The Best M.2 SSD NAS You Can Buy RIGHT NOW

Last updated on 30 Dec 2024 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 The Best M.2 SSD NAS of the Year
1.1 Criteria for Selection
1.2 Honorable Mention: Asustor Flashstor Gen 2
1.3 Best Business M.2 NVMe SSD NAS – The QNAP TBS-h574
1.4 Best Budget 10GbE M.2 SSD NAS – The TerraMaster F8 SSD Plus
1.5 Best Value Multimedia M.2 SSD NAS – Asustor Flashstor 6/12 Gen 1
2 Final Thoughts

The Best M.2 SSD NAS of the Year

As we close out 2024 and move into 2025, the evolution of SSD-based NAS systems has been nothing short of remarkable. This year has seen a surge in brands embracing M.2 NVMe and SATA-based SSD systems over traditional hard drives. Today, we highlight the best SSD flash NAS systems of the year, featuring three standout recommendations and one honorable mention. These systems leverage the enhanced performance of Gen 3, Gen 4, and even Gen 5 SSDs, providing exceptional speed and versatility.

Criteria for Selection

  1. Availability: The NAS must have been released and available for purchase before October 2024.
  2. Focus on M.2 NVMe: While SATA-based SSDs are still popular, this list emphasizes systems that utilize the high-performance potential of M.2 NVMe SSDs.
  3. Turnkey Solutions: DIY systems are excluded; we’re focusing on fully integrated, ready-to-use NAS devices.

With those criteria in mind, let’s dive into the list, starting with our honorable mention.

Honorable Mention: Asustor Flashstor Gen 2

6/12x M.2 NVMe SSD Bays (Gen 4/3), Ryzen 4 Core / 8 Thread CPU, ECC Memory, 10GbE, USB4, 10G USB – $999-1499 HERE

  • Written Review HERE
  • YouTube Video Review HERE

The Asustor Lockerstor Gen 2 is a fantastic example of how NAS devices are evolving to meet modern performance demands. Designed for users who need a balance of speed, reliability, and compact design, this NAS delivers enterprise-level features in a smaller form factor. Its Ryzen V3000 processor, paired with 6 or 12 bays for M.2 NVMe drives, makes it a powerhouse for demanding workloads. Whether you’re handling virtualization, multimedia editing, or advanced backups, this NAS is built to perform without breaking a sweat.

The Asustor Lockerstor Gen 2 narrowly misses the top spots but remains an impressive NAS. Powered by a Ryzen V3000 processor, this system is available in 6-bay and 12-bay configurations, offering:

  • 10GbE and USB 4 connectivity, enabling network and Thunderbolt functionality.
  • ECC memory support, depending on the configuration.
  • Gen4 SSD Bandwidth
  • Compact design with powerful performance, ideal for modern workloads.

This NAS combines robust hardware and versatile connectivity. The Ryzen V3000 processor ensures efficient multitasking, making it suitable for demanding applications such as virtualization, multimedia editing, and high-speed backups. The inclusion of ECC memory in specific configurations enhances data integrity, making it an excellent choice for professionals requiring reliability.

What we said in our Flashstor Gen 2 Review 03/24:

The Asustor Flashstor Gen 2 12-Bay NAS is a robust and versatile solution for users with demanding storage needs. Its combination of high-performance hardware, extensive connectivity options, and compact design makes it a standout choice for content creators, small businesses, and enthusiasts. With dual 10GbE ports, USB 4.0 connectivity, and support for up to 12 M.2 NVMe drives, it offers exceptional speed and scalability. While the device has a few quirks, such as its mixed PCIe slot speeds and lack of M.2 heat sinks, these are manageable with proper planning and aftermarket solutions. The Flashstor Gen 2 excels in raw performance, handling intensive workflows with ease and maintaining low noise levels even under load. Its power efficiency and robust thermal management further enhance its appeal for 24/7 operation. For users prioritizing hardware capabilities and performance, the Flashstor Gen 2 delivers on its promises. While its complexity may deter less experienced users, those with the technical expertise to configure and optimize the system will find it a valuable addition to their workflow.

SOFTWARE - 6/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 10/10
PRICE - 7/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.0
PROS
👍🏻Exceptional Performance: Dual 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports and USB 4.0 connectivity deliver fast and reliable data transfer speeds, ideal for 4K editing and collaborative environments.
👍🏻Extensive Storage Options: Supports up to 12 M.2 NVMe SSDs, allowing for large-scale, high-speed storage arrays.
👍🏻ECC Memory Support: Includes 16GB of DDR5-4800 ECC memory (expandable to 64GB), ensuring data integrity for critical applications.
👍🏻Compact Design: Small footprint makes it perfect for workspaces with limited room.
👍🏻Quiet Operation: Dual-fan system keeps noise levels low, even under heavy loads.
👍🏻Flexible Connectivity: Features two USB 4.0 Type-C ports and three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports for direct storage access and peripheral integration.
👍🏻Power Efficiency: Low power consumption (32.2W idle, 56W under load) makes it economical to run, even for 24/7 operation.
👍🏻Thermal Management Enhancements: Dual fans and copper heat pipes efficiently dissipate heat, ensuring stable performance.
👍🏻Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Compatible with platforms like TrueNAS and Unraid for advanced customization.
CONS
👎🏻Mixed PCIe Slot Speeds: Inconsistent PCIe bandwidth across M.2 slots complicates unified RAID configurations.
👎🏻Lack of M.2 Heat Sinks: NVMe slots do not include heat sinks, requiring aftermarket cooling solutions for intensive workloads.
👎🏻No Integrated Graphics: The AMD Ryzen V3C14 processor lacks integrated graphics, limiting hardware transcoding and multimedia capabilities.
👎🏻Steep Price: The 12-bay model’s cost ($1,300–$1,400) and the six-bay version’s lack of ECC memory make them expensive compared to alternatives.


While this NAS has only just started to reach reviewers, its potential is clear. If it performs as promised, it may well dominate 2025’s rankings. For now, it earns a well-deserved honorable mention, as it is simply too new to be compared against devices that have had more time in the market for user feedback.

Flashstor Gen 2 on Amazon Below:

Best Business M.2 NVMe SSD NAS – The QNAP TBS-h574

5x M.2 NVMe SSD Bays (Gen 3 E1.S), Intel 13th Gen Core i3/i5/i7 4/6/8 Core 10-12 Thread CPU, up to 64GB Memory, 10GbE, USB4/TB4, 10G USB – $1199-1449 HERE

  • Written Review HERE
  • YouTube Video Review HERE

The QNAP TBS-h574 redefines compact NAS design by delivering robust performance and advanced features in a small footprint. Targeted at professionals and small businesses, this NAS offers seamless integration of hardware and software, leveraging the speed of M.2 NVMe SSDs to enhance data management workflows. With its hot-swappable SSD bays and high-speed connectivity options, the TBS-h574 is perfect for scenarios demanding speed, reliability, and minimal space requirements.

The QNAP TBS-h574 is a powerhouse NAS with:

  • 5 M.2 NVMe bays (supporting Gen 3 SSDs with hot-swapping capabilities).
  • Intel Core i3 or i5 processor options.
  • 10GbE and USB4/Thunderbolt connectivity.
  • ZFS support through QNAP’s QUTS OS, allowing for advanced RAID configurations like Write Once Read Many (WORM).

This NAS stands out for its compact design and enterprise-level features. The hot-swappable M.2 bays make maintenance and upgrades easy, while the integration of Thunderbolt provides exceptional data transfer speeds. The Intel Core processors ensure robust performance, supporting applications like virtual machines, multimedia transcoding, and high-speed backups. Despite its higher price point, it offers robust performance, excellent warranty support, and a growing software ecosystem. Its lack of ECC memory and throttled M.2 speeds due to CPU lane limitations are minor drawbacks. Still, its balance of hardware, software, and scalability secures it a top spot on this list.

What we said in our QNAP TBS-h574TX NAS Review on 01/24:

The QNAP TBS-h574TX NAS emerges as an exceptional and uniquely compact yet robustly powerful system, offering outstanding performance and bandwidth capabilities. Its sleek and innovative design sets a new standard in the NAS market, particularly notable for its integration of advanced features like Thunderbolt 4 and a high-capacity 10G connection. These features are further enhanced by the utilization of cutting-edge E1.S/NVMe SSD storage, all seamlessly managed by a highly capable CPU architecture. This makes the TBS-h574TX not just a NAS, but a powerhouse of data management and connectivity. Especially appealing to photo and video editors, the NAS excels in aesthetics, portability, and functionality, making it a viable alternative to traditional portable direct-attached storage systems like LaCie or G-Tech. Its ability to support multi-user access and provide immediate local network connectivity straight out of the box adds to its versatility. Additionally, the system boasts a modest power supply and impressively efficient power consumption relative to the bandwidth it offers, highlighting QNAP’s commitment to balancing performance with energy efficiency.

However, users must note some trade-offs, such as the limitation in PCIe bandwidth for each of the SSD bays, and the fixed memory capacity. While these are necessary adjustments for its compact form, they are points for consideration. Despite these minor limitations, the 13th Gen Intel Core processor used in its configurations demonstrates QNAP’s dedication to incorporating top-tier technology, although there are more advanced CPUs in other models. This system is a testament to QNAP’s ability to innovate, offering a package that promises the high performance of larger NAS units but in a remarkably portable format. It raises the question: Is this the ideal NAS for everyone? Perhaps not. But for those seeking a high-performance, Thunderbolt-enabled NAS that combines portability with powerful capabilities, the QNAP TBS-h574TX is a formidable choice.

SOFTWARE - 9/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 10/10
PRICE - 8/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.8
PROS
👍🏻Exceptionally future-proof 13th Gen i3/i5 Processor (Mid-2023 series) with high end Int.Gfx
👍🏻2x Thunderbolt 4 connectivity, one is front mounted for convenience
👍🏻Also features a 10GbE and 2.5GbE Connection for direct editing and/or high-speed local networking
👍🏻High internal and external performance and bandwidth for such a compact system
👍🏻Compact and portable, ideal for on-site creators to share and collaborate on-the-fly
👍🏻Enhanced security protocols post-Deadbolt ransomware attack.
👍🏻Wide range of multimedia and business tools.
👍🏻Equipped with QVR Pro for extensive surveillance and numerous Backup/Sync tools as standard.
👍🏻QuTS Has numerous ZFS based advantages + QSAL Antiwear leveling
👍🏻Supports AI photo recognition, AI Surveillance Tools, 4K/8K Plex Support and VM Tools.
👍🏻Arrives with 1TB of Cloud Space with MyQNAPCloudOne for 12 months.
CONS
👎🏻High price range of $1800-$2000. Check out the TVS-h674T for similar pricing and alternative Tiering/Bandwidth allocation
👎🏻Limited PCIe bandwidth on SSD bays.
👎🏻Not a silent operation due to cooling fans.



DEAL WATCH – Is It On Offer Right Now?


These Offers are Checked Daily

Buy the QNAP TBS-h574TX NAS on Amazon Below:

Best Budget 10GbE M.2 SSD NAS – The TerraMaster F8 SSD Plus

8x M.2 NVMe SSD Bays (Gen 3×1), Intel N305 i3 8 Core / 8 Thread CPU, up to 32GB Memory, 10GbE, 10G USB – $599-799 HERE

  • Written Review HERE
  • YouTube Video Review HERE

The TerraMaster F8 SSD Plus is a standout example of affordability meeting performance in the NAS market. It is tailored for professionals and enthusiasts seeking a turnkey solution with significant storage capacity and power efficiency. Its design focuses on delivering ample M.2 NVMe storage options while maintaining a low overall cost, making it accessible without sacrificing essential features.

The TerraMaster F8 SSD Plus consistently surprises as a value-packed flash NAS solution:

  • 8 M.2 NVMe slots, each supporting up to Gen 3 x1 speeds.
  • Intel N305 Alder Lake processor with 8 cores, paired with 16GB DDR5 memory.
  • Single 10GbE port for high-speed connectivity.

This NAS combines affordability with impressive storage potential. The 8-core Alder Lake processor is designed for power efficiency, keeping energy costs low while maintaining consistent performance. Its 8 M.2 NVMe slots enable significant storage expansion, ideal for professionals managing large data sets or high-definition multimedia. At a price range of $499–$799, this NAS delivers incredible value. While its CPU limits performance to Gen 3 x1 speeds, it is power-efficient and offers significant storage potential. Notably, TerraMaster allows users to install third-party operating systems like TrueNAS or Unraid, providing versatility for advanced users.

What we said in our Review of the Terramaster F8 SSD PLUS NAS on 09/24:

You really have to give Terramaster credit for the F8 SSD Plus, as it stands out impressively among the many brands entering the dedicated flash SSD storage market recently. Despite its compact size, it offers more storage than most competitors, though long-term users may be concerned about heat management. Terramaster has addressed this with effective heatsink placement, angled airflow, and necessary SSD performance adjustments to control temperature. While not perfect and lacking some high-end business features like ECC memory and network failover, it suits prosumers, enthusiasts, and small to medium businesses. Content creators, photographers, videographers, and those managing fast-moving databases will benefit from this system, despite the absence of some enterprise-level hardware. The TOS 6 software has improved significantly, offering a wide array of features such as flexible RAID, BTRFS support, multi-tiered backup, and more. Though the “Windows 11” aesthetic might not appeal to everyone, and there is a notable absence of ZFS, the ability to install third-party OS options like UnRAID and TrueNAS adds versatility. The Terramaster F8 SSD Plus is a capable, affordable, and impressive NAS solution, holding its own in a competitive market for 2024/2025, even if it doesn’t match the software flair of Synology or the aggressive hardware approach of QNAP.

SOFTWARE - 8/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 10/10


8.4
PROS
👍🏻Compact Size with High Storage Capacity: Despite its small footprint, the F8 SSD Plus can accommodate up to 8 M.2 SSDs, providing significant storage in a compact form factor.
👍🏻Effective Heat Management: The system features strategic heatsink placement, angled airflow, and SSD performance adjustments to manage heat efficiently.
👍🏻Affordable Price Point: Offers a cost-effective solution for a flash NAS system, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
👍🏻Versatile Use: Suitable for prosumers, enthusiasts, small to medium businesses, content creators, photographers, videographers, and those managing fast-moving databases.
👍🏻Improved TOS 6 Software: The latest TOS 6 software version includes a broad range of features such as RAID support, BTRFS, multi-tiered backup, and more.
👍🏻Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Users can install third-party NAS software like UnRAID and TrueNAS, offering flexibility and customization options.
👍🏻Low Power Consumption: Utilizes an efficient Intel N305 i3 processor, which keeps power usage low while still delivering adequate performance.
👍🏻Quiet Operation: Despite being a pure SSD system, the fan noise is minimal, making it suitable for quieter environments.
👍🏻Good Connectivity Options: Includes a 10 GbE port and multiple USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, allowing for a range of external connections and expansions.
👍🏻Environmentally Conscious Design: The packaging is mostly recyclable, and the use of external PSUs can help reduce heat and potential e-waste.
CONS
👎🏻Lacks High-End Business Features: Missing enterprise-level features such as ECC memory and network failover, which are important for more demanding business environments.
👎🏻Single 10 GbE Port: Only one network port limits redundancy and failover options, potentially creating a bottleneck for data transfer.
👎🏻Aesthetic and UI Concerns: The new “Windows 11” aesthetic of TOS 6 may not appeal to all users, and the lack of the familiar TOS 5 desktop style might be a drawback for some.
👎🏻No Native ZFS Support: Although there are alternative file systems available, the absence of native ZFS support, which benefits SSD use with features like data integrity and snapshot capabilities, may be seen as a limitation.



PROs of the F8 SSD PLUS NAS CONs of the F8 SSD PLUS NAS
  • Compact Size with High Storage Capacity: Despite its small footprint, the F8 SSD Plus can accommodate up to 8 M.2 SSDs, providing significant storage in a compact form factor.
  • Effective Heat Management: The system features strategic heatsink placement, angled airflow, and SSD performance adjustments to manage heat efficiently.
  • Affordable Price Point: Offers a cost-effective solution for a flash NAS system, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • Versatile Use: Suitable for prosumers, enthusiasts, small to medium businesses, content creators, photographers, videographers, and those managing fast-moving databases.
  • Improved TOS 6 Software: The latest TOS 6 software version includes a broad range of features such as RAID support, BTRFS, multi-tiered backup, and more.
  • Support for Third-Party Operating Systems: Users can install third-party NAS software like UnRAID and TrueNAS, offering flexibility and customization options.
  • Low Power Consumption: Utilizes an efficient Intel N305 i3 processor, which keeps power usage low while still delivering adequate performance.
  • Quiet Operation: Despite being a pure SSD system, the fan noise is minimal, making it suitable for quieter environments.
  • Good Connectivity Options: Includes a 10 GbE port and multiple USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, allowing for a range of external connections and expansions.
  • Environmentally Conscious Design: The packaging is mostly recyclable, and the use of external PSUs can help reduce heat and potential e-waste.
  • Lacks High-End Business Features: Missing enterprise-level features such as ECC memory and network failover, which are important for more demanding business environments.
  • Single 10 GbE Port: Only one network port limits redundancy and failover options, potentially creating a bottleneck for data transfer.
  • Aesthetic and UI Concerns: The new “Windows 11” aesthetic of TOS 6 may not appeal to all users, and the lack of the familiar TOS 5 desktop style might be a drawback for some.
  • No Native ZFS Support: Although there are alternative file systems available, the absence of native ZFS support, which benefits SSD use with features like data integrity and snapshot capabilities, may be seen as a limitation.

 

Best Value Multimedia M.2 SSD NAS – Asustor Flashstor 6/12 Gen 1 

6/12x M.2 NVMe SSD Bays (Gen 3×1), Intel N5105 Core / 4 Thread CPU, up to 16GB Memory, 2.5G/10GbE, 10G USB – $449-749 HERE

  • Written Review HERE
  • YouTube Video Review HERE

The Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro offers an exceptional balance of capacity and affordability, making it ideal for users looking to build high-performance SSD storage arrays without exceeding their budget. Its focus on M.2 NVMe storage is matched by its compact design, ensuring it fits seamlessly into any workspace. Despite using an older processor, this NAS continues to deliver reliable performance for a variety of applications.

Although the Asustor Flashstor 12 Gen 1 uses an older Intel Celeron N5105 processor, it remains a strong contender due to its:

This NAS’s 12-bay configuration is a standout feature, allowing users to create expansive SSD arrays. The Celeron N5105 processor is modest but sufficient for basic NAS tasks, including backups, media streaming, and data synchronization. Its HDMI output adds versatility for local multimedia playback or monitoring.

While its hardware shows its age, the Flashstor 12’s low power consumption, excellent software support, and compatibility with TrueNAS or Unraid make it a fantastic choice for users seeking high-capacity storage at a competitive price.

What we said in our Review of the Asustor Flashstor Gen 1 NAS on 06/12:

I cannot stress enough how impressed I am that the Flashstor 6 and Flashstor 12 Pro are priced at $499 and $860, respectively, given the level of hardware on offer here. These are by no means enterprise-grade NAS server solutions, nor should they be thought of as such. However, given the cost of typical fully featured 4x HDD solutions from their competitors and the brand themselves, which often start at $550 and above, it is quite remarkable that the six M.2 SSD system with comparable internal hardware comes in at $499. As long as a user keeps their expectations in line with what this cost versus its capabilities, it’s really tough to argue with the price point that these two devices have arrived at on the market. The Asustor FS6712X Flashstor 12 Pro NAS presents a unique offering in the NAS market, leveraging NVMe technology to provide high-capacity, ultra-high-performance storage. The device’s design, with its rhombus-shaped enclosure and twelve M.2 NVMe slots, sets it apart from traditional NAS devices and offers a sleek and modern aesthetic. The tool-less drive installation mechanism makes it easy to set up and expand the storage capacity. However, there are some considerations to keep in mind. The limited number of PCIe lanes provided by the Intel Celeron N5105 processor may restrict the performance of high-speed NVMe drives.

The single 10GbE LAN port also presents a potential network bottleneck, limiting the device’s overall network performance. Users seeking maximum performance and network throughput may find alternative solutions better suited to their needs. Despite these limitations, the FS6712X shines as a storage solution for users who prioritize high-capacity storage, quiet operation, and low power consumption. The device’s ability to directly output 4K video, along with its range of Asustor-approved apps, makes it an excellent choice for media distribution and presentation. In terms of pricing, the FS6712X comes with a price tag of $850+. While this may appear high at first glance, it is comparable to 8 bay drive NAS SATA devices and many of those do not even include NVMe slots or 10GbE. Users looking for a more cost-effective option can consider the Flashstor 6, which offers half the number of slots and 2x 2.5GbE enabled ports for $499. As the cost of flash modules continues to drop, and larger capacity drives become available all the way up to 8TB (even without QLC), the FS6712X provides an attractive solution for those seeking high-capacity and high-performance NAS storage. While some underlying performance relativity by the end user needs to be factored in and hardware limitations exist thanks to the use of that Celeron to remain budget-friendly, the FS6712X is a tremendously smart move by Asustor. A well-designed NAS that presents a much more confident solution demonstrating the benefits of NVMe-focused NAS devices to an audience that would have assumed such things are way, WAY outside the realms of affordability!

SOFTWARE - 7/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 10/10
VALUE - 10/10


8.4
PROS
👍🏻12x NVMe SSD Flash NAS for under $1000 - COME ON!
👍🏻10GbE onboard
👍🏻Full 1st Party NAS OS Included
👍🏻USB 3.2 Gen 2 10G Connectivity and wide USB Support/Compatibility
👍🏻Very Slick and compact design
👍🏻SP/DIF and HDMI 2.0b Outputs will hugely please the multimedia user community
👍🏻Likewise, Plex Performance is very good for 4K and 1080p conversions
CONS
👎🏻12x NVMe Performance will never be realised because of the Intel Celeron CPU inside 
👎🏻Only 1x network port means Failover or NIC priority management is not possible
👎🏻4GB default memory in the 12 Bay model seems too low for day 1 (12x M.2 + 10G, plus same as 6 Bay)

 Check Amazon for the Flashstor FS6706T and FS6712X NAS Below:

Final Thoughts

2024 has been an incredible year for SSD-based NAS systems, showcasing innovation and value across the board. Whether you prioritize cutting-edge performance or affordable versatility, there’s an option here for you. As always, we’d love to hear your thoughts. Did we miss a NAS that deserves recognition? Let us know in the comments below or check out our linked article for a deeper dive into these systems. If you’re planning a purchase, consider using the affiliate links to support NASCompares—it helps us keep delivering content for the community.

Thank you for joining us, and here’s to a fantastic 2025 in NAS technology!

locked content ko-fi subscribe
Summary
Review Date
Reviewed Item
The Best M.2 NVMe SSD NAS Guide
Author Rating
51star1star1star1star1star

DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
ASK questions to NAS community
SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

457 thoughts on “The Best M.2 SSD NAS You Can Buy RIGHT NOW”

  1. Never owned a Synology, so I have no Synology user experience to compare with, but based on this ADM5 review and their modern hardware specs , I would def choose Asustor in a heartbeat over Synology! Four NVMe M.2s, dual 10Gbe NICs, etc. The only thing I wish they had is an Intel CPU for media transcoding. Great video, thank you!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  4. ECC Sodimm recommendations.. im baffled but what if any other brands can be used for the ECC Gen 2 6 bay.. is it limited to asustor branded RAM only, or can anyone recommend tried, tested and true 3rd party ECC ram?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  7. Wow huge price, almost 1600€ for the 12 bay. Im glad i have no use for a 12 bay. Looking at the 6 bay device 1150€ seems way overpriced in comparsion to the 12 bay.
    Even the Gen1 is high in price. So i must say the Lincstation n1 you can get at 340€ atm at the lincplus website is a better deal, for me. It has already 16 GB of RAM and is more flexible.
    Sure only one 2,5 LAN but has Wifi and Bluetooth, thats great if you only have Wifi availible. Bluetooth is handy sometimes too.
    I dont use unraid for it, i found openmediavault more apealing and it supports the eMMC plus wifi and BT.
    I can see that some ppl have a need for the Gen2 Asustore but my PCs running with inbuild 2,5 LAN, i have no faster network therefore the lincstation is more apealing and has a better valure for the money.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  8. WTF?? I should pay €9.99 per month to be allowed to access you “members” content… and it is all flooded with links to products where you are earning money? How is your youtube channel worth more money than netflix costs? Yeah good luck with that. I am outa here,
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  9. love my Flashstor 12 pro , silent and wife friendly design . It has all the speed and space i will need for a loong time. I have had no problems with it just “plug and play”
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  10. Hi, great video. I already have 8 x 8 TB PCIE Gen 4 NVME m2’s in a Mac Pro PCIE card. I want to move to NAS. What will support these Gen4 MS drives? Only Asustor Gen2 12 slot?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  17. INFTY3 Token is the future of decentralized finance. As an investor, I’ve seen its growth firsthand. Join the presale and be part of this groundbreaking revolution!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  32. I would *love* to see a passive system, perhaps in the same form factor as a normal consumer network router, with perhaps 6 M.2 drives. Could probably be over SATA, would be fast enough for most home networks anyway. I just want something small, super efficient and completely quiet.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  34. Omg, please slow down.. Your videos are always so rushed to the point they sound more like a con-man’s sales pitch than an unbiased review. I’d much rather you do a well paced, well articulated video than something you make a bunch of misstatements and have to throw corrections up on the screen during editing.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  36. Why do you keep saying that the Flashstor Gen 2 has Thunderbolt support? It most certainly does NOT have Thunderbolt networking or even USB4 networking support via DAS …even Asustor have finally stopped advertising that it does
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  37. I don’t see why it should be m.2/nvme and not 2.5″. After all, i suspect larger-size 2.5″ ssds are cheaper than m.2.
    Not all applications require that the nas be lightning fast, and in any case, even SATA SSDs are way faster on random access which is what matters most. So an array of SATA SSDs can max out even a faster network connection.
    M.2 NASes often have lane limitations which kinda make nvme speeds irrelevant.
    I mean if you had 25/100g networking and all 4 lanes per drive it might be of import. Not necessarily so the way it is now
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  41. Indeed these are the best turnkey solutions. However, ECC-aside, it still find more value in DIY itx/matx builds for people willing to put in a bit of time in the beginning. OpenMediaVault 7 with Docker Compose is the SOHO gem that many still haven’t discovered. I came from QNAP and Synology systems and enjoy having more freedom of hardware and software options.m, plus a Debian system.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  44. So, the TERRAMASTER F8 is really a great NAS, but still about 100,- Euros too expensive for the hardware, I think. What I’m really missing is a small, cheap and quiet SATA SSD 4-6 bay NAS.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  47. Please fix me if I’m wrong, but based on the documentation online, the new Flashstor does not support the networking over USB4 (yet?). It surprised me a little.
    Same goes for the Ugreen one. I was sharpening my teeth on the Flashstor2, but to be certain I can utilise my USB4 port on my Z790 Motherboard, I think I have to look the MS-01 route…
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  50. Little point in having Gen4 (let alone in RAID, unless for data-duplication) if the output is limited to normally 10 Gbps – a single Gen3 SSD will saturate that on its own
    You’d need like 30 Gbps networking to match the speed of a PCIe 3×4 drive
    Combining 2 x 10Gbps outputs, you’re still short of a single 3.0 x4 SSD
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  53. Where does the OS live and all of the associated Apps you’ll need to download? Is there dedicated pre-installed storage for this or will I need to create a storage pool from within my m.2 storage?
    Basically, my question is, would I be best to buy a small 500GB m.2 just for the OS and apps with the bulk of my storage being a bunch of 4tb m.2’s. If this is true, that means I will lose one of the 8 slots just for the OS. Is this true?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  54. I’ve been thinking about buying the 12 bay flashstor and installing Truenas since it came out. Originally the slow processor was the issue.. They’ve upgraded the processor but price is now the issue. The lack of integrated graphics is annoying but not the dealbreaker since there is workaround to installing OS.. The two 3×1 pci slots caps out at a measly 1 gigabyte per second. If using zfs, it’s not worth using those 2 slow slots on same array with the rest. So what I’d be really buying is 10 slots for a raidz2.

    The problem is for around the same money, you can buy brand new 1U rackmout gigabyte hotswap 10 bay u.2 server with 128GB ECC RAM, 32 Cores of Gold Skylake CPUs, and 3×2 PCI Nvme speeds. It even has some spare PCI slots where for a bit extra you could add a decent half hight 1 slot GPU or even 100Gb/s nic. U.2 drives are also more reliable and better sustained speeds. The extra RAM will cache zfs far better. I like the low power and small size of the flashstor but for a little more money I could buy a system that will smoke this and also more versatile.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  55. i don’t really understand the lane concept. the maximum speed for one client is 20gbit. 4×2 for every ssd should be enough.

    did usb 4 network really worked? on the website, asustor says, that it only works with another asustor devices, due some driver limitations from amd.
    but with 2 usb 4 ports, it would be a good nas for streamer/videocreator etc.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  56. Thanks for sharing.
    Correct me if I’m wrong but a flaw would be no RAID among the SSD ?
    And about the RAM, is it updatable to 64GB ECC using the same DSL brand ?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  60. INFTY3 Token is the project that has changed my investment strategy. The team’s forward-thinking approach and strong community make it an excellent choice. Don’t hesitate — join the presale and be part of the future of finance!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  64. My experience investing in INFTY3 Token has been entirely transformational. The project is a wise choice because of its innovative technologies and vibrant community. Act right away and register for the presale!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  67. Since its automatic algorithms eradicate paper hands, bot transactions, and bear markets, INFTY3 Token has established itself as the safest alternative coin. It will certainly get to $10 fast.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  70. Since its automatic algorithms eliminate paper hands, bot transactions, and bear markets, INFTY3 Token has established itself as the safest alternative coin. It will surely get to $10 fast.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  78. I purchased and installed the 12 bay pro gen 2, upgraded ram to 64gb ecc and installed 6 – 4tb and 6 – 2tb drives. Using it mainly for storage as I want to turn off my 2 QNAP NAS devices with spinning drives. Haven’t decided on a backup system for this yet so still working on it. I upgraded the ram as I used to run websites and databases from my Synology NAS years ago, didn’t bother to setup in the QNAPs but may be tinkering with some of the server features inside of this box. Very happy at this point and if the 6 bay gen 1 gets cheaper I may consider it for a backup end point and off load to individual spinning drives. I probably own 30 or more spinners…..
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  83. Worthy to note is that although it is possible to install a third party OS it is not usable on this gen 2. This is due to two main problems where one have been hackily solved.
    1. The NIC does NOT work out of the box with Debian/Truenas.
    2. The hack in which people got the fans working on gen1 on other OS with a chip that is not present on the gen2 no word from Asustor on how we are going to solve the fans! If not it will overheat!

    More information you can find if you find the blog posts and Reddit posts.

    I bet the kernel patches will get in to late to arrive for next Truenas release, so maybe we are looking at a 2 year time before it is usable out of the box.

    Would be great if these was solved so the only thing you need to do is to install the m.2 adapter to a graphics card to install other OS’s.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  87. Darn, 1.3k price. it sounds great but the price. time to stay with my self-made NAS. i so wanted to go full Nvem. at least i will have the gen 3 ready to swap over.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  89. I have been focusing on a new NAS for a few months, was waiting for this one, i followed many Youtubers, but at this price, it is for my feeling not worth it sadly,
    The fact it doesn’t include heatsinks is beyond me tbh, the TerraMaster F8 Plus does (I know it is ‘slow’ (like the Flashstor GEN1, 3×1), also I think they could give way more
    ECC GB as a standard for this price to make it a bit more attractive, these 2 are not ‘deal breakers’ for most i think,
    but it could make people like me ‘go for it’ as everything is max out and included in this high price range.
    I doubted also going for the GEN 1 and accepted the GEN 3×1 speeds as providers here won’t go above 2.5GB anyways soon,
    The reason is the OS/Software is far behind QNap/Synology it makes me nervous to read about lockups/resets on several forums and here in the comments (also on other videos),
    For now, as far as I see the T8 Plus is the best option for me, there aren’t many choices/alternatives that I have seen, Synology Slim was attractive also with only 2.5 SATA SSD’s but for some reason they only use
    1GB ports on their systems which was a bummer also, oh well.. sorry for the rant… I want to spend my hard-earned money on a NAS and there is just not a ‘right’ system for me^^
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  91. I love the idea of a solid state storage NAS but man it’s crazy how expensive and small SSDs still are. Crazy that we have 1TB little SD cards but the biggest SSD is about 8TB. And then it’s priced so high. Need at least 3 8TB ssd to match the capacity of one large HDD.

    And then I’ve said this before but the CPU used here is just not awesome for media streaming. Need a embedded Ryzen chip with good GPU for AV1 encode/decode and NPU for image apps that might be able to use it for facial/object recognition.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  95. This is NOT thunderbolt 4 ….it’s two HALF USB4’s ….. unless you use anything other then Windows …then it’s nothing because it doesn’t work on MAC in fact …. the whole device doesn’t work on MAC according to support threads
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  98. I have the 6 bay Gen1. Overall, very happy. but there is one key issue that will likely prevent me from ever buying Asustor again: Randomly, if I copy large quantity of data to the NAS (I use 2.5Gbit), it will drop ethernet, causing all connectivity to fail. Simply un-plugging the network cable and re-attaching fixes it. I’ve found many others are experiencing this same issue, and on a variety of Asustor NAS’s. Solutions involve updating the cache size for writes on the device. Why Asustor has not fixed this is stunning. I’ve worked with support, and they at first deny there is an issue, when I give them links to threads in their own support, they then tell me to ask others in the community. No thanks. My Synology (HDDs) has never had issues like this. I wish Synology had 2.5Gbit and and NVMe option like this.

    I have 6x 4TB Crucial P3 (Gen3) drives. I’ve updated to 16GB RAM. I did update my config setting on cache size based on 16GB. I’ve had one instance in last month of still losing network for a short period, but it auto-corrected. I had to re-run backup.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  99. I bought the 6 bays -Gen 2. I filled it with 2TB SSDs (RAID-5) (all bought for cheap during black Friday), and it took only 2 hours to synchronize everything. Oh the speeds… feels good man. No, it feels great.
    Now I have a SAMSUNG T7 Shield 4TB Portable SSD connected to the USB 4 port, and I’m getting 250 MB/s, which is good, but not the full speed I know I can get. It’s something I’m doing wrong, I’m sure. Maybe the magnetic dongle between the cable and the SSD. I know the cable is good (thick Type-A to Type-A). But again, I’m complaining of super speeds of 250 MB/s…
    And yes, I have ordered real ECC memories, so think about the extra costs… Now I see I should have gone for the 12 bay, since the extra cost I’m having now.
    I really like the software, no complaints.
    Now I see why NASCompares is always obsessed about speeds. It makes a lot of difference, have you ever waited for 1-2 days for synchronizing RAID disks? Or to BKP everything? Those days are over with this system…
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  102. I’ve never used NAS but I have media on multiple stand alone drives already.
    What would be the best way to move to a raid system if you already have full drives?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  106. the more of your videos I watch and listen to the more confused I become. I am a complete newbie to NAS but would like to have a home NAS to hopefully manage my own data how I want. I am looking for a NAS solution suitable for up to 3 people, can store all our data, photos videos films etc. has the smallest footprint possible and is future proof. can you give me a recommendation please .
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  107. For any Mac buyers, please be aware that USB4 connectivity does not work at all (supposedly it’s coming in the future, but no timeframe has been given). This was confirmed by Asustor themselves in the caption of their recently posted video “USB4 Networking Guide” and in a comment on that video. Yes, this is the only place I could find them stating this. Bought this specifically for that feature, wasted a ton of time setting it up and trying over and over again to figure out why it wasn’t working.

    Love this channel and I know Mac users are in the minority, but it might be worth throwing a note into the written review on your website to spare potential purchasers some frustration.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  110. The materials used are top notch. The leather feels soft and luxurious, exactly like the real thing. The stitching is impeccable, with no loose or uneven lines. The hardware (including the iconic CC twist lock clasp) is durable, well made, and adds to the overall elegance of the bag kislux . I thought everyone who owned an LV monogram bag knew that it was obviously coated canvas? When people spend a fortune on an expensive bag, they might as well buy a replica
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  114. Hi! Thank you very much for your videos, they are very helpful. I need to ask you something, what do I need to have for storage (I don’t need it to be a NAS) that I can share with two Macs to edit video? Thank you very much!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  115. @NASCompares please could you give some pointers on how you connected the NAS to the PC by USB4… I like to think myself fairly tech savvy but I’m getting absolutely nowhere with it and there seems to be nothing in Asustor’s documentation about USB4 at all :/ Between the noisy CPU fan and not being able to get better than 10Gbps from this I’m starting to think I should be sending it back!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  117. Here’s a little engagement to say goodbye with. I can’t be watching your content simply because the way you say Ryzon instead of Ryzen winds me right up. Good luck.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  121. Slightly annoyed the USB4 is only 20gbps and not 40Gbps, but that’s still pretty awesome… Not that I’ve worked out how you actually do the direct USB connection yet and it’s not obvious in the manual! Thanks for the fan noise test – I think I must have a dodgy CPU fan as it’s rather noisy… Off to submit a support ticket, yay!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  122. Excellent review thank you. What drives are recommended for this nas as only been used to buying spinning drives but defo want the 12 bay of this please?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  123. The speed and port configuration makes no sense to me. If you can saturate a 10Gb NIC with a x1 slot, make the design simple and make all NVMe bays x2, like the enterprise market is moving towards. It makes no sense to release an all-flash NAS product like this and make a hodge-podge of PCIe speeds and link sizes. Just split the x8 and 2 of the x4 lanes into 8 x2 NVMe bays. Or PLX the x8 into 8 or 10 gen4x2 ports. But maybe I’m missing something.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  124. this is crap – no 25GE Support… i’m achieving 3000mb/s read & 2200mb/s write with a 1000 bucks QNAP NAS – no ssd Cache pure HDD Performance 🙂
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  125. @NASCompares Robbie
    Hey, apparently on the WAN Show the other night, Linus was talking about HexOS being released beta for testing, he has a video all about it on his channel, and says there will definitely be a one time payment lifetime access plan ($50 today, $100 in December … eventually $300 long term – you might want to get ahead on that) and … that iX Systems is actually an Angel Investor in this company … thats who owns TrueNAS.
    Did ya know that?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  127. Is there room for using drives with heat sinks? I think I’d put all gen3’s in the 12 bay model just to control heat a bit. Im considering giving this a shot. I have a few 4tb nvme’s i bought for a project that i never ended up needing.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  129. How much better would heat dissipation be if the chassis and case were made of aluminium? Even steel would dissipate heat better than most types of plastic, right?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  138. @NASCompares
    Apologies for going slightly off-topic. I recently found out that Asustor has released (or is in the process of releasing) the Lockerstor Gen3 series. While the hardware offers significant upgrades compared to the older Lockerstor models and the higher price is somewhat justified, the €1,500 street price at launch for the 6-bay model here in Germany is still a tough pill to swallow.
    What do you think the chances are that the price could drop by around €500 within about a year, settling at roughly €1,000 to €1,100? Especially considering that Asustor has historically positioned its Home and SoHo NAS devices more competitively compared to Synology and, to some extent, QNAP, likely to make up for the fact that Asustor’s software and app support has lagged behind a bit.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  140. I’m sorry Robbie. Next time I’ll call it the Faststor. lol.
    As usual, feel free to leave your comments, criticism, questions, praise. The whole Shabang!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  142. @NASCompares – Can you recco a UPS for this NAS? Noob here and got the F8 SSD Plus up and running. Worried about sudden power outage and data corruption. Compatibility chart for UPS seems very old an outdated. Thank you.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  143. I’ve owned an Asustor and plan on installing Proxmox and/or TrueNAS in the future as I don’t trust ADM anymore. Their updates break their own apps.

    For example, I updated Jellyfin and it broke this app. I lost all my progress and configurations. An update for NextCloud broke it too (I had backups of my files at least). Another time, 2FA broke as well. I was lucky that I had recently had a recent Windows copy on another SSD on my laptop, so I was able to access the GUI without logging in again. I had to disable 2FA.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  144. I soo badly want to dump my Synology for a Asustore. Even more so now with ADM5. But as I said before, they really need a AMD Ryzen Embedded 8000 Series (like 8845HS) with a good GPU and media codecs (AV1 encode/decode plz) that can be the heart of a great Plex/Jellyfin setup.

    Great products.though
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  145. @NASCompares Thanks for this info, I was on the fence, between the F8 and building my own (Tru) NAS box. PCI-E version 3 and only 1 lane, is a deal breaker for me.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  147. If I have the F8 SSD Plus populated with 5 nvme SSD and plan to use TRAID. What’s the benefit of installing the system disk across the Max (4 disks) vs 1, 2 or 3 of them? That 1st step is tripping me up and not sure what the benefits are from using 1, 2, 3 or 4 disks. I’ve read the “user-defined-system-disk” (website/global/user-defined-system-disk) page a few times and still don’t understand why I should use the max or just 1 maybe 2
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  148. Asustor Gen 3 Vs Ugreen 6800 (about 500$ cheaper in black friday)

    which one should I get as my fist NAS for my video business?
    being able to connect directly with USB sounds fun, and also I think the Asustor is still more reliable for business.

    what do you think? 🙂
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  149. Apple no longer supports AFP and it’s been deprecated for at least a few years so I don’t know why it’s even included anymore. Apple supports SMB and should be used now.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  153. I don’t get it
    – if i want to restore a single file from a snapshot, can i do that?
    – there’s no way to browse the snapshot?
    – there’s no way to change time between snapshots for an individual folder?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  154. ADM also lacks the ability to backup for example Photo Gallery 3 data so if your system fails, you lose all your albums. The photos itself can be backed up but not the settings/app data. Astounding that a company which sells backup solutions for a living is not making sure its own apps are backed up.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  156. ADM has folder encryption, but you cannot use it for photo folders and still use ASUSTOR’ photo app. You cannot use encryption on user home folders either. So basically it does not work for home privacy protection in case of theft.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  160. I have an AS6806T and the LED for drive six is always on after boot-up. It’s not blinking like the others. All six drives are used in a single volume with RAID 6. any ideas? ADM-bug?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  161. They still haven’t fixed the scrubbing and raid sync been 2 tasks (manual, can’t be scheduled) it’s can be dangerous for your data because before running a raid sync you must always run a btrfs scrub first to make sure the filesystem is good (if raid sync is ran first and there is corruption in the filesystem it will sync that corruption to the parity making btrfs scrub unable to do a repair attempt)

    On Synology a data scrub automatically runs a btrfs scrub first then once finished it runs a raid sync and it can be ran as a schedule
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  163. Synology isn’t worried because they decided a few years to stop focus/no longer give a shit…about private users..it’s now all corporate and maximum profits for minimum efforts…in short, if you are still considering synology…you’re dumb.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  164. Synology SHOULD be worried because they are screwing up with their loyal customers ….. Synology ARE NOT worried because Asustor scored a massive own goal with their delusional screwed up pricing so they will not penetrate much if any of Synology’s market share….. also a worrying LACK of support with issues with Asustor products and failing drive arrays has been noticed with quite a few threads on Reddit about it …. ADM 5 looks extremely promising ….. but as Newt said it won’t make any difference….
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  165. Synology should have already been worried. I’ve been using Synology NAS since 2011, and was very pleased with their hardware/software offerings. But current hardware is lacking to the point their that their software is no longer enough to keep me loyal to the Synology brand.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  166. Is there an app for backing up a hole computer? You install some kind of agent on your station and it backs up computer to a nas. Then you restore it even on a diffrent hardware. Synology has it and it works great.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  167. With the pricetag of 1230 eur?? nooo way, I would love to have that, but this price is a BIG BIG NO!! adding drives to it it would be 2000 eur. I am not that mental
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  170. It certainly performs wonders and shits cucumbers but nothing compelling to switch from Synology. Yet. Your comments regarding the breakout of functions into separate apps makes for a very busy looking desktop. And, without SHR, I would be looking to buy a 6 bay and start with 3 drives in RAID 5 to leave me expansion flexibility.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  172. ASUSTOR is teaching us what a NAS should be today, unlike Synology, which decided to remove internal HEIC support to avoid slowness, instead of installing better hardware.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  173. The Synology Hybrid RAID still seems like the biggest selling point to me! I just don’t understand why other NAS brands haven’t done something similar. If I’ve got a 4-bay NAS, I shouldn’t have to replace all 4 drives just to get more storage.

    When I rebuild my NAS, I’ll have to go with Xpenology again or UnRAID.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  175. Always happy to see updates to the software across any of the NAS providers. Everytime time I see Asustor it makes me want to switch from Synology as my primary NAS. Also, that taskbar gives me anxiety everytime I see it ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  181. I’m waiting for at least 20-25Gbps Net, and 20Gbps USB for ‘backup’ backup. Not sure of longevity of nvme’s compared to good 3.5″s, so a USB backup of equal sized 3.5″s with the same RAID layout seems like a good idea. By the time something like that comes out hopefull nvme prices will have dropped (the chip crisis is long over, prices need to return down)
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  184. I would have a problem to justify the price of it. But this includes all other devices of the product category. For an empty board with some RAM and a CPU this is far too much money.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  195. I’m loving my F8 SSD Plus. TOS6 is pretty great but I ended up installing Unraid on it and it is a little beast. BTW, I have a 48GB SODIMM installed in mine and it works great! Corsair CMSX48GX5M1A4800C40 for anyone else that wants to do that.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  198. Nobody is reviewing the non plus model. I guess they’re not passing them out to reviewers like candy like the plus model. Can’t find a single review on the non plus model.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  201. With fewer and fewer power draw that processors and nvme drives take i wish there were more passive cooled cases/devices, this is an example, you could realistic passive cool this guy, using the case to radiate heat and with that 0 noise too.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  205. Still waiting for the Flashstor Gen 2. It’s been six months since it was announced. We’re well into Q4 and no news. I hope they’re not waiting until CES in January. I wonder what the hold up is
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  206. Compared to Asustor’s Flashstor, the Terramaster F8 SSD boasts a smaller size, a more powerful CPU, and a faster network interface, which makes me lean more towards Terramaster. Regarding the operating system, I feel that both are quite similar. Terramaster’s TOS 6 appears more stylish and organized, but functionally speaking, there is no essential difference between the two. Although Asustor seems to have many apps in its app market, most of them are duplicate third-party open source applications. Terramaster, on the other hand, appears to be more focused on their core backup applications, leaving the third-party open source applications to community developers. Personally, I think this is a good idea.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  207. Thanks for your contrast and compare. Would it be possible to dig a bit deeper in how these NAS may be used and how does that impact which NVME to purchase. As in my case, no major processing required as it is just a media server of files “as is” with no transcribing etc. I do have the Flashstor 6 that is populated with not the fastest NVME but one that will work well in a NAS and has a good 5 year warranty. So far, everything works well to serve up my movie files, music files, and store sensitive files as well as photos. If I had to buy today, I would be less sure about buying the Flashstor 6 in favour of the Terramaster. Of the latter, not sure if I would get the standard or the Plus. I do know that the Asustor may suffer on speed due to bus lane architecture and the less powerful processor. Thoughts?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  209. Thanks for the review. Still can’t seem to find a review on the non plus unit. Terramaster has done a great job of sending the more expensive Plus unit to every Youtuber on the planet.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  216. I’ve learned something from a TrueNAS forum post – this F8 SSD Plus has an interesting PCIe lane allocation. The bays on the CPU side of the board (bays 1-4) are not behind a PCIe switch, they are directly wired with 1x lane each. The bays on the RAM side of the board (bays 5-8) are wired behind a PCIe switch. TrueNAS seems to have problems when trying to create pools using the 5-8 bays. There’s also some uncertain issue relating to VT-d; disabling this in the BIOS, disabling Secure Boot, and disabling the ‘Boot TOS first’ option are the only 3 changes needed to get TrueNAS SCALE 24.04

    I’ve just finished installed TrueNAS SCALE 24.04 using a single NVME in the bay 5 slot for the OS, and then four 4TB Crucial P3 Plus NVMEs in the bay 1-4 slots, and it’s working perfectly. Performance when copying data to SMB shares from my 10GbE Mac Mini are consistently around 800MB/sec up to 1.1GB/sec (connected via YuanLey 10GbE switch).

    When I tried this same copy operation using the native TOS, I was getting long delays while macOS ‘prepared to copy’ and then awful, inconsistent performance around 60-300MB/sec.

    Posting here in the hopes of helping others. Not sure if you can post linked in here, but the title of the TrueNAS forum article is “TerraMaster F8 SSD Plus – TrueNAS Install Log”
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  219. The lack of higher memory and gen4 support is really killing this. I was planning to buy this but gave up after hearing that. It is already expensive enough and I would not mind paying a little more for a higher ram, gen4 support and maybe better cpu (if the lanes are not enough and cpu had to be upgraded) provided that the unit is compact and easy to travel with.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  220. If ssd prices had kept falling and sizes kept growing this would be a much better device. Right now the cheapest per GB nvme m.2 drives are the 2TB drives with 4TB a smidge behind them. 8 TB is twice the cost per GB. d
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  221. I’m considering a Flashstor for my next Unraid box, but the Asus website seems pretty sure that only a few models of nvme drive are compatible. Does anyone know if this is a size constraint, or based on the inbuilt Asus software, or what? I’m a bit wary of buying if I can’t put any old inexpensive drive in it.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  222. One of my key reasons for choising a NAS brand in the back-up features they have.. and I noticed a few days ago, that TerraMaster are starting to offering something called “Central Backup”, which they’re comparing the Synology ABB (https://www.terra-master.com/global/data-backup-and-protection)..

    Does anybody have any more details on this, such as:

    1) Do they restrict the models it can run on, i.e. can I run it on this F8 PLUS?
    2) If you’ve used it, how are you finding it?
    3) Its a new-ish offering, so we can’t expect it to be as polished as ABB, but are you seeing a large amount of activity to enhance it?

    Thanks
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  223. I’m new to network attached storage devices. A year in. I really wish that I would have went for all m.2 flash storage over hdd’s in my DS1522+. I have a zimaboard with 1* m.2 and 2* SATA drives. It is so much faster than my Synology (transferring large files). Now that I know how much storage I actually need. I would definitely go all m.2’s.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  224. I have exactly 0 pitty with anyone who runs the propitary crap software those companies cobble together. Both are are just x64 boxes so one can an should run something good.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  225. I really appreciate that Asustor has a gen2 coming, but I also really hope they have a solution for AMD’s transcoding issues (comparatively to intel) given they are moving away from the intel CPU’s 🙁 … I want my slightly newer (and beefier) 12 bay nas solution ahaha.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  228. Is there an idiot’s guide on “How to Install TrueNAS SCALE on a Terramaster…” F8 SSD Plus, or it is the same for any Terramaster NAS? I’m curious if I need to dedicate a smaller sized SSD for the OS, similar to what you had for the Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro and use the bios to select boot drive. Thanks much for any information.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  236. I bought F8 Plus for my home movie collection to stream to my Apple TV. I am still unsure about the SSDs I should get for it. I’m thinking about the Samsung 990 Pro 4TB the WD Red SN700 4TB or the WD BLACK SN850X 4TB. Which one would you recommend for this particular use case?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  237. For me the Asustor Flashstor 12 pro is the sweet spot. Low nois , plenty storage , hdmi portal and spdif out. Modest cpu low power with integrated graphics. A perfekt combo for my needs.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  242. I have a customer with a DS1522+ and 5 8TB Ironwolf drives in a RAID 6 configuration.
    I configured his setup with a 4 port LACP connection to the switch, which is working great.
    What I’m planning to do now is to remove the LACP configuration to use the SMB multichannel feature.
    But, to get all benefits from both worlds, I would like to configure HAProxy in the WAN side to allow load balancing between the 4 ports, since I will be using ACB and Synology drive as well.
    Do you know how to accomplish this, or if this is even possible ?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  245. I’m looking for a NVME NAS and these are on the top of my list as current standouts for my needs. This video helps confirm my thoughts that I’ll go for an Asustor, but will try to wait for a hopeful Q4 release of the Gen 2. If the Gen 1 approaches US$600, I’ll get that, if the launch price of Gen 2 price starts with an 8, that’s a sale.

    I will use Plex (or maybe move to Jellyfin) and take use of surveillance cameras, therefore Asustor is my choice
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  246. Software really matters for those who don’t want to know everything about the operating system and surprised the parity against Synology isn’t competitive for either product.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  247. I bought this NAS for my home movie collection to stream to my Apple TV. I am still unsure about the SSDs I should get for it. I’m thinking about the Samsung 990 Pro 4TB the WD Red SN700 4TB or the Crucial P3 Plus 4TB. Which one would you recommend for speed and especially durability?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  248. Not worth it to me. Have a Terramaster D5 Thunderbolt 3 DAS with 5 HDDs. Faster access, much more storage, at less cost than this enclosure. If the price of SSDs comes down a LOT, then I can switch to them and get another big boost in speed, but until then price/performance wise the D5 TD3 is a much better deal. But I don’t need a NAS, so it’s not quite apples to apples.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  252. So that would be 550USD for NAS itself and then 8x8Tb ( each SSD is around 800, so 6400) for almost 7 grand in total.
    You would really need to really need it for something to call it cost effective.

    Big part of NASs solutions are software part ( like Synology, Asustor…). How is the situation here?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  253. The Minisforum MS-01 with the i5 is $419 barebones. It comes with 3 NVME slots and a pcie expansion slot. I dunno about all of these products when that exists.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  256. Thank you for doing this review, Quick update, the rubberbands will be switched to higher quality and double the amount total 32 in each retail bundle.
    there was another solution planned but with less than 1 week to release it wont make into this version.

    I got this information while provideing my technical feedback to my terramaster counterpart.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  258. I’d consider a TopCon NAS development board.
    1xNVME slot onboard, 4 NVME slots on the PCI slots, 2×2.5G plus 1x10G ports, 1xM2 for WiFi, 2 SATA ports should you want to use them.
    Around £190 plus taxes for the I3 version. Add RAM, a plastic project case and a brick power supply of your liking.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  259. Good times for us with limited NAS requirements. 8x4TB is 32 TB – most people will not need more for their private stuff. And you don’t even need to buy the most expensive nvme’s out there.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  260. I’ve always steered clear of TerraMaster, as they always looks cheap.. but past 2 generations has been very appealing… this thing is a little larger that a WD Elements…
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  269. Guys, does anyone know this Hiksemi brand?
    I’m looking at some models, does anyone know which would be the best option, as the prices are very close.

    Hiksemi Future X SSD, 2TB, Read 7450MB, Write 6750MB – (TBW: 3600 TB / 3.98W) – More robust heatsink
    SSD Hiksemi Future X Lite, 2TB, Read 7100MB, Write 6350MB (TBW: 1500TB / 4.9W) – More robust heatsink
    SSD Hiksemi Future, 2TB, Read 7450MB, Write 6750MB (TBW: 3600 TB / 3.98W)
    Hiksemi Future SSD, 2TB, Read 7440MB, Write 6610MB (TBW: 1500TB / 6.7W)
    SSD Hiksemi Future Eco, 2TB, Read 4850MB, Write 4450MB (TBW: 3600TB / 2.5W)
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  270. I need NAS help ???? I want to buy a nas that transcode my huge 4k movies so at least 4 or 5 people remotely can watch my movies in 4k without any issues remotely ☹️please help ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  272. With the 10Gb USB C port, can you add a JBOD enclosure with 4 or more spinning HDDs and raid them with the software they provide? Or do they just show as individual drives only?
    I think this was a limitation of the Asustor, but I have not tried it recently.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  276. Just great seeing new companies blowing some of these old school ones out the water. The NAS “gate keepers” now need to step up their game . Adjust your thinking or be left behind as we head into 4K becoming the standard . I’m just blown away with the new evolution .
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  277. Could someone please help me understand why if Unraid says not to use ssd drives in the array (cache only) because trim breaks something, how do all these new 100% ssd NAS systems handle it?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  285. Regarding them using Virtualbox…. Why not…. It’s reasonably popular…. it’s mature
    They are trying to developed their other software… so why bother reinventing the wheel.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  286. I’m a total NAS noob, and wondering which of the two, this and the Asustor Flashstor 12, is more user-friendly for a total beginner. I don’t understand a lot of the features mentioned on these reviews, so I thought I should just ask. My use case is storage and access of large (giant) files. I work in Unreal Engine, and those projects can range from 40-90 gigs each. I already own 4 4b m.2 ssds I’ve been using as externals in enclosures, but having everything spread out separate drives is making me crazy.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  294. As usual, overpriced for what it is…

    Let’s gloss on the fact that the NVMEs potential is wasted in there and that storage will be limited and expensive compared to a couple of HDDs.

    This is probably the easiest NAS to replicate with a mini ITX case, a lowvend CPU and an NVME backplane, although SATA SSDs in dedicated ports could work better.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  296. Ah the N95, memories. Dropped mine and broke the screen, only screen I have ever broken I was gutted! But back to the actual video topic. This is really nice. Great to see these classes of devices coming out more now. Now to get one with dual 10Gb and auto failover support for HA……
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  298. n305 on my x86-p5 was amazing but the p5 seems got some signal issues under heavy load , not bad for a test mini pc .

    Interested in this terramaster thing ,some potential pairing with their d8 hybrid ？
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  302. Both the Plus and non-Plus models look excellent. I still have to ask the question of why are there no small form factor all SATA SSD multi-bay NAS devices available. For an all flash home media server I would love to see an 8/16/24/32 bay SATA SSD NAS or maybe an 8 or 16 bay with the option to add additional 8 or 16 bay “expansion” boxes. For a home media server, NVMe disk speeds are just overkill – plus SATA SSDs support hot-swap and NVMe don’t.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  303. Was quite nervous about buying from a relatively unknown brand but absolutely love my Terramaster F4-423, zero issues in 9 months of usage and it’s very snappy and I’m using their (T)OS – bargain for £300 from Ali. I think researching it was the reason I found and subbed to this channel.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  304. Word of warning on those rubber band attached SSD heatsinks – the rubber bands won’t last long with the heat, and the heatsinks will fall off.
    At the moment most of my SSD heatsinks that came with rubber bands have had them replaced with thin zip ties instead, I think I have a few that are using some thermally conductive adhesive though.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  309. My N95 was only surpassed by the E90 Communicator and N80ie in my list of god-tier mobiles.

    Another great review, just need to save my pennies for the SSDs ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  311. I’m looking to replace our qnap nas that has 16tb HDD capacity. We have 6-8 workstations connected for CAD work. Save and load times have become so slow that it’s hurting production. Would this be the best option?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  313. When I hear you referring to these units as “cheap” or “affordable”, I have to wonder if it’s me who’s living on another planet, or you. I think they are horrendously priced. Perhaps you are thinking of their use by large companies? But just saying they’re less horrendous than some of their competitors doesn’t make; them affordable for a lot of us.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  317. DUDE your rant is weird to me, Thunderbolt 4 certified cables are all over Amazon. that to me is a no brainer. thank you for the reviews , I’m starting to force my RIGID brain to consider SSD drives, but I wish I could find ” real world ” tests to see how long they last versus a EXOS hard drive I have in my 918+ . this unit is far from perfect. I’m typing this on a PCIE 5 machine with a Crucial T700 1TB Gen5 NVMe M.2 SSD with heatsink – Up to 11,700 MB/s – DirectStorage Enabled – CT1000T700SSD5 – DRIVE and it’s just crazy fast, that would be great for a new nas next year .
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  318. Probably a great review video, but I have to say that I don’t understand point #1. I could puke looking at this device, and I wouldn’t even want to put it into a closed cabinet. It’s a great device in terms of functionality and price, I’d definitely want to see more of these on the market, but the design really rubs me the wrong way.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  319. Do you have any cpu heat issues? I’ve read on Reddit that some said there is design flaw that the contact of the cpu heatsink isn’t contacted correctly to the CPU
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  320. I am attempting to purchase SSDs for the h574TX and confused as hell. Assuming a RAID 10 (4 disk), individual drives will be capped at 1000Mbs? Is this correct? So, any money I spend on drives with r/w speeds > 1000Mbs is a waste of money? Thanks in advance.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  325. When spending this much cash is quite ridiculous that they claim the limitation to PCIe Gen3x2 was due to keeping the device compact. Then I’d dare them to make one that is double that size (and would still be half the size or less than a traditional non SSD QNAP nas with 5 bays!) so that the end user can leverage the capabilities of the SSDs Gen4 in full. I bet they’d be also able to fit the power adapter in a case 2x the size as this one… and would still be portable enough.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  332. Ive used all kinds of QNAP over the years. That GUI is absolutely BLAZING fast compared to all other QNAPs I have seen. I think I want one of these for my homes. Just let it run 24/7 for a home NAS. I have 10Gig fiber ran all through my homer already since im a network engineer so I can fully utilize a nas like this throughput wise.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  333. Hi @NASCompares i have installed windows 10 pro on my Qnap ts 464 do you know how to i get drivers of my network cards intel killer E3100X 2.5 Gigagbit, i have already installed but i have conflicts 🙁
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  334. If it really is using Thunderbolt 4 instead of 3 is it is an instant turn-off (they both tunnel PCIe Gen3 lanes, but TB3 end device can be x4, TB4 native support is just x1…), regardless of the price. I rather suspect it is actually a TB3 device.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  335. I have my eye on this unit, however, I just had Two Dell PowerEdge 730’s and an HP server dropped into my lap, along with an Enterprise Cisco switch. The Dells include a two port 10gb sfp nic…. so I might have to wait on this QNap unit. The servers include sata busses for 3.5 and 2.5 drives…. and 40gb of 3.5 nas spinners, and 4gb of 2.5 spinners, and good amount of ram. Im going to have some fun.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  336. imho they did the right ting with the nvmes. there is no point in having thenvme’s in gen4, since a single or 2 of them can max out the 10gbe connections, having them a full gen4 speed is useless since you need a 100gbe to take full advantage. also, not all lanes of the cpu’s 20 can work at gen4. they prob. used the gen4 for the nics, the thunderbolt etc, which makes more sense. besides, 5 nvme’s can max all nics and thunderbolts even working at gen3x2. in a nas like this, nvmes are about the small size and lower latency, not transfer speeds.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  338. 1800$????? Loooool thats it, give QNAP the prize of most overpriced product of the 2024. already. Btw I stopped wathcing the review the moment you mentioned that price, even if its twice cheaper it will be overpriced. Screw you QNAP, you are worse than nGreedia
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  341. Gen 3×2???!!! Hard pass. . .Thunderbolt 2???!!! 12GB RAM???!!! No ZFS? Why did you do Raid 5?? E1.S drives may be like unicorns right now, but give it a year.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  342. how’s your speed test using the T2E? I tested mine on Mac and Windows and T2E has very very slow write speed at less than 500. Even the iPerf3 test is very slow on up test. Thunderbolt test is symmetrical and faster than 10GBe.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  345. It is a nice machine, but indeed pricey.
    Noise is not too bad, so it seems?
    I do struggle where to place this model in the roam of QNAP products. (SOHO/SMB?)
    Not too happy about the PCI-e bandwidth, should have been Gen 4, full stop.
    Therefore, the speeds you’ve shown in this video aren’t that impressive, if I can be honest for a second.
    Whilst it is not indeed a too bad speed, but with 10GBe, and all the other ports, I believe their designers could have dropped a port and freed-up PCI lines for the M.2 SSD’s.
    I personally would be skipping the i3 version and thus definitely go for the 16Mb RAM version and i5.
    Or one could, hopefully hack the system and replace the CPU?
    (but with soldered RAM, I expect the CPU also not to be replaceable)
    Soldered RAM is really annoying.
    Not including a Thunderbolt cable is standard with QNAP, I have no issue with that.
    As it than often a question of 1 meter, 2 meters or 3 meters? It is hard to please all with it comes to lengths 😉
    BTW, pricing is 1800 euros in the Netherlands.
    PS: I do hope the 120watts powerbricks are up-to-spec, we have plenty over here that die (or go into thermal-overload shutdown) and had to go for 3rd party.
    FYI, the choice for QTS versus QuTS Hero is also not a true easy one, as performance, according to QTS recent video “Webinar Best Practices for QuTS hero NAS Setup” is a thing to possibly worth reconsidering …
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  349. Not to complain (lol), but 16 gig of ram is nowhere near enough to run zfs with five 8 TB drives. not to mention the ram you would need to run containers and such.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  350. When you do noise tests, I think you should compare them with other models at the same time and/or use a sound level meter like you did in some old videos., because, for my part, I can’t really imagine the noise heard
    Anyway, thanks for your videos and articles. I’m about to get my first nas, and your videos help me a lot
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  351. About the gen 3 drives, the Intel i5-1340P CPU only has 8 lanes of gen 4 and the chipset adds another 12 lanes of gen 3. I don’t see how they could have allocated those gen 4 lanes to five SSDs. This is always going to be a problem when you build a SSD storage server using a consumer processor. That’s why Xeon CPUs come with such a large number of pcie lanes, 40-80 or more.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  352. The memory is just simply NOT enough for utilizing the system with VMs, well maybe one VM that runs containers. If they boost the memory to 64 BG the second generation of this device will have a bright future!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  356. Two things: Firstly, these reviews need to start with the price. Maybe it’ll cost views, but it’s more honest. Secondly, what’s the PCIe topology? Is this 5 3×2 connections direct to the CPU? Or are they sharing some bridge? This has been the case in quite a few NAS systems, and very cynically omitted from specs by manufacturers.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  359. Great video! Definitely outside my price range, but I really enjoy the variety of all flash NAS’ we are getting at the moment.

    I’m looking at getting my first NAS, and an all flash NAS appeals to me for aesthetics, power efficiency and noise. If we can get more devices in the price range of the Lincstation N1 that would be awesome.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  360. It still looks like a prop from the 1956 Forbidden Planet movie. No money spent on design, and horribly expensive for what you get, so a pass for me. And only five bays?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  363. Yes way over priced. Must have missed the fact that you could build a hella pc for half that price. Gen 3 pcie REALLY for over $2000. I really now have to start watching what hardware you are reviewing and giving way to much credit. You should stop selling out.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  370. If I’m going to dish out 1500+ quid for a super NAS then there is no way that I will accept a max of 16gb of ram. I’ll just build my own box with 64gb for less than a grand thank you.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  373. Now that the OWC Mercury Pro Dual U.2 exists, I’ve shifted my focus away from NVME NAS, toward NVME DAS. For $500, the Mercury gives me 8 NVME’s. For not much more money than the QNAP unloaded, I got the Mercury plus 8 x 4tb NVME’s. Much faster than the QNAP. Then I have my trusty HDD_based TruNas system for backups and fun.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  374. Talk about consistency. Every single video on this channel (and I watch all of them without exception) reliably has the following:

    – Robbie being excellent in his delivery, detail and articulation of obvious pros and cons of a system in question
    – Seagulls
    – Complaints about “slow” NVMe drives, completely ignoring the fact that any NVMe drive on a single lane will saturate all network bandwidth
    – A clown complaining in the comments about lack of ECC memory support
    – People finding things that are missing from a device in question: Robbie reviews a 4-bay device, they want an 8-bay. Robbie talks about an 8-bay, a clown turns up saying he needs a minimum of 20 bays, all full of 22TB drives storing his mission critical bird videos
    – People saying anything less than an EPYC with an RTX4090 is not sufficient for Plex
    – A long comment thread where two ‘professionals’ almost resort to insults on the basis of disagreement on ECC memory
    – A person knowing nothing about NAS, but certain he needs a pro-grade solution for his photography side hustle
    – A person running a decommissioned 2011 enterprise server idling at 900W, who thinks it’s a better option than modern solutions

    Always a sight to behold. ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  375. Finally… faster storage that doesn’t take up a lot of space. So tired of these vendors releasing old underpowered cpu, 1x nvme connections, or slow ethernet boxes.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  376. Appreciate your opinions and reviews but this content could be condensed further especially without repeating use of clips. I skipped a head 3 – time and landed on the same Simpsons clip. Please be more concise. longer videos are welcome if you are showing / discussing more about the products performance and use case otherwise. spec sheet is quicker to read.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  378. I really find your videos very informative. Have a QNAP TVS-H1688X and a TVS 1282 i3 fully populated with more than enogh disks. However, as time goes by, new Technolgy comes up. My point is that this perticular TBS-h574TX is just looking ugly Chinese. Cant they make it look squared or 19″?!? And this holds not only for QNAP, but many others that you even tested! Ugly boxes, and NOT SUFFICIENT. It would be cool to have a NAS with 8 PCIe 4 or 5 Bays but I guess, that is to come yet. Thanks for all those Videos that you made, I saw 99% I would guess
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  381. Finally a consumerish NAS that supports something aside of M.2. For the price I’d have liked gen 4 but I’m guessing there aren’t enough PCIE lanes for that. The real disappointment is the memory. I’d rather a slightly more expensive unit that could be upgraded to 64gb and supported ECC even if that made it a little larger. I can still see use cases for this but it really wouldn’t have been hard to make this a real banger of a unit.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  382. I’m jumping in ????
    For NAS PCI 4 is not necessary ( The 10G ethernet or TB4 will be your bottleneck ) unless you want to use your nvme ssd internally for VM ( and deal with more heat and power consumption )
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  388. Hi, and Iam pretty new to modern NAS so polities if the answer is obvious. Could a ‘normal’ 3.5inch SATA DAS be attached to store ‘legacy’ data such as media files ???? on HDD as well?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  389. or the record, E1.S is a form-factor. Power Loss Protection (PLP) support helps to record data that resides in buffer memory to NAND flash memory by utilising the backup power of the (often solid) capacitor in case of a sudden power supply shut down. Like when you switched off older electronics in the day, where indicators, displays etc often stayed-on for a few seconds after switching the power off.
    But (only) PCI Gen3 x2 is baffling!
    There are quite a few very nice features in this box but that “low” PCI Gen3 x2, that is an unfortunate choice!
    For that kind of price I would expect more. They could have dropped the 2.5GBe (perhaps combine it with the existing 10GBe, as there are nowadays chipsets that support both).
    BTW, I would wonder how the i3 would perform under QuTS Hero.
    And fixed memory and only 16GB for the i5? Why not 16GB for the i3, and 32GB for the i5?
    Sorry, a very hard pass on this model, too many caveats for me.
    Not interested, not even by a long shot.
    And very time deadbolt is being mentioned again and again, I do not give the video a thumbs, it is becoming silly to me.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  392. I could live with the reduced data rates of the NVMe’s but the memory being limited to 16 GB is a deal breaker for me.

    I would want to use it as a VM platform and that would require more RAM.

    Also it would be nice to have a 6 or 8 bay version as I would want to run RAID 6 and with current NVMe capacities RAID 6 would really cut into the total storage available.

    Perhaps the next generation of this device will be a viable option for my business needs!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  393. This NAS makes no sense to me: as a business user if I wanted a high speed portable NAS for production work I would list Registered ECC as a minimal requirement. This has the trappings of a business or pro series unit, but is instead a consumer grade platform with the artifice of enterprise trappings glued onto it. Factor in their asking price and it’s a solid “not on your life” scenario. There are ways of getting these requirements into a smaller form factor chassis and keeping the weight down.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  397. Possible the limited memory is part of price/market separation

    There is plenty of space to put sodimm slot or solder down a package of memory have higher capacity

    If you want highspeed pcie with switch / more memory you need to pay more for a pro / hero edition

    Thanks QNAP , you won’t get my money ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  400. I am debating between DIY vs Terramaster F4-423 (currently at $399) vs this unit (Flashtor 6). I’ll be using it for basic storage and remote cloud access (Gdrive GPhotos replacement potentially Home Plex Server). What do you recommend?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  401. Seriously considering one of these. M.2 is cheaper than SATA for flash storage.

    Any other storage appliance offering a good option for flash storage is incredibly expensive.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  403. I think the worst Problem is realy the CPU. If Asus has used something like an AMD V1500B or an R2314 with 15 Watts but 16 PCIE 3.0 lanes, they could use 4 lanes for the NIC’s and USB which would be enough to even saturate a dual 10gbit NIC and 2 10gbit USB 3.2 Ports at the same time. That the NVME only run at 1GB/s or 2GB/s at the Store 6 wouldn’t be the problem. But with intel there are no efficient 16 lanes processors, so you have to go AMD which is notorious problematic at providing embedded Prozessors, Synology has some around.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  404. After watching your reviews we have bought the Flashstor 12 for our video editing NAS. Great so far. One of our editing laptops is older and only can support 2.5Gb ethernet adapter speeds due to USB 3.1 Gen 1 bottleneck. If I got a second 2.5Gb adapter is it possible to set it up to get 2x 2.5Gb throughput❓ If so what do I need and how do I set it up❓
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  405. Thank you for the review of this product.

    I have been giving consideration to it and the form factor along with the SSD’s does have an appeal. This would be a home use application that does have SD, HD and 4k movies. There is also a fairly large amount of music files as MP3 and video as well. Other than that, it’s all about data and the combined volume is in and around 7TB. Again; home use two users.

    The question: what Drives of good quality would you recommend? I also understand through reading, the device is RAID capable. Is that part correct?

    In advance, thank you!
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  406. The product shows registered, but the website says it’s not, so I can’t open a ticket. I leave voice messages with Asustor and they don’t return my calls. I’m kind of stuck and not happy with their support. The 12 bay unit is displaying errors when I scrub and sometimes says the resource is not available. I don’t have these kinds of issues with NAS units from other brands. I’ve never had to contact the manufacturer for the other NAS units I have. Disappointing.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  407. Disappointing. Talking very long about the procuct but still nothing about the noise of the device. If you are just saying “they are not loud” – that is not enough, I have heard the exact same comment about NAS as loud as a hairdryer.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  408. In your next video, can you please advise the best NVMEs to use based on the throttling of Gen 3 x 1 and how to populate the NAS for best throughput i.e. is 3 NVMEs with Raid 5 the best. Thanks.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  409. N5105 – Max # of PCI Express Lanes = 8 – Each NVME = Capable of 4 lanes. Whats the point of running NVME? May as well use SATA SSD’s.
    Now does anyone (at home) have the capability to run 60Gb/s (12x5Gb/s) networking. Nope. But….. Thinking outside the box and allowing for smb multi channel. maybe a third edition 12 bay, a ‘proper’ processor, with 4 10Gb/s SFP+ on the back and we might have some serious sales. There are definitely people out there who have that sort of capability. (like me)
    10Gb networking for home is a sensible price currently with mikrotik but 25/40/100 is still going to be real pricey until corporate entities start rolling this stuff to the pre-loved market
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  414. Definitely interested but it is quite ‘plasticky’. I would have been keener to buy with a metal chasis, plastic just doesn’t say quality. I am quite keen to see what the competition produces that is similar. Kudos though for kicking off this type of NAS.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  415. Hmm. Need something like this but with ZFS and encryption capabilities. I guess that would need a stronger CPU. I don’t really care about the external bottleneck, even 1 Gb is more than enough for what I need. I do care about the dimensions, noise, and power consumption, which far outweigh the network limits.

    Can you boot a TrueNAS on this or is the system drive vendor-locked?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  417. I’ve recently found your site and your reviews here. Great job!

    I’d like to know if this would support having a SSD pool to have a PS 5 access it for game storage. Not sure how a PS5 would deal with NAS storage for game content.Any thoughts?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  418. 14:04 — “a thousand megs per slot” . . . but assuming that is (or is not) with all six slot filled?
    For instance, if I make a pool out of three of six slots on FS6706T, then will each slot in such a pool get double that (i.e., 2,000 megs per slot)?
    With much appreciation. Great video ????
    Kindest regards, friends and neighbours.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  419. Is there any drawback to connecting the NAS to a Mac Studio with SSD for the 10G speed and the rest of the computers on the network via ethernet? Do you get the same functionality in terms of storage and apps?
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  421. I saw your review of the Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro NVMe NAS and liked it, but I think there is missing information, such as:
    The type of memory used, is it ECC?
    Do we need to buy heat sinks for the M.2 drives?
    What is the type of the PCI lane connection, is it 3.1 or higher?

    Best budget that i found in Portugal was:
    Nome Marca unidade Preço Totais Preço Final
    ASUSTOR 12-Bay M.2 FLASHSTOR 12 PRO Asus 1 898,90 € 898,90 €
    Samsung 2TB SSD 970 EVO PLUS M2 PCIe – MZ-V7S2T0BW Samsung 12 113,58 € 1 362,96 € 2 333,90 €
    Samsung 2TB 980 Pro NVMe – MZ-V8P2T0BW Samsung 12 143,82 € 1 725,84 € 2 696,78 €
    Memória RAM Kingston 16GB 2666MHz DDR4 Non-ECC CL19 SODIMM – KVR26S19S8/16 Kingston 2 36,02 € 72,04 €

    Just for reference. Thank you for your attention. Keep up the good work.

    Best regards.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  425. Spdif is a no for me. I am getting one of these but will be going Ethernet to my transport to the DAC. This will be replacing my DS220+. Fits and better looking ????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  426. Let’s all face facts – if you’re expecting to fill a 10Gbps link with traffic all the time, or want/need a 25Gbps or 40Gbps+ link, you’re not looking at Asustor. You’re looking at professional solutions. My potential use for this is in long-term NAS storage, not performant storage. Meaning, I want to have 12x4TB disks in RAID 6, and load them with Plex data, and let them sit there. For over a decade. And be reliable. Something spinners can’t really nod their head at. With RAID 6 NVME drives, I would expect easily 10+ years of use – I’d expect that the CPU or memory may suffer a defect long before the drives die. The only thing I wish the 12 bay unit had would be dual 10Gbps ports – not for throughput (and I’m sure some people would scream about that) but for redundancy, so that if I do a switch upgrade and it reloads, nothing is interrupted from a file mount perspective.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  428. *Note* – Fairplay to @ASUSTORTV , after my criticism of the system not arriving with M.2 SSD Heatsinks, they have produced a test video showing compelling evidence that the PCIe Gen 3×1 slots are not able to generate enough heat on a x1 speed each. I will be conducting sustained tests later on that factor in spiked use, but I have to hand it to them, it is a great response and makes a solid case. You can find their video here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr__5B3oGtM
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  429. Some notes about these Asustor FS 67 series NVMe NAS’s….
    1. Currently the only 4TB NVMe supported is the WD RED 4TB (WDS400T1R0C-68BDK0) per the Asustor HCL .
    2. The NAS will stream DSD (up to quad-DSD) to an attached USB DAC. However, none of the USB DACs listed on Asustor’s HCL support DSD.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  431. So if I understood this right, If I’m still running a 1Gbps switch/router my home network would be the bottleneck not the NAS itself right (with the 6 bay)
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  432. The 1GBps per drive comment isn’t exactly accurate. Due to the CPU only having 8 PCIe lanes, they’re using ASMedia PCIe MUX chips to share all of the PCIe bandwidth. In a RAID6 array with all 12 bays populated with 2TB Intel 670Ps, I haven’t seen more than around 3100 MB/s reads and 840 MB/s writes.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  433. Wait… Let’s nip this in the bud, shall we. Making no apology, this is a ha’p’orth o’ tar situation, though in NAS terms we are talking more leaky coracle than creaky man-o’-war. More than that, here is an offstage exercise in elephant wallpapering. Having said that, I do agree pretty much with mostly all you’ve said in your pros and cons presentation, and with ASUSTOR TV clarifications and rejoinders – but!

    It’s one thing to announce that the Flashstor is populated exclusively with NVMe cards, whilst waving the like to your ear. I can’t fault your delivery. It’s priceless. NVMe cards are silent as a dead parrot, of course. But the so called bad boy Flashstor NAS – with a manufacturer stated Operation Noise Level of 18.7 dB due to the built-in active cooling fan – is, well, audible. Not just audible, but with a strangely metallic, nay, ironic quality to the noise it produces.

    Very quiet, and barely noticeable, are relative euphemisms, like almost silent, not useful in translation. Every ear hears what it will. An acceptable level of noise depends subjectively on individual use case scenarios. I suspect the majority of any gathered assembly will be quite comfortable agreeing to differ on the intrusiveness, or otherwise, of a quiet device.

    Should you buy it? On a promise it never makes and doesn’t need to keep? See below. Even if you convince yourself to overlook the inclusion of a fan in the specification you won’t be spared the morning after. Remove the fan, or if it stops working of its own accord, and there is a series of loud beeps to alert all those within earshot. No secret. It insists functionally on being present and correct, and, as I may have indicated, it is noisy. It oughtn’t be, but it is. Thanks to two significant factors: a) aerodynamics, that is diameter/rotational speed/blade design, and in particular b) dual ball bearings.

    I suggest a line be drawn at the apparently casual use of the word silent since it means something entirely different, by varying degree indicative of subjective experience of noise level, to the word quiet. (Aside – You might want to call the latter virtual silence. Mmmm, a bit 70’s. How about artificial silence. Ah, yes, now that’s modern. Of course, it still means categorically not silent in any way whatsoever, rather of questionable value, a compensatory poor substitute for the real thing. Who cares.)

    If you require silence, as in Solid State Drive, and wish to eliminate noise, as in Hard Disk Drive, then buying this machine is a straight forward mistake. Silent running is statedly not a design goal of Asustor for the Flashstor. That being the case, what exactly is the unique selling point of it? The case is sturdy, but looks ridiculous and those are fake exhausts on the front, whatever Robbie told you. If the proprietor also spreads the idea that its firmware potentially is written to deny service to those seeking to install other operating systems or scupper rival investment group’s memory modules then at best it is an impressive marketing exercise. Impressive as in pressurised sales loosening your grip on reality and in turn making a big dent in your paltry bitcoin collection. So keep your eye on the pea. Let’s go.

    Highly desirable, a silent domestic NAS device is a simple and clear objective concept. A design goal. Not a missed target. Not an Asustor. Not even a Flashstor. Not yet, anyway. To this day, the only silent NAS is a NONAS.

    “We really wanted to make this quiet. Otherwise it defeats one of the purposes of an SSD NAS.” ASUSTOR TV on Flashstor thermal design.

    There it is again. That word. Quiet. Which means a degree of noisy as opposed to silent, which still means no noise.

    My DS415+, admittedly with Noctua fans, is quiet. The reason for upgrading the fans is to eliminate the metallic grinding sound of ball bearings, to make the fans mostly tolerable. But it isn’t silent with four WD Red 3TB HDD. The escaping chronic fixed level mechanical grinding sound, more than the lively seek chatter, is a depressive ergonomic that is unnatural to the ear and a factor in long term hearing loss. That’s why most sysops tend to not live in the server room, or for that matter the plant room, or indeed the belfry. What? Away then, with those naughty hard disks and their moving parts.

    “We really wanted to make this quiet.” Really. If by quiet you mean to some extent noisy, you succeeded. You didn’t. You did otherwise. Strange, but true. In doing so, as vouchsafed, you defeated one of the purposes of an SSD NAS. The distinguishing purpose presumably being to follow through silent (not quiet) solid state disks with a silent (not quiet) solid state chassis. You know. Silent storage. Instead of quiet (to some extent noisy) storage.

    By design. Quiet and not silent. Why is that? It needn’t be that way. Why stop at swapping out the last of those noisy spinning hard disks to do only half a job by leaving in a noisy spinning fan?

    With respect to the Flashstor, use of the word silent is merely adjectival funny business, or perhaps fanny business. What I mean is this. A useful practical description of an object ought to align itself with the uniformly objective convergence of common experience and yield to independent measurement and verification. Thus, silent is probably a non-starter as there is a ball bearing attached. Unless that fan is off, that is, or running on mag-lev oil bearings below the bar of a gentle draught, which it isn’t in this case.

    Thursday there were two Flashstor 6 in stock on Amazon UK – then there was one. Closer inspection of the design would suggest that Asustor decided wilfully not to render the wannabe silent NAS in fact, silent. The thick plottens. The design includes certain case screw heads, including the fan screws, buried under pressed and recessed hard plastic caps that defy attempts to disassemble. The dimensions of the custom fan itself are suboptimal to sourcing better performing parts. Fan replacement is therefore a factory repair. Good luck with that. One is physically hampered even from modding the Flashstor for peace and quiet. One may be seen but not heard, but one’s NAS – not so much.

    When the Flashtor NAS is up and running, it’s tiddly built-in fan is up and running. The ball bearing noise can be heard distinctly and penetratingly across the room. This is not to mention the rushing sound of air. Asustor has almost succeeded with that, although the fan is rather small. In fact the airflow can only be heard if one waves the entire NAS to one’s ear or, equally, places one’s ear really quite close to it.

    That is not the major problem. The fan shifts enough air at idle to keep the inner workings from overheating and the airflow often is inaudible depending on the ambient sound of working conditions. Only in the dead of night, when you should be asleep anyway, or if you are fortunate enough to work in library conditions, can this humble rush of air be heard. The poor wee fan has to work the surrounding air a little too vigorously to waft the necessary draught. The sound level is very much like a DS423+ on SSDs, sporting replacement Noctua fans fitted with series resistors. Don’t ask me how I know. Don’t get me started on those cheap rattly Synology fans in a flimsy case. Why do you think I took in the Flashtor? Desperation. It certainly wasn’t for looks.

    I want to live with my NAS, not to have to listen to it when I require to hear a pin drop. A little more commitment to acoustic performance could easily have resulted in a silent Flashstor. Misanthropic marketing motivated by the boundless wonder of public imagination supposes why produce something good and well-engineered straight off the bat when you can sell it again, and again, and again. To the tune of a waltz.

    The problem is this. And this is the whole point. Asustor have used, not the cheapest fan design it demonstrates reasonably good aerodynamics and manufacturing but cheap enough to suffer from noisy ball bearings. I say suffer, because the sound is remarkably similar to the grinding sound of a spinning hard disk.

    So here’s a paradox for you. The elephant in the room is the Flashtor itself. As a design and marketing concept it is admirable: bold, striking and courageous. However, you could say that its greatest asset is at the same time its inevitable downfall. It is a victim of its own success. It contains the seeds of its own destruction. In other words, it has balls. And it’s a little fanny.

    There is only one thing more disheartening than suffering from noisy ball syndrome, and that is foisting your head splitting ailment on sensitive, imaginative types who are trying to manifest (let’s be generous) original thinking. That, and the blinding irony of an SSD NAS sounding for all the world like a wheezy old dog of an HDD chassis. Oooh, the bells! The decibels!

    12th Gen Intel NUC with a Core i5-1240P 35W TPD in the Akasa Turing passive case with a 2.5″ SSD, mSata and NVMe is for real. Silent. Oh, the sheer relief. Obviously, that represents overkill for power in a domestic NAS. Count them. How many cores? But proof of concept beyond doubt by an order of magnitude. The removal of barriers to achieving a silent NAS. How are you going to test the market for silent NAS if you don’t release one? I see, you are testing the market for the acceptance of a decoy. As long as that’s understood. You can be the best at taking the pea.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  437. I don’t trust the chinese Asus one single bit. Their customer service is pure crap. Here’s their latest “screw the customer” fiasco. https://youtu.be/cbGfc-JBxlY
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  438. Just please someone to tell the manufacturers, to put full size pci slot (or mobile 3070 soldered to the mb) and space for gpu and here you go, the perfect plex server ????????????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  439. I bought one of these and decided to go for the Flashstor 6 version.

    I simply couldn’t justify the jump in price between the FS6 to FS12 for an extra 6 drive slots and the 10Gb LAN.

    For me tge FS6 is plenty fast enough.

    The reason I devided on one of these is they are almost silent and use barely any power. In sleep mode they make no noise at all and use literally nothing (less than 1 watt). But the main reason is they wake up from sleep in less than 2 seconds vs my Synology NAS which takes sone 40+ seconds to wake all the drives up and come to life.

    Mine is not accessible online and i only access it via VPN so my data remains safe and its plenty fast enough for moving files around my network vs my Synology with its limited 1Gb LAN ports (why Synology).

    The only slight issue i have is with regards to the NVMe drives. Because there is limited compatibility listed on the Asustor site for these i thought I’d try just a couple of Samsung Evo 970 Plus 2TB drives to start with and if tgey worked ok I’d add more.

    I bought two and set them up as RAID 1 and everything worked fine.

    I then thought id add another and change to RAID 5, so i got another 2TB exact same drive bought only 2 days later (all bought from Amazon). It set up as RAID 5 fine and seemed all ok but the 3rd drive seemed to be considerably hotter than the previous two.

    Also i noticed the 3rd drive was showing as having “ERROR INFORMATION LOG ENTRIES” when i checked that drive in the NVMe SSD status log.

    I assumed that drive might be faulty so RMA’d it. But the replacement was exactly the same. So i completely deleted the volume and set all 3 drives up a fresh as RAID 5. But that 3rd drive is still getting the ERROR INFORMATION LOG ENTRIES which is odd. The initial two drives don’t have them and they are exactly the same drives.

    Ive tried swapping drive slots etc but that 3rd drive just seems different. The only physical difference is the first two drives were manufactured date of 2022 but the 3rd (and replacement 4th drive) are manufactured dated 2023 so presumably newer firmware.

    Any ideas what these ERROR INFORMATION LOG ENTRIES are and are they a reason for concern? Why does this 2023 drive have them but not the 1st two drives?

    @Asustor TV

    Apart from that issue im loving the system and its a great price too for such a silent, low powered (energy wise) and rapid system)
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  442. What use cases are these useful for? Seems overkill for home use, seeing as you need a network setup beyond most home networks, and is this sort of performance really needed for Plex? If you’re doing home video editing why not store the videos while editing locally and then backup to NAS. Just curious.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  444. I hope you do a followup on this device with a recomended ssd choice and tests. The hdmi output is also interesting. How well would that work vs. Accessing media on the network.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  445. A better CPU could have gotten Gen4 NVMe speeds, but then it would have doubled the cost and would be marketed towards content creators photo/video editing. With the N5105 and those ports it seems like it’s going to be marketed towards Plex media users.????
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  446. NVME’s don’t get that hot. This is only needed if you are actually pushing them but 90% of the gen3 x4 NVME’s even when using them in high end computing don’t need heatsink. A NAS unless the user is pushing it with multiple users in an x4 configuration don’t need heatsinks. If they are limited by x1 i don’t see them even remotely coming close to needing a heatsink. This is another one of those geek things that the higher end users say you need but don’t realize that 99% of the people watching their content don’t. There are also some studies out there that show they work better when they are warmed up. This is definitely seen when talking immersion cooling.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  450. 17:07 The heatsinks for the SoC are under the motherboard. Heatsinks for the SSDs if preferred, are sold separately. They’re the same heatsinks as the AS-T10G3. During testing, we could not cause SSDs to overheat in our NAS. This isn’t to say that some SSDs in the future might need heatsinks due to their design, we wanted to keep the NAS flexible to take almost any SSD while giving people the option to add SSDs later on and not pass those costs onto people who might not need them. Remember, the PCIe lanes are limited to x1 to match with the 10GbE and provide a higher quantity without much sacrifice in real world performance. Since they’re x1, they’re not being fully throttled sequentially and thus, run cooler.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  451. 15:41 The problem with the claim that the SSDs aren’t able to stretch their legs is that, practically, no copper-based network solution is going to allow 40 Gbps on PCIe 3.0 x4. We’d have to buy a 40GbE controller, add heatsinks for the cooling, tell everyone to upgrade their PCs with QSFP+ 40GbE cards, tell everyone to buy expensive 40GbE switches for their network etc… PCIe 3.0 x1 perfectly matches with a 10GbE port, and to be honest, as a NAS user myself, very few actually do much internal transferring to make x4 sockets worthwhile. 99/100 interactions are through the NIC, the main entry point, and SSDs provide unbelievably superior random I/O performance, which helps with, actions that require HUGE amounts of small files, like video editing, audio editing, photo transfers and more. Such actions will not even saturate Gigabit, but will be substantially faster, orders of magnitude faster than regular hard drives. 10GbE helps balance it out.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE

  453. 11:11 If we shoved an i3 in there, it’d cook itself. We want our customers to have their cake and eat it too. An i3 would still not support ECC either. The profile just won’t physically support a Xeon.
    REPLY ON YOUTUBE