CWWK M8 MITX 10GbE NAS Motherboard & CPU Review
The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard, equipped with either the Intel Twin Lake N150 or N355 processor, is a compact Mini-ITX platform aimed at advanced home NAS builders and small office users looking for a cost-effective alternative to branded NAS systems. Measuring just 17 x 17 cm, it combines several high-end features such as an onboard 10GbE RJ45 LAN (via the AQC113C controller), dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports, and support for up to eight SATA drives through dual SFF-8643 ports. The board also integrates two M.2 NVMe slots, a DDR5 SO-DIMM memory slot supporting up to 48GB, and a PCIe Gen3 x1 slot for modest expansion. Unlike many low-power ITX boards, the M8 includes support for Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, and hardware monitoring, which makes it a viable candidate for 24/7 operations and remote deployment scenarios. With its efficient lane distribution—critical for balancing 10GbE, NVMe, SATA, and PCIe simultaneously—it delivers a level of I/O flexibility not commonly found at this price point, particularly in the sub-$300 range.
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Quick Conclusion
The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard strikes a practical balance between performance, expandability, and power efficiency, making it a compelling choice for DIY NAS builders looking for 10GbE capability without the complexity or cost of larger platforms. With support for up to eight SATA drives via dual SFF-8643 connectors, dual NVMe slots, and a DDR5 SO-DIMM socket (up to 48GB), it delivers a surprising level of storage flexibility in a compact Mini-ITX form factor. Performance across the 10GbE port is strong—achieving near-saturation read speeds and respectable write throughput—while NVMe and SATA access remain consistent thanks to a careful PCIe lane allocation strategy. Power draw remains modest, even when fully populated with drives and expansion cards, reinforcing its suitability for 24/7 deployments. However, limitations like Gen3 x1 NVMe speeds, a single RAM slot, and shared PCIe/E-Key lane usage should be considered by those seeking maximum expansion or high-end performance. Still, for its price, pre-installed CPU, and strong open-source OS compatibility, the M8 offers an unusually capable base for home servers, backup targets, or even Plex and Proxmox environments.
Where to Buy? |
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Design
The physical design of the CWWK M8 motherboard is centered around the Mini-ITX standard, maintaining a compact 17 x 17 cm footprint that caters to space-conscious NAS builds. Despite its small form factor, the layout is methodically structured to maximize accessibility and airflow. Key components such as the dual SFF-8643 ports, NVMe slots, and RAM socket are positioned for easy cable routing and minimal overlap.
The CPU arrives pre-installed with a low-profile ball-bearing cooler, which is sufficient for the low 6W TDP of the N150 processor. There’s also a system fan header onboard with PWM support, allowing for basic thermal management in enclosed NAS chassis. The board is finished in a neutral white PCB, aligning with recent CWWK trends that blend aesthetic minimalism with function-first engineering.
Storage expansion is one of the most defining elements of the M8. It features dual SFF-8643 ports that, with breakout cables, provide connectivity for up to eight SATA III (6Gbps) drives.
These connectors are routed through independent ASM1164 controllers, each on a dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lane, ensuring that drive traffic is not bottlenecked through a single controller.
This separation also means users can confidently deploy SSDs or mixed SSD/HDD arrays without major performance drops under load. The board supports RAID configurations at the OS level via TrueNAS or Unraid, and is capable of delivering reliable throughput for multi-drive setups including RAID-Z, RAID5, or JBOD.
In addition to traditional SATA storage, the board includes two M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, each operating at PCIe Gen3 x1. While this limits peak performance to around 900MB/s per slot, it is sufficient for cache drives or SSD-based boot volumes, especially in NAS environments where latency and parallel IOPS matter more than raw sequential throughput. The placement of the NVMe slots, one top-side and one underside, helps distribute heat and gives builders flexibility in cooling strategy. Both slots are directly accessible, and installation doesn’t require removing other components, which is particularly useful during upgrades or replacements.
Storage scaling is enhanced through the modularity of the board’s SFF-8643 interfaces. As discussed in your review, these ports can be adapted not just to standard SATA breakouts but also to additional M.2 or U.2 devices with the correct adapter cards. This creates potential for hybrid NAS setups—using SATA for bulk data storage and NVMe for hot data or VM usage. Such versatility in drive mapping is rarely offered at this price point, and makes the board viable not only for home media servers but also for lab environments or light virtualized storage nodes.
One lesser-known but practical addition is the inclusion of a MicroSD (TF) slot on the PCB. While it’s not ideal for installing major OS platforms like TrueNAS Core, it can be useful for loading bootloaders such as Unraid or for system config backups. Importantly, the TF slot is recognized natively by most operating systems and appears as a usable storage device without requiring extra drivers. It also enables simple out-of-band recovery or local snapshot scripts in more advanced workflows. Combined with the available internal USB port, the board allows multiple low-impact boot or recovery paths to coexist alongside primary storage deployments.
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Ports and Connections
The CWWK M8 motherboard is equipped with a well-rounded selection of external and internal I/O ports that support a broad range of NAS and server use cases. Most notably, it includes one 10GbE RJ45 port powered by the AQC113C controller and two additional 2.5GbE ports via Intel i226-V chips.
These networking options allow the board to operate in multiple roles simultaneously, such as high-speed file sharing over 10GbE while maintaining service management or redundancy via the dual 2.5GbE ports. The inclusion of Intel network controllers ensures wide compatibility with open-source operating systems like TrueNAS and Unraid, as well as ESXi and PVE, making it a suitable base for software-defined networks, VLAN tagging, or bonded interface configurations.
On the USB front, the M8 provides a combination of high-speed and legacy options. It includes 1× USB Type-C (10Gbps) and 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps) ports for external storage or fast USB peripherals. There are also 2× USB 2.0 Type-A ports located at the rear I/O and an internal USB 2.0 header, which is useful for OS boot drives such as Unraid.
Internally, the board also features a USB 3.0 header and a Type-E header, allowing front-panel USB 3.x support if the chassis includes such connectors. These ports give builders the flexibility to attach boot media, backup targets, or even USB-based UPS management tools without additional hardware.
For video output and direct display use, the M8 includes 1× HDMI 2.0 and 1× DisplayPort 1.4, both capable of 4K@60Hz output. These are connected via the integrated UHD graphics included with the N150/N355 CPU. While these outputs are generally not essential in a headless NAS environment, they provide value in cases where the system is used as a hybrid HTPC/NAS, or when diagnostics and BIOS access are needed without SSH or remote management tools. The GPU is also supported for hardware video decoding, making the board a viable base for light Plex or Jellyfin deployments that rely on integrated graphics acceleration.
Internally, the board features several headers that further expand its flexibility. Alongside the previously mentioned USB and fan headers, there’s an M.2 E-Key slot for wireless modules, which shares PCIe lanes with the x1 PCIe slot and cannot be used simultaneously. The board also includes an SD card (TF) slot which appears natively in supported OSes—suitable for bootloaders or small backup tasks.
While not suited to high-throughput use, it does provide an alternative storage option in embedded or recovery scenarios. The arrangement and accessibility of these ports are well considered for such a small form factor, ensuring that builders can access almost all essential functionality without relying on riser boards or USB hubs.
Interface Type | Details |
---|---|
Ethernet Ports | 1× 10GbE RJ45 (AQC113C), 2× 2.5GbE RJ45 (Intel i226-V) |
USB Ports (Rear) | 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps), 1× USB-C (10Gbps), 2× USB 2.0 Type-A |
USB Ports (Internal) | 1× USB 2.0 (boot drive), 1× USB 3.0 header, 1× USB 3.0 Type-E header |
Display Outputs | 1× HDMI 2.0, 1× DisplayPort 1.4 (both support 4K@60Hz) |
PCIe Slot | 1× PCIe Gen3 x1 (x4/x8 slot compatible, shared with M.2 E-Key) |
M.2 Slots | 2× M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1), 1× M.2 E-Key for WiFi/BT |
SD Card Slot | 1× TF (MicroSD) slot (appears as storage device) |
Fan and Headers | 1× PWM fan header, various USB/F_USB headers for front I/O |
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Internal Hardware
At the heart of the M8 motherboard lies a choice between two Intel Twin Lake processors: the N150 and the N355. The N150 is a quad-core, four-thread CPU with a base architecture derived from the Alder Lake-N family, running at up to 3.6GHz and featuring a modest 6MB cache. It operates at a remarkably low TDP of 6W, making it suitable for passive or semi-passive cooling environments.
The N355, on the other hand, doubles the thread count and bumps performance further, albeit at a slightly higher price. Both CPUs are pre-soldered to the board and arrive with a compact, ball-bearing fan assembly that supports quiet, efficient cooling. These processors are not meant for heavy computation but offer enough power for file server duties, light containerization, and even modest Plex media serving—with the N150 proving capable of 4K playback in testing.
Memory support is handled via a single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot, officially supporting up to 48GB at 4800MHz. While dual-channel operation is not available, DDR5’s higher base bandwidth helps compensate for this limitation in real-world usage. The board accepts standard non-ECC modules and will clock down any faster memory to the platform’s 4800MHz limit.
For NAS and virtualization users, this constraint is acceptable, though power users may note that memory upgrades are capped to a single slot. That said, 32GB or 48GB configurations are more than adequate for common use cases like running TrueNAS Scale with Docker containers, or spinning up a few VMs in Proxmox.
The board’s PCIe lane distribution is particularly deliberate given the constraints of the Twin Lake architecture, which provides just 9 usable PCIe lanes. Despite this, the M8 balances connectivity by allocating PCIe Gen3 x2 bandwidth to the 10GbE port, ensuring full 10Gbps throughput with bandwidth overhead. The SATA controllers each receive dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lanes, and each M.2 NVMe slot is similarly mapped at x1 speed.
The remaining lane is shared between the M.2 E-key (for Wi-Fi/BT modules) and the physical PCIe x1 expansion slot. This means that users must choose between Wi-Fi upgrades or additional PCIe peripherals—a typical tradeoff on ITX boards, but worth noting during build planning.
From a system management perspective, the board supports UEFI-only boot modes and includes features such as Auto Power-On, Scheduled Power-On, PXE boot, Wake-on-LAN, and Secure Boot, making it suitable for remote deployment or integration into managed environments. The board includes thermal monitoring via BIOS and OS-level tools, with fan control limited to one system fan header supporting PWM. These features, while basic, are sufficient for home server use or edge deployment in micro data centers. The compact ITX layout also makes the board a candidate for embedded use in custom NAS chassis or OEM enclosures with constrained airflow or proprietary mounting.
Component | Details |
---|---|
CPU Options | Intel N150 (4C/4T, 3.6GHz, 6W TDP), Intel N355 (8C/8T, higher performance) |
Memory | 1x DDR5 SO-DIMM, up to 48GB (4800MHz), non-ECC |
Chipset/Lanes | Intel Twin Lake SoC, 9 PCIe Gen3 lanes total |
NVMe Storage | 2x M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1 each) |
SATA Support | 2x SFF-8643 (8x SATA III via breakout cables, each on ASM1164 controller) |
PCIe Expansion | 1x PCIe Gen3 x1 slot (shared with M.2 E-Key) |
WiFi Module Slot | 1x M.2 E-Key (2230) for Wi-Fi/BT (shares lane with PCIe slot) |
Boot Features | UEFI-only, Auto Power-On, Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, Secure Boot |
Fan Support | 1x PWM system fan header, bundled CPU fan |
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Performance and Power Tests
During benchmarking and real-world tests, the N150-based M8 motherboard demonstrated performance levels consistent with expectations for an ultra-low-power NAS platform. Sequential read speeds over the 10GbE interface approached saturation during synthetic ATTO Disk Benchmark tests, particularly with a 256MB block size, where throughput consistently exceeded 950MB/s.
Write performance, however, plateaued slightly lower, averaging between 650–700MB/s for 1GB and 4GB file tests. These figures are typical for systems utilizing Gen3 x1 NVMe SSDs and efficiency-focused CPUs like the N150, where write-intensive operations are more limited by CPU capability than disk throughput. Larger transfers or workloads involving compression will see slightly more variation, but in most scenarios, read performance remained stable and consistent.
Using a RAID 1 array of Seagate IronWolf drives connected via the dual SFF-8643 SATA ports, the board achieved average write speeds of 550–580MB/s, with occasional peaks in read performance reaching up to 800MB/s, though these were not sustained.
These results reflect the benefit of having each SATA group routed through a separate ASM1164 controller, ensuring that bandwidth isn’t choked under RAID configurations or multi-drive reads. In practical terms, this makes the board well-suited for file-serving tasks, Time Machine backups, or media library hosting, with no obvious contention across interfaces during simultaneous read/write operations.
NVMe performance was constrained by the PCIe Gen3 x1 link per M.2 slot, which limited theoretical throughput to under 1GB/s. Tests confirmed read speeds of around 720MB/s and write speeds of approximately 520MB/s in sustained transfers. While not ideal for high-performance VM storage or video editing scratch disks, these speeds are more than adequate for cache duties or container storage. Importantly, the board maintains predictable performance across both NVMe slots, and thermals were manageable under active load without throttling, thanks in part to the pre-attached CPU cooler and accessible airflow pathways on the board’s surface.
In terms of power efficiency, the system consumed approximately 19–20W under load when configured with the N150 CPU, 8GB of DDR5, two NVMe SSDs, and a 10GbE connection in active use. When idle but fully populated with four SATA drives and an expansion card installed (but unused), power draw settled at around 31.4W. This confirms the board’s suitability for 24/7 operation without requiring high-capacity PSUs or custom thermal management.
![]() |
![]() |
Test Category | Result (N150 Model) |
---|---|
10GbE Read (ATTO, 256MB) | ~950MB/s (near saturation) |
10GbE Write (1–4GB) | ~650–700MB/s |
RAID 1 HDD (SATA) | Write: 550–580MB/s, Read Peak: up to 800MB/s (occasional spikes) |
NVMe (Gen3 x1) | Read: ~720MB/s, Write: ~520MB/s |
Power Draw (Load) | ~19–20W (N150, 2× NVMe, 10GbE active) |
Power Draw (Idle, full config) | ~31.4W (4× HDD, PCIe card, NVMe, no I/O) |
Thermals | Stable under load; no active throttling observed |
CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Verdict and Conclusion
The CWWK M8 motherboard delivers a rare combination of high-speed networking, broad storage expandability, and low power consumption, all within a Mini-ITX footprint. It manages to balance PCIe lane allocation across 10GbE, dual NVMe, and eight SATA drives without compromising basic performance, thanks to deliberate hardware pairing and thoughtful board layout. The use of separate SATA controllers, a well-provisioned 10GbE controller on Gen3 x2 lanes, and native UEFI support reflects a clear intent to make this a serious option for NAS enthusiasts and advanced home users. Its ability to sustain near-saturation speeds on the 10GbE connection and provide usable NVMe throughput makes it a capable base for TrueNAS, Unraid, or Proxmox environments—whether for home backup, Plex media hosting, or light VM workloads.
However, there are trade-offs. The limited PCIe expandability, single RAM slot, and Gen3 x1 constraints on NVMe performance may not meet the needs of high-end workstation builders or enterprise deployments. Additionally, the shared PCIe lane between the M.2 E-key and the PCIe slot limits simultaneous use of both interfaces, which could affect those hoping to add both Wi-Fi and a PCIe peripheral. Still, for its price point and target use case, the M8 delivers well above average. It avoids many of the bottlenecks seen in competing low-power boards and manages to do so at under $300 with a pre-installed CPU. For users building a power-efficient, high-bandwidth DIY NAS with flexible drive options and capable base specs, the CWWK M8 stands out as a strong contender.
Where to Buy? |
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
10GbE RJ45 port (AQC113C) with full Gen3 x2 bandwidth | PCIe slot and M.2 E-Key share a lane—only one usable at a time |
Dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports with wide OS compatibility | M.2 NVMe slots limited to PCIe Gen3 x1 speeds |
Supports up to 8 SATA drives via dual independent SFF-8643 ports | Single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot (no dual-channel support) |
Includes 2× M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, suitable for cache or boot use | |
Very low power draw (~20W under load, ~31W idle fully populated) | |
Compact Mini-ITX form factor with well-organized layout | |
Pre-installed CPU and active cooling fan included | |
Broad OS support (TrueNAS, Unraid, PVE, Linux, Windows, etc.) |
🔒 Join Inner Circle
Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.
![]() |
![]() |
The Best M.2 NAS of 2025 (so far)
Jonsbo N10 MITX NAS Case Review
HexOS 6 Months Later - Better, Worse or the Same?
Is this $200+ 10GbE Intel 8 Bay NAS Mobo Worth it? (CWWK N150/N355 NAS Board)
What is AnyRAID for ZFS (Explained for Dummies)? SHR for ZFS!
Zettlab NAS - Should You Back This?
Access content via Patreon or KO-FI
Thanks for the review!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
So the good news is:
10 GbE port isn’t limited by a single 1x lane, but actually gets a 2x so the Ethernet controller is the bottleneck. (here I honestly wish Ethernet controllers had a second port or two just so we can utilize this bandwidth. A 10 + 5 would be ideal for 2x PCIe v3, or 1x PCIe v4)
The downside is:
6×6 Gb/s SATA being limited by 1x PCIe. I would more than happily throw away the second M.2 slot for the sata controller to have 2 lanes so it can keep up with the Ethernet.
Except No I wouldn’t want one less M.2 port, since what I actually plan on doing when my own board shows up in the mail is add in an M.2 pcie to 6x SATA (for an example with the ASM1166), then I can split my drives into two groups such that a software RAID 5/6 won’t be limited by 1x PCIe. And thereby perhaps be able to saturate the 10 GbE connection. (since why not use all of it?)
I can’t wait for the future when we have systems like this but with just a couple more PCIe lanes for us to work with.
I want more lanes, not faster ones, since 12 PCIe v3 lanes is superior to 9 PCIe v4 lanes. Take this board for an example, 2 PCIe lanes are wasted to get 2x 2.5 Gb/s Ethernet, that could have been 1 lane if the Ethernet controller had 2 ports. Or better yet as already stated, been on the same controller as the 10 GbE controller since 2x 8 Gb/s of PCIe has room for it. Though that do require such network controllers to be on the market, which isn’t the case sadly… So we will inevitably waste PCIe lanes, so better waste v3 lanes and have more of them, than have fewer v4 lanes in total for us to waste. (though a compromise of 6x v3 + 4x v4 is also appealing.)
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
your channel is making me want to upgrade my gen10 microserver which i am perfectly happy with. i need to block your channel.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I bought 2 of these and I can’t seem to get it to turn my screen on.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Ordered my board last week, it should arrive next monday. I did notice that they revisited the board with the N100, now its only available in N150 since last week. The N305 stayed the same.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Any idea what the power consumption is with only 2x nvme 4tb drives installed? Thanks
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Damn, wish I saw this video before getting a bunch of other parts for a custom build. This has pretty much everything I need spec wise…!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have N305 mobo in my homelab and I can say that it is a bummer. It could just randomly hang producing no any logs or clues why. It happened more than 10 times so far. I would rather buy some well known brand product instead of this chinese custom shop.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have the cwwk version of this board with 4 x Intel i226V 2.5Gbs ports, and I can’t get it below 50w at idle using TrueNAS scale and all my hdd spun down. Any help appreciated.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
If it had a heat spreader for a normal cooler rather that tiny annoying fan it would be a good buy
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
视频非常好! 我的OKX钱包里有USDT,并且我有恢复短语. 「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」 我该如何将它们转移到Binance?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
My biggest takeaway here is that the power consumption difference between n305 and a 4650g is pretty marginal
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I also bought from Aliexpress and threw my money away, for those who are thinking about buying, believe me it’s better to look for another brand, I bought it and threw my money away!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Great review. Sadly the idle is a dealer breaker. Perhaps if we keep saying this the manufacturers will change the sata controller.
Some have hacked the bios and got higher c-states.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
On board SAS controller?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
The biggest disadvantage of these boards are if any components like cpu, ram etc fails the entire board need to be replaced as everthing is soldered.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Try to use the i5 1135g7, it has low consumption of 15w, it can have up to 64gb of ram in dual channel, it has the intel iris xe igpu with double decoders for h264, h265 and av1
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have this board in use, it’s pretty good. best price-performance ratio I could find (for my needs).
But be careful, the installed fan seems to get louder from month to month.
the only thing I would wish for would be a usb 3.0 port (19 pin) on the board.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Debating on this board for an offsite backup. I picked up a supermicro itx xeon-d board to replace my onsite server. Curious how long it would take to transfer all 40tb of data to a board like this. Probably take quite awhile especially since I use unraid….
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I’ll pay the premium for a NAS from a reputable vendor because I simply don’t want to be responsible for patching and maintaining the software. The cost for me is offset by time and that’s why I continue to use brand name NAS products. This is awesome if you’re budget conscious and a great option for most if you’re willing to tinker.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I really hope we get lower power consumption in the future
Running this device 24/7 .. . Ouch ????
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
No ECC support -> Not a NAS board. As simply as that.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I bought one of these Mb from AliExpress, it never arrived, it was delivered in another state and the seller does not respond and AliExpress does not make the refund.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Why would anyone want 10GbE copper port? It is hot, it is not always stable. Optics is the way to go.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Any small boards support 6+ SAS drives onboad?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Very disappointing idle power consumption 28watt…………………
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
At the 1:50 minute mark you stated “but it’s on die ECC” mean? More specially, the word “die”?
Full statement at 1:50:
“DDR5 has ECC it technically does but it’s on die ECC is not the same as ECC the way it does the correction all the way through and die hard particularly Flash users do care for the difference there so the lack of ECC is going to bother some users”
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
The usb 20 gbps is a messed up thing overall. The exact name is usb 3.2 gen 2×2. Emphasis on x2. It requires an exactly similar device to utilise the second set of pathways to hit that speed. Thunderbolt and usb4 don’t use that configuration and hence only use one set of connection which limits it to 10 gbps.
TLDR: you need a device that explicitly says usb 3.2 gen2x2 to connect to that port and hit full speed.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Thank you so much for your ongoing commitment to the community around DIY NAS (and everything else) – your passion for what you do is contagious, and highly entertaining – good stuff, keep it coming, and f*ck those seagulls! 😀
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Seems pretty disappointing – 28W idle power consumption? My *ancient* i5-3550 server with a SATA SSD and two NVMe sticks semi-idles around 35W (light amount of data from a Home Assistant Yellow constantly flowing to postgres on the server, a cloudflare tunnel etc. when it’s not actively doing other stuff). And the PCIe lanes for the NVMe on the MW-N305-NAS is just… well, this is 2024, it’s disappointing even for a cheap low-end system IMHO.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Link is for N100 motherboard, not N305. And it is still too much. For 350 euros in europe you can assemble full NAS with case, i3 14100 with integrated intel HD730 GPU which is a beast transcoding gpu, and 32GB ram in dual channel, and that is with SSD for boot drive.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Idk what they are doing here….But I have a 8700G with an Asrock B650M PG lightening….64 gigs of ddr5 and 8 hard drives with a PCIe SATA card and 3 NVMe SSDs. My idle power consumption is 20/30W max with 3 VMs on
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Their (Topton) own website claim “1 SODIMM DDR5 memory slot supports max 32GB 4800MHz”.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
great board, great video, but….
the german “translation” of the description is total crap. Please just show the original english one.
The translated one has no relevance for the video or product
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
If that cooling fan is broken, can I attach a PC cooling fan?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
The mainline retail manufacturers like Asrock, MSI, Asus, etc. really missed the boat.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I’m gathering parts to build my first DIY NAS, I did have the n100 version of this in my cart but I changed my mind. Should I hang on for the new n355 and n150 crop of motherboards to come out? I’m not in any rush. I’m hoping for a low power draw but with a little performance.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
After I get more Christmas spending money, I plan to get a Mini-ITX to replace my router host. Is it worth the $60~$100 to get this over an N100 with 4x 2.5Gbps ports? My initial plan is just to run pfSense in Proxmox, but maybe I’ll move my NAS there too ????????
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
YouTube your translate AI is crap!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
16gb means – no ZFS…
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
These little Alder Lake N CPUs are pretty starved of PCIe lanes. 9 Lanes ain’t much. I would have sacrificed a M.2 slot to add another lane to the JMB585. To give those those HDD a more room to breath.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
28 watts idle on that is terrible, some BIOS optimisation and power top I’d expect closer to about 15 watts max.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
This is cool. Respectfully, your mic quality isn’t very good.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have this board (minus the 10GB NIC) and it is running Xpenology in an N2 case. Wonderful, perfect for what I wanted/needed. Get it before tariffs hit. I use the MicroSD card to load ArcLoader for Xpenology.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Pops head into room…
No ECC
Leaves room
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
hey look, it’s Teef Richards the lispin’ luddite
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Just me? the N305 aliexpress links take me to a N100
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
You do a great job within this product space, keep it going. I would love to see you improve the video quality though. It looks very compressed / recorded with low bitrate and the highlights are compressed.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Another Chinese crap’y board without quality control with random defects and no support. He’ll thank you. It’s only just a curiosity for a few people who know how to deal with defective equipment.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
28 watts idle with the disk powered down is way too much. Powered down HDDs consume very little, which means the other items on this board are very power hungry. A laptop with 1 NVME and in idle uses as less than 5 watts.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Anyone have an AMD version of this? I don’t have time for Intel anymore.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I was queued up to take a drink when you said “243 knicker” but you dropped a dollars on us!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
It’s work with 32gb ddr5!
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
can i power everything from usb-c?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
copper rj45 10gbit is worth to me less than 2.5gbit ports 🙁
I was convinced by people that sfp+ is the way to go, its a nas,it would be near switch in most cases, cheap DAC cables…
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
27W on idle is beyond pathetic for a board you may want to have powered on 24/7.
When will they get rid of that horrible sata controller?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
this is the best channel for DIY nas builds. I haven’t found any channel that matches the quality and coverage.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Awesome breakdown (as always). It’s a hard pass for me, but I’d love to see something like this with a lot more nvme and no USB other than USB 2x.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Those combos are insanely affordable. For a price of an underpowered off-the-shelf diskless device without integrated GPU you can build a beast NAS which can everything you want including transcoding. DIY reality
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
not sure i want to aliexpress a nas mobo. if it fails all the data could be gone
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
So if you want to put in 2 nvme drives what would be the best perf/price SSD to choose ? seems overkill to use like 2 Samsung 990 Pro gen4 drives even with utilizing the 10Gbe port
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I want to see how it performs over a 10Gbe SMB connection from Raid 5
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Its really disappointing , yet again, the mobo has so few pci lanes at such low speed. Its about time this was ameliorated for those ‘NAS Mobo’s’
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I just can’t see much of the point to buy N305, yes it has 8 cores, but still only 9 lanes, better get a 8505 or even i3.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I had an n100. It wasnt powerful enough for my nas needs. The n305 has been perfect. Never goes above 65% usage wheras the n100 was always maxxed out
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
So what is the best option if ecc is needed?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
if I want to use unraid plex server with 30 pisses 20 * 22 *24 tb hdds is this MW-N305-NAS ok ore is better to buy 14100 intel and some desktop pc
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
You can get n305 and n100 mobos for cheap now. Next month Intel is releasing refresh of these and topton is building stock. They just can’t sell them yet
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Both of your N305 links point to N100 varieties.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Ahhhhh, you had to make this video today. lol. I just picked up an Aoostar R1 for $199. It literally came in the mail today. But I don’t need the extra horsepower of the N305 atm, but still cool to have those nics and extra sata ports. I needed a small nas setup either way. Raid 1 and done.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE