Why is 10GbE STILL NOT Everywhere (especially on NAS)?

Last updated on 01 Oct 2025 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 Why are NAS Systems not 10GbE as Standard Right Now?
1.1 Discussing the Issue / Barriers to Manufacturers
1.2 The Solution – How Can 10GbE Be More Accessible?
1.3 Verdict and Conclusion – Buy a 10GbE NAS Now or Wait?
1.4 5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)
1.5 Summary Table
2 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
2.1 Related
2.2 Discover more from NAS Compares

Why are NAS Systems not 10GbE as Standard Right Now?

It is 2025, yet the majority of NAS systems on the market continue to ship with 1GbE or, at best, 2.5GbE networking, leaving many users questioning why 10GbE has not become a standard feature. Over the past decade, the cost of 10GbE networking equipment, including switches, NICs, and adapters, has steadily declined, and the technology has long since moved from being an enterprise-only option into mainstream availability. Home labs, creative professionals, and small businesses are increasingly working with 4K and 8K media, large VM environments, and multi-terabyte datasets, all of which can easily saturate a 1GbE or even 2.5GbE connection. Despite this shift, when browsing the portfolios of Synology, QNAP, Asustor, TerraMaster, or even newer DIY-friendly NAS brands, the entry-level and mid-tier systems remain locked at bandwidth speeds that are already dwarfed by modern SSD arrays and multi-bay RAID configurations.

asdasd

This gap between user expectations and manufacturer offerings has become more striking as affordable consumer motherboards and even some mini-PCs now integrate 5GbE or 10GbE as standard. By contrast, NAS vendors still tend to position 10GbE as a high-end add-on or restrict it to flagship models, often requiring costly proprietary NIC upgrades. For the average buyer, this creates the perception that NAS devices are lagging behind broader networking trends and are artificially constrained to maintain price tiers. The reality is more complex. The question of why 10GbE has not become universal in NAS hardware cannot be answered solely by pointing to falling market prices of controllers and switches. Instead, the explanation lies in a mix of economics, hardware design limitations, CPU lane allocations, and the fact that networking itself is evolving beyond 10GbE into alternatives like 25GbE and USB4. All of these factors together show why the integration of 10GbE into NAS devices remains more complicated than it may first appear.

Discussing the Issue / Barriers to Manufacturers

One of the most persistent barriers to universal 10GbE adoption in NAS systems is the economic reality of how these devices are positioned. Vendors like Synology, QNAP, and Asustor operate in a layered product ecosystem, where each tier is designed to push customers toward more expensive models. Entry-level devices often compete on affordability rather than raw performance, meaning that features like 10GbE are deliberately held back to differentiate mid-range and enterprise systems. The actual bill of materials (BOM) cost for including 10GbE hardware is lower than it was five years ago, but manufacturers still view it as a premium feature that justifies higher price points. By holding 10GbE in reserve for upper tiers, vendors protect their margins, avoid cannibalising sales of more profitable models, and keep upgrade paths clear for customers as their needs grow. This is not simply technical gatekeeping but a conscious market segmentation strategy.

A second, more technical challenge comes from CPU and chipset design. The processors used in affordable NAS devices are almost always low-power embedded models—Intel Celeron, Atom, or entry-level AMD Ryzen Embedded chips—which provide only a limited number of PCIe lanes. These lanes must be distributed across storage controllers, NVMe slots, expansion slots, and network interfaces. Introducing 10GbE requires not only dedicating at least two, and often four, PCIe lanes, but also ensuring that the CPU can handle the higher throughput without becoming the bottleneck. If a vendor reallocates lanes to add 10GbE, they may have to reduce the number of NVMe slots, cut down on SATA ports, or compromise expansion card bandwidth. For many manufacturers, it is simpler to leave 10GbE out of the base design than to risk producing a system that looks good on paper but struggles to deliver in practice.

Beyond lane allocation, there is also the issue of power, thermals, and board layout. 10GbE controllers typically draw more power and generate more heat than 1GbE or 2.5GbE chips. In compact NAS enclosures designed for low-noise operation, this can force more aggressive cooling solutions or tighter thermal management. For brands already working within strict acoustic and energy efficiency limits, especially in home or small office NAS devices, the integration of 10GbE becomes a balancing act between speed and stability. Higher thermal load can also reduce the overall lifespan of components or require larger enclosures, both of which erode the appeal of entry-level systems where buyers expect compact and efficient designs.

Another factor that discourages widespread 10GbE adoption is ecosystem alignment. NAS vendors are keenly aware that a large percentage of their target audience does not yet operate in 10GbE-ready environments. Even though 10GbE switches and NICs are more affordable in 2025, many households and small offices still rely on routers and switches with 1GbE or 2.5GbE uplinks. For these users, the inclusion of 10GbE would have little practical benefit, since the rest of the network infrastructure cannot support it. From the manufacturer’s perspective, bundling 10GbE into a device that will simply be throttled by the customer’s network backbone risks making the feature look pointless, or worse, “non-functional.” As such, 10GbE tends to be reserved for prosumer and enterprise segments, where it is more likely that users already have or are willing to invest in compatible infrastructure.

Finally, there is a subtle but important business factor at play: vendor ecosystems and upsell opportunities. Many NAS brands sell proprietary 10GbE upgrade cards or branded NICs, which can only be used with their systems. By omitting onboard 10GbE but providing expansion slots, vendors create an additional revenue stream while giving customers flexibility to upgrade later. This model also ensures that users who truly require 10GbE end up spending more within the brand’s ecosystem, while casual buyers stick to lower-cost systems that do not overdeliver. In this sense, the absence of 10GbE on affordable NAS units is not only about technical limitations, but also about preserving a staged upgrade model that aligns with each brand’s long-term revenue strategy.

The Solution – How Can 10GbE Be More Accessible?

The landscape for 10GbE networking hardware has improved significantly in the last few years, with controllers becoming cheaper, more efficient, and easier to integrate into consumer systems. Early 10GbE relied heavily on costly Intel or Mellanox chipsets designed primarily for enterprise servers, often priced in the hundreds of dollars per card. Today, vendors such as Realtek, Aquantia (now under Marvell), and Broadcom produce consumer-focused 10GbE controllers that are smaller, run cooler, and consume less power. These newer chipsets are also designed to integrate more smoothly with mainstream CPUs and motherboards, reducing the need for complex PCB layouts. The result has been a marked reduction in the cost of standalone NICs and USB-to-10GbE adapters, which now frequently sell for under $100, making them accessible even for home users experimenting with faster networking.

Even with this progress, manufacturers remain hesitant to make 10GbE a baseline feature across all NAS devices. Part of the reason lies in how modern NAS systems must juggle limited resources. As CPUs have shifted to PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 5, the available bandwidth has increased, but vendors are also using these lanes to expand NVMe storage pools, enable GPU acceleration, or add AI-focused co-processors for surveillance, indexing, or media analysis. In many cases, vendors see greater value in offering more M.2 slots, dual PCIe expansion options, or flexible NIC bays than in permanently dedicating space to 10GbE. This explains why hybrid designs are now common: devices shipping with 2.5GbE or 5GbE onboard, with a dedicated slot for an optional 10GbE card. Such configurations give users a faster-than-gigabit baseline, but also keep upgrade paths open for power users who truly need multi-gigabit networking.

The state of 10GbE is also being influenced by the rapid adoption of adjacent technologies. 2.5GbE has become the de facto standard in new consumer motherboards and mid-tier switches, offering a cheap and widely compatible upgrade path for everyday users who want more than 1GbE without changing their cabling. At the other end of the spectrum, higher-speed networking such as 25GbE or 40GbE is filtering down from data centres to advanced prosumer setups, while direct-connect solutions like Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 offer bandwidth well beyond 10GbE with less CPU overhead and simpler plug-and-play deployment. Software optimisation is also playing a role: modern NAS operating systems increasingly support IP over Thunderbolt or USB4, which provides a parallel path to multi-gigabit performance without the traditional reliance on Ethernet standards. As a result, 10GbE finds itself squeezed in the middle—too expensive to be a no-brainer at the entry level, but increasingly overshadowed by faster alternatives at the top end. It remains a critical sweet spot for small businesses and creative professionals, but its window of dominance is being challenged by the pace of networking innovation.

Verdict and Conclusion – Buy a 10GbE NAS Now or Wait?

The question of why 10GbE has not become a standard feature across NAS devices in 2025 does not have a single answer, but rather a convergence of factors. Manufacturers face technical challenges in CPU lane allocation, thermal management, and system design, while also making deliberate market choices to protect product segmentation and encourage upsell opportunities. At the same time, 10GbE sits in an awkward position within the networking landscape: cheaper and more efficient than ever, yet increasingly bypassed by the widespread adoption of 2.5GbE on the low end and the emergence of 25GbE, Thunderbolt, and USB4 on the high end. For now, this means that 10GbE remains reserved for higher-tier NAS systems where the hardware can genuinely sustain its throughput and where the user base is prepared to invest in compatible infrastructure. While prices will continue to fall and adoption will grow, it is unlikely that every NAS will adopt 10GbE as standard before other technologies begin to replace it as the next performance baseline.

5 affordable Turnkey 10GbE NAS Solutions (Between $499 and $699)

For years, 10GbE networking has been seen as a premium feature reserved for high-end or enterprise-grade NAS devices, often pushing total system costs well beyond the reach of home users and small businesses. However, as controller prices have dropped and demand for faster data transfers has grown, a new wave of affordable NAS solutions has started to appear with built-in 10GbE. These systems no longer require expensive proprietary upgrade cards or third-party NICs, and many sit comfortably below the $699 / £599 price point. They cover a range of use cases, from compact SSD-based NAS devices to rackmount storage appliances and versatile desktop units. Below is a selection of some of the most notable options currently available, each offering a balance of performance, connectivity, and affordability for users who want to move beyond 1GbE or 2.5GbE without breaking the bank.

UniFi UNAS Pro (7-Bay, Rackmount)

I keep coming back to two words for the UniFi UNAS Pro—fundamentals and consistency. UniFi has clearly focused on making this system a strong addition to their ecosystem, prioritizing the essential storage needs of a NAS. They’ve succeeded in this, but comparisons with long-established competitors are inevitable. While solid, reliable, and stable, the UniFi UNAS Pro will take time to be competitive on the software front. If you’re deeply invested in the UniFi ecosystem, you’ll appreciate its ease of use and integration. However, outside of a UniFi network, it may feel feature-light compared to alternatives. The pricing is competitive for a launch product at $499, and while it’s not the best NAS on the market, it’s the most user-friendly and UniFi-ready. It will likely satisfy many users’ needs. I can certainly see this being integrated into existing UniFi networks as a 2nd stage backup alongside their already existing 3rd party NAS solution, with the potential to graduating to their primary storage as Ubiquiti continue to evolve this platform above and beyond the fundamentals their have nailed down in the UNAS Pro system.

  • Approx. Price: $499 / £400

  • Specs: ARM Cortex-A57 quad-core CPU, 8 GB RAM, seven 2.5″/3.5″ SATA bays, 1×10GbE SFP+ and 1×1GbE.

  • Why It Stands Out: Exceptional price-to-performance for pure storage needs. Lacks advanced multimedia or container apps but ideal for high-speed backups in a rackmount setup.

BUILD QUALITY - 10/10
HARDWARE - 7/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.2
PROS
👍🏻Nails down the fundamentals of NAS Storage very well
👍🏻Easy to use GUI and well suited in the UniFi Ecosystem/UX
👍🏻Complete Offline Use is supported
👍🏻Use of a UI account is NOT compulsory
👍🏻Excellently deployed Snapshot Features
👍🏻10GbE out-the-box
👍🏻Open HDD Compatibility, but also 1st party options too
👍🏻Backup and Restoration Options Nailed down perfectly
👍🏻Very power efficient and CPU/, Memory utilization rarely high
👍🏻Compact, Quite and well designed chassis
👍🏻The LCD controls are completely \'different level\' compared to other brands in the market
👍🏻Promised competitive pricing
👍🏻FAST deployment (3-5mins tops)
👍🏻Reactive Storage expandability and easy-to-understand storage failover options
👍🏻Mobile app deployment is intuitive/fast
👍🏻Feels stable, secure and reliable at all times
👍🏻Performance is respectable (considering SATA Bay count and CPU) but also sustained performance is very good
👍🏻Single screen dashboard is clear and intuitive
👍🏻Ditto for the native file explorer
CONS
👎🏻7 Bays is a bit unusual, plus feels like the existing UNVR with different firmware
👎🏻Additional App installation (eg. \'Protect\') not currently supported. So no container support for 3rd party apps
👎🏻Network Controls are limited
👎🏻Works at it\'s best in an existing UniFi managed network, feels a little limited in \'standalone\'
👎🏻Multiple storage pools not supported (nor is RAID 0)
👎🏻Lack of Scheduled On/Off
👎🏻Lack of redundant PSU
👎🏻Only 1 10Gb port and 1x 1GbE, no USBs for expanded storage or an expansion

 

Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 (Compact NVMe NAS)

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

  • Approx. Price: $750 / £600

  • Specs: Intel Celeron N5105, 12×M.2 NVMe slots, single 10GbE port, compact form factor.

  • Notable Traits: High-density SSD storage in a small desktop chassis. Excellent value for SSD-heavy builds.

SOFTWARE - 6/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 10/10
PRICE - 7/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.0
PROS
👍🏻Exceptional Performance: Dual 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and USB 4.0 connectivity deliver fast and reliable data transfer speeds, ideal for 4K editing and collaborative environments.
👍🏻Extensive Storage Options: Supports up to 12 M.2 NVMe SSDs, allowing for large-scale, high-speed storage arrays.
👍🏻ECC Memory Support: Includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 ECC memory (expandable to 64GB), ensuring data integrity for critical applications.
👍🏻Compact Design: Small footprint makes it perfect for workspaces with limited room.
👍🏻Quiet Operation: Dual-fan system keeps noise levels low, even under heavy loads.
👍🏻Flexible Connectivity: Features two USB 4.0 Type-C ports and three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports for direct storage access and peripheral integration.
👍🏻Power Efficiency: Low power consumption (32.2W idle, 56W under load) makes it economical to run, even for 24/7 operation.
👍🏻Thermal Management Enhancements: Dual fans and copper heat pipes efficiently dissipate heat, ensuring stable performance.
👍🏻Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Compatible with platforms like TrueNAS and Unraid for advanced customization.
CONS
👎🏻Mixed PCIe Slot Speeds: Inconsistent PCIe bandwidth across M.2 slots complicates unified RAID configurations.
👎🏻Lack of M.2 Heat Sinks: NVMe slots do not include heat sinks, requiring aftermarket cooling solutions for intensive workloads.
👎🏻No Integrated Graphics: The AMD Ryzen V3C14 processor lacks integrated graphics, limiting hardware transcoding and multimedia capabilities.
👎🏻Steep Price: The 12-bay model’s cost ($1,300–$1,400) and the six-bay version’s lack of ECC memory make them expensive compared to alternatives.

 

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus

BOTTOM LINE – The UGREEN NASYnc DXP4800 Plus does not feel ‘finished’ yet and still needs more time in the over, but UGREEN have been very clear with me that this product is not intended for release and fulfilment till summer 2024 and improvements, optimization and product completion is still in progress. Judging the UGREEN NAS systems, when what we have is a pre-release and pre-crowdfunding sample, was always going to be tough. The DXP4800 PLUS is a very well put-together NAS solution, arriving with a fantastic launching price point (arguably even at its RRP for the hardware on offer). UGREEN has clearly made efforts here to carve out their own style, adding their own aesthetic to the traditional 4-bay server box design that plagues NAS boxes at this scale. Equally, although they are not the first brand to consider Kickstarter/Crowdfunding for launching a new product in the NAS/personal-cloud sector, this is easily one of the most confident entries I have seen yet. The fact that this system arrives on the market primarily as a crowdfunded solution (though almost certainly, if successful, will roll out at traditional retail) is definitely going to give users some pause for thought. Equally, the UGREEN NAS software, still in beta at the time of writing, although very responsive and nailing down the basics, still feels like it needs more work to compete with the bigger boys at Synology and QNAP. Hardware architecture, scalability, and performance are all pretty impressive, though the performance of the Gen 4×4 M.2 NVMe slots didn’t seem to hit the numbers I was expecting. Perhaps a question of PCIe bottlenecking internally, or a need for further tweaking and optimization as the system continues development. Bottom line, with expected software updates to roll out closer to launch and fulfillment, such as an expanded App center and mobile client, the UGREEN DXP4800 Plus is definitely a device worth keeping an eye on in the growing Turnkey and semi-DIY NAS market. As an alternative to public cloud services, this is a no-brainer and worth the entry price point. As an alternative to established Turnkey NAS Solutions, we will hold off judgment till it is publicly released.

  • Approx. Price: $595 / £475

  • Specs: Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (6-thread), 8 GB DDR5, 4×SATA + 2×M.2 slots, 1×10GbE and 1×2.5GbE, plus HDMI, USB-C, USB-A, and SD reader.

  • Why It’s Attractive: Well-rounded design with rich connectivity and media support, undercuts most rivals on price and features.

SOFTWARE - 6/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 6/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 8/10


7.6
PROS
👍🏻Exceptional Hardware for the Price
👍🏻4 HDDs + 2x Gen 4x4 M.2 in 1 box under $400
👍🏻Good Balanced CPU choice in the Pentium Gold 8505
👍🏻10GbE and 2.5GbE as standard
👍🏻An SD Card Slot (wielrd rare!)
👍🏻10/10 Build Quality
👍🏻Great Scalability
👍🏻Fantastic Mobile Application (even vs Synology and QNAP etc)
👍🏻Desktop/Browser GUI shows promise
👍🏻Established Brand entering the NAS Market
👍🏻Not too noisy (comparatively)
👍🏻Very Appealing retail package+accessories
CONS
👎🏻10GbE Performance was underwhelming
👎🏻Crowdfunding choice is confusing
👎🏻Software (still in Beta) is still far from ready 22/3/24
👎🏻non-UGREEN PSU is unexpected
👎🏻

 

TerraMaster F4-424 Max / F6-424 Max

The TerraMaster F4-424 Max is a robust 4-bay NAS system that offers a powerful mix of features and flexibility for a wide range of tasks. Powered by the Intel i5-1235U CPU with 10 cores and 12 threads, the F4-424 Max excels at resource-intensive applications such as Plex media streaming, 4K hardware transcoding, and virtual machine hosting. Its dual M.2 NVMe slots running at PCIe Gen 4 speeds significantly improve storage performance, especially when used for caching, while the two 10GbE ports offer high-speed networking environments, allowing for 20Gbps throughput via link aggregation.

In terms of software, TOS 6 brings notable improvements, although it still lags behind the more polished ecosystems of Synology DSM and QNAP QTS. That said, TerraMaster’s continuous software evolution with each new version of TOS ensures that users have access to more robust tools and security features. For its price point of $899.99, the F4-424 Max is a compelling option for those seeking high-performance NAS solutions with scalability in mind. While the Pro model offers competitive performance, the Max takes it a step further with advanced networking, making it ideal for environments where speed is a priority.

  • Approx. Price: $675 / £550 (F4-424 Max, during sale) – $899 / £700 (F6-424 Max, regular)

  • Specs: Intel Core i5-1235U (10-core), 8 GB RAM, dual 10GbE ports, dual M.2, with 4 or 6 SATA bays depending on model.

  • Why It Helps: The F4-424 Max frequently drops below the $800 mark in promotions, offering unusually strong CPU performance and dual 10GbE at a mid-range price point.

Where to Buy?

Terramaster F4-424 Max ($899 Amazon) – HERETerramaster F4-424 Max ($799 Aliexpress) – HERE

SOFTWARE - 6/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 9/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.2
PROS
👍🏻Powerful Hardware: Intel i5-1235U with 10 cores and 12 threads for resource-heavy tasks.
👍🏻Dual 10GbE Ports: High-speed networking capabilities with link aggregation for up to 20Gbps, ideal for large file transfers.
👍🏻PCIe Gen 4 NVMe Support: Two M.2 NVMe slots offering exceptional performance for caching or additional high-speed storage.
👍🏻Efficient Cooling: The large 120mm fan ensures quiet and effective cooling, making it suitable for home and office environments.
👍🏻Improved TOS 6 Software: Enhancements in GUI, backup tools, and overall security bring TOS closer to its competitors.
CONS
👎🏻Higher Price Tag: At $899.99, it’s more expensive than TerraMaster’s other models, which may deter budget-conscious buyers.
👎🏻No PCIe Expansion: Lack of a PCIe slot limits potential for future upgrades, such as adding 10GbE cards or more M.2 drives.
👎🏻Presentation: The software has improved a lot, but still feels inconsistent in places compared with alternatives from brands such as Synology and QNAP.

 

Summary Table

 

Model 10GbE Ports Price (USD) Under $800? Highlights
UniFi UNAS Pro 1×10GbE SFP+ ~$499 Yes Rackmount, high bay count, pure storage
Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 1×10GbE ~$750 Yes 12×M.2 NVMe, SSD-focused design
UGREEN DXP4800 Plus 1×10GbE + 1×2.5GbE ~$595 Yes Versatile ports, compact and affordable
QNAP TS-332X 1×10GbE SFP+ ~$600–700 Yes Entry-level 10GbE desktop NAS
TerraMaster F4-424 Max 2×10GbE ~$675 (sale) Yes Strong CPU, 4-bay, Plex-friendly
TerraMaster F6-424 Max 2×10GbE ~$899 No 6-bay version, exceeds budget

 

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      Discover more from NAS Compares

      Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      172 thoughts on “Why is 10GbE STILL NOT Everywhere (especially on NAS)?”

      3. People keep talking about the hardware being too expensive but gloss over one big reason. IMO the biggest issue for 10gb adoption (which drives down price) is infrastructure. Ive worked in IT for decades in the SMB market and none of my clients are even remotely on 10GB. The biggest reason is moving to that speed would require re-wiring the entire office. Upgrading all the wiring in the building to something like cat7 is very expensive, especially when its a retrofit vs during a new office build out. Until regular businesses start adopting it at scale, there will not be the economies of scale that drive prices down.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. I just got 10gbe for my diy nas and desktop, and I’m just reaching 4Gbps over smb. I had to turn off encryption and signing on the samba server to reach that speed because I ran into single threaded performance issues on my ancient xeon.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      7. Lanes I can understand, but oomf is overrated. Compare n100 vs v1500b. Similar oomf, but 9 vs 16 pcie lanes. (disclaimer. This is oversimplified, so check the chip cpecs for details) As a simple storage device, a low power cpu with enough lanes is enough for 10gbe throughput based on my experience. I would prefer a low power cpu for longterm usage over a i3 or i5. But it must have enough lanes and be sufficiently powerful.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. Most people don’t need it, its increased per-port power and cost. Heck, lots of non-geek households are mostly if not entirely wireless these days. Neither of my sisters have wired Ethernet devices, they just use their ISP’s wireless gateway-modem as-is. Most of my friends only have wireless devices too.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. I think the question is more why don’t we have more (affordable) 10gbe switches. If you have the switches, the devices will follow. At this time why put a 10gbe port on a nas when hardly any home user can reach those network speeds. Yes there are smaller 10gbe switches but many nas users (by definition) will be running larger networks. I’ve wired my home with cat 6 but I can only (reasonably) find affordable 2.5gbe 24 port switches.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. ”Little note to add, the exception to SATA drives that can actually hit the cap of 10GbE will be data centre sata drives, but not a lot of people will be putting those in their home raids either, so that’s basically moot”.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. I think 10gbe will arriving consumer NAS and mainboards next year when the new cheap and low energy realtek RTL8127 chip they announced this spring is really available.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. Ryzen Embedded 8840U or Ryzen Embedded 8640U.
        Checks all the boxes: TDP can be configured between 15 – 30 watts. 6 – 8 cores with SMT from 3.3 to 5.1 ghz. Dual channel ddr5 with ecc support. Beefy integrated grapics (for a NAS). 20 pcie gen 4 lanes (4x nvme + 8x general purpose + 8x dgpu). USB 4, usb 3.2, usb 3.0. And even a 16 tops NPU.
        That would perfectly fill the gap.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      22. Question: Is 10GBe backwards compatible to 2.5Gbit? My network is 2.5Gbit, and I keep seeing cases where 10Gbit is not compatible. That results in a concern and a barrier of entry for me.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. Because for most people 10Gbe is a frivolous “nice to have”, not a necessity. My entire network is still 1Gbe and apart from occasionally having to wait a few minutes when copying a multi-GB file, it is more than adequate for the task. Removing the inconvenience of occasionally having to wait is not worth the price of upgrading.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      24. Thank you for posting – so basically if a NAS only has 2.5GbE, the manufacturer is basically telling you that the unit will not support 10GbE throughput so there is no reason to have the network interface to begin with.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. 10Gbit NAS -> means you also have/need 10Gbit capable router/switch and then pc/notebook with adapter. Yes, also all NVMe SSD NAS, HDD will not do it. That’s my understanding. Considering I do not want to shell out on all NVMe NAS, I do not see the need for 10Gbit NAS, so 1Gbit-to-2.5Gbit is enough for my daily use case. If you move/use gigs of data daily, investing in 10Gbit all setup makes very much sense. I am currently in the process of upgrading my DS223, have been using Synology for decade+, to Aosstar WTR Pro 5825U and install Xpe…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. I think 10gbe just doesnt have much use in a home setup. Switches are expensive. And most home networks have various other bottlenecks limiting the potential gains
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. The one true reason is that 1gb internet is the wide spread norm and the price sweet spot. Until that changes its only the nerds who will run faster home setups as the 99% are just using a router and an internet connection. Tried to get my HOA to invest in 10gb connection – would be around 150$ pr unit to install. Just not happening…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      30. Not a lot of homes are wired for 10gbe. To upgrade my home with dozens of cat8 cables wired throughout I needed to hire an electrician. He had to fish all the wires and install the wall outlets. That’s only the first thing: the steps require a router with 10gbe (or 2 for mesh setups) and a bunch of 10gbe switches. Next is having a NAS and computer with 10gbe LAN ports. Last is subscribing to an ISP that can provide Internet close to 10gbe (mine is 8gbe up and down). All these things put together are expensive.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      31. My guess is dongles are massive and expensive, so not accessable for laptop.
        Nas’s also needs more than 4 drives to come closes to 10gbe speeds, and most are 4.

        I feel like 5gbe should be common though as the dogles are small and cheap, and a lower drive limit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      34. The power consumption of a 10Gb/s connection increases as follows: DAC, fiber, Ethernet over copper. Managing system power consumption requires a NAS with a SFP+ port.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. Thanks for mentioning IP over TB4.. was wondering if I am the only one wanting it. Even 10gbe wouldn’t really do much. But if I could get a direct TB4 for my main machine, my other clients would be even fine with a 1Gbe NIC. Not sure if there are so many users who need multiple clients with fast throughput
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. The other reason(s) I think they may be reluctant is… Very similarly to the difference between binary and decimal measurements. The data rates between nodes are typically far less than one might expect.
        My 1GBe connection really get close to that thresh hold. B.U.T.
        My 10GBe connections between my computers or between my computer and my Synology 10GBe is no where near the expected.
        If I run a test…(using black magic speed test) is right up there about 9GBe Not exactly 10 but ok close enough.
        But my real world speeds (like transferring a 50GB mkv file) are much closer to 4.5GBe (and yes I have set jumbo packets to 9014)

        (and yes I have swapped out all my cables for CAT8 and tried a cheap 10GB switch and then upgraded to a managed significantly more expensive switch. and all cable lengths under 10 feet)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      40. What’s the use case for 10GbE at home that justifies the significant investment in a 10GbE LAN? There isn’t one and that’s why it’s not everywhere. The price point for 2.5GbE is quite good, that’s where those that need a bit more performance are going right now.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. 10gig is impossible for 99% of the users. SO you use 10gb switches and computers whoopie.. I understand why synology doesn’t push it, OLD hardware …hell they got another ferrari payment
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. Synology are the biggest culprits of this due to their money hungry practice thats been going on for years
        Other brands have proven they can supply better hardware for cheaper prices than synology. RIP Synology you money hungry muppets
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      44. Ya know, I remember back around 2008 my brother and I got a new Dell PC and it had Gigabit ethernet. What I find more fascinating is not so much why everything isn’t 10gig now, but how after all this time, 1gig is still so adequate for the majority of users. I love my 2.5gig and I’m sure 10gig would be sweet. But I don’t make money with my NAS and I’m just not throwing large amounts of data around often enough that I can’t just tab over to a different page for the extra minute a transfer might take.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      45. When you first get 10GbE installed and notice that LAN throughput is faster than the C: drive on most clients, it makes you reconsider the point of local drives at all.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      46. My homebuilt homelab NAS has a 64 lane configuration from a pair of fast Xeons. It has 8 off 10GbE RJ45 ports. It has capacity to support 8 off SAS3 drives and 16 off M2. Cost about £500 [ PLUS DRIVES OF COURSE ]. I get about 8.5 GbE throughput consistently under moderate load – which is all it ever gets. Its currently got tiered RAM -> M2-> SAS3 storage of 96TB.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. Managed 10GbE switches are still insanely expensive. All of the UniFi and Omada stuff is $300 and up.
        Yes, there are cheap unmanaged switches, but I want network visibility and VLANs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      51. Pci-e 5.0 X1 slot is good for 25gbe (actually about 32gbe but Sfp28 is 25gbe so that’s the limiting factor I think), 6.0 X1 slot would be good for 40gbe via qsfp+ but really we just should go straight to qsfp28 100gb with a 4x/2x interface (5.0/6.0). We just need power and switching equipment pricing to not be totally insane. Samsung’s recent controller in once of their SSDs has a 4x/2x 4.0/5.0 arrangement and it would be good to see more of that happening on expansion cards.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      52. Fantastic video and well explained. Grok or other AI’s are useful to help explain where the bottlenecks in speed are with any system a consumer is looking at purchasing or upgrading. Prevents you being ripped off by dubious marketing promising unrealistic data transfers with brand new NAS boxes that actually contain old gen equipment. Just plug in all the specs and ask the question. I added cheap second hand 10Gb/s cards to an old QNAP and TrueNAs server (after upgrading my network to 10 from 1) and noticed little difference. Still it was worth proving all this myself. Then there is the issue of why HDD are still around (which you explained recently in another excellent video) and the limitations of read write speed to those… I am only getting up to around 240Mb/sec on data transfers even with the new 10 Gb/s cards because of SATA/HDD limitations anyway…. Cheers
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      54. 10:08 to 10: 11 for the US or others the world “Knicker” can also be used as an expression for UK money…like quid, a monkey, a ton. So 200 knicker means £200 or $200 ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      55. Well…the biggest problem is, that most people use laptops, and on laptops 10Gbps is not mainstream yet. And people that use pc’s have the option to install a lot of hard drives locally. So I guess most Nas users rather have a lower end cpu that uses less power. Because they don’t have a need for 10 GbE. But yeah: for enthusiasts like me that’s a shame.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      56. Um, because 10gb everything is still expensive and doesn’t actually have benefits for a large amount of people? 1gb still saturates the Nas, and I only have 600mbps Internet, I have zero need to spend money upgrading for no actual benefit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      60. I’d love 10GbE on the NAS, however my bottleneck would then become the 48 port, Level 3, 1GbE switch in the house.
        Once/if a L3 48 port 10GbE switch becomes affordable, I’ll happily populate the rest of the network with 10GbE devices via expansions slots, replacement NICs, etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      61. I’d love 10GbE on the NAS, however my bottleneck would then become the 48 port, Level 3, 1GbE switch in the house.
        Once/if a L3 48 port 10GbE switch becomes affordable, I’ll happily populate the rest of the network with 10GbE devices via expansions slots, replacement NICs, etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      62. I’d love 10GbE on the NAS, however my bottleneck would then become the 48 port, Level 3, 1GbE switch in the house.
        Once/if a L3 48 port 10GbE switch becomes affordable, I’ll happily populate the rest of the network with 10GbE devices via expansions slots, replacement NICs, etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      86. TrueNas running on ancient Xeon E3-1240 can easily saturate 10GbE link with eight disk RAID-Z3 array (5-3). Any number of M.2 NAS box without 10GbE is really really stupid. The future is two lane PCIe 5.0 40G QSFP+ connections and switches. If Thunderbolt/USB 4 ever gets suitable switches, routers, and cabling the costs will be very very high. 40G QSFP+ is affordable for video editors now.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      87. Both of your points, lack of PCIe lanes and the lack of CPU umph is what a lot of people don’t understand. You did a great explanation, thanks, now I know where to point people ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      89. There in my opinion is one unusual scenario when one can benefit with 10gbe using only sata harddisks and low cpu hardware. I have jellyfin/NAS server based on gmktec nucbox g5, partly dissembled in order to use m.2 pcies CPU is n97 – 9 lines. And i have similar system for offsite backup. Regularly i mirror first to second. My 8 hard disks, which are not in any RAID, just standalone and have speed reads from 150 to 250mb/s (different disk sizes), if read simultaneously, can output up to 1gbs and even more. The same is with writing on the offsite side. For now I only have 2 m.2 pcie, one for OS, one for SATA adapter in each system, so i am limited to 5gbe usb to nic adapter speeds (even so usb is 3.2 and supports 10gbe in each system). So i do plan to move my OS to one of the NAS disks and to use the second m.2 pcie for 10 gbe adapters.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      90. Wi-Fi 7 is just only 4Gbps … so 10 Gig is ONLY when u have multiple devices connected to one router and switch …. for home WiFi 7 or even WiFi 6E is completely enough …
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      94. I recently procured an MS-A2 and decked it with 128GB of RAM to boot. But, ironically, only one of its SFP+ NIC ports will ever get used, with the other three ports just sitting there, twiddling their thumbs. Surely it must be realistic for a DIY NAS that has no NICs actually hardwired in, but with the design to provide the flexibility of allowing the buyer to have the exact amount of ports present for their deployment scenarios.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      97. N100 is powerful enough for 10GbE consistent performance though. You have the ram bandwidth and even cpu power of the NIC is good enough. Just a reminder – on server market 10G was common in core2 era with 2-4 core server cpus being common, and n100 is faster per core than core2 was.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      98. I see some being happy with 1gbe network connection for their home network. I guess they don’t have many connected devices, tv, fridges, cellphones, tablets, laptops, backup devices, ect, let alone a spouse/partner or multiple children utilizing the network simultaneously. The average home setup usually has all of the wired or wireless connections feeding into a single connection to the ISP modem as well. Bottleneck anyone? With respect to a NAS using “slower” hard drives, all respectable modern NAS or NAS software allow the inclusion of a much faster NVME based Cache drive speeding up either writes of reads significantly. IMHO, 10gbe is something that in even an active household the user doesn’t realize what they were missing until they actually have it. Of course the implementation would have to be correct.

        In my setup, and I would guess many others are similar, there are I have a 4gb NVME based storage pool on my diy NAS, Melannox 10Gbe nic, used to store the most frequently accessed HD video and audio files which at times have 4 or more users accessing at the same time on multiple devices. This pool alone can saturate a 10Gbe network during heavy use. My 10gbe network, is also hard wired to 2 additional pc’s, each with 10Bge nics, one a multi use workstation and the other my Linux/Video editing station where video files are edited right off the NAS. All the connected PC’s and laptops are setup to run backups frequently throughout the week. As for wireless 75% of the devices using the wireless network are Wifi 7 capable connecting through Asus BT10 mesh devices with a 10Gbe wired backhaul.

        All this to say , I and the family, see a definite difference when moving to a 10Gbe network making sure all the right pieces were in place. I don’t think our home environment is all that different from many. I have helped a number of friends upgrade their networks to 10Gbe and 100% have noticed a definite improvement. You may not know you need it, until you have it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      102. Just face it, no plebeians like me going to prepare for 10gbe connection, let alone 2.5gbe, if 1gbe alone is enough. I’d rather have robust software on top of longer software support than useless overpowered device I wouldn’t take advantage of. Not that I support Synology practice in testing the water with HDD DRM though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      103. The Lincstation N2 with a messily N100 has no issues saturating 10GB and can sustain it with large file transfers. Allocating more than one lane to a m.2 slot when the majority of users will raid them all together is not an efficient allocation of bandwidth.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      105. It doesn’t answer though why they can’t do 5GBE? 10GBE switch are cheap now and multi-speed. If device has 5GBE port I feel a 4 bay NAS can potentially take advantage of it over a 2.5GBE port?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      106. Today did my first 10gbit based around SFP+, using mikrotik swithes, intel NICs, DAC cables, and some optical SM LC duplex cables,… love it and how everything just works, but I understand why its not wide spread.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      108. As a home user, 2.5 GbE is sufficient for me. I avoid 10 GbE devices due to power consumption and heat generation. I keep all my gear in an IKEA cabinet with active cooling and the temperature is manageable with a cable modem, UniFi cloud gateway, switches, NAS, and UPS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      110. My guess is that at least part of the equation is because the NAS is the end of the line in your network. PC -> Old Cat5 or Wifi -> Switch – > Router -> NAS. So, the NAS makers are asking why they should add 10 Gbe until the other bits of the network are available with 10 Gbe first at a reasonable price.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      114. I don’t know if it’s that important for everyone. If you’re using it as a cold storage probably not worth investing in the whole infrastructure as 10Gb on your PC, 10Gb switch and 10Gb NAS while hight class pcs come with 2.5G and unifi 2.5g switch costs $49. For processing photos and editing video I have all of that on the SSD on my PC anyway, and 10GB ethernet won’t worth the upgrade (yet).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      115. I´d guess because it´s only relevant for enterprise level and 10GbE Switches are still pretty expensive, especially when it comes to 8 port+. I´m running two Netgear 2,5GbE 8-port Switches that were affordable, but still 10 times the price of their 1GbE coutnerpart. At least for me, 2,5GbE is fast enough and will be for the foreseeable future, as it pretty much matches the maximum speed of HDDs. I´m doing photography with raw images and run a jellyfin mediaserver. Not too demanding regarding network bandwith though, but still…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      117. GREED!! we went from 10 to 100 to 1000 to 10000 but then greed kicked in and they went BACKWARDS to 2500 and 5000 mbps.. THIS is why 10Gbps was delayed…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      119. I have no idea who needs 10gbit at home. I believe even YouTubers, who always edit their videos, are pretty fine with 1 gbit, while telling us that “I’ve upgraded my home network to 10gbit and I’m happy” that everything works as it did before” ????
        And professional companies have access to 10gbit devices easily
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      121. Quite disappionting to me. I hoped, I could move from Synology to Terramaster but as I see, Terramaster TOS has NO option at all for data security features like Volume/Folder Encryption!?! How on earth..? _(°°.)_/
        Yes, I could install an other OS like TrueNAS, but then I would loose the greatest advantage of Terramaster – the TRAID option like the Synology SHR. Because if the space is getting short, I would not like to buy ALL drives new and bigger to get more volume space.*

        Is there any other NAS provider or OS out there, that gives me both – flexible RAIDs AND Volume/Folder Encryption …without “dongle”ing me to ‘their certified’ harddrives like Synology?

        * Besides, that’s why I don’t agree with You over the 4bay as a better option. 2 free bays for a hundret bucks are MUCH cheaper (especially in TRAID) while using an older already existing hdd in a free slot, than buying one or more bigger hdd (at least two if there is no already unused TRAID space available) to expand volume space!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      122. Sadly there are only F6-424 MAX reviews available. No reviews of the MUCH cheaper F6-424. Admitted – It has a weaker processor and all that stuff, but it’s about half the price of the MAX version. Certainly for people with a tight budget that look for a cheaper storage device it should be very interesting.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      123. Awesome video—really appreciate you putting this together! I’m only considering TerraMaster because of the Hybrid RAID option. Mixing drives is such a useful feature. That said, I’m a bit let down that the Pro version doesn’t include a 14th-gen i5 or i7. I totally get having an entry-level and a high-end model, but the high-end should feel like overkill—in a good way.

        QNAP seems to be getting it. Synology still doesn’t. TerraMaster is close, but not quite there yet… though I do see some solid progress. Just beef up the CPU to an i7 that would be great in my opinion.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      124. I have been running my F6 424 MAX a month now and I must say it’s an excellent little box. I haven’t even bothered trying the stock OS. I bought it to run TrueNAS Scale, and so it does. Took ten minutes to set up and has been running flawlessly since. I upgraded the RAM to 64 GB and the M.2 slots I use for read and write caching. Unfortunately that leaves me without a drive for the OS, so I have a Samsung T7 drive dingling outside, which doesn’t look too good. I might try do something about that some year. I did consider building my own NAS from parts, but after adding together all pieces needed, there isn’t very much to save, and it will end up with a bigger box. There’s pros and cons with both, but I am really happy. In fact, to the extent I bought another of their boxes – a plain F4 424 to use as a backup for the big one. I run mirrored vdevs (“RAID10”) in a 3×2 configuration of 16 TB each in the main box, and 2×2 of 24 TB in the backup, adding up to the same amount of storage. The total sum left some holes in the pocket, but this is a great start to get rid of the cloud services.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      127. I need help with this. I just got this 3 days ago and I am STRUGGLING to find ANY solution to get write speeds over 80mb/s
        Raid-0 is supposed to be # of drives times write speed, so 2 Ironwolf 22tb drives should give me write speeds of 400 mbps.
        I am connected to a gigabit lan hub with an appropriate RJ45 (both from PC and from the hub to the terramaster).

        Forums have been obtuse, unhelpful and downright insulting, and not finding any clear information on websearches either.
        I’m new with raid things, so maybe there’s a trick for performance. I am expecting 4 more 22tb drives shortly and planning Raid-10, normally this should give me a 50% increase on current raid-0 with 2 drives.

        But if anyone as good tricks to kick the speed up, let me know. I find 80mb/s aggravating as a write speed.
        Any help appreciated, as I am not impressed so far.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      129. New to the nas world.

        Thinking of getting this but watching videos when adding drives it asked to wipe them.

        I plan to add 2 drives at first filled with movies I don’t want to lose them.

        Will this be the case?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      133. Any chance you have or will try TrueNAS Scale, to determine drive availability & or support for the Network adapters, USB support, maybe Video Drivers for the HDMI etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      134. One thing about DDR5, it does have on chip ECC, so it is somewhat better than non-ECC DDR4. They definitely missed the boat on Thunderbolt 4. the CPU and BIOS even support Thunderbolt 4, even if they raised the price $100, they would have had a price point catagory killer.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      135. I own the F6-424 non Max with the N97 processor running TrueNAS. I am satisfied with it and the price was excellent. I believe if Aoostar offered their WTR Pro with 6 bays, they’d charge a similar enough price.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      137. Read the official forums before buying it. The bios is locked, they support the devices only for 2 years. And this particular model is made of thin plastic with lots of ugly supports on the inside. Not the quality for the price
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      139. Highly recommend this NAS, great hardware at a small & quiet form factor. I haven’t used the TOS software, I immediately booted using Unraid instead which I also recommend. I run Plex (with impressive transcoding leveraging the integrated graphics of this Intel CPU), HomeAssistant, etc, this thing can handle it without breaking a sweat. Synology seems to be moving away from Intel CPUs, from a hardware spec perspective at this form factor size I think this is the best option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      146. I’d always like built for use NAS, but so much more expensive than my pc nas build… not sure if the power savings will make up the difference very quickly.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      147. Using a f4 pro with n305. Just for exploring all i am learning:
        Installed proxmox and indeed using the hdmi for a mate-desktop over it.
        Only downside, It has 2 different raid-controllers (2×2) so use virtual truenas with 2 zfs-pools.
        So far a really good allrounder for learning. Speed is not that important at moment and later-on will probably end up with truenas baremetal or Tos for only NAS. Curious how those raid-controllers will function.
        As substitute for a self-made, time wasting N305-motherboard with all it’s pittfalls (also raid 5+1 , nvme shared with Pci-slots) this Terramaster works great so far.
        Will probably use this as backup NAS in future and end up with a P520 to go a step up with more horsepower.
        Great videos Rob (every July being attacked by seagulls when putting clothes to dry) greetings from Spain.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      148. im very very close to getting their new 12 bay unit because of synology dragging their feet and hybrid raid being so important to me, im just worried about software glitches/security holes, this is the only thing im worried about
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      150. I think, I might be the target audience of that NAS and maybe can help some others decide:
        TL;DR: If you can afford it, like a pre-built solution for a NAS, have no need for virtualization on a NAS and have a reliability over features mindset, you might want to buy it.

        I bought this NAS some months ago and can say that most of the negative points were a positive for me:
        – 6 instead of 4 bays for 100 is fine for me and most other vendors ask for more for that upgrade
        – The “old” CPU was the main reason I chose Terramaster and not some other vendor, since it is still a series where Intel had no degradation issues
        – Intel was chosen should I decide in the future to re-purpose it as a jellyfin server for transcoding
        – The HDMI port is exactly what it should be (for me) on a device like this: a console (for TrueNAS in my case) and nothing else.

        The other two negatives I can kinda agree with or at least am ambivalent about. Yes, I upgraded to 64GB of RAM just to be on the safe side and hate to waste a perfecctly fine 8GB stick. For me, and I can only speak for me, this is a good solution. As an IT guy, I don’t like to combine too many features in one device – especially a NAS – and for that this device is kinda perfect. I have old HP Microservers with TrueNAS on them running for about 10 years now – with Intel G2020T and AMD N40L. And they do what they are there for: Being NASs. Reliability over features. And I hope this NAS will do the same and give me 10 years plus of storage service. If you want an all-in-one device, the newer ASUS or UGREEN stuff might be more interesting for you.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      151. Purchased the F4-424 Pro 16gb last week for £471 (20% off voucher) on Amazon, wasn’t impressed with TOS so threw Unraid on it… brilliant little nas now.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      153. I am currently torn between the F4-424 and building my own NAS, and your 5 Reasons Not To are very helpful. I may end up spending a little more, but I think now I’m edging towards having a newer CPU and USB 4.0 connectivity. Terramaster produce great compact NAS at an affordable price, but for my tinkering I think I prefer the old school rack storage case with my own choice of (upgradable) CPU and motherboard in the back. It will cost me more power and space, but I’m okay with that – others mileage may vary.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      155. @nascompares Aside from the upcoming N5 Pro, which OEM nas system offers a more modern cpu (not an N-series chip) with an Intel iGPU for Plex/Jellyfin for a similar price?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      156. Subtitle keeps translating the product as ‘Terror ‘Master’ . Must mean that if you are worried about storage, this device will sooth your worries.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      157. It looks nice, and it should be a call for Synology. QNAP has the QNAP TS-h973AX with 10gbit, it has far less CPU but more bays and with 8GB is a little bit cheaper. The QNAP also is not built by a company that has a review board of the CCP inside the company having the last call about every single decision made. The QNAP also supports two U.2 bays and has a fall better OS. synology has the Synology DiskStation DS1621+ has less RAM and one has to add the 10gbit ethernet.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      158. it just seems like the Unas and installing your own OS on it may be the best all the road if you wish to stay away from Synlogy. The hardware on that Ugreen is just awesome. Terramaster seems like it as well. .. Hmm decisions, decisions.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      159. Thank you for a good preview of this Terramaster NAS. I got this for about a week ago after some comparing between different Synology as I had 213j and 718p before. I got mine from Amazon and did not see the difference in price between the k4 and 6 bay that big but I would rather prefer to have an option to have it without memory. That 4GB usb memory have I removed because I choose to install Truenas scale on it. Must say as a user of Synology so it very different and not that easy to get everything to work as I’m used to on the Synology 718+

        I think Truenas have made a good open system with decent hardware. Would have been nice to be able to use ECC memory but that is as I understand it only available on AMD based system.

        Dust filter have been good to have but I haven’t seen any NAS with that future.

        Don’t remember the name of the YouTube channel but there is one guy who is part L1 tech that used this Terramaster with 2 pics of 48GB memory to a total of 96GB of memory. Might be overkill but I might test it if I see someone else report successes on that. To much ain’t enough ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      160. BeWare of TOS. Unless you are about to Unraid it or sth, its useless as TOS is totally unreliable. Otherwise is very good hardware with supremly bad software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      162. Initially it looks great *but* that CPU represents a huge red flag, it’s age plus the limit of 64GB when more modern CPS give 192GB? Not good. I can understand why but this more of a Plus than a Max model compare to the standard. You gain 64GB vs 32 GB, 2 x 10 Gb vs 2 x 2.5Gb and 2 x PCIe 4 x4 vs 2 x PCIe 3 x1 plus more cores, with the problem that you can really use them. (VMs limited by memory)
        If they did a barebones 14th gen with an extra 2 x 2.5 SATA bays, for boot OS it becomes a real game changer
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      165. Many thanks for this vid, Rob. I’ve been looking at buying this as I’m upgrading my network to 10gbe, so need a NAS with 10gbe capability, and this fits my needs perfectly. I just need to find a vid on migrating Plex settings from one NASto another ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      167. i have the f2 424, best dual-bay nas that i’ve ever had, a beast; (and technically is 4 slot, cause of the 2 nvme); this have even a better cpu so, ANOTHER BEAST.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      168. I have problems with the price, the old processor, lack of ram, and that it os made in China. Makes me worry they built in a backdoor for hacking by the ccp. I am looking at building my own server rack nas using a 14th gen intel processor.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE