been nagging you about going to make it into a store? I need a link so I can support you and Eddie. 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      199. I currently use a 4-bay Synology DS920+ NAS to store movies and TV shows I rip from Blu-rays and 4K UHD Blu-rays. I don’t do any transcoding or even any additional compression, and I stream them to a capable but aging gaming PC to watch on my TV at the best possible quality. Aside from that, I back up my OneDrive stuff, but I’d be more than happy to just continue using my Synology NAS for that.

        If I just wanted more potential capacity in the form of more drive bays, then would UNAS Pro be good for my use case, or would a Synology NAS still be preferable in terms of performance?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      201. Does anyone know how you can set up a folder where multiple people can access AND upload things without setting up an account for every user?
        I intend to use it like a google pictures folder, where I give people access to upload pictures of a wedding.
        Problem is, UNAS only lets me use a QR code to a user folder once over the Identity app. I was planning on printing the QR code to the app and then to the folder so all guests can upload the pictures of that day and share it.
        It is kinda frustrating not having the possibility to share a folder and make so that people are also able to upload.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      202. I am always surprised by the critics: check the features before buying and if it does not fit, there are a multitude of other options on the market. So think before you buy.
        There are many users for whom this NAS is suitable.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      203. Thanks for the follow up video, I am currently in the market to get a new NAS, I want rackmount 7 8 drives, single or dual 10gb SFP+, I have mini pc’s running all my dockers etc, but this just doesn’t seem like it has the performance or a qnap or synology for read writes and it definitely doesn’t have the features for user folder control. The nested folder long file – character name issues seems worrying too, I want confidence in when i copy up a lot of data it goes up there.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      205. Well if the British didn’t want us to call it Soccer they shouldn’t have invented the word and spread it to the US and Australia. Anyway great follow up on the UNAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      206. RAID6 is not officially supported yet. See Unifi’s response in the latest firmware update page for 4.1.11! Discussions online suggest the appearance of RAID6 advanced protection is a UI bug and not fully implemented. Use at your own risk!!!!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      208. Hi, great video. When you say the unas can backup to another unas, do you mean it can backup to a unas in another location ? Would I need vpn to do this ?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      211. UNAS Pro is actually not safe to use for sensitive data atm.

        There is a major flaw discussed in their forums concerning RAID which puts data at risk
        also there is this:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJtxCzdwxQs&t=2s

        Simply put: this device is not ready for primetime and do not rely on it!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      212. I have found a good way to see how good or bad a UniFi product currently is can be found by looking at the comments on the current software release post for that product on their website. The comments for the UniFi OS NAS and UniFi Drive make it clear it isn’t a good option today.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      213. Just ordered one. I wish I would have done it through your link now. Then I spent $2k on 7 drives…. Like putting a full tank of Biden era gas in a 1976 Ford Pinto. ???? But I like Unifi. Have my who,e network in all Unifi. Plus 15 cameras with the NVR. Prolly have $12k tied up in Unifi. Hope they dont Bambu me.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      214. OK, I just had an idea that I think would be awesome. What if UniFi create a Compute Key like the new AI Key and fit in the AI Key rack mount. Where the compute key is where you would run containers.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      215. it would be great to find out a good working rsync solution with my Synology. Than you can have best of both. i saw some explanations on Reddit but its not as simple as it looks i guess
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      216. Thanks for the deep dive. Really interesting to hear about longer usage than 60 minutes. The issues you discussed are a thing yeah, especially Super Admin back-up options (why would I want my users to set it up individually?) and multiple pools.

        I do think however that they did make a good choice to not have any container/app deployment options.

        For the price and the power requirements this is absolutely worth not having the apps. Any Synology that people compare it with has twice to three times the price and energy consumption. Totally not worth it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      217. By far the worst NAS experience I’ve ever had. Almost killed four drives for me. Missing crucial functions, encryption and backups are a joke. Looks pretty though. Super happy I can send this pos back tomorrow 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      218. An 1U 2 or 3 bay unit would be ideal for me… BUT, why not step into the future and offer an 1U 4-bay 2.5″ unit. 3.5″ is going into the history soon…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      221. I ordered one of these just before I saw your videos about this. If I end up ordering a second for backups, I’ll definitely use the product link from one of your videos.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      222. anyhow, I hope china soon starts to flush the market with cheap but ok-ish ram and flash nand so we finally get affordable huge capacity ssds, would need to consolidate a few dozen hdds ranging from 80GB to 8TB and an old collection of a few hundred cd and dvd /if they are still viable/ all in all about 100TB netto /after wiping redundant and obsolete data about half-ish/ and it would be really nice if I could do it in one tiny compact form factor like asus flashstor with 6or12 m.2 @16TB capacity per drive that should launch any time now or the terramaster with 2or4 U.2 @60TB with prices for endconsumer around or below 30eur per TB independent on scaling, currently you have meh 1TB for around 50eur and up to 8TB it scales up to 650-1050 eur, and the 60TB solidibm U.2 is around 7500 eur
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      224. “Three months of slow progress…”. Let’s give UBNT some credit. Two GA OS releases and five GA application updates in that time frame is not what I’d consider slow.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      225. This is nothing to bank on, but Ubiquiti has a great track record in regards to improving its plattform.
        I bought into Access about year ago, knowing that the new line of devices was brand new and quite limited. It has since been contiunually improved with more features and better reliability.
        I bet that UNAS will be getting a whole lot better in the near future.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      228. I own this device. I got it on January 10 after ordering it on January 2 I did look for the other solutions, which have you all built in Plex but setting it up seemed difficult now I am a tech person, but I did not want to do the set up for that for some reason it seemed too difficult, I remember when I saw that UniFi was coming out with one and I was very happy because I own the dream machine SE and wireless access points so I already have their system and there was pretty easy to set up and I didn’t need a server on my nest because I already had a Mac mini that has Plex which is way more powerful than whatever comes on those other mass systems all I needed to do was to run Plex and you know do my transcoding which it’ll do way better than any of those systems now having it since January 10 I’ve loaded up 3 24TB Seagate iron pro hard drive and everything is working fine. Transferred all my data. I’m keeping my external hard drives for a back up just in case something happens to the Unas pro to me all they need to do is improve on stability of the pool. I don’t need them to add the functionality to do a Plex server or run apps or anything on this thing I just needed to store my media and whatever I want, I’ve already been backing up my Mac computers to it using the Time Machine no problems there mounting the drives or simple with a script, but they also have the UniFi app that you can get for your computer to help with mounting that I am not using that just running a script to when I turn on the computer. It automatically loads all the drives, as for reading and writing speeds I’m getting 600 MB per second or more read and write speeds over my 10 gig SFP plus port, which is more than enough to edit off of which I’ve set up a scratch desk for or record gameplay or whatever I want from my Windows machine to that scratched desk over the network, no problem. which is fantastic for the price in Canada. It was 670 I believe and that was a good deal to me with seven drive base I think all the other options were five sometimes four bases for the same price or more so I’m just still very happy that they decided to come out with this.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      229. I really want one. I may wait until they get a little farther along with fixing those SMB copy errors and filename issues. All I need is pure storage, which this seems pretty perfect for. I already have a Synology DS918+ for running VMs and dockers… it’s a little slow on the network interface, but I can still use it as a backup destination for the UniFi data, where speed is less critical, and let it continue running VMs, and just let UniFi handle the bulk storage. Win-win!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      230. I’ve had mine for about a monte now. It did not start well. I installed 3x 8TB Seagate Ironwolf drives, and then create a single user, a shared drive, and mounted it via NFS on a Linux server. I lettori my backup script to dump about the whole server fs (1Tb or so) overnight. Next morning the nas was stock on requiring reboot, and I had to reset to factory settings and reformat to have it working again… next day, same thing, but this time I had the setup saved, so I did a factory reset but was able to keep the data on the drives. It happened 4 times, and I wrote to the support explaining the problem. They replied the next day, asking if I was backing up symlinks via NFS, and of course I was. That was a bug in drive versions prior to 1.16.15 (which I was able to update to a week later using the preview channel). Using the system with SMB/CIFS in the meantime was a little tricky, as I could not transfer all I needed. Now, with the new version, I am using it without any hitch that I found out. The 1GB Port is saturated by my server at 976 Mbps (but the server also has a 1GB port, so no issue here), and the system has about 1 million files of various sizes, all managed without problem afaik. Only thing I don’t like is the need to use all same size disks and inability to create multiple disk groups.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      231. Finally caught this in stock and it’s delivering today! I’m unsure what size drives to start with. I could go with two 8TB drives or three 4TB drives. What would be the pros and cons? Migrating from a Drobo 5N with different size drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      236. I’ve had my UNAS Pro since the first order bank shipped and I love it. Popped in seven 18TB Seagate refurbished IronWolf Pro drives for 108TB of storage. This is paired with a headless Mac mini and it works beautifully. I’m mostly using this combined system as a Plex server, and Time Machine backups directly to the UNAS Pro. Haven’t powered on the POS Asustor AS6704T since I flawlessly transferred the data over SMB.

        I know I’m not using the UNAS Pro in a professional or high demand setting, but it has been absolutely flawless. As you say, great value for money.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      238. I ran into a really odd issue, that I think is related to RAM/CPU limitations personally. Somehow while transferring all my media from Unraid to the UNAS, all of the folders were made, but then recreated and nested under a single folder about 20 folders into the transfer. NBD easy fix right? Wrong, when trying to transfer those folders and files out the UNAS would not Merge the folders keeping the existing content, nor would it overwrite the existing folders entirely as per the options. I had to use the Keep both option which created a ton of Folder (1) folders and go 1 by for 2000+ folders deleting the old and renaming the folders that contained the actual data. I am not entirely sure the folder Nesting was caused by the UNAS as much as Krusader moving the folders but cleaning the mess up was a rough experience through the UNAS UI. In hindsight, using Windows Explorer may have simplified the process.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      239. I didn’t get it as you could only share entire “Drives” to users. Instead of just sharing specific files or folders. I want it to work like Google Drive. No idea if that has changed. The day this changes, and I get aware of it, is when I’ll buy one.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      243. They should make a compute node that’s a 1u server that runs all the apps and software and connects through the 10g sfp+ port. The node can have multiple sfp+ ports allowing you to link multiple storage pools for larger storage sets while still letting you use a port for 10g internet. This way those who want just storage get it without paying more and you could have more than 1 storage per compute node. Hope this made sense
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      247. I am reviewing this solution as a possible replacement for a Synology NAS with the addition of a NUC or something similar from where I can run some docker containers. But looking at the multitude of problems which people are reporting and basic NAS functionality missing, to me this product just seems to be a skunkworks project, something that was put togheter very fast with some bit of hardware and software that they had at hand, this is not by any means a mature product or one which underwent a serious development process. Ubiquiti is probably dipping its toes in the NAS water to see how it goes, learn from the experience and decide if this could be a new line of business for them or if geting in the NAS world would be too much of a hassle which is not really worth it.
        UBT is making some great networking stuff but I would probably not want to by and early addopter aka. guinea pig even though the NAS has a really tempting price.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      248. i had contact with ubiquity about a problem with .exe files. its still has no support for opening .exe files on my pc. so when i have .exe files in my smb folder, i cant open them on my pc becuase of admin rights. they dont know if this is a feature that will be added later in a update. they know the problem. lets hope they add it later.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      249. I can live with the lack of Protection – they haver the dedicated NVR for that – why cannibalise your own sales but the lack of iSCSI was a deal breaker for me.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      250. The only thing that I would like to see is the ability to modify a backup set after configuring it, from what I’ve been able to find there is no way to modify the backup set
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      251. The UNAS Pro is not exactly out of stock, look at the UNAS Pro as it’s always in stock. It seems that Ubiquiti is putting the NAS on the back burner until either they figure out and fix all its issues or decide to discontinue it altogether. I think the latter is where they will end up, unfortunately. 90-95% of the issues are in fact software-related and their dev team is not versed as well in NAS software as it is in other dev software Ubiquiti uses. With that being said, I see no reason why the NAS software couldn’t be used on the 4-bay NAS or even on other equipment as it is at the heart *nix based.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      253. I just purchased the UNAS and will be deploying it sometime in the next few weeks. Your follow up will certainly keep my expectation grounded in reality. All my appliances run outside the NAS, so some of your concerns won’t be relevant, but the large file migration issues you’ve touched on have certainly given me pause. Many thanks for your exceptional work!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      254. The price is pretty good, but for me anything less reliable than raid6 or raid-z2 is unacceptable. The performance is also lacking. I would easily pay 3 or 4 times the price for an 8 or 8+ bay nas with such features if ubiquiti ever release one.

        Oh, haven’t watched to the end, turns out raid 6 has been implemented, that is a step in the right direction for sure!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      255. Not really surprised by the lack of iSCSI. Do you also want Multi-Pathing iSCSI ?
        There is not enough performance in this appliance. To me it’s a non issue.
        You get what you buy with the CPU/RAM and single 10G interface.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      256. Q./ Can you install TrueNAS or UnRAID on this? Do the lack of RAM expandability make this impractical? Is the BIOS locked or the process of installation is difficult? Thanks for the video, very deep and clear. Love your awesome reviews!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      257. This is a great video! Nuanced, informative and exactly the right time, tech depth for me. Great that you gathered the Reddit replies and added them to your view on the product. Your calm an pleasant way of presenting is the icing on this review cake. This is how a review should be!

        Maybe I’m too praising but I’m sure you can ask someone in the pub to make some funny cynical negative puns.

        As a NAS I almost went to buy it. Most features dont bother me for a basic local 2 user “network storage” its only the unreliability in copying files that is unacceptable as a main storage.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      259. Back to you get what you pay for. Mixed media storage pools, tiering ISCSI support and beefier hardware for virtualization and apps would inevitably drive COST and complexity. Not really a complaint to make on this product. It’s like complaining over missing crystal champagne fluits in your Honda Civic. You should not expect these features on a system at this price point. Storage pools really doesn’t make much sense in an SMB setup for storage without ISCSI. Sure, more backup destinations like iDrive and OneDrive would be great and might be coming, but the logical separation of access to shared folders is enough for SMBs to separate documents from users in my opinion.

        Totally agree on the user folder backups though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      260. I wish I had purchased on the opening day, but I didn’t and missed out. Mine has only been here a week and I’m very happy as it does exactly what I need – storage. I’m using raid 5 and copied data from three smaller desktop NAS drives with zero errors and 100% confidence my data is solid after spot checks. The device is built solidly and because it used existing and proven hardware I don’t have concerns on the physical box. The software is and was my main concern but it looks like Unifi is sorting that out.

        Could there be additional features, absolutely! But I feel this is an excellent solution for the price and would buy it again. I do agree with you on some of the should be there as a default items you listed in the video and feel they are totally realistic for a NAS at this level. I know some people want more, but as a guy who works with this stuff all day for a living, I don’t expect a server, apps or whatnot in a rackmount case at this price point.

        …and the football / soccer screen display bits were funny. I’m not a sports guy but we could probably have a long dueling rant on that topic.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      262. Hmm. So a LOT of the complaints you seem to have gathered are feature requests that were clearly defined as not included when purchased. So i would not quantify them as valid complaints. I mean, look at the product page, clearly see what feature sets are included or not and purchase based on that, it is disingenuous to buy a product that does not list, for example, the inclusion of a USB port, and then complain that it is not available.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      263. Hmm. So a LOT of the complaints you seem to have gathered are feature requests that were clearly defined as not included when purchased. So i would not quantify them as valid complaints. I mean, look at the product page, clearly see what feature sets are included or not and purchase based on that, it is disingenuous to buy a product that does not list, for example, the inclusion of a USB port, and then complain that it is not available.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      267. Raid 6 is not actually available yet. You can get to the option if connected directly, not through the normal unifi consoles access, but it doesn’t work. UI-Team said it scheduled to be released (*Currently*) on Unifi OS 4.2
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      268. Looking forward to your review at the end of 2025. I think you will find that a lot of the things you have mentioned will be addressed by then. I personally do not think that Containers will ever come to the UNAS Pro because of the debacle that occurred with the UDM Pro and Ubiquiti’s move from Containers to Bare Metal for the OS. This was due largely because of all of the Support Calls they received from users trying to add containers to the UDM Pro and “screwing things up”. But I could certainly see things like Active Backup for Business, iSCSI support, multiple pools, and such coming later this year. Right now I am sure they are focused on getting what they have to be very stable and get the current issues (like large file transfers) addressed. Once that is done, then I can see them adding more functionally. Just look at how much the Network application has improved, as well as new features added, now that the UDM Pro and the UDM SE are now both using Bare Metal (a consistent OS, instead of having to maintain two completely different OS systems). I would also point out the expanded lines of hardware in the “Campus”/Enterprise arena where they are making a serious push into the “true” Enterprise space. To be able to compete there, they will need a NAS that can meet business solutions, not necessarily Home Lab users. Therefore, they will make decisions on software updates that will benefit businesses, both large and small.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      269. I’ve had mine for about 1 month. We are a small 5 user company and had been using a Lenovo P320 PC with a couple of big hard drives for file sharing. I have been looking at NAS systems for a couple of years. As I have a complete Ubiquiti network solution at work and home I was happy that the UNAS would suits my needs. And it does exactly. I have 3 identical drives in a raid 5 format which is great and it does file sharing exactly as I need for our business. A perfect solution at a great price. I don’t need it to do anything more. Brilliant device and I’m very pleased with it. I already have an NVR for running our cameras, so don’t need this to run protect. And happy for these two systems to be completely separate.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      272. I really like my unas! I use it for Time Machine back ups. And I SMB to Infuse app on my Apple TV and have a great local media server without having to run a plex server. If I need to stream while I’m away from home, I Teleport in using UniFi vpn and I can then stream from the Infuse app on my iPhone or MacBook.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      276. Was very interested and intended to buy, until my Dream Machine SE completely died out of the blue. It did everything I expected for a little over a year and then paperweighted itself. Non recoverable, no parts to be had, no repair service and tech support sent basically a one-liner that said “Hardware failure”. I couldn’t read the logs, only they could, so I have no idea where to look. What I did see during my research is that there are a bunch of these failures, but you can’t find anything out on the ubiquiti site as to whether they are aware of the problem or changed something to fix it, etc. Not going to get into that eco because of it. The stuff ain’t cheap. They call it enterprise quality, and so I guess if it dies they think of me as an enterprise and I’ll just get another one because I have enterprise money. Also, I don’t look at it as a fluke either because a ton have died in the exact same way, even down to the same message on the screen. No, doubt somebody will jump in and say this isn’t what I should be posting about on this video because it’s not about the UNAS. That’s my point. I never got that far, even though I intended too.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      283. Got mine last week from the biggest onlinestore in Switzerland (probably the only one who got one ????)

        I have done a backup over SMB from my ASUSTOR NAS. Over 1.1TB of pictures (photography) and I had in the Asustor logs looooots of pictures „failing“
        But…… I checked on my UNAS and the pictures were actually there… it actually did the job, but I am not sure why the logs were showing me a ton of pictures that failed the transfer. Did a comparison of the folders and they matched.

        Multiple storagepools would be really nice. I already had 2x 20TB Harddrives and I still have 4x4TB drives I would love to use as a separate pool.
        Right now they are still in my ASUSTOR NAS with Plex running… I would like to have my Linux Server run Plex, but with the storage from my UNAS but I dont really have the knowledge on how to configure that properly. This UNAS is supposed to be my main storage system someday.

        But I have to say, this this even with its shortcomings is a reeeeraaallly good solution for photographers.
        You can share folder with pictures of your clients without a thirdparty ❤ something like wetransfer.
        A fulltime photographer friend of mine actually is also interested in the UNAS because this is the perfect and easy solution.
        I just sent a link to my UNAS to friends because one of them is getting married and they need older pictures of her. Easy! Made a folder with all her pictures. And sent the link.

        A note on the pictures subject:
        The selection of the pictures is STUPID! You do not gave the option to select the pictures you want like in any other app/program. Or I am just stupid or it is not intuitive.

        You have to keep Options or Command button pushed to select more than one.
        Usually when you click into a square to select, you are able to just select more. But no… here you can just select one…? ????

        So yeaaa… needs improvement before I can use it as my main storage system.

        Also, will iSCSI make my life easier to use Plex with my UNAS? Not really there yet in my Networking abilities… but I am on it ????

        Cool Vid btw ???????? thx for the updates.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      284. Its their NVR repurposed for a NAS. Version 2 could be a big jump with memory and an nvme slot for cache. The cpu is scraping the barrel for cost so a containers are a no go. Saturating the 10gbps connection as it is won’t happen.

        I would get one although I have a Synology and use it for the Synology type features. Unifi doesn’t do roadmaps so there’s no reason to wait around for some feature.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      285. Without proper raid6, it’s a hard nope. The system could easily run the more sophisticated raid levels because it’s Linux just like any other nas. I can ignore cache nvram, or expanded system ram for fs virtual buffer caches, and many other features… But raid6 is a huge selling point.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      287. Not having docker containers is a deal breaker for me. I would have bought this device yesterday if unifi had docker support. It would be great to have Plex, emby or jellyfin. A photo app for your own photo library would be nice
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      289. So basically it’s FANTASTIC value for money as a NAS, but owners want… more. Well, they should have paid somebody else for “more”.

        I seriously considered this NAS, but I do want to run VMs and containers on the same box, so I’m going to build my own – but I really appreciated Unifi offered a clean, simple and very affordable solution to network storage.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      290. A NAS that cannot guarantee that files copied over from another computer are all included and without errors is just a waste of money, even though it only costs 499 USD.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      291. Ideas for future models… A 2.5″ version with at least 16 drive bays for an SSD based NAS. Also a hybrid version with both 2.5″ and 3.5″ bays… A NVME version too??
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      293. Love concept of the video. Love the content of the video. Hated the text to speech that was used. It took me out of the experience. Look into using ElevenLabs 🙂 Keep up the good work!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      295. Appreciate the follow up!
        Been considering one, mainly because of 10GBE and the low price.
        Just pure storage is fine, can always use other boxes for containers and stuff.
        But that user having problems with transmission error is truly horrifying. A dedicated storage box that might corrupt files (and also missing several files). No thanks. Just no.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      297. My initial thought on why Ubiquiti doesn’t let you run Protect on the UNAS-Pro is because then the argument would be: why can’t I use my NVR-Pro or NVR as a NAS? Then Ubiquiti would have to support all sorts of situations. It might happen one day, but I think those of us that bought the UNAS-Pro are beta testing it before they’re ready to open it up to the NVR crowd. Oh, that and they want to sell more devices is also another obvious reason.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      298. NFS speeds are horribly slow, unusable. less than a gigabit in linux. Windows 11 also only gets 1 gigabit speeds. Linux over SMB and Windows 10 gets 5/6 gigabit transfers with spinning drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      299. I’ve been on the fence about the UNAS Pro and a larger picture with a Dream Machine SE and some cameras. My finger has been hovering over the buy button for days now, but this morning, the UNAS Pro was actually back in stock. I bought the lot. I think it is the right move, we shall see. Good timing for you to post this video 🙂 Now I just need to pick out some drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      301. Soooo… “football” was originally (still is) called “Association Football” and it was from the association portion where “soccer” was derived.

        Ironically, in England. Where it was called soccer first.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      303. for a pure NAS i agree iSCSI is essential, i don’t think containers are essential on something designed as a pure NAS, and same for the backup options. I am sure this is disappointing to many, i would argue wait until they release a more powerful unit or buy something else – they designed this (rightly or wrongly) as dedicated network attached storage (NAS) not a general purpose server branded as a NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      304. a system with no capacity for nvme to do caching or a faster tier, along with missing iSCSI makes this a fart in the wind. I’ll wait for the Pro max or ProHD version or the v2 refresh.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      305. I really don’t get the desire for containers. Intel mini PCs are such an insanely good value for running apps, and the NAS being dedicated to storage only feels like a better separation of concerns.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      307. I would like to see it add Active Backup for Google. Also a 1U version would be nice at the $300 price point similar to the 1U NVR at the $300 price point.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      308. The performance sucks in many ways. When I copy thousands of small files over to Unas it’s ridiculously slow. I have screen shots showing that to copy over 100GB of small files can take days….!!!! Yes, I have proof. And my rack is all 10gbe connected. But I assume they will get it to be much better eventually as they are new to the whole NAS game.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      310. Had a bit of an issue with mine. Got it all set up and copied all my files across. Then the NAS started saying in the dashboard there was no drives installed. Network shares still worked fine etc. restarted it to try get the drives to show up… Made it worse now it genuinely thinks there are no drives installed. Have contacted Ubiquiti support and they are looking into the logs but not great so far
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      311. I love mine. Right now I mainly use it as a backup to my Synology DS920. I don’t need a device to run dozens of 3rd party apps like the Synology. My only complaint about it is that it is lacking in the area of backups. I wish there was a built in solution to do a NAS to NAS backup from Synology or even PCs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      312. This is almost perfect. No fancy app crap is exactly what I need. However ISCSI and backup is a must and caching and/or tiering via NVME drives. Maybe a UNAS pro max later this year ?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      313. I feel like some of these issues are unreasonable expectations. Ubiquiti is not positioning this product for server/general computing. Unifi devices are designer for simplicity and not being overly complicated. Some of these complaints just don’t really apply to this kind of device. This isn’t a general purpose server with spare compute for ancillary tasks (containers etc…).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      314. Can you make more than one storage pool yet, that’s a big negative imo even at this point. I do like it though and as this could be implemented as a SW update. I dont care about containerisation on nas i dont think they are the bestvproduct for the job i use a mini pc running xcp-ng and a VM with docker/docker swarm for this .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      317. that is how I’ve made my diy nas , 4 x 4 tb SSDs in a raid 5 and a 12 tb hard drive mirror , but saying that with synology you do the same with a SSD and HD mix and write to SSDs the HD will wake up too .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      318. Unifi has the worst customer service ever. Actually scratch that, unifi doesn’t have customer service. Maybe if you pay for it. I’ve been using their equipment for years, installed it at dozens of clients. Once in awhile i had a faulty device but overall was pleased. Until I used their phone. You see, you sign up for a phone number and a phone number is pretty important. You wouldn’t want to just lose your phone number because you know, your credit card expired and you need to put a new credit card number in.

        That’s what happened to me, my credit card expired, no big deal. You would think I would maybe get an email from unify saying that it expired or that they couldn’t charge my account, but I didn’t get any email from them. Realizing my phone wasn’t working, I checked my account and saw that my credit card was expired. So I put a new credit card number in and nothing. My phone still didn’t work, and worse, I didn’t know what to do. So I contacted unify, and I never heard back from them. I went on message boards asking for help, and I never heard back from them. I lost my business’s phone number because my credit card expired. So now I have a phone number that people try to call that goes nowhere, UniFi has harmed my business directly and I recommend no one use their products.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      321. I think the issue is, Software RAID, isn’t enough in 2025 to exist as a product when similar functionality is coming at the same price points, with 10Gbe and 6 drives (some with M.2 hardware), running on Ryzen R1600 or Celeron N95/N100 CPUs, and some potentially with intel/AMD Copilot NPUs.

        There’s also the secondhand NAS market, but 2U racks are a whole other principle. Universal power+PSU, 10Gbe NIC, but no SSD/2.5″ or M.2 cache, or even a M.2 Coral AI Accelerator to add in for Unifi Protect to use, eh.

        Not being able to run a reliable folder sync on NFS/SMB is kind of trashy. I sort of understand why, it’s a prelude to a better product that requires testing. But, it’s an expensive beta-test to participate in, at your own expense. Much like the EV charger or the audio amp, or the door security, or the phones, etc. There are lots of potential Unifi products that need a home.

        But, you really want to think it through as a first design product, that it has to do what it’s labelled for. They made 2009 Thecus NAS units back in the day with better software/hardware, and those would need to be rebooted after 2 weeks at times because the SMB would crash due to 2GB RAM. I get why ‘personal’ drives can’t (encryption, likely) but that’s dysfunctional as noted. Non-Tech people won’t know why their data is gone, or how to manage their own snapshots unless they use Time Machine (sic), and only if it’s configured and regularly kicks in.

        They can run container/VMs to process tasks and run updates, sync states to get identical setups, etc. Including NVR Camera software, rsync, and various prosumer tasks. I don’t expect it to be a Synology clone, but it’s a strange product as is.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      322. Appreciate your video, you alway help in with my final choice lol. Because I fully understand what the Unas is and is not I am okay with its short-coming so to speak. I dont own one yet (since its always sold out) but I am looking forward to getting one. I have the Qnap Nasbook with 5 8TB m.2 drive and the Unas would serve as mostly cold storage in my case and workflow.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      325. My QNAP TS-432XU-RP from 2020 just died ???? and I’m looking for a replacement. I already have a complete Unifi stack. I’m just looking at simply a backup setup to my home desktops. Does this device come with anything like QSYC, if not what might you suggest for supporting backup from Windows PC’S to this device?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      326. The price on that thing is tempted to get for a backup NAS, but my eye is on an HL15. I’m guessing in a year or so they’ll come out with a UNAS Pro Max anyway ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      328. With Protect still not having automatic backups to the UNAS (I shouldn’t ever have to manually select footage to backup, ever), there is no value for me with this product over a synology. Sure the price is nice, but basic nas functions are still broken called out in this video and this product is not ready for prime time. I’m not even concerned about docker containers, I like a NAS to just be a NAS, but basic NAS software is 1/2 baked on this unit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      329. Their products are never in stock. Why would I buy anything from them when they’re never in stock? This is a serious question.

        Looks like a Casio F-91W on your wrist. That’s all the watch that most people need. I say this while owning enough watches that I could wear a different one every day for a year and never repeat.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      330. At least soon (it’s in early access) you can automatically backup Protect footage to the UNAS, sorta like Archive Vault on Synology. But would be amazing if could also run Protect, maybe that will come in a UNAS Pro Max Enterprise Etherlight version
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      331. I noticed drives run hotter in these even in idle versus synology etc, I saw 52C at idle versus 30C for synology in the same room, would love to hear you experience
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      332. Appreciate these follow-up reviews. Sick and tired of reviewers who don’t spend any time with the product and just want to rush a video out to get the ad revenue quickly.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE