Official UniFi U-NAS NAS Drive Leaked

Is Ubiquiti Launching a UniFi NAS in 2024?

YES THEY ARE – Update, the UniFi UNAS Pro is now LIVE, and I have made my review HERE on YOuTube and HERE on the NASCompares website.

Alternatively, you can find more resources and comparisons on the UniFi UNAS Pro in the links below:

  • Official UniFi UNAS Pro Page – HERE
  • The UniFi UNAS Pro NAS Review HERE
  • UNAS Pro NAS. SHOULD YOU BUY? HERE
  • Synology vs UniFi UNAS Pro Comparison HERE
  • QNAP vs UniFi UNAS Pro HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro. FIRST TIME SETUP GUIDE HERE

UniFI UNAS Pro Videos Coming Soon:

  • Synology vs UniFi UNAS Pro HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro, PROS and CONS HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro VS QNAP NAS HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro NAS – BIG REVIEW HERE
  • UniFi UNAS Pro. COMPLETE SETUP GUIDE HERE
  • The PROs and CONs of UniFi Networking (in 2024/2025) HERE

Back to the Original Article:

*clicks fingers* And JUST like that, it looks like we might FINALLY be seeing a UniFi NAS system! I have been in and around the world of storage for well close to 2 decades and in that time I say seen a lot of things. One consistent name in network technology that has been a mainstay of the prosumer and business landscape that want pure ‘Easy to Setup and Forget’ tech that you can trust has been Ubiquiti and their UniFi series of devices. Yet, with such an extensive range of network hardware and software solutions, the brand has never pushed forward with their own 1st party NAS server… until now it appears! UniFi has always supported the likes of Synology and QNAP NAS systems in their network architecture, but many of those deep in the UniFi landscape have requested something proprietary, something uniform and ultimately something streamlined in a way that is largely the USP of UniFi. Numerously pieces of information (ranging from compatibility listings, to product docs and references on companion media) have bubbled to the surface in the last month or so that seem to indicate that not only that a UniFi NAS is ‘a thing’, but also that the brand is jumping in with both feet – launching 10GbE equipped, quad-core, desktop and rackmount solutions which are truly native to the UniFi ecosystem. So, let’s discuss everything we have learnt, whether this is all legit, how it compares with the current NAS status quo and ultimately – would a UniFi NAS be a good idea?

What is UniFi and Who Are Ubiquiti (just in case you want to be up to speed)?

As massively unlikely as it is that anyone reading this is unaware of what UniFi is, just to play it safe, here goes! UniFi is a range of network equipment and related solutions developed by Ubiquiti, which targets large businesses, but has nonetheless become popular with prosumers and home users, as they offer enterprise-grade products with no licensing fees. The UniFi range includes high-performance Wi-Fi access points, switches, firewalls, and routers which are formulated to offer a strong and flexible networking solution. These devices come with features such as network routing, firewall capabilities and network VPN to allow for efficient network operations. Furthermore, UniFi provides Network Video Recorder (NVR) and high definition cameras for UniFi Protect video surveillance systems to offer all-round security and surveillance management. The UniFi Dream Machine Pro and Max are both standalone, massively fully-featured solutions offering the capability of traditional routing, as well as diverse security and networking management tools in the UniFi application ecosystem inside one machine, useful for homes or businesses.

The UniFi software platform is considered as the core element of this system since it allows managing and configuring all UniFi devices through a single interface – it’s kinda their whole appeal! This software can be run locally hosted or via a cloud-based computing service provided by Ubiquiti which makes it easier to expand. UniFi also offers products in the range of switch aggregators and data center solutions that can handle heavy demands of high-density deployment. Able to deliver considerable connectivity with minimal hassle and offering an enhanced range of features, UniFi appliances and devices are popular in a variety of applications, from home use to complex company networks. They provide a single and technical interface for managing all network devices, hence conducting operations on the networks of different types of devices is easily done. So, given the popularity of NAS systems in the last few years (as cloud providers increase base prices and large scale data download pricing for businesses) you can see what introducing a native UniFi NAS product into an existing UniFi ecosystem would be appealing. NAS systems CAN be intimidating for the less data/networking technically and therefore a modular and seamless deployment of a central data system has enormous promise! But is the UniFi U-NAS series real?

What Evidence is there of a UniFi NAS in development?

There is a surprisingly larger amount of data circulating online about a possible UniFi NAS system, referring to devices/SKUs that include the ‘U-NAS Pro’ and ‘U-NAS Professional’.  One of the clearest and most obvious indications comes from an official UI.COM outlet, with a 10GbE 5 Port switch that, in it’s diagrams of deployment, show a new tower system connected via 10GbE (as well as a workstation). I will touch on this later with a leaked datasheet that appeared on reddit, but there are plenty of indications that this is a UniFi NAS.

Source (Official eShop) HERE

But you do not even need to dig that hard after these product deployment images, as you literally click the deployment tab and a similar product layout appears on a new image that clearly labels this white tower system as a NAS server. Even if you wanted to play devils advocate and speculate that this is a 3rd party server, the system carries the familiar U logo on the top. Plus, Ubiquiti/UniFi/UI.com  VERY rarely show 3rd party hardware on their product pages (for understandable reasons).

Source (Official eShop) HERE

Then, then via the same outlet, we find that an add on is available on the UI pages that listed an 8TB and 16TB UI labelled HDD that is listed as ‘ideal for storage-intensive UniFi systems’. Under this drive are numerous part numbers that relate to the brand’s Dream Machine Pro and Dream Machine Pro MAX systems. So, maybe these are just drives for cross-purpose and dedicated surveillance systems, right? Well, maybe, but the workload ranging heavily indicates enterprise storage use (i.e an ENT or PRO class server drive) which really does seem overkill for some of those systems that are highlighted that are 1-2 SATA/SAS slot systems. I KNOW how tenuous this sounds, but…

Source (Official UniFi Outlet) HERE

The fact that the ‘Enterprise Class’ media seems separate from that of the surveillance media is quite telling too. Could easily be nothing, but surveillance storage media is typically much more focused/geared towards ‘heavy write’ activity – as surveillance is often 95% write and very irregular read (when you need to check those past feeds!), whereas a NAS, especially a Prosumer/Business/Enterprise focused system will be at it’s best with drives that deliver peak on BOTH! Or shift gears entirely and switch to SSD. These enterprise drives definitely link with Surveillance systems that scale up considerably from UniFi, but having this division in their media is slightly overkill for just surveillance deployment alone.

Source (Official UniFi Outlet) HERE

Still not enough for you? Well, luckily an enterprising soul on reddit snuck what looks like a product datasheet for a new rackmount system that appears similar to some of the UNVR-PRO systems, but is clearly defined as a NAS server solution in the UniFi Drive series. If this is fake, it’s an impressive bit of work! Definding everything from the internal hardware specifications and system hardware feature set, right the way down to system PSU and projective power requirements!

Source (Reddit) HERE

Base on this document, the UniFi NAS would come in an rackmount steel chassis with optional brackets and would feature a Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57 processor running at 1. 7 GHz, 4 GB DDR4 system memory and 32 GB eMMC on-board flash storage. With a power budget of 135W for drives and a maximum power consumption of 160W, it is powered by a 200W internal AC/DC power supply. Connectivity options include a 10/100/1000 Mbps RJ45 port and a 1/10GbE SFP+ port and Bluetooth v4. 1 for RF interface. It also has a 1. 3” touchscreen LCM display for system status and firmware updates via Ethernet in-band interface.

Also, the 87mm height confirms that this system is a 2U rackmount, as well as not being full depth either (a little over half depth infact). Here are the rest of the specifications that were on the doc found on reddit:

Category Specification
Dimensions 442 x 325 x 87 mm (17.4 x 12.8 x 3.4″)
Weight Without rackmount brackets: 9.2 kg (20.28 lbs)
With rackmount brackets: 9.45 kg (20.83 lbs)
Enclosure material SGCC steel
Mount material SGCC steel
Hardware
Processor Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A57 at 1.7 GHz
System memory 4 GB DDR4
On-board Flash storage 32 GB eMMC
Max. power consumption 160W
Max. power budget for drives 135W
Power method (1) Universal AC input 100-240V AC, 3A Max, 50/60 Hz
(1) UPS-Battery DC input 11.5V DC, 13.91A
Power supply AC/DC, internal 200W
Network interface (1) 10/100/1000 Mbps RJ45 port
(1) 1/10GbE SFP+ port
RF Interface (1) Bluetooth v4.1
LCM display (1) 1.3″ touchscreen
Bootup animation: bootup in progress
Firmware upgrade icon: firmware upgrading
Steady white: factory defaults, awaiting adoption
Steady blue: device is adopted
Management interface Ethernet in-band
ESD/EMP protection Air: 12kV
Contact: 6kV
Operating temperature -5 to 40°C (23 to 104°F)
Operating humidity 5 to 95% non-condensing
Certifications FCC, CE, IC
LEDs
Ethernet Green: 1Gbps
Amber: 10/100 Mbps
SFP+ White: 10Gbps
Green: 1Gbps
HDD Amber: disk error
White: disk detected
Battery Blue: ready

Some details, such as the LCM Control panel are quite unique in the NAS server market (with many other brands out there largely retiring LCD panels, despite end users still wanting it). Others are a little more common but still very desirable, such as the confirmation of 10GbE (fiber / SFP+). That said, the CPU choice, if true, is going to divide opinion slightly. ARM processors are designed to be incredibly power efficient – something that is understandably desireable in a 24×7 NAS server of course. That said, even a 64bit ARM processor is going to be a little lean on the hardware capabilities.

This would indicate that, if real, the U-NAS system is going to be very fixed in it’s feature set, as ARM processors in NAS are much MUCH better at rigidly sticking to a handful of services and tasks (fixed defaults, allowing the software development to be a great deal more targetted and resulting in greater system efficiency). That would not make the system ‘weak’ – one look at how the likes of Synology can run DSM 7.2 on the ARM Realtek RTD1619b 64but ARM would show you just how much you can do with a dedication to efficiency in hardware, but it would be interesting to see how Ubiquiti/UI/UniFi approach the software and feature of this system. Will it be a wholly dedicated GUI or an extensive of the existing software platform that users UniFi users already have at their fingertips? Another photo also went on to appear on a reddit thread indicating a product stamp/label, but there wasn’t a huge amount of backing for this one.

Source (Reddit) HERE

Then there was a scree that was highlighting in an official UI video that was picked up by YouTube Channel ‘MacTelecom’ that raised queries about a product that was featured in a promo video. It would be easy to just assume that it is just a surveillance system, but…

Source #1 (Mactelecom) HERE and Source #2 (Official UniFi Channel) HERE

Obviously, the most compelling thing here is the product datasheet and the direct references to a 10GbE ‘NAS Server’ on the official product pages for the USW-Flex-XG, but we have to also take all this with a pinch of salt. plenty of times we have observed products alluded to online or even revealed at official event’s by brands that do not cross the technological finishing line! Still, it’s still tremendously hard to argue with that Ubiquiti/UI and by extensive the UniFi series, are dabbling with NAS systems. What about Synology and QNAP NAS systems? Arent they already an option?


Can You Use a Synology or QNAP NAS with UniFi?

Yes. Adding a NAS to an existing UniFi network is not new, and even now you can connect an external NAS (a QNAP or a Synology, for instance) to a network that is operated using the UniFi devices and increase its storage and data-organization-related capabilities multiple times. This integration means that the NAS will now act as part of the UniFi system as in that it can contain multiple services within a single NAS device. For example, the NAS can be used to store recorded video from the UniFi Protect system, using RTSP streams to guarantee that any footage that is recorded is either in the NAS or is used to send video data to the NAS as well. Furthermore, the NAS can be leveraged for backup for network devices; this is basically used to store the critical configurations and data that can be lost in the devices in question. It is also possible to configure SMB or NFS on the NAS storage in order to offer dedicated shared network storage for the network users to simplify the file sharing procedure.

In addition, this configuration should be supported by UniFi networking capabilities in order to make the workflow even more productive. The NAS is also capable of interfacing with security gateways as well as UniFi Switches and Access Points to offer a highly functional network solution. This integration also enhances the process of management and back up of data besides supporting other utilities such as the Time Machine for Mac users and enhance the use of the community network. Thus, using the offered functions of the QNAP/Synology NAS in the UniFi network allows to organize a powerful system with a potent scalability and capable of fulfilling a wide spectrum of tasks in both business and home environments. So why would a user care about a UniFi Official NAS device?

Why Would a Ubiquiti Launched UniFi NAS Be a BIG DEAL?

If Ubiquiti were to launch their own first-party NAS device, users would likely be happy and excited for several reasons:

1. Seamless Integration: If they launched a NAS, it would no doubt be created to ease the workload for the company regarding supporting all its network devices and storage devices within the existing UniFi system. It would make it easier for those who are already using UniFi devices to plan their set-up and maintenance, centralizing that data, as well as potentially facilitating further backups from there (3-2-1 etc)

2. Unified Management Interface: Let’s face it, UniFi is all about central management and a potential UniFi NAS product would continue to be managed through the UniFi software platform and the central management features will be carried over to managing the storage resource pool. This shortens both the time and the effort used in managing the network and this is widely considered to be very efficient.

3. Enhanced Features: Another appeal of a possible 1st party UniFi NAS would mean that it would open the door to Ubiquiti establishing features that are tailored to its network hardware. Such as optimization for UniFi Protect’s video surveillance storage, optimizing backups, and build photo sharing capabilities within the Ubiquiti network. Matching this functionality specifically for the product could offer a better user’s experience when compared to third party NAS solutions.

4. Consistent Updates and Support: For those that have already integrated a Synology/QNAP NAS into their ecosystem, they are well aware that this means allowing for the system to access updates whilst 24×7. A potential UniFi NAS would require this also, BUT would benefit from that seamless 1st party management and services, like any other Unifi product in the environment, This would be beneficial to users because the NAS could get supported firmware updates as regular AND also open the door to technical support from Ubiquiti to make sure that it is safe, operating, and up-to-date. This could make deployment easier and faster in the case that any issue arises to do with the issue deterring from having a flexible integration in the UniFi ecosystem.

5. Aesthetics and Form Factor: Though Ubiquiti is 20 years old, the UniFi series is much newer by comparison, but stands out with it’s is very popular for its modern design. It might sound fantastically shallow, but if UI launched a NAS device, they would definitely want to maintain this house/brand style and would target the look and feel of the rest of the equipment from the UniFi ecosystem – there would definitely be an audience for this!

6. Vendor Trust and Loyalty: A number of users are brand loyal: data security in 2024 is MASSIVE! People like using services by a particular brand that they trust and prefer to stay with this brand. Many consumers who are pleased with the functionality offered by Ubiquiti in the areas of networking would be much more likely to comfortably integrate a NAS device constructed and certified by that brand compared with a 3rd party, thus easing their lives of an additional device and learning a new GUI and UX. Not everyone of course, some will look at the product history of established NAS vendors and that will be enough – but that ‘if it ain’t broke, don;t fix it’ attitude is definitely out there!

The popularity and interest that would come from the idea that storage will be ‘in house’ in a reliable and simplified form that fully integrates and supports the expanded features provided by Ubiquiti and it’s UniFi series would be popular, there’s no debate there. However we have to also acknowledge that Ubiquiti and UniFi (if real!) would be a relatively new player in this field, with a narrower and very specific history in network data management, that is perhaps a little more specific than the more open storage utilization of network-attached storage. If a NAS is coming from UniFi – we have to wonder what new take that might bring to the table beyond the uniformity of UniFi devices and that ecosystem (arguably their USP!).

If it IS Real, When would the UniFi U-NAS Series Be Released?

That’s the BIG question really, as demands for a UniFi ‘in house’ NAS have been long-running for years. That said, the evidence discussed is pretty conclusive to say the least. Additionally, we are not discussing small mis-shared text or off-hand remarks at a tradeshow – we are seeing product images, direct references to two NAS products on official pages and even system add-ons that are listed on the brand’s eRetail outlets. Then there is the fact that the bulk of these references and documents are all within the last month, which seemingly indicates the revving up of a launch on the horizon. This all adds up to a product that is far along in development and one that is nearing release – Q3/Q4 2024 at the latest. However, without official confirmation, this still needs to be treated as speculation! Watch this space.

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      ASK YOUR QUESTIONS HERE!

      616 thoughts on “Official UniFi U-NAS NAS Drive Leaked

      1. Hi! I get that the hardware is ”underwhelming” BUT it is designed to store and share data. No apps docker or other stuff. If you want a server. Get a server. For what it is supposed to do hardware isn’t lacking.

        One storage pool. Again. Use case. I understand that you might want different storage pools for different uses on the same system BUT this system ONLY serve files. So there is no need for more than one storage pool here. Folders and accounts are enough separation. Come ON. A $499 device with tiers of disks? Not really realistic.

        Yes. Converging UNVR pro and UNAS Pro is a no brainer. It’s basically the same device purposed differently. But now when Protext can use NAS for archiving you could use an UDMP UNVR / Pro for protext and archive to UNAS which kind of makes sense.

        NO. Apps aren’t missing. This is NOT that kind of device. We use QNAP NAS for backups at work. We NEVER use apps on them. That is just bloat. For workloads we use virtualized clustered Linux servers windows servers and SAN drives or HCI clusters. NAS devices are great as slower tier backup storage or SMB file shares. That is the audience for this NAS. Not hobbyist home labs running pinhole in docker. That market belongs to QNAP and Synology
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. Am I the only one who thinks it’s silly we can backup to other services but we can’t use the UNAS to be the backup for said services? (Would love to have the UNAS hold everything so I can just offload everything and keep using drive as the easy upload access but trying SMB)

        Thanks for the guide! Very in depth and makes this easy!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      3. Great review! Thank you.
        Just to clarify… I cannot have 2x 16TB disk in here without RAID, together with 4x 4TB disks in RAID10 right? Because the two 16TB ones would be consumed by the RAID as well (as 4TB disks).

        Is that correct?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. Unifi has a few great lines: wifi, switching, maybe power.
        Then they have some weird stuff:
        – Security cameras, where users can’t add cameras in the phone app unless they are given admin rights.
        – Signage product that plays content on a TV. Nice idea, lousy software. Transitions between pictures are not suitable for public use.

        I didn’t try access control yet.
        I wonder how will the NAS turn out.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      5. im curious why you seem to say that the rps port on the back is for ups, not the redundant psu port plug-in it actually is, unless i misunderstand what your saying here. at 6:23, it shows that rps port that allows an effective power supply backup/redundancy for your box when you plug into the unifi power backup
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      6. Can’t wait to get mine! keep missing the alert when they go on sale. but anyways are you planning on doing a video like the one you did for “Backup a QNAP NAS to a Synology NAS with RSync” about 5year ago? I would love to see that process for backing up the Unas Pro to a QNAP or a Synology. @NASCompares
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      7. This is perfect for me… I have other servers for Virtual stuff.. I just wanted a NAS. They have a another system for cams . I will be picking one of these up for sure!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      8. I do not see ability to make groups and assign users to groups. Missing also is subfolder access permissions which allows you to connect to share within windows as an admin and set the file permissions using the groups created within the NAS. I just setup a Buffalo Terastation which allows subfolder permissions, QNAP has Advanced Folder Permissions and I think Synology does it also can use its own UI. TrueNAS too! This is missing in UniFi NAS it seems… please clarify.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      9. Synology stands as a prominent player in the NAS industry for the time being, but it’s nothing more than a “Blackberry of the future.” While Synology has maintained a relaxed and overconfident demeanor, its competitors have gradually introduced innovative and high-quality products. In the next decade, it is plausible that Synology will be acquired at a significantly reduced valuation compared to its current market worth.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. I actually really like the system, but i really do want separate storage pools so j can have a local on machine backup of a faster and smaller SSD array onto HDDs.

        Im also hoping they give us an AI enabled photo storage system so i can atop using google photos as much or at all. But aside from that i think this thing just being a NAS and not much else is not a weakness in my eyes.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      11. I still don’t think focusing on the NA_S_ (S is for Storage) part of the equation is as problematic as some make it out to be. There are tons of small computers out there for super cheap that can be container hosts that will run circles around Synology, if containers and server features are concerned. But if what you want is centralized (network) STORAGE, nothing can touch this 7-bay beast, for the money.

        I keep seeing people (and reviewers) complaining about the lack of dual PSUs, as well. I’m split on this one: One the one hand, for hardcore business work, I 100% agree: We only buy storage with dual hot swap PSUs, at work. But on the other hand… which Synology and QNAP and TerraMaster NASes actually have that feature? Complaining that this doesn’t have the container features the others have, and then simultaneously complaining that it lacks the thing the others on the market lack, seems a bit much. Again, for HIGH END business use, I agree completely. But when was a $500 NAS a serious contender in the Enterprise NAS market?

        The single storage pool thing bothers me the most, for my personal use. But that’s also the thing most likely to be addressed in future software updates. Well, that, and no M2 slots for Caching, which obviously won’t be addressed until the next round of hardware updates… perhaps a UNAS Pro? (throw in a second SPF+ port, too)

        Adding Protect is an interesting idea that I’d love to see. I wonder if the processor and hardware can manage a ton of cameras AND heavy network storage access, at the same time? Again, that may need to wait for future hardware upgrades (or a Pro/”Enterprise” version).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. UNAS arrived about 30 minutes ago. She’s already up and running, and I was pleasantly surprised to find NFS shares are already an available service! That was my main gripe when I purchased. Taking notes for you now, will keep on it and am happy to provide updates as I go.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      13. Hey, thanks for the video! I have a question about the backup feature with two NAS setups. If I set one up at home and the other at my business, will I still be able to use the home NAS for personal data while also having it back up the business NAS? Or will the business backup limit my home NAS to only serving that purpose? Thanks!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. Hey, thanks for the video! I have a question about the backup feature with two NAS setups. If I set one up at home and the other at my business, will I still be able to use the home NAS for personal data while also having it back up the business NAS? Or will the business backup limit my home NAS to only serving that purpose? Thanks!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. Thank you. Since the UNAS does not have its own usb port: is it possible to shutdown the UNAS via ethernet if the UNAS is directly connected to a battery UPS? Or do I need the Unifi UPS-RSP in addition as a sort of “power supply controller”. If so, does the UPS-RSP communicates with a battery UPS?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      16. umh … on the UDM-PRO, the SFP+ port you showed has number 10 because it’s the 10th port, the globe indicates it accepts a WAN (WAN_2) connection like port 9 (WAN_1)
        port 10 can be switched from WAN to LAN interface
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. I have a Synology 920+ already and have a bunch of Unifi cameras, switches, and Dream Machine Pro SE and I’ll be picking up the UNAS Pro when it comes back into stock. I have 6 8TB drives in an old computer I used for a NAS before I got my Synology that I’ll use for the UNAS Pro (thankfully unlike Synology, you can use pretty much any drive without it complaining). I like the 10GB port, which the best my 920+ can do is bonded 1GB links.

        I’ll run 3rd party apps on the 920+ and to start with, use the UNAS to backup my 920+ in a NAS to NAS backup system. I hope they will be updating the features quickly. The one I would love to have multiple storage pools. That should be able to be added at a later date though. Might have to reformat all the drives, but should be doable.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      18. This is great! Thanks for the video! Like I mentioned on the previous video, would be awesome to see a step by step on 2 things:
        1) Migrating data from my Synology to the UNAS Pro (assume a simple drag and drop with both NAS’s running)
        2) Build out a mini PC (beelink, etc) for synology pointing back to the UNAS pro. Would love docker containers with Plex, etc etc

        Regardless, amazing stuff!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. Great video. I already have the UDM-SE, but was looking for a really good NAS that meets my specific requirements. I think that RAID6 suits me best but good to know that the UNAS can use a single disk
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      20. Thanks for the review! I buy storage, for storage. I have servers, I don’t need (or want docker/containers). It has to hold hard drives, and put them into a RAID. I would appreciate finer grained controls over the RAID level and stripe width and size, as well as performant expansion options. m.2 Cache would be a good thing for 10 Gb networks as well. But all in all, I think this is a solid firt offering from Unifi. I just hope that that they add RAID6 to the feature set soon.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      21. That is good for homelab – you have storage, and you can add whatever standalone proxmox that will work with that. No point in having 128core cpu in nas, and to be able to make everyone happy. They got storage, you can diy whatever you want to work with that but data is perfectly safe. I might switch feom synology at some point for great form factor- i like rack mount. In Synology its absolutely crazy priced
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      22. Wow, I saw many videos about, but I had no idea you can have only one storage pool until I saw this video. This is huge problem for many people and it just kills it for me. That’s a shame, because it would be otherwise a perfect NAS for me. Hopefully they will fix it in software update.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. Great info! Very nice to see some real world installations. Can’t lie, we’ve been a little hesitant to go full UniFi on very large installations. Thanks again for the candidate info.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      24. I likely won’t buy it because it lacks all the stuff that my Synology can do – Plex and a pretty good security system.
        But for the price, 7 bays and 10gb Ethernet and rack mountable, it’s a pretty amazing value. For a $499 server, you shouldn’t expect redundant power supplies, and dual 10gbe. If the ARM processor makes it consume less power, that’s great for most people. If I were doing a ton of video production, a 7 bay raid would be fast enough for 4k prores work. I think it’s an amazing solution for most people.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. The Unifi lineup is full of devices that are simple, and do their tasks simply. So I doubt very much that they are going to allow any third party software to run on them. The reason that the hardware is fairly anemic in comparison to other NAS hardware is that the Unifi UNAS is only a NAS. It has only enough hardware to do what it is designed to do. Which makes it more price and energy efficient in the process.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. As someone who has a slow internet connection, little money and takes lots of videos and photos. The 4 bay UNVR is a better device for me to be running as a sharable file server for my clients to view content
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      27. the question is which target group Unifi wants to serve with this NAS. For the price, it is certainly a nice storage solution for small companies that easily fits into the budget.

        As a private user, I am not really the target group. I essentially agree with your criticisms:

        a. why only 1 GBIT Ethernet? Unifi seems to be slowly switching to 2.5 GBit (see Cloud Gatewy Max and 2.5 GBit Switch)

        b. No support for virtualization solutions (Proxmox, Plex, etc.)

        The last point in particular puts the “inexpensive” thing in a different light. If I put a little more money on the table, I can get competitive systems from QNAP or Synology or Terramaster. that better meet my needs as a private user. An alternative would be to run a small home server alongside the Unifi NAS and use the NAS as a data repository. This solution would result in more administrative effort and higher power consumption and would not bring me any personal benefits.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. I work in a school with two block, on the main one we have servers in a rackmount 1m depth, on the small one we have a small rack with switch and unifi dream machine, we use a VPN to share user files with the remote lab, but is slow. I’ve made a replica of our DC … and now I think I’ll di the same for data. UNAS pro is definitively what we need.
        Does’t care much about the “UNIFI system” is just form factor, depth, cost. No virtual machine No docker … we need NAS.
        Is just my scenario.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      29. ok, so for me, give me double the height, 14 bays, 12 for my spinners, 2 for my SSD caching, give me snapshotting, 3rd party apps like plex, hybrid raid and an even semi decent CPU to cover encryption overhead and i will pay 4x-6x this price without even thinking possibly more
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      30. Managed to buy the UNAS this morning. Cannot wait to get it loaded with drives, move everything from my annoying ASUSTOR over, and setup a headless Mac mini M4. Admittedly the Mac mini is overkill for Plex, but I’d rather have the headroom and flexibility. Thank you for this vid validating my reasons for getting the UNAS Pro.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      31. If they add the option to backup workstations and restore them directly to the machine, or do bare metal backups from an ISO, I’d be all over this thing. I’d pay more for it too
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      32. I ordered one as well. I’ve used Unraid for years, and while it is a good solution, the idea of a simple fileserve baked into the Unifi ecosystem is ideal; especially for simple, secure, offsite file access through “Unifi Verify.” I’d love a version with more drive bays, but other than that I think this will fit a lot of people’s needs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      33. The functionality of this is probably comparable to my Thecus N5200 from way back in 2006……and that was already crappy back then. The rather decent price though suggests it is actually an alpha test at the customers expense. You gotta start somewhere…..ARM NAS are just not versatile enough when it comes to the things you mentioned like containers, VMs (especially Windows Server VMs)…and soldered the memory to the board? come on…….Ubiquiti, you can do better. And the performance is just meh…..but then again for the price, it’s probably not that bad.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      34. Im a major UniFi fan.. hell I even have my garage door opening with a tap of my mobile phone!! I have a sizeable Synology NAS but actually dont love DSM.. BUT using Synology Drive like a local OneDrive feature is difficult to give up for simple SMB shares and Active Backup for Business automatically backing up the entire family set of computers has saved my bacon in more than one occasion… as much as I think the UNAS Pro looks great and fits with my rest of my network, I’m more likely to end up buying another Synology to backup my NAS than the UNAS Pro.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. I like the fact that it’s a NAS, and nothing else. I see the addition of 3rd party apps just adding potential attack vectors. For the price savings, one can add a couple of Raspberry PIs, and configure how you want.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      36. Maybe it’s just me but I love it. I love the single NAS idea, the way is made to be an Unifi NAS and nothing more. I own a synology nas but since the day one I separated the file storage part from the server applications. My point is, if you want a rackable NAS, dedicated to begin a NAS and nothing else..this is for you. If not, maybe take a look at other brands.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      37. I like the idea of this NAS and I’m tempted to pick one up today, but I’m not a fan of being the first in line for a new product like I used to be.

        This machine is exactly what I’ve wanted for ages. A good, solid name brand rack mount NAS without the gold plating I’ll never use.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. Would it be possible to see what happens when you swap drives from one unit to another unit? How do you restore your data? With a single PS, you would need to swap out chassis, thus having to move your drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      39. My main criticism is its only got one 10gb nic and one psu not ideal for a “pro” device . Other than that i really like it. Something that cant be fixed by sw update. My other critisms.are mostly sw based so can easily be fixed. I dont really care about apps as i run xcp-ng /XO pool(cluster), i have apps coming out of my ears .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      40. Nice addition to the Unifi collection. It is network storage only with a 10gb connection. No need to compare to Synology or QNAP can be used a backup to Synology or QNAP.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. Rack mount device with singlenpower supply missing one ?
        For the price tag probably you can buy two device instead of one when spending same budget for “proper” turkey rack mount storage soultion

        And the software solution from this company looks more promising in stability and security compare to synology and qnap

        Plus they have a own ecosystem ( although a bit pricy compare to consumer/ home use product)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. *REQUEST* Hi. I have a request for anyone who ends up buying a UNAS Pro NAS system. I need your help with a video I want to work on in the new year about the “UNAS Pro 3 Months Later” (maybe 6 months, will see how UI approach the updates and roadmap). I know I have hit the ‘content button’ hard on this device, but as a new entry into the server space from such a well-known player in networking tech, I want to 1) obviously cover as many angles on what users want to know as possible, but also 2) keep the pressure on UI/Ubiquiti to develop this system more and more (and more!), as I think this thing nails the fundamentals very well, but could be more. So, here’s my request. If you end up getting this device (or maybe you are a fellow reviewer who will be continuing to work with the system), I want to slot in a video early next year – kind of a “what has happened since launch” piece. A big, big part of that should be what real-world users think of it, did it meet expectations and did you stick with it, or abandon it as ‘a fun play thing’ and little else? If you can provide your input below in the comments or directly to me on robbie (at) nascompares , that would be awesome and of course, all those individually featured will be credited and linked appropriately. No worries otherwise, and cheers for reading! Have a bloody great week.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      43. I tend to think that this is a test or research device. It’s as basic as one can get but discussions on it will bring about information on what people really want. I really considered this purchase but several things told me to wait.

        I’d love a device that is simple. But… it needs a processor that will be able to obtain a 10gb transfer rate. My synology’s can do that with just the spinning drives. I can see this device choking under a heavy load.

        Second, user management is too simplistic. I’d like to see the ability to create user groups to make assignments for folder access easier.

        Third, like you said, it needs to have the ability to expand storage beyond its own case and I would add the ability to provide iscsi service.

        And fourth, I’d like the ability to add memory.

        Thanks.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      44. What I don’t understand is, that most people criticise the fact that it can’t run apps (through docker, etc.). Its a network attached storage solution, not a server. Sure, other brands offer that functionality, but it’s not really what a nas is for. If you have the money to buy a NAS, then you most certainly also have the money to buy a raspberry pi and run containers on there. I think that the UNAS Pro is something a small business would use in conjunction with an actual server.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      45. it really looks more like a backend device, set and forget, backups only, maybe appealing to Synology/QNAP/Proxmox users that may migrate to SSD-only “server” build and looking for just backup bulk storage “elsewhere”
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      46. To me, this video shows me 10 reasons to BUY an UNAS-PRO. ????
        As soon as RAID6 is added to the features, my aging WD EX4100 is going to the IT Heaven. My 10G Link Aggregation switch is eagerly awaiting his new UNAS-PRO brother.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      47. I like this video, I think it’s a cool breakdown. However, I think there are two major points I want to see considered when looking at the two ecosystems. 1) 99.9% of folks considering a UNAS already own a UDM, the two together should be part of the baseline comparison. 2) The size and sound should be a bit more clear, my understanding is the UNAS is half depth, the equivalent synology rack mount 8 bay item is full depth and VERY loud. I think that, overall, Synology seems like the winner for a closet or desktop mounted 4-8 bay for folks looking for heavy storage in their home with the all-in-one ease of use with the ability to run a lot of third party applications. The UNAS seems ideal for folks who JUST need to add mass storage to their existing Unifi network.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. It really seems like Synology and UniFi Unas pro are really aimed at different markets. Synology is really seems more for home users. The UniFi is really for integration with a UniFi based network. I have seen a lot of UniFi at small business and this would be a simple way to integrate with their existing UniFi hardware and services. I can see this see this being adopted because over time cloud storage starts getting very expensive as companies data storage needs grow. A lot of companies will not use most of the software apps on Synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      49. Fantastic in depth review man! I just got the Minisforum MS-01 to replace my DS918+ in terms of server needs, so my Synology is just acting as storage now, so this would be the perfect unit for me to upgrade to 10Gbe to go with the rest of my UniFi stuff besides that it doesn’t have NFS yet :/ quick question, when you say reactive storage, do you mean you can add drives to the pool without wiping and just increase pool size?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      50. How does this unit handle drive expansion? Say I have all 7 bays filled and I need more storage…Can I swap a drive or two with higher capacities in place and it dynamically adjust the array to make that space available?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      51. I think if you are use to the way Synology DSM works, it makes it easier. If you are use to Unifi then that is easier. I find I get lost in Synology DSM, where as I don’t get so lost in Unifi as I find it more intuitive. This really comes down to what you are use to and I feel people who have used Synology for a long time tend to know where things are in DSM, where as a newer user will not know which app to use for what to the same extent. That makes long term Synology DSM users leaning toward finding DSM easier, like you have done as you are a long term Synology user. 🙂
        On the processor side, the 923 may be an x86 processor, but it is a very low power x86 processor, and only dual core.
        Synology may have the edge on the app ecosystem though, but I don’t think Ubiquiti are aiming to make their NAS into a small home server. It does what it says on the box really well. It’s a NAS. ????
        If you want a home server, UI’s UNAS is not the device you seek. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      52. You give UI too much of a pass for being an ecosystem and as such they don’t have to play nice with others. You also mention the word “Enterprise” numerous times. So does UI whenever it can. These two add up to missing one big fundamental, as you put it, which is directory integration and I’d argue licensing bc it’s a huge part of the marketing. Everything “Enterprise” must have directory integration, that’s what pretty much the term really means. UI in its AzureAD/Keycloak/Okta/ADFS/etc knockoff — none of which ALSO requires specialized branded hardware BTW — put LDAP/AD integration behind a per-user per-month subscription, despite the fact that unlike the aforementioned, they aren’t providing any service at all, only the permission to connect your own hardware to your own systems, AKA: licensing.

        This storage thingy is worthless is you need to keep separate accounts for it. It opens doors for so many problems. If you want to use the Enterprise moniker you need to integrate or have a system so well thought out that you can cover any need, absolutely any need even if it’s convoluted, perhaps egregious, like Cisco’s. This ecosystem thing is cute until it starts being a headache, the pretty dashboards in day-to-day are rarely useful, and the push for a cloud dependency, the fact that your network devices tasked to guard your data are exfiltrating it from your network, the fact that UI relentlessly pushed for mobile app-based mgmt revokable at any point leaving gear unmanageable (like UniFi Video did) are headaches waiting to happen.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      53. 1. Power By Intel N100 CPU
        2. The DIY NAS MINI PC is compatible with 3.5″ and 2.5″ SATA HDD, up to 2*20T
        3. Support Multiple Operating Systems an Softrouting, NAS,, ESXI, PVEvirtualization platform(support VT-X,VT-D
        4.N100 mini PC is equipped with Type-C (supports 65W charging, requires GaN charger), DP, HDMI, 2*USB3.2 GEN2, 2*USB2.0, 2*RJ45 2500M LAN, 1*Audio Interface, 1* microSD card port ,1*DC port
        it only cost 298 in prime member Nas Intel N100 32G+1T
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      54. When it comes to NAS, the fewer apps, the better . Be good at the one thing. That said, the Unifi NAS is lacking in several areas. I’ll buy one once they add in the missing features (NFS & iSCSI).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      55. UniFi’s equipment is designed to be accessible, and this new NAS seems aimed at fulfilling a specific purpose: providing network storage at a competitive price point. Whereas Synology’s product line seems to blur the line between providing a networked storage solution and a home server. Let’s face it, if you have a server rack at home, you likely already have a dedicated machine running various network services and if you’re planning on running a bunch of VMs or containers on bare metal, wouldn’t you prefer to have a dedicated machine for that? I think UniFi are doing the right thing here by focusing their efforts on solving one problem; and solving it well (even if it doesn’t have redundant power supplies, additional networking ports for link aggregation & no SSD caching, I imagine those features will come later).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      56. I was going to get another Synology NAS and have decided to go with an Ubiquiti UNAS instead as it is much easier to set up files and file shares with the Ubiquiti software. I prefer the UniFi way of showing the information over the Synology interface. Looking forward to getting the new UNAS next month when it finally ships.

        I am looking for purely a NAS not something that runs a bunch of apps and Docker containers. I will run that stuff on a server.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      57. Unable to have a phone app for backup pictures and videos is a deal breaker for me on the Ubiquity side. I will just go with 2 20TB HDD and DS224+. 2Gb/S data transfer(SMB3). Phone backup app, UPS USB battery management support, and Docker. Black Friday shopping for $250(hopping) for Synology. 2 years later we will see what happens.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      58. Hi there, thanks for the video.

        I am looking to see the following:

        1. iPhone and Android Applications to backup the pictures from the phone into the UNAS.
        2. something similar to google documents to create office documents directly on the UNAS.
        3. backup up one entire windows computer to the UNAS, similar to synology backup for business. .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      59. As someone who was about to pull the trigger on a RS1221+, I am now feeling more confused than ever. I am deeply invested in Unifi equipment in my home so I am interested in this and I also keep hearing that it’s a good idea to separate your NAS from your media server box if possible so you can scale them individually. However, this Unifi NAS doesn’t really seem to offer any hardware upgrade paths so in this case it doesn’t seem to be a good argument.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      60. I will get one because I have a ton of UNIFI in my house (Personally, I would not use Ubiquiti at work. Not Ent enough for that). But what I love about Synology is all the apps you have access to, and the more significant benefit to me is upgradability. On my 1821+, I tossed in a 10G card, two 2TB NVME caches, and 32 GB RAM.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      61. Thanks.. good review. I have converted all my networking to Unifi and am considering while building a new house whether I want to use Unifi cameras. If this could have replaced the UDM it would have been a no brainer, but as a satisfied UnRaid user of 20 years, the lack of some networking and apparent inability to mix/match drive sizes may make me just get a UDM and keep my existing UnRaid. Definitely something to keep my eyes on though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      62. So now that their lineup is available at retail (at retail pricing), and their OS has had time to mature, maybe it’s time to revisit UGREEN. A comparison between UGREEN’s NAS OS and Ubiquiti’s would be interesting. UGREEN had to create a NAS OS from scratch in a space where there’s a lot of competition. They didn’t get much of a pass, as I recall, at the time of their initial release. So, now that UGREEN is no longer the new kid on the block, let’s see that comparison.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      63. I disagree that this is not an exciting product. I think it is exciting to see such an intuitive user interface, a focus on the basics, and very capable hardware for such an unheard of low price. I don’t use the snazzy bits of my Synology NAS and would prefer the 10Gb/s connection and the intuitive interface of the UniFi NAS. UniFi don’t unecessarily prescribe any UniFi-branded hardware and are yet to remove features that one paid for, like Synology. Can’t wait to see RAID 6 support and perhaps a future model with support for media-transcoding and a USB port.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      64. for me at thos time That NAS is only for hosting backup of my data and config of Synology nas becouse I need runn all my services from nas. I actuaky run old websites on my nas and run docker on my main Synology. But Synology pice me of when I see deleted apps – webstation plugin deleted from DSM 7.2 – old PHP (Update php code for that sites is not cost effective in terms of time or money to rewrite them to the latest php) and I mast be on DSM 7.1 – deleting support too apps fron old dsm on new version pice me of but I intrested to have uptodate nas.

        UNAS for me is also to big and have too big energy consumption and 7 HDDs is not form me.
        If UNAS will be based on 4 HDDs UNVR and have webstation like on Synology and docker support (to install DNS Server on difrent docker apps).
        About Unifi apps for me will be good Use UNAS as unifi backup target storage for auto backup network or protect or UnifiOS on UNAS – If I see that things on Unifi devices as UNAS I probably will swich from Synology.. – I’m a homrlaber have a unifi network on my home.

        I think UNAS Pro ss for me for a bog misness or enterprise where data access tiime or suoort alot users too data on drives, on home is too big and bare additional functions as for energy consumption.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      65. The Unify NAS would be a highly viable solution if Unify were to consider upgrading the internal hardware to incorporate a SAS backplane by default. This would maintain compatibility with both SATA and SAS drives, offering the best price-to-performance ratio in refurbished enterprise HDDs per terabyte, including warranty. Whilst understanding that USB ports would introduce security risks, a third 5Gb LAN port would be beneficial, as it would be sufficient for speeds under 500MB/sec. I wouldn’t object if they were to replace the 10Gb connection, which can hardly reach its full capacity without an internal SSD cache
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      66. So the probleem with the UNAS is that it’s a NAS? I have a Mac Mini as server that can do way more and better than the synology al-in-one closed system. The UNAS will be a great addition to my network. At one point in time UniFi will introduce al-in-one system that will be more expensive and with faster hardware like they did with the gateways->UDM. But this is a NAS, please compare it with an NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      67. I’m currently running a UDM SE, so the Unifi NAS is a no brainer. especially at that price point.
        I’ve been on the fence for a long while about a NAS solution, Thankfully Ubiquiti has come to the rescue.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      68. You keep harping on about the unas ” requiering” aditional unify gear for functionality, sorry but duh thst is the whole point of unify, it’s a complete stack and now thay have added a nas offering. On the the fact the unas doesn’t run docker, well I know synology does thst, by my question is is that really the job of a nas, or js that mor a combination of a virualisation/container hist and a nas in a box? I know that containers an vm guests need storrage but isn’t it better to have less powerhungry storrahe and have the compure separatøt thst cabån be scaled accordibg to need, you might nedd massive compute an modest storrage, or the situation may be reversr. You might want an nvr or not. Stuffing irvall in one nox just intruduces a singel point of faliyr. Ok containers die idåf storrage goes avsy, but the nas does not go down if the cpu in a dedicated nvr koes down
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      69. For refence before someone picks the below apart…. I have been a Synology user for the last 12 years and only a Unifi user for the last 1… these are my own opinions and as my home network grows (CCTV, Media room, IOT integration).

        There have been no major improvements to the Synology OS for a while, the GUI interface is stale (iOS 6 or Android 5.0 vibes) clunky and just lacking compared to other OS, then you throw into the mix them taking features away, locking the OS to either their own devices (why USB Wi-Fi was taken away I don’t know, it was a handy feature when you can’t use CAT and the NAS is in another room) or just lack of any real apps (Docker the exception), its just lacking flexibility compared to others.
        As for backups (time machine for want of a better phrase) don’t get me started on how complicated this is and how many times it falls over, then there is surveillance station costs….. hold on I have just spent $$$$$$ on a NAS, had to pay yet more for the 10GbE NIC and now you want me to spend more on licences…. no ta!

        However that being said, I’m not going to be ditching them just yet besides the cost, the DS1821+ in the media room and the RS422+ do the job, BUT will be replaced once Ubiquiti fix the following short falls, minimum, (1 x 2.5GbE minimum / 2 x 10GbE / Nvme cache) once these are standard, then i’ll be one of the first to ditch Synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      70. Currently a Synology user leveraging surveillance station. Looking to move my network to unifi, including my cameras as well. I’ve seen you can only effectively move your protect footage to the synology with a third party solution (git). I understand the unas doesnt come with protect natively – dies this literally mean you csnt take Unifi camera footage and store it on the UNAS? I know that is a dense question… but if thats really the case, thats dumb as hell!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      71. I will use my synology as my front line trooper. It will carry my plex and photos and use the Unifi NAS as the back up to it and all the files, like a solid home base
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      72. I really like Synology but their recent business decisions around ignoring home users, being way behind in hardware for many devices and downgrading their software especially around codecs is not a good look and doesn’t give me a lot of confidence in recommending them to new users trying to get into the home “cloud” space.

        It was only a matter a time before Unifi did this. Their NVR is basically already a NAS they just needed to make a more NAS focused software. This new NAS is a great addition to their portfolio and will be good for anyone already in the Unifi space. However, I don’t think it will attract many people from the outside. Especially those who are less techy. Most people just want a desktop unit like the classic Synology.

        Then there is there is the app support and functionality. Synology is still way ahead in that when it comes to providing a cloud at home experience. Especially things like Synology Drive, Synology Photos, Docker and VM support, backup solutions amongst a lot of other things.

        In conclusion the Unifi NAS is a great start. It is definitely targeted at current Unifi users and people that need literally only a NAS and nothing more. (Which is fine). They probably smell some blood in the water with all the miss steps Synology has been making and want to try and capitalize on it a little.

        Unifi, if you are listening… I need a 5 bay m.2 1U NAS with dual 10G Ethernet for $699….
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      73. To me the UniFi NAS is targeting different people than Synology. The Synology obviously has better software and hardware. But it is not just a NAS, but an all-in-one solution that a lot of people use for other applications as well (docker, vms, etc). The UniFi UNAS is what it’s name implies: A network attached storage. As long as the UNAS Pro serves as a reliable easy to use storage solution than that’s fine for me as well.

        Maybe sometimes the “less is more” mindset, as in purpose built machines (just storage, just computation etc) might be better if things are developed properly. But we have to see how Ubiquiti will develop the UNAS in the coming months and years.

        I will probably buy the UNAS Pro because my DS420+ died right after warranty ended and I lost all of my data (around 25TB). I will probably look for a power efficient 1U server for other applications like docker/plex etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      74. To me the UniFi NAS is targeting different people than Synology. The Synology obviously has better software and hardware. But it is not just a NAS, but an all-in-one solution that a lot of people use for other applications as well (docker, vms, etc). The UniFi UNAS is what it’s name implies: A network attached storage. As long as the UNAS Pro serves as a reliable easy to use storage solution than that’s fine for me as well.

        Maybe sometimes the “less is more” mindset, as in purpose built machines (just storage, just computation etc) might be better if things are developed properly. But we have to see how Ubiquiti will develop the UNAS in the coming months and years.

        I will probably buy the UNAS Pro because my DS420+ died right after warranty ended and I lost all of my data (around 25TB). I will probably look for a power efficient 1U server for other applications like docker/plex etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      75. To me the UniFi NAS is targeting different people than Synology. The Synology obviously has better software and hardware. But it is not just a NAS, but an all-in-one solution that a lot of people use for other applications as well (docker, vms, etc). The UniFi UNAS is what it’s name implies: A network attached storage. As long as the UNAS Pro serves as a reliable easy to use storage solution than that’s fine for me as well.

        Maybe sometimes the “less is more” mindset, as in purpose built machines (just storage, just computation etc) might be better if things are developed properly. But we have to see how Ubiquiti will develop the UNAS in the coming months and years.

        I will probably buy the UNAS Pro because my DS420+ died right after warranty ended and I lost all of my data (around 25TB). I will probably look for a power efficient 1U server for other applications like docker/plex etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      76. It’s Ubiquiti. You know their NAS will be a toy for years to come. It’s based on the NVR hardware which I already have for Protect and I find it quite disappointing both hardware and software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      77. It’s Ubiquiti. You know their NAS will be a toy for years to come. It’s based on the NVR hardware which I already have for Protect and I find it quite disappointing both hardware and software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      78. It’s Ubiquiti. You know their NAS will be a toy for years to come. It’s based on the NVR hardware which I already have for Protect and I find it quite disappointing both hardware and software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      79. It’s Ubiquiti. You know their NAS will be a toy for years to come. It’s based on the NVR hardware which I already have for Protect and I find it quite disappointing both hardware and software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      80. It’s Ubiquiti. You know their NAS will be a toy for years to come. It’s based on the NVR hardware which I already have for Protect and I find it quite disappointing both hardware and software.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      81. Well, Synology got what it deserved. I have 923+ for backups (spinning rust HDDs), my SSD grade NAS will be UNIFI, as soon as they release PRO MAX or Enterprise grade model.
        I want 2x 25G SFP28, more CPU cores, and at least NFS service. iSCSI would be also great. I absolutely don’t care about docker and VMs in the NAS (I have the server for that).
        But I expect to see much more settings there to fine tune everything.
        @NASCompares – please test all SSD array, how it performs?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      82. Iam pretty much a noob when it comes to networks and stuff. My parents wanted a mesh network and from there on out Iam building a surveillance system (camera, already have a separat system for locks and windows) on unifi gear atm. So far that worked great. However, Iam not sure when it comes to a NAS. So far, they “had” a QNAP desktop 4 bay, but it was basicly never used. I convinced them to get a NAS, so in case of harddrive failure, the family fotos and videos wont be lost.

        I guess the unifi nas does just that. But there are two questions still open for me:
        1. How can I get phone back ups on there, even if its just the media stuff. My idea was google drive and then have that somehow downloaded to the nas. But I didnt look into it much further.
        2. How can I display pictures and videos from the nas to a potential smart tv (say sony bravia 9, we would buy one) on the network. we could just hook up a laptop every xmas, but if there can be a more elegant solution, ill take it.

        the budget isnt that much of an issue. we would like to populate the nas with 24 or 26TB WD ultrastar. i just want something that works with more than 4 bays if possible. I was looking into the QNAP TS-855eU, as it will be rack mounted (short rack). Or the Synology RS 1221+. But most of the stuff these NAS can do seems… not to be for my use case? I dont like to connect to that system like its a remote pc. Just upload and display media, like its a better external hard drive. What would you suggest?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      83. Unifi absolutely lets you use 3rd party authentication app. be that google authenticator app (or other authenticator app) or Azure Entra. Synology also allows this. so, they are pretty much equal.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      84. Question. You told me to wait until today. Underpromised and overdelivered! Always appreciate your work. I couldn’t live without Tailscale on that UniFi. For now I’m sticking with my DS920+ w/4 2TB Crucial MX500 HDDs in SHR1. Need an online backup solution using Hyper Backup. Considering C2 Storage. I have a 1.2 TB data cap on my US broadband plan. Any sense how much traffic (data) would be used during an integrity check of a 1 TB backup with average file size of say 1 MB?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      85. My network is Unifi and my NAS and backup NAS is Synology. No need to upgrade now but I do like the idea of integrating my NAS in to my Unifi network once feature set expands. Right now I’m a fan of SHR and Hyper Backup. The price is right. Just waiting for the feature set to evolve.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      86. We have multiple NAS in our company.
        And we don’t use any further functions/ apps then iscsi or smb shares maybe the UniFi aims at this kind of usecase
        Yes i know iscsi isn‘t available yet
        What I want to say on a semi-professional level these apps aren’t used very much.
        The same here at home I have my NAS and only use it as a storage.
        If I want apps I would prefer a server or raspi
        And I think file backups on a second device would be able over the smb-shares
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      87. Everyone needs to consider that unifi is dipping it’s toes in nas. Using the UNVR Pro chassis allows them to gauge the appetite before committing to creating further chassis types. Personally, I am holding off for a 12 bay device, and then I will go all in. I love their other kit and ui. I only hope this is the beginning of a great journey.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      88. I own a Synology 4 Bay. They are spectacular all-in-one boxes!

        After watching the bombardment of Tech-Youtuber UNAS reviews, I have decided to buy a UNAS to supplement the Synology. I have never liked the “File Server” NAS aspect of my Synology. Synology File Station is not intuitive and the Home/Homes folder and Sharing of Photos logic is difficult to explain to a layperson.

        The UNAS seems to be designed to move files easily from A to B.

        Apples to Apples -Value
        The 4 Bay RS422+ that you compared the UNAS Pro can ONLY have 2GB with an extra $100 for a 10GB card.

        I think from a hardware perspective
        $1300 Synology 8 Bay RackStation RS1221+ (4 GB, no 10GB)
        $499 UNAS Pro 7 Bay 8GB w10GB

        Does the Synology software platform cost $800? If you want it sure. As others have said, there is definitely a place for a well designed INEXPENSIVE Network Attached Storage device that just moves files.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      89. I like the UniFi software presentation a lot more as so many companies including Synology go for a “Modern aesthetic” last time I checked looking like a knock off Android 4.0 isn’t modern. At least UniFi realises what works and sticks with the basics.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      90. Personally UniFi is to expensive, but on the otherhand i use 2 DELL PowerValt md3220i and a DELL R630 with a 4 sfp+ 10gbit ports and a h730 mini raid controller and 2 compatible Raid controller with SAS 12gbit.

        i yeah if this stuff would be new, this is properly even more expansive. But i payed for my R630 300€ and got both PowerValt md322i for free because those were damaged, i spend about 130€ for repair. i bought over the last 2 years, 2 xeon e5 2683v4 and replaced my single e5 2609v3 and bought another set of 4 4RX32GB 2133mhz ECC for the second socket and have now 256GB total System memory and 32 cores and 64 threads, instead of only 6 cores and 6 threads.
        In the end, i spend for all of that 700€ the upgrade included.
        IF someone asks about the drives, both PowerValts were be filled with 12 1.8tb SAS 10k drives as I got them. Both PowerValts got dropped so they thought the drives are done so they left the drives in the system. Lucky my R630 had already 2 PCIE Raid controller cards in it for PowerValt and a massive 40gbit NIC with 4 10gbit sfp+ ports. I mean, i guess it makes sense if you have only 6 cores and relative massive amount on RAM, using it as a server for storage makes sense in this configuration.

        My R630 and both PowerValt with the drives run fine, besides the fact Both powervalt don’t fit in my 5U rack encloser because i have, there are a bit bend but i don’t care they work.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      91. If you have unfy network and synology nas. Can’t you then mount the unas with smb to the synology for the synology features ? Because it’s cheaper then a bigger synology, and with the 10GB fiber it should not make your read and writes slower then an internal disk i guess.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      92. Synology is better, we all know this. As you said, More than 25 years of experience. Ubiquiti should’ve made this a NAS/Protect solution. Looks like a money grab to me that they didn’t. I’ll probably get it just to mess with it and sell it to a client that only needs backups. I need to upgrade my Synology, and the whole hard drive lockdown thing has really pissed me off. Should be illegal to do those things. If Ubiquiti gets better with allowing apps and better hardware I’ll switch over immediately! Needs redundant psu, needs at least 2 SFP ports, needs better CPU and ALOT more RAM! We all know they have a “MAX” version under their sleeves. So let’s see what that has to offer.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      93. I think people who pick up the Unifi NAS are likely also owners of Unifi network products. I think Ubiquity are likely targeting their pre-built customerbase. Personally I run Protect on my UDM Pro, I’m not interested in the same thing on my NAS. I want it to integrate well and it would be nice to get proper access to my raw video footage via the NAS rather than messing around downloading clips via the frontend (haven’t watched you deep dive yet). I also don’t want duplicate network functionality in a Unifi product, that would just be bizzare.

        If NAS manufacturers are moving more towards a NAS just being a NAS as Synology seem to be doing, with increasing numbers of their products being ARM based and support for transcoding being removed, I think maybe users have to consider the possibility of a low powered mini PC to run their docker containers and if that’s the direction of travel then maybe Unifi starts to eat at Synologys market share. It’s possible that Unifi are ahead of the game in this regard and have set their user expectations early rather than Synology’s long history of being great for a multitude of purposes.

        I think the hardware comparison was bizzare, find a like for like comparison and then conclude that Synology wins based on range of product!?!

        If I were chosing a new NAS today with the Unifi and Synology products that are currently available, I’d stick with ASUS because I want that flexibility and power in my primary NAS. If I needed a secondary NAS to act purely as a NAS, I might go Unifi because it integrates well with my current set up and I know the Unifi experience.

        Ask me a couple of years ago and I’d have told you Unifi for networking and Synology for everything else.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      94. I much prefer the Unifi NAS software presentation / UI. Why NAS companies try to recreate a windows feel is beyond me… Once you have mapped drives etc, I rarely log in. The fact that I can see everything on my management interface for Unifi, with immediate performance… It’s so much better.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      95. There was no new NAS from Synology for almost 2 years /last one 224+/. Some nonsense Beestations, Active protect enterprise and very very little on App front I think they either switch to Enterprise or will go bankrupt /means downhill to no more usable in SOHO/. Zimaboard, Unifi Drive, Truenas etc. Its sad.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      96. I want a rack NAS. Wanted a Synology but it is stupidly expensive for outdated hardware. I am considering getting the unifi nas and adding a 1u server running intel hardware for dockers VMs etc. It still comes to half price of a synology rackmount nas. Do you think this approach makes sense?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      97. Not really a fair comparison to compare to Synology really as Synology are not just a NAS, they have an app ecosystem too, where as the Unifi NAS is just a NAS and no extra crap.
        I think the hardware is identical to the UNVR Pro, except the UNAS is 8gb RAM. Price is identical as UNVR, and I feel the price point is pretty good for a 10gbp link, Directory Service integration. UI have advised they are adding Raid 6 in a firmware update, so they do listen to the users. I don’t think M.2 is really a big deal, you can get adaptors from M.2 to 2.5″ 2.5″ SATA will max out a 10gbps connection anyway. The single PSU is not an issue as it supports the Unifi USP device as well when you want redundant power supplies. It would add cost if you had a redundant PSU and this is NOT an enterprise version of the device.
        I have seen several reviews of this unit and the speed tends to be consistent. Again, remember this is not an Enterprise version of the device. This is a Pro version, which is in between standard and enterprise. A lot of Synology devices at similar price point only have 2 x 1gbp NIC’s
        I feel if this sells well, UI will likely release an Enterprise and standard version, based around the other UNVR form factors they have.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      98. Is it true it doesn’t do iSCSI or NFS?

        If so it should be called the “UniFi NAS Home”, or “UniFi NAS SMB”

        I am fine with it not doing containers or VM’s, but not doing NAS features such as iSCSI or NFS, and then calling it a “PRO” NAS is ridiculous

        I am even fine with the price point, but the NAS PRO name without iSCSI or NFS is ridiculous
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      99. this iust a simple and very basic NAS / filer but lacks « business » features specially for the number of drives that it holds:
        * NVMe Cache
        * Better and more capable processor
        * More RAM!!
        * Dual 10GbE RJ45/SFP+ for LACP & redundancy
        * Dual PSU for power resilience
        * AD Authentication integration
        * FIPS 140-2 compliance for business that is required
        * No SCSI or NFS support

        Wouldn’t recommend this unit for professional use.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      100. Raid 6 is a curious omission, with raid 10 you have to rely on luck for more than one drive failure especially here with an odd number of drives. So three options, basic protection(raid 1), advanced protection raid 6) and performance (raid 10 would have been ideal. Perhaps a max version with raid 6 and zfs/NFS is in their future. I don’t see the point personally of adding docker etc when most will use another more powerful scalable server for virtualization (proxmox etc)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      101. It is “cheap”, short depth, quiet, and Unifi. Those are the selling points. Everything else goes hard to the other guys by all appearances. Qnap has a few very short depth (13cm) NAS as well, but the price point speaks for itself.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      102. Look Unifi is a cult like Synology BUT ….a NAS that doesn’t have docker, apps, rubbish ,,,a NAS that actually prioritizes local Network attached storage? …Well that is very interesting to me.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      103. Huge question for using this at work: What is the Active Directory integration like? I saw the checkbox option being moused over many times, but it was never explored on the video. Can I manage access to shares based on group rights, and apply group rights to a share, or a folder within a share?

        From a business perspective, the lack of a second PSU is definitely problematic… they really want to push their weird outboard PSU, I know, but that just doesn’t fly if you’re trying to play with the big boys. For small environments and homes, however, it seems pretty great… as long as what you want is STORAGE and not all the extra stuff Synology and the like have grown into becoming.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      104. Excellent review. Thank you. I would really be interesting to knowing what drive setup with RAID5 would be needed to saturate the 10b both for reads and writes. Your numbers are not that great with the drives you used. Could faster hard drives do it? Would SATA SSD’s do it and how many would be needed? I am not buying another NAS with 10g that will only do less than half the network capabilities. With this unit in particular, it really needs to have 10g file transfer capabilities.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      105. A teeny tiny bit frustrated that I ordered a backplane mini-ITX case from AliExpress last month (and am still waiting on delivery) intending to build my homelab server/NAS for my Unifi stack then they announce this thing. Chances are it’ll be like the 2U PDU they make & stay out of stock for 10 months…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      106. GREAT video and I love that they have nailed the fundamentals. In your comparative videos, I suspect it’s going to be REALLY hard to find something in this price range that can even come close. (Find an off the shelf 7 bay NAS for $500?)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      107. 7:26 There is a secondary PSU. Uni does it using the Unifi RPS… That is Unifi’s redundant power supply device. Also if you are worried about noise then RACK MOUNT HARDWARE ISN’T FOR YOU! Only a little over 7 minutes and I already dislike this review.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      108. Great comprehensive video. I absolutely love all things Ubiquity but I feel like I want to wait for another version or at least more apps. I have a Synology now and don’t even scratch the surface of the features available (including things like running docker images) but the one thing your video suggested is given the lack of use of file metadata I would certainly be missing some app features like the Synology photo app at least and probably video as well so I could look up pictures by person (facial recognition) or geo (show me my Aruba vacation pictures)

        I have wanted all things Uniquity on my network and maybe I just need to wait a few software and maybe even a hardware revision or 2. I feel like it may need more memory and CPU once and IF they start to add more app features.

        Also, I wish they would have done an M.2 drive slot at least for caching.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      109. What is your opinion regarding UNIfI selecting BTRFS for their filesystem? I see many video stating that BTRFS with RAID is not ready for production. This is a topic that I would love for you to expand in one of your future videos for the UNIFI nas.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      110. If the unit included NFS, multiple volumes and mixed hard drive sizes . . . that would be then end of Synology for me.
        A luxury version with larger screen – summarising all the data at a glance would be a nice option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      111. I’m running a bare metal k8s cluster, so I really don’t need to be able to run docker containers on a nas. This is exactly what I wanted and at a great price. Ubiquiti nailed their first NAS outing
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      112. Great video, this is almost exactly what I have been looking for, just need the ability to make immutable backups (WORM) which it sounds like you are expecting from them in the near future. Will be looking forward to your future videos.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      113. 10:01 you’re forgetting that this is unifi’s “pro” line not “pro max”. “Pro” really just means rack mount entry level SMB for unifi devices. I wouldn’t expect dual 10Gb on the regular “pro” model.

        Now a “pro max” NAS I would expect to have NVME, more bays, dual 10Gb and a single 25Gb.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      114. I would be interested to know how the hardware compares to the Protect UNVRPro? But none of the reviews peek under the lid. Is it the same hardware but with more memory or is the more to it?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      115. Thinking if these do well they will come out with a ‘Max’ and ‘Enterprise’ editions.
        I’ve been looking at getting a Synology or building my own TrueNAS system for home. Now this came out, I have more research to do to see this will work for my home and families needs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      116. Having already invested in Unifi gear (including a Pro switch with a spare SFP+ port) and already having a fairly beefy Proxmox host in play to host applications this seems like a great option!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      117. It’s pretty clear their goal for this device is having basic file storage for users of a home/small business that are going to connect to shared folders on mac and windows systems. What a NAS by definition really is… I see a lot of people complaining about lack of redundant network ports, NFS, iSCSI, etc. IMO, I think all those features they’re wanting are things needed when you are building enterprise infrastructure and Ubiquiti knows that’s really best handled by a proper SAN product from the likes of Dell, HP, IBM, NetApp, etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      118. 11:30 on my Synology rs3614rpxs, those read and write speeds are what I was getting with five hard drives, over a SPF+ DAC cable. When I switched to a LC om4 fiber SPF+ cable, I was achieving 750MBps or 7Gbps.
        Not sure why I’m getting better numbers from fiber cable over the copper cable. Both cables are rated 10gigabits per second
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      119. Have you actually logged in via SSH and poked around the system? I’m curious what filesystem its running on those drives; given the feature set, it sounds like they are using btrfs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      120. Maybe I missed but is there any thermal test for this machine? The front design of those drive bay let me suspect it might have thermal issue once you use it for some years later.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      121. Some what disappointed, this is just a software patch of the UNVR with a slightly more RAM. I’m sorry to say this but I’m not going to buy it, well not until an NVME slot, 1x 2.5 gbe lans and 2x 10 gbe SFP+
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      122. Dude this is amazing how many people are now entering the consumer space. honestly if the software is stable and good like synologys and as a storage server this seems like a no brainer for a home user who doesn’t want to configure a lot.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      123. A product like this is for a specific market and it’s not me. I prefer DIY… A used 12bay 2U server is about the same price but way more powerful and more versatile. I do like and use their networking hardware though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      124. Such a detailed review, thank you ???? It is a pity about Docker/VM/Plex support (or lack of!), but I understand why Ubi have focused on making just a NAS right now.

        Also re reply you made to another comment, I would love to watch the story of how you had to reshoot this video multiple times. Fair play to you on the patience.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      125. disappointed in the power consumption. Granted being 7 bays at 500$ seems decent but my AIO server is a much better fit long term. I hope they continue to add to their offering.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      126. Finally someone is throwing a bomb in the NAS market, $500 is CHEAP for a proper built system with solid software and hardware support from a company that is represented in the whole world.
        And those that shout “software”, that is something completely different, it takes way more resources to come up with comparable features that Synology has. If that is the need Synology have you covered at a high price with weak specs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      127. I think it’s very nice to have a system that’s actually ONLY a NAS. I do use docker on my Synology devices at home and in the office. And the Synology backup between these two sites is so great that I wouldn’t be without it.

        But for something like an actual online disk system in the office, this fits the bill nicely at a much lower price. Also, as an on-site backup for the backup, this would do well.

        The only reason why this is the case is the price, of course. If it had been comparable to Synology, why would you ever get it? It’s nice to see someone hitting Synology with a price hammer, though. They’ve been getting a bit pricey over the years.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      128. I know you are looking for proxmox setups with the GMKtecK8 mini PC. Do one with the mini running proxmox and a vm like home assistance os (needs a vm) and another vm or proxmox container to run docker containers. The data or docker volumes are atore in the new Unifi nas using SMB (I hope one day it gets NFS)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      129. I did have a question, understand you were able to put a large seagate hdd without issues. But don’t you usually need more ram when total storage size is much larger? If so is there a limit? For instance, if I fill all 7 bats with 24tb drives let’s say, is it capable of that? Or will the 8gb ram be an issue?

        Also if I put 3 drives inside, does it have the ability to add more drives as you go and expand your storage without wiping data from existing raid array?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      130. Now I need ubiquity to make a 1U server that can run media apps like plex or any of its alternatives and make it for about $200 since rackmount chassis are about $200 on their own which is insane
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      131. Can you mix and match drives? On the nvr pro it made me use old 2tb drives because when I tried to put in 2x 10tb, 2x 8tb, and 2x 4tb, it wanted to only use 4tb of d ery drive.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      132. My entire feed is now just tech tubers reviewing this device. I’m guessing they must have all been waiting for an embargo to end. I am, of course, watching this guys review because he’s THE MAN.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      133. It’s all a bit bizarre. Let me check…. yes, it’s definitely 2024. As always, beautiful interface, Ikea-style Unify minimalism, but NIC redundancy, no NVMe, single PSU, it’s all a bit drab. Can you run TrueNas on it ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      134. Can be cool if those who dont have a server rack to be able to have Unifi Drive on a cloudkey g2 to have a small file storage without redundancy. Or even on the drive of a UDM.

        As they keep the UNVR frame, im assuming they will have a UNAS Enterprise as well with the UNVR Enterprise frame 🙂

        And no need apps on a NAS… its a NAS and not a server… I have Plex on my truenas and I regret not having it on my proxmox instead.

        I will for sure ditch my TrueNAS for UNAS and migrate my Plex on a VM
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      135. This is the “beta” product. They will cut production quickly and check how many buyers, then renew the team that made it to continue with next unit. New unit will have slot-in PSU (regular server style) but still no backup, as they want to encourage purchase of the Ubiquiti UPS battery. Two SFP ports (depending on cost and users making use of 10G speed, could be one 10G and one 2.5G) and two RJ45 ports (probably regular 1Gbps or using the new 2.5G that throttles when hot). Likely one fewer drive bay. Newer CPU. More RAM. Double the price.
        Pro: all driver ports will be SATA/U.2 compatible, much more expensive CPU, possible socketed RAM slot (onboard or soldered 4GB or 8GB). Pro will be around 10x the price.
        Ubiquiti developer team isn’t huge, they will not support apps or VM until far future. Best you can hope is to SSH and attempt to install your own OS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      136. The only thing I would have liked was for them to drop the RPS connection and put in dual hot-swappable power supplies. But I get it, they are using the existing hardware from the UNVR Pro so it takes much less effort to make one of these. I plan on getting two of these. One for my primary backups and then the second one for backups of my backups. I will use my current Synology NAS that I am currently using for backups as a Docker system running HA and Plex and move my backups from Synology to the Ubiquiti NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      137. I would buy this without hesitation if I could split data pools to have a 4 drive raid 1 nas as a data replication for my Synology, and a 3 bay raid 0 for unifi protect. To add to that, I would love love LOVE to also be able to use the drive bay in my UDM SE as an additional storage option for unifi protect. (I don’t need redundancy for my home cameras Ubiquiti, I just want as many days recorded as drives I have available).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      138. This will save me a ton on having a NAS to backup my 1821+. My old 4 bay Synology died. So, I’m backing up one volume on my 1821+ to another volume on the same NAS, which obviously worries me. I can’t justify buying another 8 bay Synology, but I can justify this easily. As soon as it’s proven itself in production environments, I’m getting one.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      139. I quite like the NAS and just NAS approach they took. I have separate machines for hypervisors to run VMs and containers on and like the separation. Two of these in a shadow mode active-passive fail over setup would be tits.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      140. I feel like you miss the point of the single PSU. Unifi devices all ahve a single PSU and they have a solution for it that connects to multiple devices and acts as a secondary psu for them. I do not know of any NAS or computer/server that people typically use at home that have duel psu’s.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      141. Hopefully the firmware up-downgrade will be even easier than their other network devices, as they do sometimes release stinker of updates. Currently they broke many widely used IoT devices like shelly. It would probably be good for install-and-forget areas though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      142. WOW, excellent review, I have Unify network setup at home along with a QNAP NAS and heard on the grape vine that there may be a Unifi NAS released soon, and that price, you can’t go wrong… Can’t wait for future updates to see whether they include docker etc as I do like having the utils that QNAP provide. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      143. For my Home Lab this is almost what I need. I have QNAP 8 bay ARM (~1000€) but it’s not rack mounted. But I also use ssd in raid 0 as a cache. And I have about double the ram. I really use it as SMB store so thats fine. I wanted so bad to replace my QNAP with this but it seems, it will just be a backup for QANP storage with speeds I see. UNAS Pro MAX would just need to have 2 NVME bays for CACHE, double SFP+ and give us the 12 bays and 3U. But who knows, maybe the UNAS Pro is enough for raw video editing of SMB and playing games with Steam?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      144. All I need is my private dropbox, ability to back up family phones and view uploaded and edited videos from hols on TV and phone. Dont care about plex or dockers (what are these?:)Is that going to cut the mustard?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      145. Hey there! Finally it came to life, so many years! Now I’m glad I never did spend time on switching OS on a UNVR, that time is now _saved_.

        thoughts: It’s good that there’s no concept of pools. keep it this simple or it will just not fit into its very limited scope anymore.

        If I could, and if it would already support the right bits, I would put one in each access switch cabinet and use them as archival storage or similar. Not as team folder or anything they would suck at. but as a way to spread out tertiary storage. The price is right, the URPS connector is suitable, don’t need a second 10g port for that either. Integrate moosefs or similar at the same level of hands-off-no-choices setup and this would be nice[tm].

        I also would say the lack of WORM features is a pity. how well do they have that down in UNVR? it’s not a trivial feature to implement to any non-laughable level of reliability.
        Given the price point, I’d even ejnoy a toggle switch that makes the whole device read-only and can only be cancelled at the front panel. Fill it, lock it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      146. Kinda a bummer, i was holding out building something for myself. Sure Not having plex is a bummer butttttttt…. Not allowing Unifi Protect to be used on the NAS is a deal breaker….
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      147. Good review.

        I’ve a question about user management and “directory integration”. Does it mean that instead of creating local users in this NAS, if I’ve a MS AD server on ny network, I can assign rights for some network users on some directories ?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      148. Thanks for really nice video!
        When sharing a folder, you can add a user. What user is this? Is this something that you create on your machine?
        And how does the remote login for it look?

        I’m currently using Nextcloud on Truenas to share large video files. All my friends and clients have a personal login where they view/download/reshare the media. I’m curious if I can replicate this with the UNAS.

        Also, when you preview/stream remotely a video file does it transcode? If yes, does it also do h265? Sorry for the interrogation 😛 It’s just it can be a dealbreaker or dream for me depending on the answer.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      149. For the price, this is great! I usually have my Plex server and VMs and stuff on another machine anyway. Seems pretty desirable to split the two so you have some redundancy.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      150. Nice start, but not a homerun.

        Give it:

        More cores/threads (n305)
        Replacable RAM
        NVME storage
        Usb ports
        Alligned front drives, not this masonry pattern

        I’d like to run docker and apps like photobackup, torrent, jellyfin, home assistant.

        Happy to pay twice the price
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      151. Got it, this is intended to be mostly a pure NAS not a compute and app platform. For the cost that is a great value prop for SMB. They currently seem to have more interest in nailing the NAS basics rather than trying to run any and all docker apps. This seems ok. woah, directory integration, hope they extend that to the whole control plane and not charge a subscription for that.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      152. Given Ubiquiti’s history of never delivering promised features on new devices before they reach EOL, I’ll wait to see if they actually deliver the app that simplifies mounting of drives for end users before I decided to make a purchase… I’m over here having “Security Scanning Radio, SHD-AP” flashbacks…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      153. Great video, lots of details thanks! One question, can you mix and match different HDD sizes? As someone who hacked unvr to NAS, I have installed 4 disks which automatically turned on raid 5. Is this the same case with UNAS PRO?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      154. Kind of limited to me but I can see this being great for a lot of people, especially those already using Ubiquity equipment and/or who might be on the fence about buying Synology. Kind of refreshing to see a ‘pure’ NAS though as someone who still believes in separating storage and compute.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      155. Great video! will be using your link to purchase one.
        I currently have a TrueNAS box that has 9 drives in it but going to scale down to 7 drives anyways to save power consumption (yes for me it does make that big of a difference). That is the biggest thing for me… when my NAS is at idle it is 90-100w and reading/ writing heavy it is 160-200 w. I don’t do docker or anything like that on my NAS, I have another machine for that. I just need something efficient and that will do the storage thing well, and it will match my other Unifi equipment…. lol
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      156. I actually like that it’s not a Synology or QNAP. I can’t stand how those brands are trying to turn their NAS into a Swiss army knife. I don’t need my NAS to be a VM host, run Docker containers, host OpenOffice, Nextcloud, Home Assistant, act as a DNS or DHCP server, or provide LDAP, etc. I hve proxmox clusters, DC servers, and Routers that already do all of that. I need my NAS to do one thing, and one thing only—store stuff. And that’s exactly what this does. It’s a no-frills solution for straightforward storage.

        That said, Ubiquiti has a bad reputation for exciting the world with new products then abandoning thrm 9 months to a year after release and leaving a bunch of early adopters with useless doorstops after they stop supporting it (ask me how i know), so I think I’ll hold off buying one until its been around for a while but it looks like a great jumping point for a platform. as it seems to be based off the UNVR Pro, I imagine the UNVR and UNVR Enterprise will eventually join the ecosystem as the UNAS and UNAS Enterprise so well see. lot of potential here.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      157. For simple business NAS this is probably more than adequate but anyone who wants a server like Synology/QNAP or something more advanced like Unraid won’t be interested in this at all. What would be cool is if they launched a 4U rack mount case with tons of hot swappable drive bays so we could build what the client (or Prosumers) wants.

        I have a 90TB Unraid server in a desktop style ATX case. There are not many rack mount cases that work great imo other than those massive LTT style servers they build (forgot the companys name) but they don’t just sell the case.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      158. If it can do storage and permissions better then unraid/truenas then I could care less about vm/docker support. Proxmox does vms better and docker is just better on a dedicated machine
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      159. I’ve got multiple Synology’s in my house, and I love them. I also have a full Unifi setup. I’d love to try transitioning to one of these in the future, but I’m going to wait until the software gets a little more polished, and some more features get added. But $500 for a 7 bay rack mountable NAS is a great price!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      160. It’s surprising to see the same hardware as the NVR Pro, running Drive but doesn’t support Protect. If you combined the NVR and NAS into a single product line, eliminating the need to purchase and manage two separate sets of drives, I’d be ready to purchase it, even with the current software limitations. Over the past few years, Synology has been scaling back on features while continuing to charge a premium for hardware that is outdated. It’s hard to justify paying top dollar for a NAS that still ships with generations old CPU and 1Gb Ethernet. Unfortunately, UniFi’s solution doesn’t seem to be quite there yet either. I had high hopes that UniFi was going to get me out of the Synology downward spiral.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      161. What’s the underlying file system, BTRFS? No NFS 3 or NFS 4.1? No iSCSI LUN and target support? Upgradeable memory? Does it deliver data fast enough for 4K streaming (Plex) running on a connected device? Does seem disappointing compared to Synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      162. I don’t understand the connectivity/single PSU complaints. The thing’s 500 bucks. It’s got SFP+. This is 100% a repurposed NVR, and fit for purpose at a frankly insane price. Great for storing your jellyfin library and similar workloads. Don’t ask it to do stuff it wasn’t designed for.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      163. I really like this product. Most home users these days want a “NAS” but really they want a home server that runs a lot of different services and stores files for their network and they think their NAS is supposed be that device. I appreciate that this device goes back to being what a NAS was originally intended to be and seems targeted perfectly to the small business and home business market.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      164. I’m not sure if it supports dynamic expansion, such as adding more hard drives later like SHR, or flexibly expanding by replacing one hard drive with a larger capacity. After all, not everyone is a professional who would spend a large amount of money to buy all the hard drives at once.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      165. You mentioned it’s quiet and I’ve heard the same from other reviewers. What HDDs were you using when you put the mic on it? It sounded just like my UNVR, which is very quiet. I can’t get over how quiet these Unifi devices are compared to my Synology with Ironwolf drives, which I can hear 2 rooms away.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      166. I’m not terribly impressed with the documentation on the website as it doesn’t cover what the back plane and system support. is it all SATA3 6Gb or does it also support SAS 12Gb? yes there’s only one 10Gb port BUT the fewer drives you need to saturate that bandwidth the more drives you can allocate for redundancy if you aren’t just looking to maximize storage volume. Despite my grump there, the price alone makes this device appealing and thanks for the video!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      167. @liamfoneill We have to wait for the UNAS Pro Max for NVME M.2 drive support!! 😛 😀 🙂
        It’s also worth noting 1 PSU isn’t a big deal, it has a connection (from what I see from your pictures) for an RPS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      168. this NAS is a good machine for back-ups over the network
        the only think I want to know is what if the unit fails (mobo/PSU) can I remove the drives and move them to another unit and have the data?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      169. Needs to have SFP+ for me to leave synology 2.5Gbps. I am very happy with synology software ecosystem (drive, photos, audio, video, VM Manager). I can’t leave that either.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      170. I’m wondering if the storage can be increased by adding more drives without destroying the data already there. Say you set it up in RAID6 with 4 drives and then add 3 more, do you have to wipe the array and start over or is there a way to expand the storage without losing the data already there? 7 disk bays, 10 gig and an easy to manage interface for $500 seems like a crazy good deal if you don’t want to hassle with a DIY job (which I’ve done and hate).

        Edit: LOL should have finished watching the vid first
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      171. Cheap is not good. There could have been a bit more hardware and software for a 20% higher price.
        It’s just a data repository with a fancy interface, there’s still a lot to do. I have UGreen NAS as an EA, it could do more than NAS when it came out and it’s not more expensive. For the little that the UNAS can do (lack of synchronization between PC and MAC, no NFS and iSCSI, no M.2 NVMe) you don’t need a “special” interface. And the worst thing for me is that I have 7 disks and I can’t set them up in different storage pools.
        Is the video also available in slow mode? Many of the interfaces are hard to recognize and the video is extremely hectic.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      172. Great Video thanks. I’ve been waiting for something like this since I turned off my Power hungry Apple 1U Servers and huge Apple RAIDs and bought a Qnap, which I have hated for years. All I want is mountable storage , easy to use, no faffing about, couldn’t care less about Apps and Containers and real hot swappable storage. Gonna get one for sure.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      173. give us Max version: x86 platform at least 4/8 core, nfs+iscsi, 4x NICs /2+2 10G/, nvme storage, wasabi+backblaze backup target, native apps or dockers. will happily pay 899+ EUR any day.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      174. I guess the price reflect the features. But you can use it for Protect archiving recently released. I guess you have UDMP with protect and archive to this or the cloud. The cpu and memory on this are slim because it can’t run any other apps but it’s good for shuffling files. Also the Microsoft / Google account integrations for identity enterprise could be a big feature for businesses.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      175. I was excited until I discovered it does not have NFS or iSCSI, as I consider those services a fundamental requirement for even an entry-level NAS. I’d also love to see an NVMe RW/RO cache option.

        I’d have instantly given UI my money if it had iSCSI, NFS, NVMe cache, and dual 10GB SFP+.

        I guess those will come as a PRO MAX version 😛
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      176. Thank you, thank you, thank you for a great video on this system. I felt your review was very honest and unbiased. I totally agree on your Pro’s and Con’s and for me, I think the ‘current state’ of this unit is underwhelming for my needs. Maybe if they release another unit that will allow third party software, unifi surveillance integration, a better CPU, and memory upgrades. BTW. I’m almost all in on the Unifi ecosystem although I do have a QNAP and Synology NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      177. Well there goes my hope of not having to wait for synology. So you think if we dont get a synology announcement by first week of Nov no release again this year? I dont see how they would miss the holiday buying period. Unless their plan is to sell old NAS on black friday and release the new one right after and really p everyone off.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      178. The “Create a UI account” really seems to be disingenuous on UniFi’s part. Not being at all familiar with Unify, I would just think that it’s the normal user name and password to login locally to the desktop *User Interface* and not an online account. Unify could have been far clearer about this but I suspect that a fair number of people would have blindly proceeded with setting up the UI account which is what they are counting on. And, to put that in perspective, think back to your review of HexOS and the really solid push back by those who did not want an online login. I don’t like to do business with anyone who runs their business like that. No thanks.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      179. Synology is the only NAS brand where I think their software adds value beyond being a storage server. But if I’m being honest, over time as I’ve migrated most of my docker/VM services over to Proxmox or XCP-ng and have very little running on the Synology hardware itself.
        I could see myself being interested in exploring Unifi as a storage server in the future, but I’d need a higher performance version.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      180. Defiantly going to pick one of these up. Don’t give a hoot about the docker side, that’s why I have servers. I want a storage NAS that does just that, store things and get data to the right users, I don’t want to host my docker apps from it as well. Great video thanks for the review!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      181. Is it even possible to saturate a 10G connection with spinning disks? Other than that, i assume this is meant to be connected to an SFP+ aggregator (USW-Aggregation) switch to split between multiple storage units
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      182. This device is the beginning . It’s affordable and it’s easy to use.

        If it catches on, you bet you’re bippy, more will come.

        I’ve got four Synology unit in use between my family members and they are great but … I would love something that just efficiently stores data.

        It also appears that it may easily, allow safe direct remote access.

        I’ll have to watch how things go before I would purchase.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      183. So I see some real good here; one, Unifi has a track record of software upgrades, so I fully expect items like NFS/ISCSI. I do not in any way expect Plex, Docker, etc. and I shouldn’t – that isn’t who this product is aimed at. Two, the remote management through the UI account management system is a potential IT godsend in comparison to the way that this works in Synology. Three, I do like the snapshop methodology in comparison to the way that this functions in synology. Now, the biggest items I see that will be big is that it fits directly into the UI ecosphere, and that is good. Now, I can see a lot of room for improvement, but I can see where this can have a big future with some of the integration options this is going to have. I do like how this is a business ready product that isn’t moving to drives that are made by them and nothing else (screw you Synology on that one)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      184. Soooooo ugly. I like Unifi, have a lot of their hardware. But just can’t understand why 7 drives? Why layout is so strange? Just… why? Can’t they just stack two 4-drives cases?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      185. Thanks for the review, well done and thorough. Not surprised to see no availability for Docker at this point. At the price point, this is great for fire storage. It’s not HA or high-speed system, which is fine. There are other players for that type of equipment. It appears that UI gave us a purpose-built system that does one thing really well, at a price that is hard to not smile at.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      186. This looks like a decent start – funnily enough while eating my bacon, egg and black pudding (and watching this video), I got the email from Ubiquiti titled “Welcome to Unifi Drive and UNAS Pro” (1134hrs EDT). As others have commented though, I won’t be swapping my DS920+ for the UNAS Pro. I do have a Ubiquiti network setup, so was very excited when I saw your video this morning. As always – great video and thanks for taking the time to post!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      187. I am… underwhelmed.
        I was not expecting perfection, but… it lacks so much to be an instant buy. But yeah, it’s truly cheap (especially for Unifi) for a 2U 7 drive bay (which is really something) and would play nice into the ecosystem. But… no ZFS, no NFS, no iSCSI, no docker (because let’s be honest, even if purists say that a NAS should be just a NAS, but… it makes sense to have those hosts a few docker).

        I know Unifi makes update, albeit slowly.. but.. at the moment it’s not worth it. But 500 euros… it’s super interesting when they started adding features.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      188. First galance. Where does the air flow come from to cool the drives. As not much air is going to get around those solid caddie faces. As a rackmount. Its supposed to have front to back airflow. The almost solid front panel raises questions.

        The network ports have one up and one pointing down is an odd design choice. Not to mention being in the front.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      189. This is just a pure NAS. Nothing more. I mean, yea. But at the same time it does not go up against things like Unraid or Truenas. Even OMV has more functions. For what this is, it is about $200 more then it should be for what you get. I was really looking forward to this to replace my Unraid server, but damn.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      190. I’d consider going with a Unifi Nas, but I don’t want rack-mount (5 bays would be great) and I’d like to see more configuration options. Docker support would be (really) nice.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      191. I’m disappointed in the backup options on this nas. Let’s be honest, no one will be backing up their 7 drives of data to Google Drive. That would be a insane cost. So this device doesn’t have a real, usable cloud backup that you can use. It doesn’t also have USB backup, so to backup this device you need to… get another NAS. Because you haven’t payed enough just yet.

        I do agree it’s a good value target for a synology backup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      192. This looks really interesting to me. My big question though, what if you get more than 1 of these? Say I expand and need more than 7 drives, could I buy a second unit and have the pools merge between the 2? Because that would be cool. Also seeing performance stats of SATA SSD’s would be nice too!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      193. people complaining about the features for a $499 NAS drive from Ubiquiti, common guys .wait for next more expensive version will probably have all those missing features.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      194. This seems interesting and I might even pull the trigger. It would be nice to have a single pane of glass to manage everything and not to have to worry about Synology and the lack of 3rd party device support. I mean from a NAS perspective it literally does just that and anything else can be added later.

        Also, do we know anything about the file system or did I miss it in the video? Is it BTRFS or EXT4?

        Also, more information about the backups would be awesome! Like is this sort of like hyper backup?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      195. Great and very timely review Thanks! Did I understand you correctly, can you uses different sized drives in the raid array (like Synology Hybrid raid) or do all drives the array need to be the same size?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      196. I have nevered owned a NAS…just an OWC Thunderbay 4 nut need a NAS u now. So now that this item is released I’m wondering whether for my first NAS I should still stick to getting the Synology DS1522+ as a SOLO videographer and editor using 10TB per year?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      197. Genuinely worried about this as ive been using a UNVR Pro for a while as a nas using SSH to install samba. I hope they dont artificially block people using the UNVR Pro now that there is an official NAS offering
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      198. They could’ve gone with an Intel N100 or N200 which would’ve been so much better, even if they tack on an added $100-200 dollars to the price tag, unfortunately I’ll not be considering it. It’s nice tho, maybe they’ll release something with an Intel/AMD chip in the future…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      199. It’s one strange NAS.
        Strange layout. Strange software. Strange hardware. Thermals are dubious. Rackable but lacking features standard for rack hw such as modular redundant PSUs.
        Good for undemanding brand fanboys only.
        When b- and c-tier brands and even nonames have started pumping out decent NAS devices, seeing such a device from a respectable brand is utterly perplexing. I’d love to get into the product development team’s heads and learn their thought processes that led to the appearance of this bucktoothed inbred monstrosity…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      200. Phenomenal review and THANK YOU for the well labeled chapter marks in the video. Wanted to jump around to just my highest importance spots first in the video before watching end to end.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      201. I think you hit it on the head at the end Robbie. I’m defo going to be replacing my onsite backup ext. drives with one of these (going by how stuff sells out on their site though, that’s probably going to be around 4/3 2025!). But it won’t be replacing the Synology for day to day work stuff that’s for sure.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      202. *It FINALLY Happened* – ‪@UbiquitiInc‬ finally launched the #Unifi UNAS Pro – and here is my massive review https://youtu.be/rbq2so5S-zI

        Stay tuned for more on this system very soon here on the channel. Otherwise, use the pages below on NC and UNiFi to learn more:

        – UniFi UNAS Pro NAS. SHOULD YOU BUY? https://nascompares.com/guide/unifi-unas-pro-nas-should-you-buy/
        – Synology vs UniFi UNAS Pro Comparison https://nascompares.com/guide/synology-vs-unifi-unas-pro-comparison/
        – QNAP vs UniFi UNAS Pro https://nascompares.com/guide/qnap-vs-unifi-unas-pro-which-nas-should-you-buy/
        – UniFi UNAS Pro. FIRST TIME SETUP GUIDE https://nascompares.com/guide/unifi-unas-pro-first-time-setup-guide/

        – The UniFi UNAS Pro NAS Review https://nascompares.com/review/the-unifi-unas-pro-nas-review/
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      203. Their thinking on the 1G port is probably to use that on a management network for config management and use the 10G for data only. At least that’s usually how appliances set up like that are intended to be used. Would be nice to have more ports for flexibility though if you’re trying to do something like directly attaching vm hosts.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      204. Looks like your last video comments for opening CCTV and NAS has been addressed? I have just purchased the UCG_Max (F*kn brilliant!) and adopted 2 ONVIF camera (out of 3 in my setup) Awesome! And now I can also bin my sh!ty Google Doorbell and get the G4 doorbell! Oh.. and a Unify NAS? I hope i can connect that extra storage to my UCG Max!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      205. I’m wondering if they are not simply adding a new application to the NVR Pro. That would make a lot of sense. The processor listed is identical to the NVR Pro, and the pic of the box is identical as well.

        With Onvif coming to Protect, I’d be interested in this if I could use the NAS to backup an NVR Pro to it. I would not need a powerful processor. Not looking to replace my Synology NAS’s, and all the applications I run on them. I am looking to move my security to dedicated hardware. I was looking at the NVR/Pro, and found it does not seem to have the ability to natively send backups to a NAS in its current form. I saw a workaround sending RTSP feeds to another security system to record, but that’s not really a proper solution for back up.

        I also wonder if it could run both at the same time on the same box. I have run storage and backups on the same box before, but it is a bad idea. Rather, a better solution would be to have two boxes, one running Protect, and the other NAS. In that case if the Protect box went down, you could convert the NAS to take it’s place while you get a replacement. Temporarily running them on the same box would allow time to build the system out instead of going all in at once.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      206. All of this is happening because Synology has completely fumbled the ball. Old hardware, high prices and worse software updates. Synology might not be scared on UGREEN but they better be scared of Ubiquiti…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      207. I am actually more annoyed that they are doing a nas system. They need to stay on their lane and develop their switch and wifi range better instead of going on side quests like cameras and NAS devices.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      208. https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=Y&application_id=qkDUs%2Fe7pIac7WyObDTZAg%3D%3D&fcc_id=SWX-UNASP
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      209. That NAS pro marketing material is old and in fact predates the UNVR pro. It’s essentially what became the UNVR pro. I even commented to this on the thread on Reddit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      210. A NAS with 1GBE????

        My main gripe is all their stuff comes with 1GBE including their dream walls, and other appliances! its 2024 seriously… I find it massively overpriced to get subpar speeds
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      211. The biggest benefit I would hope to see from it is interrupting the existing NAS space by making more affordable 10Gb hardware. If UniFi can come in with affordable products that include 10Gb then I would hope Synology would follow suit. Right now their cheapest Synology solution that comes with 10Gb included is over $1800 (DS1823xs+) (several others with optional upgrade to 10Gb NIC).

      212. Mate. The seaguil is lovely I never felt bother by them. In contrast, It is constant reminder to the audience that u an authentic loyal to ur background and what you said is always (I mean always) valuable to a large IT community.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      213. I can’t say I am very excited about it. I don’t like their NVR system. It does not integrate with other vendors. I REQUIRE all of my infrastructure to use common protocols and not have their own special sauce. I do like their Switches and Access points though. In terms of NAS my go to has for many years been Synology but these days I am leaning more and more towards TrueNAS. Software matters more than a pretty enclosure.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      214. I’m curious if this would require a console that can run it. Like how you need to be able to run Protect, Talk, etc, I wonder if this will have that requirement. I’m interested in the desktop NAS from Ubiquiti, but if my UCGU has to be able to run whatever software is needed for it and that device can’t do it, I’d probably opt for Synology before I’d upgrade my Unifi gear.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      215. If true then it looks cool but based on a NVR-Pro. Honestly though, I wish Ubiquiti would slow their R&D for new products and just get the current products fully integrated to the extent they’ve spoken about. For example, they’ve officially said that in a future update that the Intercom Viewer will integrate with the G4 POE doorbell with POE chime – has this happened yet? Nope.

        Personally I love their products however they need to just finish the things they’ve made public and then create new things. For a NAS solution, Synology is the go-to for rapid deployment in most SMB cases (QNAP if the HDD thing Synology did is an issue), I say this as there’s a hell of a lot of work to create a comparable NAS unless Ubiquiti were to either licence an OS from Synology or QNAP or unless they got permission to deploy TrueNAS (or a fork of it).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      216. I’m very interested in this. I really enjoy playing with my home network, but I’m no IT or engineer so I just save files on a windows PC that’s pretty much always on and wired to the network. I hope these devices can also host the unifi controller so I don’t have to have the said PC running it anymore
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      217. If they do a NAS I am suspecting that people will expect it to be an easy to use system that has the feature set of Truenas. That means they will need 25 gig switching.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      218. 10G is no good for an SSD based NAS. That’s less than two SSD’s-worth of speed. It will be worse than local storage.
        My target spec is 8 PCIE Gen4 x4 NVME slots, 4+ SATA, PCIE Gen 4 x16 slot for networking.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      219. As a unifi user at home, with almost all my networking gear on unifi… I dont really care for a unifi nas. I believe these products are so different that i dont know why it would be an advantage to have it… Unified.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      220. As a user who just changed their network over to Unfi to run ethernet throughout the house and who has NAS in the plan, I’m quite excited to see this video poop up in my feed. I hope it’s true and is a decent product. I’d definitely buy it if so.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      221. I wish Amazon would simply EOL that CPU/SoC, it is 12 years old now and should not be used in newly released products anymore. Ubiquiti needs to move onto something 2-3 generations newer finally.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      222. I would rather see them bring in asked gor features to existing products than focusing on new products.

        A 10Gb switch with 25Gb uplink would be great and optional upgrades for udm pro, se, promax for 25Gb uplink to switches would make more sense or optional upgrade to 25Gb WAN and bring unifi to med – large business.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      223. If the rack mount only has 6 bays.. that’s a bit… low? Especially since the rack mount version will probably cost a fair bit. If they could make it 3U (or 4U) and be able to fit the HDDs vertically instead, they should be able to fit at least 10
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      224. Interesting but I’m impatiently awaiting my UGreen 4800P+ – recently received an email from them to expect a query for shipping information! Getting closer… Now what RAM should I buy to expand it to 16TB and HDD 12TB? Already bought a 5 port 10Gbe router and cables plus a 10 Gbe PCIE card for my PC… Suggestions?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      225. I can see unifi selling a nas solution as part of a way to “host” multi site networks. As well as being a secondary backup to the nvrs and the controllers.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      226. As someone who’s looking to run a UniFi network and so far has been looking at Synology for a NAS to go with it, this is very interesting. However, DSM is so far along, could Ubiquity really get all those ducks in a row, Photo App, Video Station, Plex support, Docker, etc, etc. I’m not sure they will go down the “open” road, and it’ll be more for basic file storage and a place to put UniFi camera footage.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      227. I personally like the Synology DSM solution. Very complete. However, you’re totally right: a NAS solution from Unifi would be different than others: simple to setup and will just work. Kinda like Protect. That would be sweet. Simple deployment. Central management. Synology DSM does have some business solutions built-in, like M365 and Backup for Business are great to have for a full business solution. I’m guessing UniFi won’t have that. At least not on their first version.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      228. I like unifi, but recommend steering clear from new product lines. Unifi unfortunately have a reputation of releasing buggy/incomplete products (from a software point of view) and I recommend leaving it to early adopters to iron out the issues.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      229. It really not. Well the Desktop is an Alien Router in white. Faceplam. That image is just an example of a NAS. for the diagrams… That shape can’t hold a HHD let alone 2 or 4… possibly SSDs.

        There may be a Rack… Sysnology has 40+ designs and purchase levels.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      230. I can’t trust UNIFI. they under deliver or just plain change what they are doing at the drop of a hat post deployment. worse yet they have other that they promise and never deliver on. i’d trust a crowd funded no name at this point before i trust unif for NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      231. Ubiquiti Networks UNVR-PRO UniFi Protect NVR Pro was one of the pics you showed. I would love them to create a nas but im not holding my breath. It would be nice though.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      232. Hmm, feels a wee bit a Me-too product to me but I’m not that into Ubiquiti eco-system, so I could be wrong.
        My concern is that the specialist-knowledge required for NAS is more & more watered down by just everybody (pun intended) bringing out a NAS. (too)
        If I was Ubiquiti, I would seek partnership instead with a industry-leading NAS company.
        Feels like reinventing the round wheel and sliced-bread again, to me.
        I know one thing for sure, it will be Ubiquiti pricing, so quire expensive…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      233. Great idea, however, my biggest concern would be about scalability and if you had to buy another unit, how they connect together to increase storage, iSCSI or fiber link etc and also the cost of both units.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      234. Great idea, however, my biggest concern would be about scalability and if you had to buy another unit, how they connect together to increase storage, iSCSI or fiber link etc and also the cost of both units.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      235. I don’t understand why anyone with any interest or skill in technology would buy any of these overpriced and underpowered ready-made NAS’. I can understand if someone knows nothing about storage or technology just wants an easy plug and play storage device, but other than that it makes no sense.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      236. I don’t understand why anyone with any interest or skill in technology would buy any of these overpriced and underpowered ready-made NAS’. I can understand if someone knows nothing about storage or technology just wants an easy plug and play storage device, but other than that it makes no sense.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      237. I’d buy the desktop version 10Gbe, Intel Cpu for Plex transcoding, VM’s maybe would be nice. The touch screen would be cool match my Amplifi Alien I’m still using which they also need to upgrade to Wifi 7.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      238. I’d buy the desktop version 10Gbe, Intel Cpu for Plex transcoding, VM’s maybe would be nice. The touch screen would be cool match my Amplifi Alien I’m still using which they also need to upgrade to Wifi 7.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      239. This has been one of the worst kept secrets. And it probably will include the same form factor and tech from the NVR Pro. That will make it cheaper to manufacture since they are already making this. Since the CPU and memory are fairly pedestrian ARM embedded chips that Unifi uses everywhere, I’m thinking the device will be limited to file service and related functions but don’t expect to be doing VMs or anything sophisticated. Whether they open APIs to run third party apps is anyone’s guess.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      240. This has been one of the worst kept secrets. And it probably will include the same form factor and tech from the NVR Pro. That will make it cheaper to manufacture since they are already making this. Since the CPU and memory are fairly pedestrian ARM embedded chips that Unifi uses everywhere, I’m thinking the device will be limited to file service and related functions but don’t expect to be doing VMs or anything sophisticated. Whether they open APIs to run third party apps is anyone’s guess.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      241. I can’t trust Unifi with my Data. Nope! I rather trust Google it! ????

        To many times has there been updates to unifi and it breaks everything. I’ll wait a few years like 10 years before trusting them
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      242. I can’t trust Unifi with my Data. Nope! I rather trust Google it! ????

        To many times has there been updates to unifi and it breaks everything. I’ll wait a few years like 10 years before trusting them
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      243. Interesting. I hope it’s more then a rumor. If it is in development one can also hope it steers clear of bloody Kickstarter and has wide availability. Having said that, ARM isn’t my preference. Sure Apple has done an outstanding job with their silicon and Windows on ARM via Snapdragon Cortex SoC is seemingly coming along nicely. However, server / NAS on ARM gives me the dry heaves.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      244. Interesting. I hope it’s more then a rumor. If it is in development one can also hope it steers clear of bloody Kickstarter and has wide availability. Having said that, ARM isn’t my preference. Sure Apple has done an outstanding job with their silicon and Windows on ARM via Snapdragon Cortex SoC is seemingly coming along nicely. However, server / NAS on ARM gives me the dry heaves.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      245. would be nice , but thing is i dont want rackmount ,
        1. rackmounts are not easy to place in a small 2 room house
        2. they are less mobile
        3. i perfer a network setup with small devices like “Gateway Max”

        i dont need that many ports, just a few, and thing is they only care for larger scale, while we are getting 8gb fiber internet soon, unify don’t make consumer products that are 2.5g or more

        its a downside of unify
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      246. would be nice , but thing is i dont want rackmount ,
        1. rackmounts are not easy to place in a small 2 room house
        2. they are less mobile
        3. i perfer a network setup with small devices like “Gateway Max”

        i dont need that many ports, just a few, and thing is they only care for larger scale, while we are getting 8gb fiber internet soon, unify don’t make consumer products that are 2.5g or more

        its a downside of unify
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      247. FOR FECK SAKE !!!! 0:58 ALIGN THE DANG HDD CAGES EVENLY!!! this twisted shiz is horrible…

        oh and if they make a NAS? yeah count me in if they price is decent and pref NO DISKS plz thx don’t wanna pay overprice for drives
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      248. FOR FECK SAKE !!!! 0:58 ALIGN THE DANG HDD CAGES EVENLY!!! this twisted shiz is horrible…

        oh and if they make a NAS? yeah count me in if they price is decent and pref NO DISKS plz thx don’t wanna pay overprice for drives
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE