CWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS Board Combo Review – Worth $200+ ?

CWWK M8 MITX 10GbE NAS Motherboard & CPU Review

The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard, equipped with either the Intel Twin Lake N150 or N355 processor, is a compact Mini-ITX platform aimed at advanced home NAS builders and small office users looking for a cost-effective alternative to branded NAS systems. Measuring just 17 x 17 cm, it combines several high-end features such as an onboard 10GbE RJ45 LAN (via the AQC113C controller), dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports, and support for up to eight SATA drives through dual SFF-8643 ports. The board also integrates two M.2 NVMe slots, a DDR5 SO-DIMM memory slot supporting up to 48GB, and a PCIe Gen3 x1 slot for modest expansion. Unlike many low-power ITX boards, the M8 includes support for Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, and hardware monitoring, which makes it a viable candidate for 24/7 operations and remote deployment scenarios. With its efficient lane distribution—critical for balancing 10GbE, NVMe, SATA, and PCIe simultaneously—it delivers a level of I/O flexibility not commonly found at this price point, particularly in the sub-$300 range.

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Quick Conclusion

The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard strikes a practical balance between performance, expandability, and power efficiency, making it a compelling choice for DIY NAS builders looking for 10GbE capability without the complexity or cost of larger platforms. With support for up to eight SATA drives via dual SFF-8643 connectors, dual NVMe slots, and a DDR5 SO-DIMM socket (up to 48GB), it delivers a surprising level of storage flexibility in a compact Mini-ITX form factor. Performance across the 10GbE port is strong—achieving near-saturation read speeds and respectable write throughput—while NVMe and SATA access remain consistent thanks to a careful PCIe lane allocation strategy. Power draw remains modest, even when fully populated with drives and expansion cards, reinforcing its suitability for 24/7 deployments. However, limitations like Gen3 x1 NVMe speeds, a single RAM slot, and shared PCIe/E-Key lane usage should be considered by those seeking maximum expansion or high-end performance. Still, for its price, pre-installed CPU, and strong open-source OS compatibility, the M8 offers an unusually capable base for home servers, backup targets, or even Plex and Proxmox environments.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 10/10
VALUE - 10/10


9.0
PROS
👍🏻10GbE RJ45 port (AQC113C) with full Gen3 x2 bandwidth
👍🏻Dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports with wide OS compatibility
👍🏻Supports up to 8 SATA drives via dual independent SFF-8643 ports
👍🏻Includes 2× M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, suitable for cache or boot use
👍🏻Very low power draw (~20W under load with 10g+2xM.2, ~31W idle fully populated with HDDs)
👍🏻Compact Mini-ITX form factor with well-organized layout
👍🏻Exceptional Price vs H/W Level
👍🏻Broad OS support (TrueNAS, Unraid, PVE, Linux, Windows, etc.)
CONS
👎🏻PCIe slot and M.2 E-Key share a lane—only one usable at a time
👎🏻M.2 NVMe slots limited to PCIe Gen3 x1 speeds
👎🏻Single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot (no dual-channel support)

Where to Buy?
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on Amazon (£174) HERE
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on AliExpress ($166) HERE
  • N355 CWWK NAS Motherboard on AliExpress ($249) – HERE

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Design

The physical design of the CWWK M8 motherboard is centered around the Mini-ITX standard, maintaining a compact 17 x 17 cm footprint that caters to space-conscious NAS builds. Despite its small form factor, the layout is methodically structured to maximize accessibility and airflow. Key components such as the dual SFF-8643 ports, NVMe slots, and RAM socket are positioned for easy cable routing and minimal overlap.

The CPU arrives pre-installed with a low-profile ball-bearing cooler, which is sufficient for the low 6W TDP of the N150 processor. There’s also a system fan header onboard with PWM support, allowing for basic thermal management in enclosed NAS chassis. The board is finished in a neutral white PCB, aligning with recent CWWK trends that blend aesthetic minimalism with function-first engineering.

Storage expansion is one of the most defining elements of the M8. It features dual SFF-8643 ports that, with breakout cables, provide connectivity for up to eight SATA III (6Gbps) drives.

These connectors are routed through independent ASM1164 controllers, each on a dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lane, ensuring that drive traffic is not bottlenecked through a single controller.

This separation also means users can confidently deploy SSDs or mixed SSD/HDD arrays without major performance drops under load. The board supports RAID configurations at the OS level via TrueNAS or Unraid, and is capable of delivering reliable throughput for multi-drive setups including RAID-Z, RAID5, or JBOD.

In addition to traditional SATA storage, the board includes two M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, each operating at PCIe Gen3 x1. While this limits peak performance to around 900MB/s per slot, it is sufficient for cache drives or SSD-based boot volumes, especially in NAS environments where latency and parallel IOPS matter more than raw sequential throughput. The placement of the NVMe slots, one top-side and one underside, helps distribute heat and gives builders flexibility in cooling strategy. Both slots are directly accessible, and installation doesn’t require removing other components, which is particularly useful during upgrades or replacements.

Storage scaling is enhanced through the modularity of the board’s SFF-8643 interfaces. As discussed in your review, these ports can be adapted not just to standard SATA breakouts but also to additional M.2 or U.2 devices with the correct adapter cards. This creates potential for hybrid NAS setups—using SATA for bulk data storage and NVMe for hot data or VM usage. Such versatility in drive mapping is rarely offered at this price point, and makes the board viable not only for home media servers but also for lab environments or light virtualized storage nodes.

One lesser-known but practical addition is the inclusion of a MicroSD (TF) slot on the PCB. While it’s not ideal for installing major OS platforms like TrueNAS Core, it can be useful for loading bootloaders such as Unraid or for system config backups. Importantly, the TF slot is recognized natively by most operating systems and appears as a usable storage device without requiring extra drivers. It also enables simple out-of-band recovery or local snapshot scripts in more advanced workflows. Combined with the available internal USB port, the board allows multiple low-impact boot or recovery paths to coexist alongside primary storage deployments.

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Ports and Connections

The CWWK M8 motherboard is equipped with a well-rounded selection of external and internal I/O ports that support a broad range of NAS and server use cases. Most notably, it includes one 10GbE RJ45 port powered by the AQC113C controller and two additional 2.5GbE ports via Intel i226-V chips.

These networking options allow the board to operate in multiple roles simultaneously, such as high-speed file sharing over 10GbE while maintaining service management or redundancy via the dual 2.5GbE ports. The inclusion of Intel network controllers ensures wide compatibility with open-source operating systems like TrueNAS and Unraid, as well as ESXi and PVE, making it a suitable base for software-defined networks, VLAN tagging, or bonded interface configurations.

On the USB front, the M8 provides a combination of high-speed and legacy options. It includes 1× USB Type-C (10Gbps) and 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps) ports for external storage or fast USB peripherals. There are also 2× USB 2.0 Type-A ports located at the rear I/O and an internal USB 2.0 header, which is useful for OS boot drives such as Unraid.

Internally, the board also features a USB 3.0 header and a Type-E header, allowing front-panel USB 3.x support if the chassis includes such connectors. These ports give builders the flexibility to attach boot media, backup targets, or even USB-based UPS management tools without additional hardware.

For video output and direct display use, the M8 includes 1× HDMI 2.0 and 1× DisplayPort 1.4, both capable of 4K@60Hz output. These are connected via the integrated UHD graphics included with the N150/N355 CPU. While these outputs are generally not essential in a headless NAS environment, they provide value in cases where the system is used as a hybrid HTPC/NAS, or when diagnostics and BIOS access are needed without SSH or remote management tools. The GPU is also supported for hardware video decoding, making the board a viable base for light Plex or Jellyfin deployments that rely on integrated graphics acceleration.

Internally, the board features several headers that further expand its flexibility. Alongside the previously mentioned USB and fan headers, there’s an M.2 E-Key slot for wireless modules, which shares PCIe lanes with the x1 PCIe slot and cannot be used simultaneously. The board also includes an SD card (TF) slot which appears natively in supported OSes—suitable for bootloaders or small backup tasks.

While not suited to high-throughput use, it does provide an alternative storage option in embedded or recovery scenarios. The arrangement and accessibility of these ports are well considered for such a small form factor, ensuring that builders can access almost all essential functionality without relying on riser boards or USB hubs.

Interface Type Details
Ethernet Ports 1× 10GbE RJ45 (AQC113C), 2× 2.5GbE RJ45 (Intel i226-V)
USB Ports (Rear) 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps), 1× USB-C (10Gbps), 2× USB 2.0 Type-A
USB Ports (Internal) 1× USB 2.0 (boot drive), 1× USB 3.0 header, 1× USB 3.0 Type-E header
Display Outputs 1× HDMI 2.0, 1× DisplayPort 1.4 (both support 4K@60Hz)
PCIe Slot 1× PCIe Gen3 x1 (x4/x8 slot compatible, shared with M.2 E-Key)
M.2 Slots 2× M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1), 1× M.2 E-Key for WiFi/BT
SD Card Slot 1× TF (MicroSD) slot (appears as storage device)
Fan and Headers 1× PWM fan header, various USB/F_USB headers for front I/O

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Internal Hardware

At the heart of the M8 motherboard lies a choice between two Intel Twin Lake processors: the N150 and the N355. The N150 is a quad-core, four-thread CPU with a base architecture derived from the Alder Lake-N family, running at up to 3.6GHz and featuring a modest 6MB cache. It operates at a remarkably low TDP of 6W, making it suitable for passive or semi-passive cooling environments.

The N355, on the other hand, doubles the thread count and bumps performance further, albeit at a slightly higher price. Both CPUs are pre-soldered to the board and arrive with a compact, ball-bearing fan assembly that supports quiet, efficient cooling. These processors are not meant for heavy computation but offer enough power for file server duties, light containerization, and even modest Plex media serving—with the N150 proving capable of 4K playback in testing.

Memory support is handled via a single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot, officially supporting up to 48GB at 4800MHz. While dual-channel operation is not available, DDR5’s higher base bandwidth helps compensate for this limitation in real-world usage. The board accepts standard non-ECC modules and will clock down any faster memory to the platform’s 4800MHz limit.

For NAS and virtualization users, this constraint is acceptable, though power users may note that memory upgrades are capped to a single slot. That said, 32GB or 48GB configurations are more than adequate for common use cases like running TrueNAS Scale with Docker containers, or spinning up a few VMs in Proxmox.

The board’s PCIe lane distribution is particularly deliberate given the constraints of the Twin Lake architecture, which provides just 9 usable PCIe lanes. Despite this, the M8 balances connectivity by allocating PCIe Gen3 x2 bandwidth to the 10GbE port, ensuring full 10Gbps throughput with bandwidth overhead. The SATA controllers each receive dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lanes, and each M.2 NVMe slot is similarly mapped at x1 speed.

The remaining lane is shared between the M.2 E-key (for Wi-Fi/BT modules) and the physical PCIe x1 expansion slot. This means that users must choose between Wi-Fi upgrades or additional PCIe peripherals—a typical tradeoff on ITX boards, but worth noting during build planning.

From a system management perspective, the board supports UEFI-only boot modes and includes features such as Auto Power-On, Scheduled Power-On, PXE boot, Wake-on-LAN, and Secure Boot, making it suitable for remote deployment or integration into managed environments. The board includes thermal monitoring via BIOS and OS-level tools, with fan control limited to one system fan header supporting PWM. These features, while basic, are sufficient for home server use or edge deployment in micro data centers. The compact ITX layout also makes the board a candidate for embedded use in custom NAS chassis or OEM enclosures with constrained airflow or proprietary mounting.

Component Details
CPU Options Intel N150 (4C/4T, 3.6GHz, 6W TDP), Intel N355 (8C/8T, higher performance)
Memory 1x DDR5 SO-DIMM, up to 48GB (4800MHz), non-ECC
Chipset/Lanes Intel Twin Lake SoC, 9 PCIe Gen3 lanes total
NVMe Storage 2x M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1 each)
SATA Support 2x SFF-8643 (8x SATA III via breakout cables, each on ASM1164 controller)
PCIe Expansion 1x PCIe Gen3 x1 slot (shared with M.2 E-Key)
WiFi Module Slot 1x M.2 E-Key (2230) for Wi-Fi/BT (shares lane with PCIe slot)
Boot Features UEFI-only, Auto Power-On, Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, Secure Boot
Fan Support 1x PWM system fan header, bundled CPU fan

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Performance and Power Tests

During benchmarking and real-world tests, the N150-based M8 motherboard demonstrated performance levels consistent with expectations for an ultra-low-power NAS platform. Sequential read speeds over the 10GbE interface approached saturation during synthetic ATTO Disk Benchmark tests, particularly with a 256MB block size, where throughput consistently exceeded 950MB/s.

Write performance, however, plateaued slightly lower, averaging between 650–700MB/s for 1GB and 4GB file tests. These figures are typical for systems utilizing Gen3 x1 NVMe SSDs and efficiency-focused CPUs like the N150, where write-intensive operations are more limited by CPU capability than disk throughput. Larger transfers or workloads involving compression will see slightly more variation, but in most scenarios, read performance remained stable and consistent.

Using a RAID 1 array of Seagate IronWolf drives connected via the dual SFF-8643 SATA ports, the board achieved average write speeds of 550–580MB/s, with occasional peaks in read performance reaching up to 800MB/s, though these were not sustained.

These results reflect the benefit of having each SATA group routed through a separate ASM1164 controller, ensuring that bandwidth isn’t choked under RAID configurations or multi-drive reads. In practical terms, this makes the board well-suited for file-serving tasks, Time Machine backups, or media library hosting, with no obvious contention across interfaces during simultaneous read/write operations.

NVMe performance was constrained by the PCIe Gen3 x1 link per M.2 slot, which limited theoretical throughput to under 1GB/s. Tests confirmed read speeds of around 720MB/s and write speeds of approximately 520MB/s in sustained transfers. While not ideal for high-performance VM storage or video editing scratch disks, these speeds are more than adequate for cache duties or container storage. Importantly, the board maintains predictable performance across both NVMe slots, and thermals were manageable under active load without throttling, thanks in part to the pre-attached CPU cooler and accessible airflow pathways on the board’s surface.

In terms of power efficiency, the system consumed approximately 19–20W under load when configured with the N150 CPU, 8GB of DDR5, two NVMe SSDs, and a 10GbE connection in active use. When idle but fully populated with four SATA drives and an expansion card installed (but unused), power draw settled at around 31.4W. This confirms the board’s suitability for 24/7 operation without requiring high-capacity PSUs or custom thermal management.

For edge computing, offsite backup, or low-power homelab deployments, this balance of power efficiency and consistent I/O throughput is a key strength of the M8.
Test Category Result (N150 Model)
10GbE Read (ATTO, 256MB) ~950MB/s (near saturation)
10GbE Write (1–4GB) ~650–700MB/s
RAID 1 HDD (SATA) Write: 550–580MB/s, Read Peak: up to 800MB/s (occasional spikes)
NVMe (Gen3 x1) Read: ~720MB/s, Write: ~520MB/s
Power Draw (Load) ~19–20W (N150, 2× NVMe, 10GbE active)
Power Draw (Idle, full config) ~31.4W (4× HDD, PCIe card, NVMe, no I/O)
Thermals Stable under load; no active throttling observed

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Verdict and Conclusion

The CWWK M8 motherboard delivers a rare combination of high-speed networking, broad storage expandability, and low power consumption, all within a Mini-ITX footprint. It manages to balance PCIe lane allocation across 10GbE, dual NVMe, and eight SATA drives without compromising basic performance, thanks to deliberate hardware pairing and thoughtful board layout. The use of separate SATA controllers, a well-provisioned 10GbE controller on Gen3 x2 lanes, and native UEFI support reflects a clear intent to make this a serious option for NAS enthusiasts and advanced home users. Its ability to sustain near-saturation speeds on the 10GbE connection and provide usable NVMe throughput makes it a capable base for TrueNAS, Unraid, or Proxmox environments—whether for home backup, Plex media hosting, or light VM workloads.

However, there are trade-offs. The limited PCIe expandability, single RAM slot, and Gen3 x1 constraints on NVMe performance may not meet the needs of high-end workstation builders or enterprise deployments. Additionally, the shared PCIe lane between the M.2 E-key and the PCIe slot limits simultaneous use of both interfaces, which could affect those hoping to add both Wi-Fi and a PCIe peripheral. Still, for its price point and target use case, the M8 delivers well above average. It avoids many of the bottlenecks seen in competing low-power boards and manages to do so at under $300 with a pre-installed CPU. For users building a power-efficient, high-bandwidth DIY NAS with flexible drive options and capable base specs, the CWWK M8 stands out as a strong contender.

 

Where to Buy?
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on Amazon (£174) HERE
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on AliExpress ($166) HERE
  • N355 CWWK NAS Motherboard on AliExpress ($249) – HERE

Pros Cons
10GbE RJ45 port (AQC113C) with full Gen3 x2 bandwidth PCIe slot and M.2 E-Key share a lane—only one usable at a time
Dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports with wide OS compatibility M.2 NVMe slots limited to PCIe Gen3 x1 speeds
Supports up to 8 SATA drives via dual independent SFF-8643 ports Single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot (no dual-channel support)
Includes 2× M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, suitable for cache or boot use
Very low power draw (~20W under load, ~31W idle fully populated)
Compact Mini-ITX form factor with well-organized layout
Pre-installed CPU and active cooling fan included
Broad OS support (TrueNAS, Unraid, PVE, Linux, Windows, etc.)

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      ASK YOUR QUESTIONS HERE!

      70 thoughts on “CWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS Board Combo Review – Worth $200+ ?

      1. So the good news is:
        10 GbE port isn’t limited by a single 1x lane, but actually gets a 2x so the Ethernet controller is the bottleneck. (here I honestly wish Ethernet controllers had a second port or two just so we can utilize this bandwidth. A 10 + 5 would be ideal for 2x PCIe v3, or 1x PCIe v4)

        The downside is:
        6×6 Gb/s SATA being limited by 1x PCIe. I would more than happily throw away the second M.2 slot for the sata controller to have 2 lanes so it can keep up with the Ethernet.

        Except No I wouldn’t want one less M.2 port, since what I actually plan on doing when my own board shows up in the mail is add in an M.2 pcie to 6x SATA (for an example with the ASM1166), then I can split my drives into two groups such that a software RAID 5/6 won’t be limited by 1x PCIe. And thereby perhaps be able to saturate the 10 GbE connection. (since why not use all of it?)

        I can’t wait for the future when we have systems like this but with just a couple more PCIe lanes for us to work with.
        I want more lanes, not faster ones, since 12 PCIe v3 lanes is superior to 9 PCIe v4 lanes. Take this board for an example, 2 PCIe lanes are wasted to get 2x 2.5 Gb/s Ethernet, that could have been 1 lane if the Ethernet controller had 2 ports. Or better yet as already stated, been on the same controller as the 10 GbE controller since 2x 8 Gb/s of PCIe has room for it. Though that do require such network controllers to be on the market, which isn’t the case sadly… So we will inevitably waste PCIe lanes, so better waste v3 lanes and have more of them, than have fewer v4 lanes in total for us to waste. (though a compromise of 6x v3 + 4x v4 is also appealing.)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. Ordered my board last week, it should arrive next monday. I did notice that they revisited the board with the N100, now its only available in N150 since last week. The N305 stayed the same.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      3. I have N305 mobo in my homelab and I can say that it is a bummer. It could just randomly hang producing no any logs or clues why. It happened more than 10 times so far. I would rather buy some well known brand product instead of this chinese custom shop.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. I have the cwwk version of this board with 4 x Intel i226V 2.5Gbs ports, and I can’t get it below 50w at idle using TrueNAS scale and all my hdd spun down. Any help appreciated.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      5. 视频非常好! 我的OKX钱包里有USDT,并且我有恢复短语. 「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」 我该如何将它们转移到Binance?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      6. I also bought from Aliexpress and threw my money away, for those who are thinking about buying, believe me it’s better to look for another brand, I bought it and threw my money away!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      7. Great review. Sadly the idle is a dealer breaker. Perhaps if we keep saying this the manufacturers will change the sata controller.

        Some have hacked the bios and got higher c-states.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      8. I have this board in use, it’s pretty good. best price-performance ratio I could find (for my needs).
        But be careful, the installed fan seems to get louder from month to month.
        the only thing I would wish for would be a usb 3.0 port (19 pin) on the board.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      9. Debating on this board for an offsite backup. I picked up a supermicro itx xeon-d board to replace my onsite server. Curious how long it would take to transfer all 40tb of data to a board like this. Probably take quite awhile especially since I use unraid….
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. I’ll pay the premium for a NAS from a reputable vendor because I simply don’t want to be responsible for patching and maintaining the software. The cost for me is offset by time and that’s why I continue to use brand name NAS products. This is awesome if you’re budget conscious and a great option for most if you’re willing to tinker.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      11. At the 1:50 minute mark you stated “but it’s on die ECC” mean? More specially, the word “die”?

        Full statement at 1:50:
        “DDR5 has ECC it technically does but it’s on die ECC is not the same as ECC the way it does the correction all the way through and die hard particularly Flash users do care for the difference there so the lack of ECC is going to bother some users”
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. The usb 20 gbps is a messed up thing overall. The exact name is usb 3.2 gen 2×2. Emphasis on x2. It requires an exactly similar device to utilise the second set of pathways to hit that speed. Thunderbolt and usb4 don’t use that configuration and hence only use one set of connection which limits it to 10 gbps.
        TLDR: you need a device that explicitly says usb 3.2 gen2x2 to connect to that port and hit full speed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      13. Thank you so much for your ongoing commitment to the community around DIY NAS (and everything else) – your passion for what you do is contagious, and highly entertaining – good stuff, keep it coming, and f*ck those seagulls! 😀
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. Seems pretty disappointing – 28W idle power consumption? My *ancient* i5-3550 server with a SATA SSD and two NVMe sticks semi-idles around 35W (light amount of data from a Home Assistant Yellow constantly flowing to postgres on the server, a cloudflare tunnel etc. when it’s not actively doing other stuff). And the PCIe lanes for the NVMe on the MW-N305-NAS is just… well, this is 2024, it’s disappointing even for a cheap low-end system IMHO.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. Link is for N100 motherboard, not N305. And it is still too much. For 350 euros in europe you can assemble full NAS with case, i3 14100 with integrated intel HD730 GPU which is a beast transcoding gpu, and 32GB ram in dual channel, and that is with SSD for boot drive.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      16. Idk what they are doing here….But I have a 8700G with an Asrock B650M PG lightening….64 gigs of ddr5 and 8 hard drives with a PCIe SATA card and 3 NVMe SSDs. My idle power consumption is 20/30W max with 3 VMs on
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. great board, great video, but….

        the german “translation” of the description is total crap. Please just show the original english one.
        The translated one has no relevance for the video or product
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      18. I’m gathering parts to build my first DIY NAS, I did have the n100 version of this in my cart but I changed my mind. Should I hang on for the new n355 and n150 crop of motherboards to come out? I’m not in any rush. I’m hoping for a low power draw but with a little performance.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. After I get more Christmas spending money, I plan to get a Mini-ITX to replace my router host. Is it worth the $60~$100 to get this over an N100 with 4x 2.5Gbps ports? My initial plan is just to run pfSense in Proxmox, but maybe I’ll move my NAS there too ????????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      20. These little Alder Lake N CPUs are pretty starved of PCIe lanes. 9 Lanes ain’t much. I would have sacrificed a M.2 slot to add another lane to the JMB585. To give those those HDD a more room to breath.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      21. I have this board (minus the 10GB NIC) and it is running Xpenology in an N2 case. Wonderful, perfect for what I wanted/needed. Get it before tariffs hit. I use the MicroSD card to load ArcLoader for Xpenology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      22. You do a great job within this product space, keep it going. I would love to see you improve the video quality though. It looks very compressed / recorded with low bitrate and the highlights are compressed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. Another Chinese crap’y board without quality control with random defects and no support. He’ll thank you. It’s only just a curiosity for a few people who know how to deal with defective equipment.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      24. 28 watts idle with the disk powered down is way too much. Powered down HDDs consume very little, which means the other items on this board are very power hungry. A laptop with 1 NVME and in idle uses as less than 5 watts.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. copper rj45 10gbit is worth to me less than 2.5gbit ports 🙁
        I was convinced by people that sfp+ is the way to go, its a nas,it would be near switch in most cases, cheap DAC cables…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. Those combos are insanely affordable. For a price of an underpowered off-the-shelf diskless device without integrated GPU you can build a beast NAS which can everything you want including transcoding. DIY reality
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      27. So if you want to put in 2 nvme drives what would be the best perf/price SSD to choose ? seems overkill to use like 2 Samsung 990 Pro gen4 drives even with utilizing the 10Gbe port
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. Ahhhhh, you had to make this video today. lol. I just picked up an Aoostar R1 for $199. It literally came in the mail today. But I don’t need the extra horsepower of the N305 atm, but still cool to have those nics and extra sata ports. I needed a small nas setup either way. Raid 1 and done.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE