Synology FS200T NAS Revealed

Last updated on 22 Jan 2026 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 Synology FS200T NAS is STILL A THING! But Is It Too Late?
1.1 Synology FS200T NAS – Hardware Specifications
1.2 Who is the Synology FS200T NAS For?
1.3 Has the Synology FS200T NAS Arrived Too Little, Too Late?
2 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
2.1 Related
2.2 Discover more from NAS Compares

Synology FS200T NAS is STILL A THING! But Is It Too Late?

The Synology FlashStation FS200T is a compact 6 bay 2.5 inch NAS that has followed an unusually drawn out and fragmented path to visibility. The device first appeared through semi official leaks in Q1 2025, before being shown more openly at Computex during May and June, giving attendees a first real look at the hardware. After that appearance, public information largely dried up, leading many to assume the system had been delayed indefinitely or quietly cancelled. Interest resurfaced later in 2025 as more complete documentation began to circulate, culminating in a leaked datasheet dated October 16, 2025 that outlined specifications, software capabilities, and Synology’s intended positioning for the device. Despite the lack of an official launch announcement, demand has remained present at a low but steady level, particularly among users who value small, quiet systems and are already invested in the DSM ecosystem. Online discussion has continued across forums and social platforms, with recurring questions around release timing and justification for the product’s existence in a rapidly changing NAS market. The FS200T appears designed to serve a specific niche rather than a broad audience, focusing on an all flash configuration, low acoustic output, and minimal physical footprint. Rather than competing on raw performance or expandability, its purpose is to deliver a responsive, self contained storage platform that runs the full Synology software stack in environments where noise, size, and power consumption matter more than upgrade paths or maximum throughput.

Synology FS200T NAS – Hardware Specifications

At the heart of the Synology FS200T is the Intel Celeron J4125, a 4 core, 64 bit processor with a 2.0 GHz base clock and a 2.7 GHz turbo ceiling. This is a chip originally released in the 2019 to 2020 timeframe and has been widely deployed across several generations of entry and mid range NAS systems. While it remains serviceable for basic DSM workloads, file services, and light container use, it is increasingly dated by current standards. Intel has since retired this naming convention entirely, shifting its low power roadmap toward newer N series Alder Lake and Twin Lake processors that offer improved efficiency, IPC gains, and more modern media and virtualization capabilities. In that context, the J4125 feels more like a holdover from an earlier design cycle than a deliberate forward looking choice, particularly for a flash focused system introduced in 2026.

The CPU does include a hardware encryption engine, which aligns well with DSM features such as encrypted shared folders, secure snapshots, and HTTPS services. However, expectations around virtualization, AI assisted services, and sustained multi task workloads should remain conservative. Compared with newer low power CPUs, the J4125 lacks the architectural refinements and efficiency improvements that would better justify pairing it with an all flash storage configuration. This choice reinforces the impression that the FS200T is designed around stability and familiarity rather than performance progression.

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of DDR4 non ECC SODIMM installed by default. The system provides 2 memory slots with an official maximum capacity of 8 GB using 4 GB modules. While sufficient for basic DSM services, backup tasks, and light multi user access, this ceiling quickly becomes restrictive when enabling heavier applications such as Virtual Machine Manager, Synology Drive for multiple users, or container based services. Synology also notes that optimal compatibility and warranty support depend on using official Synology memory, further narrowing flexibility for users who might otherwise attempt more aggressive tuning.

Storage is where the FS200T makes its clearest statement, and also draws its most obvious criticism. The system supports 6 x 2.5 inch SATA SSDs with hot swap capability, and no other internal storage options are listed. There are no M.2 NVMe slots, no cache bays, and no PCIe expansion. In a market where even compact NAS systems increasingly rely on NVMe for primary or cache storage, the exclusive reliance on SATA SSDs feels increasingly out of step. SATA bandwidth limitations mean that even in optimal RAID configurations, the storage subsystem will be constrained long before the SSDs themselves are saturated, particularly when paired with the available network interfaces. This design choice prioritizes compatibility and thermals over performance scalability, but it also places a hard ceiling on what the platform can deliver.

Networking is limited to 2 Ethernet ports, consisting of 1 x 2.5GbE and 1 x 1GbE with failover support. While the inclusion of 2.5GbE is a welcome baseline upgrade over legacy 1GbE only systems, the absence of additional multi gig ports or 10GbE options further compounds the performance bottleneck created by the SATA only storage design. External connectivity is handled via 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, suitable for backups or peripheral devices, but there is no mention of USB based expansion units or higher bandwidth options.

Physically, the FS200T maintains a compact and understated design. The chassis measures 121 mm x 151 mm x 175 mm and weighs 1.4 kg, making it easy to place in home or small office environments. Cooling is managed by a single 80 mm fan, and the lack of mechanical drives supports Synology’s positioning of the system as quiet during operation. Power input is rated from 100V to 240V AC at 50/60 Hz, with operating conditions specified between 0°C and 40°C and 8 percent to 80 percent relative humidity. These characteristics reinforce the system’s focus on low noise, low power operation rather than sustained high performance workloads.

Category Specification
CPU Intel Celeron J4125, 4 core, 64 bit, 2.0 GHz base, 2.7 GHz turbo
Hardware encryption Yes
Memory (included) 4 GB DDR4 non ECC SODIMM
Memory slots 2
Max memory 8 GB (4 GB x 2)
Drive bays 6
Drive type 2.5 inch SATA SSD
Hot swap Yes
LAN ports 1 x 2.5GbE RJ 45, 1 x 1GbE RJ 45
USB ports 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1
Cooling 1 x 80 mm fan
Dimensions 121 mm x 151 mm x 175 mm
Weight 1.4 kg
Power input 100V to 240V AC, 50/60 Hz

Who is the Synology FS200T NAS For?

The Synology FS200T is clearly aimed at a narrow segment of users who value compact size, quiet operation, and access to the DSM software ecosystem over raw performance or hardware flexibility. This includes home users, enthusiasts, and small office environments where space and noise are limiting factors and where workloads are largely centered around file storage, backups, photo management, and light collaboration services. Users already familiar with DSM who want an always on, low maintenance system for everyday data tasks may find the FS200T fits neatly into that role, particularly if power efficiency and physical footprint are higher priorities than throughput.

At the same time, the FS200T is less well suited to users expecting strong virtualization performance, heavy multi user access, or storage scalability over time. The combination of an older processor, a modest memory ceiling, SATA only storage, and limited network bandwidth means it is not designed to grow alongside more demanding workloads. Power users, media professionals, and those comparing against newer M.2 based NAS platforms may find the system restrictive. In practice, the FS200T makes the most sense for users who want a quiet, self contained DSM appliance and are comfortable accepting its fixed performance envelope from day one.

Has the Synology FS200T NAS Arrived Too Little, Too Late?

The FS200T enters a NAS market that has evolved significantly since its first appearance in early 2025. In that time, compact and enthusiast focused systems have increasingly shifted toward M.2 NVMe as primary storage, often paired with faster multi gig or 10GbE networking as a baseline rather than an upgrade. Against those expectations, a 6 bay, SATA only flash system built around an older Celeron platform feels cautious and, in some respects, behind the curve. Even where SSD responsiveness is present, the combination of SATA bandwidth limits, modest CPU capability, and a single 2.5GbE port constrains how much of that performance can realistically be delivered to connected clients.

These limitations are more pronounced when the FS200T is compared directly with consumer and prosumer alternatives released over the last 12 to 24 months. Many competing systems, including small form factor DIY and appliance style NAS solutions, now offer newer Alder Lake or Twin Lake based processors, higher memory ceilings, and NVMe storage that can scale well beyond SATA constraints. While those platforms may lack DSM and its tightly integrated services, they often deliver noticeably higher throughput, better virtualization headroom, and more flexibility for future expansion at similar or lower price points. In that context, the FS200T’s hardware profile risks appearing static rather than intentionally restrained.

Whether the FS200T is ultimately “too late” depends on how much weight is placed on software versus hardware. For users who specifically want DSM in a very small, quiet enclosure and are comfortable with a fixed performance envelope, the system still fills a clear niche. However, its weaknesses become harder to overlook in a consumer market that increasingly expects NVMe storage, modern CPUs, and faster networking as standard. If pricing and SSD compatibility further narrow its appeal, the FS200T may struggle to justify its position against consumer focused alternatives that offer stronger hardware fundamentals, even if they require compromises on software maturity and ecosystem integration.

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       
      Where to Buy a Product
      amzamexmaestrovisamaster 24Hfree delreturn VISIT RETAILER ➤ 
      amzamexmaestrovisamaster 24Hfree delreturn VISIT RETAILER ➤

      If you like this service, please consider supporting us.
      We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you. Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which is used to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H. You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks! To find out more about how to support this advice service check HERE    

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
           

      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      Discover more from NAS Compares

      Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site

      Leave a Reply to @sojirouCancel reply

      98 thoughts on “Synology FS200T NAS Revealed”

      1. Love my ds620slim, home assistant VM, some dockers, jellyfin, 4 phones and 4 computers backing up, surveillance station.
        Running with a modded fan and 6 4tb SSD (bought when a lot cheaper)
        It’s silent, it’s does everything I need, low powered and small.
        As long as the new one is not drive locked and can do everything the ds620 slim can do I’ll upgrade.
        I can keep using my SSD’s and I get 2 more CPU cores, a fast LAN form the future and support for longer.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      15. … … … feel better?
        Sometimes its good to just get it out.
        Your begonias arent growing well, the kids are messy, the local fish and chips shop is closed for painting,
        … lets just take it all out on Synology. Its just healthy. lol
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      16. Absolute cinema. DS625 slim. Yeah I said that. Synology, please. Burn all those remaining J4125s already, nobody wants them. Fire individuals or whole department, which pushes vendorlocking your HDDs, SSD, RAMs. Yesterday was late. Forget about whole 25 series, it is already lost. Keep the chases, Put there powerful CPUs capable of hw video encoding, 1x10GbE NIC with few 1 or 2,5GbEs, but the 10GbE is now minimum. Ability to easily put there 32 or 64GB of RAM (I know the prices skyrocketed, it is 2026), ability to use any HDD of my choice, any SSD of my choice, any RAM of my choice and put the price tag in some competitive area. Basically create new “XS+/XS” serie with “Plus” prices. And then and only then, I will buy Ugreen anyway.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      19. Honestly it seems to me that Synolgy is out of touch with reality. Headless chicken type of business strategy… they have no idea anymore what the customer want and need. They just live in their own reality.
        Even their NAS OS DSM which was (and maybe still is for a little while) the gold standard seems to loose it’s shine.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      20. This thing is being released because it will likely be cheaper for Synology to manufacture the initial run and then scrap it if there is no demand rather than just cancel the contract with the actual factory doing the manufacturing up front. Some products are sent out to die.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      22. You’re right. We don’t need this. This could might been a thing 15 years ago. With the same processor. ????

        What we do need with hardware is a powerful arm chip in there like a snapdragon X.
        Consolidate number of hardware options.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      24. I seriously considered buying a DS620slim last year to host a bunch of old SATA drives but the price didn’t make sense for me. The primary market for these is silence and small space. Think small apartment dwellers, van dwellers, liveaboards on sailboats, and so on.

        But it may be a bit late to market with the end of the SATA SSD era. The 8 TB QVO drives make a nice combination.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      31. This should be U.2/U.3 with 10Gb base-T and SFP-28 and enough processor to saturate that. That’d put it in a whole different price bracket, but 2.5″ SATA is dead, NVMe isn’t even new anymore and without the networking to back it up, it’s pointless to use flash for storage unless you have a very niche use case.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      34. So a old cpu and no 10gbt ports ? , I have a shit load of 4tb SSDs ( 7 and 3x8tb SSDs ) but I think I’ll pass , a better cpu and 10gbt would be nice.
        I’m looking at the Minisforum N5 Air , 5 drive bay and 3 x nvme , 1 x 10gbt and a 1 x 5gbt port .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      36. These drive through bottle shops used to be fairly standard here in Australia and the ones here didn’t require you to turn around halfway through (built in sobriety test?). More recently they’ve been replaced by motorcycle based home delivery services.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      40. Designed by P.T. Barnum. ????

        With a decent CPU and SAS SSD drives support (so that they don’t have to worry too much about PCI lanes), this could have been a nice product.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      42. I need a small NAS, and it has to be from Synology… don’t ask why — I honestly don’t know ????.
        The CPU seems… slow?
        Should I wait, or buy one of the Synology Slim models? I’m not sure.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      44. Synology shooting themselves in the foot. Just improve your hardware and at least compete with Ugreen hardware. Release a wave of 2027 devices and forget the consumer HDD, memory and cache lockdowns. DSM 8 got to be tasty
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      45. It would be interesting if it had 10GbE and could saturate it read/write. I really don’t care what CPU is used if the device will perform well and saturate the network connection. If you put six 4tg sata drives in there with RAID5 you would have 18tb usable in a very quiet, lower power, small form factor that could easily saturate 10GbE if there was enough cpu. I would buy into that (if it wasnt Synology). I have a bunch of 2.5 sata’s laying around looking for a home.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      47. No, Robbie, it’s not “incredibly negative.” It’s simply realistic. Synology have once more decided to release hardware that is already outdated. Choosing 2.5 SSD over M.2 NVME is also baffling, but again this is how Synology seem to operate these days.

        Even if you can use any SSD in this, the idea of this is already superseded by NVME arrays from several other competitors. If they do what Synology does of late and insist on using their vastly overpriced SSD’s, this is already DOA. They might do better selling it in a boutique store as a novelty paper weight.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      49. Well if it’s not coming, why give it a new name? Seriously, I have been waiting for this since my Drobo died. Thanks to covid my home office is next to my LDK and those HDD’s were LOUD … so silencing family complaints was a big +. I ended up with a 4-bay UGREEN with all-SSD’s. That becomes my NAS back-up the moment this goes on sale. More NAS drives the better. For my HoSo use slow CPU and slow ethernet are not that bad, although I hope Synology will bump those up too. That “drive lock-in” might be a turn-off. The one conspicuously absent point is that USB-C port, which could become a game-changer for first-time users if they get the set-up right.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      53. It might be more valuable to me if the SSDD market saw greater capacities than 4TB.
        My 1522+ has 5 x 18TB drives
        I might consider something like that for maybe a Minecraft server or a Database server.
        But my graphics machines and Video editing machines already have highspeed drives in it… and I just dump it on a nas when the project is complete

        This seems very niche
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      55. I have a 620slim (refurb via amazon or BH or newegg for like $300) at every house with used enterprise 2.5 SSDs as a working NAS for real light services (arr stack, photo storage, remote backup) that sips power with a 2.5gig USB. WAF is very high. I just don’t see the value in this FS200T vs the 620slim.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      57. This is effectively fan service for the existing Synology Slim customers. There must be enough of those customers who are due an upgrade from their previous slim products to justify this product. This fs200T is in no way competitive spec wise with the market, so it is clearly not aimed at new customers.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      61. I don’t get why there is no 2.5 GBE, n100, ecc, sata sad nas?! Like just give it 5 slots for old sata SSDs.

        Would be so perfect cause low power not too much of a waste of the bandwidth and completely silent.

        This is what I’m looking for since I only need a handful of terabytes of storage nothing insane. But there is nothing! :/
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      62. So, just to make sure … I am getting not more than about 3.5 GB/s in my 10GB Networkt, because the source drive in the NAS is an 2.5″ SSD?
        To fully saturate the 10 GB, I would need NVME drives?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      63. Another reason to use that type of system is to put a PLEX or Jellyfin media server in a vehicle. The no moving parts for the storage makes it less likely to have issues in that application & if you pair that with a Wi-Fi router even a 1 gigabit port would be more than enough speed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      64. Just don’t waste your money on high speed and buy the SSD closer to the saturation limit. %10 or less over shouldn’t be too wasteful. Or buy slow SSDs m.2 or even sata which are cheaper. Stop being stupid.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      65. What everyone else said. Quiet, low power, cool, fast, small. Makes it great for image management or video. I’ll buy one when the media prices become more affordable. As for running apps, its a NAS. No idea what the fixation with running containers on a NAS is all about.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      66. well first price of ssd has to go down, 8TB should be around 300 eur by now, than the above companies have get their shit together and offer a tiny well cooled box with easy install m.2 drives while the box has a processor that on its own or a coprocessor that can handle the internal bandwidth that is not castrated to barely cover gigabit network speeds, also a separate storage /embedded emmc or tiny m.2/ for the proprietary OS -or os of your choice- can be run from instead of intermingling with the main item storage
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      67. re: AI
        Are the NASes powerful enough to run, for example, the DeepSeek R1:70b model?

        Unless the NAS itself has 64 GB of RAM or something, I would think that it wouldn’t really be able to do so, at which point, if another system is loading the model over the network, then you would DEFINITELY want that to be as fast as possible.

        (The DeepSeek R1:70b model is 43 GB in size. I think that my current local NVMe SSD will read the model into RAM and then VRAM, at around 1.8 GB/s tops, so you’d definitely want something that’s decently fast, if you’re going be loading the model in, over the network).
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      69. I bought the GMKTec G9 to use as a “cache NAS”. My use case is simple and I (not so humbly) think that it’s a bit ingenious. I use the m.2 NAS as a cache NAS for my actual NAS which is remotely hosted at a place with faster internet, much cheaper electricity and looser content law.

        Remote NAS: Mass storage, Plex and other self-hosted apps/dockers run on the remote NAS.
        Cache NAS : extra storage for local computers, backup of local devices, some light local apps/dockers, syncs to remote NAS nightly.

        Since I am not swimming in money, the GMKTec G9 + 3x2TB Drives cost me in total 500 Euros which I find to be pretty good value. Added bonus: the m.2 NAS sits on my desk at home and doesn’t disturb me or my gf which wasn’t the case when my main NAS was at our place. Also lower energy cost which is significant in Germany.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      71. My ancient 4-core Xeon from 2012 can saturate 10Gbps eth, with an nvme > pcie adapter, and the cpu utilization is basically like 5%. They really need to stop making e-waste like this garbage and give us ethernet that matters. The rest of the chips in these things should be running a wifi lightbulb or something… they’re totally unbalanced.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      75. Another overlooked reasons:
        1. Portability/Size: If someone has to move frequently, then the smaller form factor and the lighter weight definitely helps. It’s a similar reason to why I am into SFF pc builds instead of the typical tower builds.
        2. Noise: somebody who doesn’t have enough space to have the noisy NAS installed in a separate room will greatly appreciate the silent SSD-based NAS (especially if they need to do audio recording.. just think about the seagulls that are mentioned so often in this channel), even if it doesn’t have 10Gb ethernet port

        Yes, being able to take advantage of the speed is great, but for some, the above two reasons are more important than the performance itself. (There’s also the issue with how many pcie lanes are available too.)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      77. Do most people not have faster then 1gb internet? We’ve had 2gb up and down for a good few years and we live in the middle of nowhere Ohio USA! I guess if you only have a gigabit internet I guess a 1 gig port it’s all you really need
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      79. lose the section graphics and ripped off audio … repetitive annoying a h*** to us who use these vids as background. this garbage degrades your presentation and lowers value of information you presents … it kicks brains into *NOISE – STOP LISTENING* mode … and channel gets switched to something less annoying – and your numbers start declining. DO NOT listen to teh YouTube *experts*, they regurgitate whats is trendy and is usually totally opposite of the user base
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      83. Excellent presentation. Thank you. For me personally, I am not buying or building a new NAS that does not have at least one 10GbE network interface. I have several units with both spinning drives and SSD’s and they are all pretty much obsolete and restricted by the crappy “less-than-10GbE” network interfaces. That all said, even 10GbE is slow for both PCIe 3 and 4 drives with x4 lanes, especially if you have a few of them in an array. If you want to get ahead of the end-of-life curve and are buidling a new, expensive, unit with a bunch of SSD’s and even hard drives, you really need to consider 25GbE. Nobody in their right mind would ever consider a switch from the 90’s with 100meg ports, even a nice one from 3Com or Cisco. The same is happening to 1GbE and pretty soon 2.5GbE.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      86. Small. Portable. Energy-Efficient. Cold running. Thus needs no active cooling. Thus very quiet in operation.
        Not much space, but very quick space . . . It is perfect for an HTPC where you store your actively watched
        non mafia content and move it to HDD storage when you have consumed it.
        I tried watching from my 5400rpm HDD based server around Christmas, and it chugged and hung and almost
        crashed just from trying to quickly change between media files and fast forwarding and going back because
        i was looking for a certain scene in an anime series . . And even the NAS with just 2xSATA SSD NEVER HAS
        THOSE KINDS OF PROBLEM!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      90. it seems kind of silly to have a network interface that is 1/20th the speed of the drive, even high-endurance enterprise drives with slower speeds will still very easily saturate the entire link speed without breaking a sweat. to me this just seems like cost saving from the NAS manufacturers
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      91. Could be great for content creators on the move. Travel vloggers etc, that need a lot of storage on the move, storage that they can edit from as well as archive to, whilst away from home for periods of time. 2.5gbps is plenty fast enough to edit directly from the Nas for 1080p editing. Fast enough to move footage on and off a sort of scratch disk on your laptop too, if doing 4k.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      92. Two other fundamentals:
        1) size, wattage, noise. For close by usage most will prefer these to 4 HDD + fans whirring away, eating deskspace and £s.
        2) outside of full business installations & enthusiasts most people barely know they can get a) wired ethernet, b) faster than 1Gb. The limited affordable support for even 2.5Gb by mainstream soho router & switch manufacturers only adds to that slow take up. So dual 2.5Gb is like magic if buyers can use it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      93. For me the biggest issue with HDD is the noise, I want a completely silent solution (fanless ideally) as I have to live/sleep in the same room. And I find HDD overall too unreliable, they tend to fail too quickly for my taste.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      94. Me, thanks to this channel. Bought an Aiffro and it’s my portable NAS I bring with me everywhere now that I’m traveling to a lot of countries. Takes up almost no space in my backpack and I’ve got TrueNAS Scale running on it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply

      96. Me! At least I’d say that if anyone made NVMe drives that were cheaper and perhaps slower. I don’t need more than 1gb/s speeds but what I do need is quiet, cool and low power storage. I have a 2 bay HDD NAS at home but I regret it because I don’t need the high capacity and the noise it makes when the drives wake up is pretty irritating.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

        Reply