CWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS Board Combo Review – Worth $200+ ?

CWWK M8 MITX 10GbE NAS Motherboard & CPU Review

The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard, equipped with either the Intel Twin Lake N150 or N355 processor, is a compact Mini-ITX platform aimed at advanced home NAS builders and small office users looking for a cost-effective alternative to branded NAS systems. Measuring just 17 x 17 cm, it combines several high-end features such as an onboard 10GbE RJ45 LAN (via the AQC113C controller), dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports, and support for up to eight SATA drives through dual SFF-8643 ports. The board also integrates two M.2 NVMe slots, a DDR5 SO-DIMM memory slot supporting up to 48GB, and a PCIe Gen3 x1 slot for modest expansion. Unlike many low-power ITX boards, the M8 includes support for Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, and hardware monitoring, which makes it a viable candidate for 24/7 operations and remote deployment scenarios. With its efficient lane distribution—critical for balancing 10GbE, NVMe, SATA, and PCIe simultaneously—it delivers a level of I/O flexibility not commonly found at this price point, particularly in the sub-$300 range.

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Quick Conclusion

The CWWK M8 NAS motherboard strikes a practical balance between performance, expandability, and power efficiency, making it a compelling choice for DIY NAS builders looking for 10GbE capability without the complexity or cost of larger platforms. With support for up to eight SATA drives via dual SFF-8643 connectors, dual NVMe slots, and a DDR5 SO-DIMM socket (up to 48GB), it delivers a surprising level of storage flexibility in a compact Mini-ITX form factor. Performance across the 10GbE port is strong—achieving near-saturation read speeds and respectable write throughput—while NVMe and SATA access remain consistent thanks to a careful PCIe lane allocation strategy. Power draw remains modest, even when fully populated with drives and expansion cards, reinforcing its suitability for 24/7 deployments. However, limitations like Gen3 x1 NVMe speeds, a single RAM slot, and shared PCIe/E-Key lane usage should be considered by those seeking maximum expansion or high-end performance. Still, for its price, pre-installed CPU, and strong open-source OS compatibility, the M8 offers an unusually capable base for home servers, backup targets, or even Plex and Proxmox environments.

BUILD QUALITY - 9/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 7/10
PRICE - 10/10
VALUE - 10/10


9.0
PROS
👍🏻10GbE RJ45 port (AQC113C) with full Gen3 x2 bandwidth
👍🏻Dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports with wide OS compatibility
👍🏻Supports up to 8 SATA drives via dual independent SFF-8643 ports
👍🏻Includes 2× M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, suitable for cache or boot use
👍🏻Very low power draw (~20W under load with 10g+2xM.2, ~31W idle fully populated with HDDs)
👍🏻Compact Mini-ITX form factor with well-organized layout
👍🏻Exceptional Price vs H/W Level
👍🏻Broad OS support (TrueNAS, Unraid, PVE, Linux, Windows, etc.)
CONS
👎🏻PCIe slot and M.2 E-Key share a lane—only one usable at a time
👎🏻M.2 NVMe slots limited to PCIe Gen3 x1 speeds
👎🏻Single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot (no dual-channel support)

Where to Buy?
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on Amazon (£174) HERE
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on AliExpress ($166) HERE
  • N355 CWWK NAS Motherboard on AliExpress ($249) – HERE

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Design

The physical design of the CWWK M8 motherboard is centered around the Mini-ITX standard, maintaining a compact 17 x 17 cm footprint that caters to space-conscious NAS builds. Despite its small form factor, the layout is methodically structured to maximize accessibility and airflow. Key components such as the dual SFF-8643 ports, NVMe slots, and RAM socket are positioned for easy cable routing and minimal overlap.

The CPU arrives pre-installed with a low-profile ball-bearing cooler, which is sufficient for the low 6W TDP of the N150 processor. There’s also a system fan header onboard with PWM support, allowing for basic thermal management in enclosed NAS chassis. The board is finished in a neutral white PCB, aligning with recent CWWK trends that blend aesthetic minimalism with function-first engineering.

Storage expansion is one of the most defining elements of the M8. It features dual SFF-8643 ports that, with breakout cables, provide connectivity for up to eight SATA III (6Gbps) drives.

These connectors are routed through independent ASM1164 controllers, each on a dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lane, ensuring that drive traffic is not bottlenecked through a single controller.

This separation also means users can confidently deploy SSDs or mixed SSD/HDD arrays without major performance drops under load. The board supports RAID configurations at the OS level via TrueNAS or Unraid, and is capable of delivering reliable throughput for multi-drive setups including RAID-Z, RAID5, or JBOD.

In addition to traditional SATA storage, the board includes two M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, each operating at PCIe Gen3 x1. While this limits peak performance to around 900MB/s per slot, it is sufficient for cache drives or SSD-based boot volumes, especially in NAS environments where latency and parallel IOPS matter more than raw sequential throughput. The placement of the NVMe slots, one top-side and one underside, helps distribute heat and gives builders flexibility in cooling strategy. Both slots are directly accessible, and installation doesn’t require removing other components, which is particularly useful during upgrades or replacements.

Storage scaling is enhanced through the modularity of the board’s SFF-8643 interfaces. As discussed in your review, these ports can be adapted not just to standard SATA breakouts but also to additional M.2 or U.2 devices with the correct adapter cards. This creates potential for hybrid NAS setups—using SATA for bulk data storage and NVMe for hot data or VM usage. Such versatility in drive mapping is rarely offered at this price point, and makes the board viable not only for home media servers but also for lab environments or light virtualized storage nodes.

One lesser-known but practical addition is the inclusion of a MicroSD (TF) slot on the PCB. While it’s not ideal for installing major OS platforms like TrueNAS Core, it can be useful for loading bootloaders such as Unraid or for system config backups. Importantly, the TF slot is recognized natively by most operating systems and appears as a usable storage device without requiring extra drivers. It also enables simple out-of-band recovery or local snapshot scripts in more advanced workflows. Combined with the available internal USB port, the board allows multiple low-impact boot or recovery paths to coexist alongside primary storage deployments.

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Ports and Connections

The CWWK M8 motherboard is equipped with a well-rounded selection of external and internal I/O ports that support a broad range of NAS and server use cases. Most notably, it includes one 10GbE RJ45 port powered by the AQC113C controller and two additional 2.5GbE ports via Intel i226-V chips.

These networking options allow the board to operate in multiple roles simultaneously, such as high-speed file sharing over 10GbE while maintaining service management or redundancy via the dual 2.5GbE ports. The inclusion of Intel network controllers ensures wide compatibility with open-source operating systems like TrueNAS and Unraid, as well as ESXi and PVE, making it a suitable base for software-defined networks, VLAN tagging, or bonded interface configurations.

On the USB front, the M8 provides a combination of high-speed and legacy options. It includes 1× USB Type-C (10Gbps) and 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps) ports for external storage or fast USB peripherals. There are also 2× USB 2.0 Type-A ports located at the rear I/O and an internal USB 2.0 header, which is useful for OS boot drives such as Unraid.

Internally, the board also features a USB 3.0 header and a Type-E header, allowing front-panel USB 3.x support if the chassis includes such connectors. These ports give builders the flexibility to attach boot media, backup targets, or even USB-based UPS management tools without additional hardware.

For video output and direct display use, the M8 includes 1× HDMI 2.0 and 1× DisplayPort 1.4, both capable of 4K@60Hz output. These are connected via the integrated UHD graphics included with the N150/N355 CPU. While these outputs are generally not essential in a headless NAS environment, they provide value in cases where the system is used as a hybrid HTPC/NAS, or when diagnostics and BIOS access are needed without SSH or remote management tools. The GPU is also supported for hardware video decoding, making the board a viable base for light Plex or Jellyfin deployments that rely on integrated graphics acceleration.

Internally, the board features several headers that further expand its flexibility. Alongside the previously mentioned USB and fan headers, there’s an M.2 E-Key slot for wireless modules, which shares PCIe lanes with the x1 PCIe slot and cannot be used simultaneously. The board also includes an SD card (TF) slot which appears natively in supported OSes—suitable for bootloaders or small backup tasks.

While not suited to high-throughput use, it does provide an alternative storage option in embedded or recovery scenarios. The arrangement and accessibility of these ports are well considered for such a small form factor, ensuring that builders can access almost all essential functionality without relying on riser boards or USB hubs.

Interface Type Details
Ethernet Ports 1× 10GbE RJ45 (AQC113C), 2× 2.5GbE RJ45 (Intel i226-V)
USB Ports (Rear) 1× USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A (10Gbps), 1× USB-C (10Gbps), 2× USB 2.0 Type-A
USB Ports (Internal) 1× USB 2.0 (boot drive), 1× USB 3.0 header, 1× USB 3.0 Type-E header
Display Outputs 1× HDMI 2.0, 1× DisplayPort 1.4 (both support 4K@60Hz)
PCIe Slot 1× PCIe Gen3 x1 (x4/x8 slot compatible, shared with M.2 E-Key)
M.2 Slots 2× M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1), 1× M.2 E-Key for WiFi/BT
SD Card Slot 1× TF (MicroSD) slot (appears as storage device)
Fan and Headers 1× PWM fan header, various USB/F_USB headers for front I/O

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Internal Hardware

At the heart of the M8 motherboard lies a choice between two Intel Twin Lake processors: the N150 and the N355. The N150 is a quad-core, four-thread CPU with a base architecture derived from the Alder Lake-N family, running at up to 3.6GHz and featuring a modest 6MB cache. It operates at a remarkably low TDP of 6W, making it suitable for passive or semi-passive cooling environments.

The N355, on the other hand, doubles the thread count and bumps performance further, albeit at a slightly higher price. Both CPUs are pre-soldered to the board and arrive with a compact, ball-bearing fan assembly that supports quiet, efficient cooling. These processors are not meant for heavy computation but offer enough power for file server duties, light containerization, and even modest Plex media serving—with the N150 proving capable of 4K playback in testing.

Memory support is handled via a single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot, officially supporting up to 48GB at 4800MHz. While dual-channel operation is not available, DDR5’s higher base bandwidth helps compensate for this limitation in real-world usage. The board accepts standard non-ECC modules and will clock down any faster memory to the platform’s 4800MHz limit.

For NAS and virtualization users, this constraint is acceptable, though power users may note that memory upgrades are capped to a single slot. That said, 32GB or 48GB configurations are more than adequate for common use cases like running TrueNAS Scale with Docker containers, or spinning up a few VMs in Proxmox.

The board’s PCIe lane distribution is particularly deliberate given the constraints of the Twin Lake architecture, which provides just 9 usable PCIe lanes. Despite this, the M8 balances connectivity by allocating PCIe Gen3 x2 bandwidth to the 10GbE port, ensuring full 10Gbps throughput with bandwidth overhead. The SATA controllers each receive dedicated PCIe Gen3 x1 lanes, and each M.2 NVMe slot is similarly mapped at x1 speed.

The remaining lane is shared between the M.2 E-key (for Wi-Fi/BT modules) and the physical PCIe x1 expansion slot. This means that users must choose between Wi-Fi upgrades or additional PCIe peripherals—a typical tradeoff on ITX boards, but worth noting during build planning.

From a system management perspective, the board supports UEFI-only boot modes and includes features such as Auto Power-On, Scheduled Power-On, PXE boot, Wake-on-LAN, and Secure Boot, making it suitable for remote deployment or integration into managed environments. The board includes thermal monitoring via BIOS and OS-level tools, with fan control limited to one system fan header supporting PWM. These features, while basic, are sufficient for home server use or edge deployment in micro data centers. The compact ITX layout also makes the board a candidate for embedded use in custom NAS chassis or OEM enclosures with constrained airflow or proprietary mounting.

Component Details
CPU Options Intel N150 (4C/4T, 3.6GHz, 6W TDP), Intel N355 (8C/8T, higher performance)
Memory 1x DDR5 SO-DIMM, up to 48GB (4800MHz), non-ECC
Chipset/Lanes Intel Twin Lake SoC, 9 PCIe Gen3 lanes total
NVMe Storage 2x M.2 2280 NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x1 each)
SATA Support 2x SFF-8643 (8x SATA III via breakout cables, each on ASM1164 controller)
PCIe Expansion 1x PCIe Gen3 x1 slot (shared with M.2 E-Key)
WiFi Module Slot 1x M.2 E-Key (2230) for Wi-Fi/BT (shares lane with PCIe slot)
Boot Features UEFI-only, Auto Power-On, Wake-on-LAN, PXE boot, Secure Boot
Fan Support 1x PWM system fan header, bundled CPU fan

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Performance and Power Tests

During benchmarking and real-world tests, the N150-based M8 motherboard demonstrated performance levels consistent with expectations for an ultra-low-power NAS platform. Sequential read speeds over the 10GbE interface approached saturation during synthetic ATTO Disk Benchmark tests, particularly with a 256MB block size, where throughput consistently exceeded 950MB/s.

Write performance, however, plateaued slightly lower, averaging between 650–700MB/s for 1GB and 4GB file tests. These figures are typical for systems utilizing Gen3 x1 NVMe SSDs and efficiency-focused CPUs like the N150, where write-intensive operations are more limited by CPU capability than disk throughput. Larger transfers or workloads involving compression will see slightly more variation, but in most scenarios, read performance remained stable and consistent.

Using a RAID 1 array of Seagate IronWolf drives connected via the dual SFF-8643 SATA ports, the board achieved average write speeds of 550–580MB/s, with occasional peaks in read performance reaching up to 800MB/s, though these were not sustained.

These results reflect the benefit of having each SATA group routed through a separate ASM1164 controller, ensuring that bandwidth isn’t choked under RAID configurations or multi-drive reads. In practical terms, this makes the board well-suited for file-serving tasks, Time Machine backups, or media library hosting, with no obvious contention across interfaces during simultaneous read/write operations.

NVMe performance was constrained by the PCIe Gen3 x1 link per M.2 slot, which limited theoretical throughput to under 1GB/s. Tests confirmed read speeds of around 720MB/s and write speeds of approximately 520MB/s in sustained transfers. While not ideal for high-performance VM storage or video editing scratch disks, these speeds are more than adequate for cache duties or container storage. Importantly, the board maintains predictable performance across both NVMe slots, and thermals were manageable under active load without throttling, thanks in part to the pre-attached CPU cooler and accessible airflow pathways on the board’s surface.

In terms of power efficiency, the system consumed approximately 19–20W under load when configured with the N150 CPU, 8GB of DDR5, two NVMe SSDs, and a 10GbE connection in active use. When idle but fully populated with four SATA drives and an expansion card installed (but unused), power draw settled at around 31.4W. This confirms the board’s suitability for 24/7 operation without requiring high-capacity PSUs or custom thermal management.

For edge computing, offsite backup, or low-power homelab deployments, this balance of power efficiency and consistent I/O throughput is a key strength of the M8.
Test Category Result (N150 Model)
10GbE Read (ATTO, 256MB) ~950MB/s (near saturation)
10GbE Write (1–4GB) ~650–700MB/s
RAID 1 HDD (SATA) Write: 550–580MB/s, Read Peak: up to 800MB/s (occasional spikes)
NVMe (Gen3 x1) Read: ~720MB/s, Write: ~520MB/s
Power Draw (Load) ~19–20W (N150, 2× NVMe, 10GbE active)
Power Draw (Idle, full config) ~31.4W (4× HDD, PCIe card, NVMe, no I/O)
Thermals Stable under load; no active throttling observed

CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Mobo – Verdict and Conclusion

The CWWK M8 motherboard delivers a rare combination of high-speed networking, broad storage expandability, and low power consumption, all within a Mini-ITX footprint. It manages to balance PCIe lane allocation across 10GbE, dual NVMe, and eight SATA drives without compromising basic performance, thanks to deliberate hardware pairing and thoughtful board layout. The use of separate SATA controllers, a well-provisioned 10GbE controller on Gen3 x2 lanes, and native UEFI support reflects a clear intent to make this a serious option for NAS enthusiasts and advanced home users. Its ability to sustain near-saturation speeds on the 10GbE connection and provide usable NVMe throughput makes it a capable base for TrueNAS, Unraid, or Proxmox environments—whether for home backup, Plex media hosting, or light VM workloads.

However, there are trade-offs. The limited PCIe expandability, single RAM slot, and Gen3 x1 constraints on NVMe performance may not meet the needs of high-end workstation builders or enterprise deployments. Additionally, the shared PCIe lane between the M.2 E-key and the PCIe slot limits simultaneous use of both interfaces, which could affect those hoping to add both Wi-Fi and a PCIe peripheral. Still, for its price point and target use case, the M8 delivers well above average. It avoids many of the bottlenecks seen in competing low-power boards and manages to do so at under $300 with a pre-installed CPU. For users building a power-efficient, high-bandwidth DIY NAS with flexible drive options and capable base specs, the CWWK M8 stands out as a strong contender.

 

Where to Buy?
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on Amazon (£174) HERE
  • CWWK M8 10GbE NAS Board on AliExpress ($166) HERE
  • N355 CWWK NAS Motherboard on AliExpress ($249) – HERE

Pros Cons
10GbE RJ45 port (AQC113C) with full Gen3 x2 bandwidth PCIe slot and M.2 E-Key share a lane—only one usable at a time
Dual 2.5GbE Intel i226-V ports with wide OS compatibility M.2 NVMe slots limited to PCIe Gen3 x1 speeds
Supports up to 8 SATA drives via dual independent SFF-8643 ports Single DDR5 SO-DIMM slot (no dual-channel support)
Includes 2× M.2 NVMe 2280 slots, suitable for cache or boot use
Very low power draw (~20W under load, ~31W idle fully populated)
Compact Mini-ITX form factor with well-organized layout
Pre-installed CPU and active cooling fan included
Broad OS support (TrueNAS, Unraid, PVE, Linux, Windows, etc.)

 

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      Discover more from NAS Compares

      Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      Leave a Reply to @arie_babaCancel reply

      282 thoughts on “CWWK M8 N150/N355 10Gbe NAS Board Combo Review – Worth $200+ ?

      1. I bought a CWWK AMD 8845HS motherboard, slapped on a Noctua tower cooler, 32GB RAM, 2x 512GB NVME for a cache pool and just recently dropped in a 20TB Toshiba N300 drive. On this system I run unRAID, within that OS I have multiple VMs and Containers, including a Sophos Firewall VM and a Unifi Network Controller. Basically I have a full home lab all contained within a Fractal Node 304 case. Power draw is a reasonable (80W including my Virgin Media router, a POE switch and a Unifi AP), sound level is low enough that it doesn’t upset the wife, and more importantly it has more than enough processing power to run my full home lab without breaking a sweat. Plex transcoding is handled by the AMD integrated GPU, but I don’t need any transcoding since this is a Direct Play household!

        Overall I am grateful to Synology for no longer supporting 3rd party brands because that was the reason I chose not to go for a Synology NAS, and I was only looking at Synology because of SHR. Once that was no longer an option DIY was my only option.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. Power efficiency is always my thing. I did pick up and old PC with a 6700 but its too heavy on thr wattage, assuming i do leave it on 24 7. I do own a mini PC which is great and pulls max maybe 10ish watts at the wall, usually 7w as it’s idle. I’d definitely go prebuilt, but I’d have to buy something that’s power efficient.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      3. Camp BYO:
        Being a Windows/Unix/Linux server admin for the last 30 years, I built my own which is smaller and more powerful than the commercial offerings. First with FreeNAS/TrueNAS, then later with Proxmox and a DIY Linux LXC for NAS duties plus a whole bunch of other LXCs and VMs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. My NAS is jast a headless Debian server, because I like pain I guess 😀

        Actually it’s because I just liked the idea of learning to manage a “proper” server. I started with Ubuntu Server and made a bit of a mess because I didn’t really know what I was doing, but second time around with Debian it really was a breeze. Now it’s a pretty clean setup with lvm, ZFS, a bunch of smb stuff as well as Plex and Jellyfin (testing before I’m confident enough to drop Plex), both with hardware acceleration for transcoding and tone mapping. Sometimes I even run some game servers.

        All in all, very educational, but certainly has quite some learning curve. It also puts you in the danger zone for getting into homelab, now I’m playing around with Proxmox and OPNSense…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      5. the only reason i may go for prebuild nas , is the ability to use it from outside my network over the internet , i will use dropbox , since the diy route is to complicate i have try next cloud , don t manage to make it work even truenas dose not support it , don t see any other benifits compar to a simple compute use as nas .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      6. I’ve just built a Nas, which involved rebuilding my old PC back into its old case, and the fun of designing and printing my own harddrive rack with side loading bays. So for the cost of harddrives only (and a bit of 3d printing) I got a Nas that allows me to figure out what I need and how I’m going to use it, and to completey change my mind all I need to do is print something else. Truenas has been easy to set up and use, almost too boring really, I thought it was going to be more of a hobby but I don’t have to do anything ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      7. This is exactly what I did. Ditched Synology, bought an Intel NUC with Thunderbolt 3 external drive enclosure. Installed Linux with ZFS, NFS, Samba, JellyFin, etc. So much better than fighting with the restrictive options of Synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      8. Easy options for someone like myself…… internal network use only… I would (now) choose the DIY route. Internal and external use the now traditional NAS solution would be best. I only use my NAS for internal network streaming, I wish I knew this b4 buying a QNAP solution..DOH ????‍????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      9. ditched prebuilt a few years ago now.. I’m never going back.. I was planning to move to synology but that idea died when they moved to amd cpu’s without video codecs in them…and I’m glad I escaped before the whole HD lock-in mess
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. Long time fan, first time commenter!

        I’m making the move from my DS923+ (it’s been an absolute kubernetes nfs pvc permissions nightmare) to DIY. I know this isn’t discussed much on the channel, but any suggestions on a DIY setup that works well within a homelab/kubernetes setup? I’m moving my cluster to Talos this weekend and want to plan out the storage swap in the near future. Thanks for an suggestions!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      11. I’m still enjoying my 1618+ but i feel that after this unit is unsupported, and in light of Synology’s recent ‘business practices’, I will investigate ‘roll your own’ options, as it were. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. Thanks. I am concerned about reliability. My Lincplus N2 had issues losing some ssds, my Minisforum MS-01 is dead for seemingly no reason. All the while my 2 Synologies are chugging along, one of them for 10 years.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      13. I used to think Synology for turnkey… but they don’t care about home/small users anymore, removing apps, codecs etc. (and of course their rip off for memory and the mess with disk compatibility). More and more I’m setting up open source, immich, nextcloud etc in docker as I’m in de-syno mode nowadays. When I get my next nas it sure won’t be Synology. Sorry but I’m not paying a premium for your stuff anymore. And my final, they don’t care, when the f are you going to support dark mode (yes I can use a browser extensions, but its not the point). A proper theme management so I can properly see the current line in file manager etc, uck.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. It is unfortunate that HP stopped making MicroServers. I have a couple from the G7 era that work great as NAS devices, one running Xpenology and the other OMV. Both have Mellanox Connect-X3 10G add-in cards and run cool and quietly. Somewhat larger than a 4-bay NAS but much smaller than a tower.

        For services other than network storage, I run Proxmox on a cluster of 3 1L fanless PCs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. Went from turn-key NAS products to DIY and will never go back. I run Plex on my NAS which leverages the GPU to handle transcoding since all my rips are 1:1 and sometimes need conversion. I remember running my huge video library through OCR software to extract subtitles because the low end CPUs in turn-key NAS boxes couldn’t even burn the subs into the video stream without the CPU being overwhelmed. With a DIY NAS you can add a GPU/iGPU to do all the heavy lifting.

        I just run ZFS on top of Ubuntu server. If you are not familiar with Linux there isn’t much involved with getting ZFS running on it. The precooked NAS solutions like OMV or TrueNAS are great for new NAS users, especially if you want to run stuff in containers. I didn’t bother with those since I wanted something simple that I’m in complete control of.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      16. I went diy 6 months ago. Unraid, 12600k, 32GB, 80TB usable sata storage, 3 nvme zfs cache drives, windows gaming VM, plex server. Blisteringly fast and around 60w standby power consumption. Never going back 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. I’ve dreamt of doing it, but:
        1) It’s not hard to bypass the HDD “lock” on turn-key systems.
        2) Yes more OS options, but it’s a steep learning curve, and DIY won’t support those machines if there was a build error.
        3) Hardware is getting better for DIY, but they always seem to be a larger case for HDD, and takes more PSU power which is a problem 24/7/365
        4) Cost is more than just software! Sure DIY “can” be cheaper, but I’m not sure how much I’d have to save to go DIY. When the DIY doesn’t have a warranty or a customer service chat or phone number to call.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      18. I’ve been thinking for quite a while about building my own NAS, especially after Synology basically said ‘screw you’ to their customers. However, energy efficiency and the cost of electricity should, in my opinion, be taken into consideration when calculating the total cost. Whats your take on this and how to calcuate this?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. Making the plunge into homelab myself and hosting my own apps and files on an NAS due to the availability of nice ITX cases and motherboards that make it very do-able without getting locked-in to a subscription or a Synology-type hardware requirement. I ended up building an 8-bay NAS a few days ago with a Jonsbo N3 case and CWWK Q670 board after various build reviews (including yours).

        Some BIOS configuration snafus aside, which I was able to resolve, I have it running Linux Mint for testing purposes to verify all the hardware works. So far so good. Planning on installing TrueNAS Scale and adding 4 28TB Seagate Exos CMR drives when I have everything else configured.

        Specs:
        Jonsbo N3 case
        2x Noctua NF-A9 case fans to replace the original case fans.
        CWWK Q670 8-bay Motherboard (revised white version)
        Intel Core i3 14100T (may or may not upgrade later)
        Noctua NH-L12Sx77 L-Type Low Profile CPU cooler
        128GB (2x 64GB) Crucial Pro DDR5 5600 UDIMM Memory
        Lenovo Intel X710-DA2 Dual Port 10Gb PCIe Network Adapter Half Height (01DA902) (plus a full height bracket to swap out)
        1 x Samsung 990 PRO 1 TB SSD NVMe M.2 (future boot drive – overkill but I got it on sale – I had an ancient 128gb NVMe I was going to press into service but it was not compatible)
        2 x Sabrent Rocket 2TB SSD NVMe M2 (for apps pool – pulled from my workstation PC during an upgrade)

        For testing purpose I threw in a couple of old SATA drives I had pulled from old systems and they were detected. One has Linux Mint installed as the boot. These will be retired eventually once I get TrueNAS Scale set up.

        Planned apps:
        Truenas Scale (OS)
        Nextcloud
        Jellyfin
        Possibly Handbrake
        Calibre-web
        Immich
        Possibly Navidrome

        As far as Synology goes, I am not keen on any ecosystem (however well-designed) that requires proprietary software. The recent decision to require Synology-certified drives just hardened my stance against them. Nope. They just got added to my sh*t list alongside MIcrosoft, Adobe, Google, and Apple.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      20. I would build my own if I had time to tinker with it. I love to do that. But for my current needs I just need something I can plug in, add drives and it works. That’s why I have my Synology. I plugged it in 5 years ago and it’s never been shutdown other than for cleaning or updates. Whether I’m at home or in another state it’s there when I need it. Replaces any need for Google or other cloud services.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      21. personally for a nas, ill stick with a pre built like my ds1522+ is just the ease of use and simplicity.

        with my data that a value i have zero interest with tinkering, i want stability and zero risk (its why i dont use linux as a desktop os and only use Windows or macOS, and only linux in a server environment) its why i separate the my hosted services onto a 2 node proxmox cluster on a separate system, in case something goes wrong i dont lose my data in general.

        i like the low power and efficiency as well
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      22. Really fair and valid points raised. It boils down to use case and keeping to what your needs are. I have had some big switches and an old blade but they were loud and power hungry. Now I have two pc, 4790k 32gb ram and 7700k 16gb ram, with an array of nvme , sata SSD and HDD. its perfect for me, its quieter, uses less power, smaller foot print, flexible, easy to get parts and upgrade over time. that is what I wanted. Turn Key and going bigger DIY had to big an outlay cost for me, I don’t think negatively of the turnkey stuff due to nice simple layouts and all in one construction. I just love tinkering. I have been really having fun with CasaOS, proxmox etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. What about families in the Apple ecosystem? Do you recommend using a Mac mini? It’s energy efficient, and even has a new native containerization framework. For docker like functions.
        You won’t have the build your own joy but it could be a nice way to go?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      24. The only thing stopping me from moving (apart from the money already invested in Synology 4 bay + 5 bay expansion box!) is Active Backup for Business – if I could find an alternative solution (that was as easy to use, solid and natively supported Windows & Linux) I would likely move. Really don’t like the way Synology have gone with ever increasing lock in …. 🙁
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. When I was younger I built my own pc for gaming and had a lot of fun tinkering. For a NAS I would rather buy something purpose built whilst accepting that it wouldn’t be as full featured / powerful as DIY.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. Thank you for doing this but you only focus on hardware. What about software? Features? Could you do that? All the backup apps, mail server, file server, Drive Sync, document link sharing, etc … I’m on Synology. Pretty happy with it. Curious on what’s on the other side.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      27. My friend, I agree. Zima OS Nas software it’s amazing!, and I have three of them brands Qnap, Synology and Asustor.????
        But thanks to Nas Compare???????? I have installed Zima OS 1.44.1
        I have it installed on the Beelink Me, and on a PowerEdge r440, they both run flawless.
        And the remote access function is awesome???? on the R440, which I have in production. Which I have lockdown for my UniFi network.
        Thank you again, Nas Compare????
        This video is Top Notch????????????????????????????????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. open-media-vault is the most underated NAS OS BAR non. Unraid is great, TrueNAS/FreeNAS are good but you need to know SMB commands to make it easy to use. OMV is just the perfect sweetspot and even better if you have a cheap Adaptec RAID card to manage your drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      29. @NASCOMPARES – What does this mean for ECC NAS RAM ?

        Gigabyte’s AI Top CXL R5X4 quietly expands RAM capacity for demanding workstation workloads
        The card supports four DDR5 RDIMM ECC modules totaling 512GB of memory
        PCIe 5.0 x16 connection ensures direct CPU access for improved performance
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      30. I built a DIY NAS on a Pi using OMV and a USB drive to solve a short term network file sharing problem one time. Built in short order from bits lying about on the desk, it saved a bunch of passing the shared drive around the various devices on the network. FrankenNAS performance was pretty good actually but not any sort of long term production solution. Hand made is good option for folks who want to mess about and build the thing that matches their vision.

        Off the shelf though, generally smaller form factor than hand made, low noise, low power consumption, built for the job, no messing about. Could be pros or cons depending on personal perspective.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      31. The problem with turn key solution is once you buy it kind of stuck with it. It may last 5-10 years, but after a while you will have to buy another one. At this point you outgrowing your current setup. With DIY, you can start with modest hardware . Reuse older components and concentrate on acquiring hard drives at your own pace. Eventually, after couple years, the same hard drives can be transferred to a new hardware. I think Synology is preventing it currently on their new hardware.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      32. As someeone somewhere between a pro-sumer and homelab-er, I’m willing to take a bit of perf hit for polish and stability… but Synology sure has been testing me on the compromises.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      33. I’ve purchased 2 QNAP 8 bay desktop NAS systems. The hardware (CPU/memory) is underpowered from the start and they have very limited RAM capacity/expandability. But what has really annoyed me is that the major OS version updates have not been supported on my systems. I would have liked to build my own, but I am not satisfied with the variety of desktop 8 or 10 bay 3.5″ cases. I backed the Orico Cyberdata kickstarter and plan to test various software platforms.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      34. Turnkey are appealing, but I wonder how much fine tuning you can do with the apps when you want the NAS to be your all purpose server (Web server, IMAP server, Home Assistant with Zigbee dongle, File server) ? Apps may also be available in containers, are they fat and does they slow down the system ?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. I got a problem on my “DIY side”: can´t decide between Xpenology and Truenas. I´m using Synology Hardware for a long time and I´ll use my DS1621+ as long as it is supported. But for sure I won´t buy any new Synology hardware unless they drop their restrictions.

        For fun and additional roles I´m also using some Xpenology Systems for a long time, which are running pretty well I must admit. But now I tried a Truenas build and I´m amazed how well Truenas runs. Especially setting up Jellyfin and Immich is way more easy than on Synology. I´ll guess I have to run both and maybe get additional hardware. ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      36. For roommate approval factor (5G internet with best signal in the living room), the Ugreen DXP2800 was a pretty compelling solution. Discreet enough to stick next to the AP without drawing attention.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      37. You always post the most interesting topics in your channel, keep up the good work. I’ll stick with DIY, more power, more slots, less money spent, and above all, better power consumption.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. Going DIY right now. Looked long and hard at Synology, Qnap, Asustor. Even bought one, but returned it. It takes a while to collect all the parts but you get much bang for your buck if you shop around and compare going DIY. I get Xeon, hundreds of gigs of ECC memory all for a fraction of what a turnkey solution cost.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      39. Support in turn key NAS is not always the best. For example I tied to do 1:1 copy from old DS1819+ to DS1525+ with no success at all. After 10 days of writing to support and reading how they blamed everything else but not Synology I gave up. I would rather invest time to learn something new with DIY NAS than wait for the crazy answers in support ticket. Restoring task speed 10MB/s on 2000 EUR NAS is no way neither the CPU V1500B with end of life 2028. I wanted to call Synology support but that one engineer who is responsible for 15 mil Czech and Slovak just did not have a time.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      40. What options do you have with a turnkey system when the manufacturer decides it is EOL and there will be no more security updates for it? Will you be able to install another OS on it or not? I still have a Netgear RN316 that had some Debian flavor on it and the support stopped with Debian 8.11. Also they made it very hard (no documentation on it at all) to install another OS on it. The system still works fine, but the software is really old. For any turnkey system I would recommend only those that give you an option to install another OS after they go EOL, which they inevitably will at some time.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. I’ve never owned a turn-key home NAS. About 10 years ago I picked up a Supermicro X9 montherboard, an HBA, an 8-bay hot-swap case, and installed FreeNAS. I started with 3 TB SATA drives but now I’m using 22 TB SAS drives. I have had one motherboard die, but other than that I’ve had no issues with this system. I see no reason to pay a premium to use a turnkey NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. I tried a QNAP 4 bay nas a few years ago – compact, easy to setup, nice selection of utilities etc but not that cheap. It started playing up at about 2 years old. 2 bays stopped working, fan was on max and temp readings were all wrong. Believed to be an issue with the intel cpu they used that fail over time. Of course everything was attached to the board so no means of replacing components. 🙁

        So went for a mATX intel based board and a 4 core 8 series intel cpu, nothing fancy but has 6 sata connections. Setup in a small cube case with 6 drives and using freenas/truenas and has been working fine for years. Got a couple of external drives I do backups too, just in case. Using WD Red NAS drives, which I’ve had one fail (or at least starting giving smart errors). May look to change to bigger drives or SSDs when prices are a bit better.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      43. Been waiting for a 12+ bay case (hot swappable) that is descent price. Not in love with Jonsbo N5 honestly but might end up going with that if there is not one available soon. I’m coming off of a Synology system because i have lost faith in synology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      44. For Apple fans, there’s also the hybrid option between DIY and turnkey: use an old Mac mini (eg M1 refurb or 2nd hand) with an external drive enclosure (JBOD or RAID for example). MacOS works fine as a server OS for backups, media libraries etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      45. NAS-devices were correctly priced at the start of -00’s. Then they abandoned EU customers and priced themselves for Americans, Middle-East gulf oil countries and new rich chinese. So fuck’em i say. Never a NAS, never a new PC 2025->.
        There are other hobbies one can have that are free.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      46. I keep thinking, if only Truenas would get fleshed out more to compete with turnkey OS’s. The solid ZFS basics are there but… Also I’m not a CLI-warrior. Kudos to those that are, but don’t expect it if every user to be one.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      47. Hello, I really like your videos and the infromation you provide.
        Will you one day make a build of a complete DIY or something like ? OR at least not only show the motherboards, but all other hardware required ? (alimentation, cases ? etc )
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. Turnkey is convenient, but has an ongoing cost of having to replace the unit when either the software and/or hardware inevitably goes EOL (assuming you want the latest bug fixes and security patches). DIY can largely eliminate this, but has an ongoing cost of your time and skills. After experiencing my first NAS (WD MyCloud EX2) going EOL, I’m firmly in camp DIY going forward.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      49. LOL – I gave up on my DIY disasters and bought a UNAS Pro on Sunday. Of the 8 incidents I’ve had 1 has been actual hardware failure, the other 7 have been some unrecoverable OS management oddity. DONE.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      50. I’m just building my Jonsbo N2 NAC. That is NAC as Network Attached Computer. Figured out I also need some extra processing cores at the same time when I need larger storage, so R9 5950x with ecc and running Win 11 with a software Stable Bit. Anyone tried this software?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      51. It all comes down to one thing for me! Unraid allows you to use different sized and mismatched drives in your Arrays (Pools). Hard drives are the most expensive part of any NAS so it only makes sense to go the route that gives you the most flexibility when it comes to your hard drives. So for me it has to be either a DIY Nas or some kind of a pre-built that will allow you to use Unraid!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      52. NAS is a bit of a misnomer these days. What you are buying is a small server. The only real difference between rolling your own and a turnkey solution is the amount of hand holding that you get and the fact that in a turnkey solution the hardware/software/config has been validated to be reliable.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      53. This is exactly what I did about six months ago. Dumped the contentss of my Synolgoy NAS to a 2TB drive. Then turned it off and put it away. I did pull the disks but used new ones first to set up my new NAS which is a Proxmox box running on a x570 mobo. It runs TrueNAS Scale just fine. Once I loaded the data back I then created a 2nd VDEV of the same size and disks as the first. I also run a bunch of other stuff from this Proxmox server and it runs well. I didn’t like the direction Synology was heading. I have had no problems with them over the years of having two NAS systems from them. They even replaced the mobo on my first as it somehow died. But I like the control I have now and would not go back.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      54. Terra-Master is anything but locked in, IMHO. It’s not the highest quality casing, but it’s a standard PC and they run Unraid just fine, even within warranty. With Unraid you get a working real-time RAID system built on top of standard file systems and, if you stay away from their own Docker implementation and run Portainer as your Docker manager you’ve got compact, decent hardware and freedom in terms of your containers and your data.

        I’m not arguing against BYO, just saying it’s hard to get something as compact, as power-lean and as “acceptable by your partner” as a small Terra-Master box.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      55. Whereas I can image that turnkey is appealing, if you really want control over how and where you store your data, BYO is the way to go. And honestly, if you can install Windows, you can install TrueNAS. It’s not really rocketscience.

        Putting the hardware together can be a challenge but there are plenty of tutorials online. If you are not afraid to dive in, I bet you are done with the hardware part within an hour and move on to the software part.

        Also, a lot of those turnkey appliances are chonically underpowered in terms of CPU performance. With BYO YOU can decide what you put in. Do you want to run containers? Aim a bit higher with your hardware. And regarding apps, look at the apps section from TrueNAS. It will get you quite far.

        So, I come to a different conclusion; unless you really do not want to spend time on the hardware part and just want the ‘service’ as quick as possible, go with the of-the-shelf brands. But if you value where you invest your money and you are not afraid to get your hands a little dirty, build-your-own is the way to go nowadays.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      56. The issue would be you can’t get free m365/gws backup anywhere else. I still think if Synology enters the space they will beat Synology if they include those licenses and they already beat them on hardware and entry level sufficiency
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      57. In the past I’ve built like really big storage systems as my job, based on Nexenta Solaris ZFS running on Dell hardware.
        Yet, at home is it different, one of the main reasons I’m using Synology (DS1621+, DS916+ and dedicated NVA 1622) is that power usage is so much lower compared to DIY.
        Maybe one day I might just be building me a nice Truenas system.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      58. If you are not familiar with DIY, or don’t want to dive into the rabbit hole, it’s OK to buy a pre-build NAS and install the OS your want.

        If you want to DIY NAS, just one suggestion, don’t think too much on how to build my NAS, just think it like DIY a basic PC, then consider what you you need, like how many disk, how powerful it would be, you don’t have to use a special case or ITX mobo.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      59. For me I prefer to build because I get exactly what I want from a performance perspective. But for friends I’ve been recommending Terramaster and then I help them setup unRAID on it. That means all the difficult parts are done and I can even help them remotely using screen sharing for the software configuration.

        And my friends (I’ve helped 2 now do the terramaster thing) like two things about these systems, they have a lot of slots (both bought 12-bay units), they’re affordable when it comes to the price per slot and they get an Intel chip to do Plex transcoding. I don’t have any attachment to Terramaster as a brand I just think right now they have good options. If some of these other NAS brands decided to let you boot whatever OS you want and added more slots at a reasonable price I’d recommend them too.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      60. I’m in the pre-built NAS camp. I’m currently running a six and a half year old QNAP TS-1277 with six 10TB NAS drives in it along with four 500GB 2.5″ SSD’s that I use for my Plex and Channels DVR systems, and for sharing data and backing up the desktops and laptops on my home network.

        Prior to getting the TS-1277, I tried the DIY route, but kept coming up with hardware compatibility issues with the OS, and the lack of a user friendly OS that didn’t require a lot of babysitting, caused ne to look at QNAP. What I like about QNAP is I go into the OS once or twice a month to check on updates, and the system notifies me of problems.

        That leads me to today. In the past few months, I’ve had two of the six 10TB drives start to fail so I decided to do an upgrade to my NAS. I looked at DYI again, but decided to bite the bullet and stay with QNAP. For this system, I wanted to go all solid state in an effort to reduce some of the heat and noise the TS-1277 produces. When the TS-h1277afx, with all of the new SSD’s installed in it is fired up, you can barely hear it.

        I recently purchased the QNAP TS-h1277 which can handle twelve 2.5″ SSD’s. Because I have almost 20TB of data on the current NAS, I’ve installed twelve 4TB 2.5″ SSD’s in the unit. When is ordered the drives, I ordered three drives at a time and different times in hopes of getting drives from different manufacturing batches. Also ordered a 10GB network adapter to install in the old TS-1277 so I can connect it to a 10G switch that that is on my network. Both NAS devices will connect to the 10G switch and will help speed up the transfer of the data and settings from the old NAS to the new NAS using QNAP’s HBS 3 app.

        Currently prepping both NAS devices so once I receive the new network adapter (UPS is taking it on a tour of the US), I’ll start the transfer process.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      61. The challenge of DIY NAS please help with is motherboards have a variety of pcie channels with different but similar connectors? The advantage is huge that I can start at any size and add in any way, using everything from m.2 to ssd to large capacity hard drives. Can use a small case I already have and just get a bigger one or jbod for big drives or mini m.2 setup. But channels??? A 25 years old atx case with dust still fits atx boards off ebay or new and holds tons of drives. Turnkey obsolescence – Ifw have 5 hot swap hard drives and want to replace with SSDs =junk.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      62. I have been utilizing an Asustor at my company for years. As our data volume increased, the EZ Sync just ended up not being able to operate properly, some computers would sync, some would not, remote sync became sporadic. I recently built a self-NAS solution using an Intel NUC we had laying around, with a Sabrent 5 bay docking station. Using ZFS Raid and 5 2TB Barracudas, loaded the NUC with Proxmox, installed Nextcloud, and setup a clouflare tunnel to the unit. We couldnt be happier. Once we have 3 months under our belt without any issues, I am going to basically convert our Asustor unit to this setup as well and utilize it as a remote backup to our new setup. We didnt really use any apps on the Asustor, but if we ever want to, we can just install an instance of TrueNAS or something similar. The whole Proxmox approach is incredible for our application, and find myself researching new ideas i have for other environments to add to the proxmox setup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      63. My concern is getting a case that doesn’t suck (e.g. Too cramped, poor airflow, flex PSUS) and that doesn’t take too much space.
        Then there is the psychological perception of a small cube being a NAS vs a mini tower being a server… ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      64. I love to see a pcpartpicker style comparison between a DIY NAS and turnkey. I wonder if, beyond 4 bays, the % difference in savings makes DIY less appealing. For instance, an 8 bay system with a i3 or i5 with 20 or 24 TB HDDs. The savings in terms of money might only be like .. 2 to 5%
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      65. Never bought a NAS, always to expensive and pretty slow internals.
        I run OMV on a DIY JBOD NAS, just setting up a backup server with an external USB, on bare debian, but not everyone has the knowledge.

        Now there are so many opensource and free os’s, for the home user DIY is the way to go.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      66. So Terramaster gave absolutely NO response to security incidents aside from “we’ll look into it”, and that was months ago. Yes, it’s time to build your own NAS, or at least, get one you can install your own OS on instead of their stuff.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      67. I’d love to build my own NAS in the interest of re-using old equipment to reduce e-waste (and because I loathe overpriced proprietary systems), but sadly, there is a dearth of good case options, especially for m-atx.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      68. I get the attraction of DIY but nowadays I just don’t want to spend the time needed to investigate the right hardware and software, collecting it, setting it up and maintaining it. It is always going to take more time and I no longer want to spend that time if I don’t have to.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      69. Most of the turnkey NAS es are underpowered and overpriced to begin with. You are paying mostly for the support and software which with few exceptions(Qnap and Synology which granted had a long time to polish it)) still feels like a beta version. on pretty much all the new players (Terramaster, UGreen etc) For most people are ok but still overpriced and like you said you are very limited in terms of upgrade and expansions. The options for DYI are now now far more than they were years back. If you add to that the OSes that keep on popping up I don’t see any reason why a person with decent PC building skills wouldn’t build a NAS.Or just ask your more savvy friend to build and install the OS. But also like you said the learning curve deters people to go this way but on the long run the skills acquired in the process will be very useful. But to each his own, some look at this and think it’s some sort of sorcery for which they do not have the patience nor the knowledge to tackle and prefer to buy a prebuilt solution, some are more technically inclined and would love to tinker with the hardware and the software. Now we have a lot of options for sure ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      70. I am ditching my synology platform because of the locked in hard drive. I have a U3, 3d printed case with hot swapping hard drive bays. I have 10gig and 1 gig internet ports. I am currently making a clone of my system to place at another location so I can have a safe backup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      71. Hahaha, got you… Kraftwerk we are the robots.
        Awesome video, thanks. Our office has an older computer that will be turned into a NAS after the new one arrives. Your video his helpful for us to choose its system.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      72. Though I think it might be fun to build a DIY NAS, it seems like most of the cases are huge when compared to Synology, Ugreen, and others in the turnkey category. I like the idea of buying from Ugreen or Minisforum because you get the ability to install the OS of your choice, but still get a hardware platform that doesn’t make you feel like you’re using a full-blown PC as your NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      73. The general advice I have is: are you suggesting a build to a family member or a business? Then go turnkey every time. Remember, if you build it and they break it, guess what, you’re on the hook for fixing it. It’s much better for your own sanity and reputation if you can hand over a problem to a vendor who knows their product stack really well.
        If it’s for yourself, consider if you like spending your weekend away somewhere or troubleshooting an issue. If it’s the latter, then DIY is for you. In the world of DIY, there’s probably very few who have the exact same configuration as you for the motherboard, cpu, memory, SSD/HDD, OS, containers, app versions, or who followed the same guide online to set up your services.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      74. These proprietary systems are so expensive and lack the flexibility, so I bought a secondhand Hp elitedesk, stuck a Nvme and 2 hard drives in it and added ZimaOS and Jellyfin, never done it before, a couple of hiccups but ZimaOS was so simple and Jellyfin gives me a basic system to load up my dvd discs. Happy days.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      75. Trolling so hard you found a 05 tray on a 4-bay NAS. I think HexOS is mostly selling itself on future promises, mostly buddy backups. I think the only reason anyone pays $200 now is cause they don’t want to pay $300 when it’s actually ready.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      76. I started cheap building my first NAS myself while learning to homelab… then I outgrew this and wanted a second NAS for backing up the first one, but needed something efficient, so I got a Ugreen 4800 plus during their kickstart. Can’t be happier (after I installed TrueNAS, ofc)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      77. I got my ugreen dxp 8800 plus it’s my first nas and I got to thank you for this. Your video gave me alot of confidence sinking this much money and I love it every single bit. Overkill yea but having the performaces is so nice to have
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      78. Ditching Synology would only be fair, as they themselves ditched everyone who doesn’t either have the most basic or a high-end use case.
        Unfortunately, Synology is not able/willing to openly communicate (or admit) that they apparently don’t care about enthusiasts/homelab’ers/prosumers and even small businesses anymore
        Not only in the NAS space, the Wi-Fi router line is pretty much abandoned as well.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      79. Recently installed this board (N355) to run as home NAS and container host under Proxmox. Initially thought to use TrueNAS Scale with pass-through PCI-e controllers, but ended up with running ZFS under Proxmox directly and just sharing it over Samba/NFS under Turnkey Fileserver in LXC.
        Setup is 48GB RAM, 2x 2TB Samsung 990 (ZFS mirror for boot/containers/VMs), 7x 8TB WD Red (RAIDz2 pool for shared storage), 1x 2TB Samsung 870 Evo (ext4 for temporary storage of data that can be lost), 10Gbe ethernet controller at 2.5Gbe to the switch.
        RAIDz2 pool runs at around 800-1000MB/s, even though it is slightly limited by 4 SATA ports per 1×3 PCI-e lane, drives are only tiny bit faster, so not much is lost at all. NVMe drives are severely limited by PCI-e lanes, but for this use it is not an issue.
        The negatives:
        – power consumption at idle is quite high, at around 35W for the board with NVMe drives only (and around 70-80W with 7 HDDs) – all the power management settings are missing in BIOS, so there is not much you can tune;
        – board came without manual and it was not available on the site listed on the “warranty” card – took a while to find one on web just to figure out pinout for front panel connectors;
        – rear USB3 port was causing random crashes under Proxmox with external HDD attached and performing intensive file transfers – this could be hardware or linux driver compatibility issue; when doing slower transfers (using USB flash drive during Proxmox installation etc) it worked;
        – proprietary CPU heat-sink and fan is just silly, should have used a heat-sink that accepts standard 80mm fans. Only reason I can think of for such heat-sink is if they are primarily producing these for some off the shelf NAS that has board height restrictions;
        – perhaps some of the BIOS setting issues are fixed in a new BIOS, but the update is not published on manufacturers site (just like documentation) and installing BIOS update from some random google drive that web search has found seems acceptable risk only if you have BIOS chip programmer at hand to read and save backup before flashing and then can restore it if update bricks it.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      80. Remember folks, all this bickering about controller speed is a moot point when your network speed is the limiting factor. How are you gonna reach the speed limit if your network’s own speed limit capped you long before you got there?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      81. no buy – had already 2 cwwk boards with a similar styled onboard cpu cooler / fan combo – horrible – around 1 year 24/7 use they get loud, and 2 month after that they fail. could not find a replacement from cwwk so i ripped out the old fans and replaced both fans with noctua 40×40 …. with 3d printed holders…. pathetic coolerfans – sorry – give this board with a proper itx cooler socket and it would be in instant upgrade buy for me – thank you –
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      82. I came across a board that looked just like this on Amazon from a brand named “oaknode”. No reviews or anything. Seems too good to be true! Really hard to find a mini-itx board that has everything I need but this board has everything I need and is half the price with less features of what I could build from consumer grade parts.. Just worry about the dice roll, even on $200.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      83. Great video!

        One question:

        I currently want to upgrade my old unraid server.

        After your video I’m not sure what to do xD.

        Either the board from the video or a build with a Core Ultra 5 225 and 32gb ram, without 10gbe only 2,5gbe( Cost different is 100 euro)

        Which of the two options would you recommend?

        I have 8 sata drives, vm’s and use Plex (also for transcode).

        My current system is an i5 6500 with a rtx3050 and consumes 30 watts in idle.
        The rtx ist only for transcode (plex)

        Thanks to you!

        🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      84. I only need file protection, and media server for my home. Don’t have the room for making basically another PC sitting in a corner. It’s been a rabbit hole researching, mini x86 PC’s, 4-8 NVME, connections to SATA drives, (facepalm). Need more vids on how to make basic use systems. Saw the unifydrive up6 coming soon. Size, portability, efficiency, looking very good.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      85. Hey man, great run through but for power draw you need to make sure you do your best.. CPU C-states was disabled in Bios and it seems like most ASPM features also were disabled. This shows everytime you were doing lcpci, all devices ASPM are disabled. You will never get proper draw… if all devices support it you could hit sub 12W idle even with drives connected
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      86. When you make a review video on 1240 MITX NAS Board which is teased at 1:25, Can you include the information about its PCIe slot like bifurcation support?
        It would be really helpful information if we want to add two NVME ssd in that slot
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      87. just got mine (topton) but similar to your board. i plan to put my two google coral tpu’s into the nvme slots. they run at x1 anyways. then run software raid0 ssds with proxmox – pfsense, home assistant, frigate nvr, rtl_fm, rtl_433, serial GPS for NTP time server, and tp link omada software controller. i read 32 gig modules work on this board, so I’ll be trying a 32 gig crucial brand module. pfsense doesn’t support the 10gbe chip, but everything else does.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      88. I will never understand why so many boards, for NAS or desktop use, just ad the 10GbE-NIC to 1-2 2.GbE-NICs. It makes no sense, the 10GbE-NIC supports 2.5GbE, too, and with just on NIC you are faster than 2*2.5GbE.
        Save the lanes for faster connection of ASM1164 or M.2 or the PCIe-slot or a second AQC113.

        I also don’t understand why the use 2*ASM1164, but each is only connected with Gen3x1. ASM1064 would do that, too, ASM1164 is specifically to connect to Gen3x2. Gen3x1 is to slow for even 4 modern 2.5″-HDDs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      89. The throughput on any given network port indicates the maximum speed in transmission OR reception. Therefore is perfectly normal to allocate 20gbit to a 10gbit network port to achieve full duplex.

        The same applies to those cheap switches on the market: the chipset can handle 60gbit concurrent (full duplex) TX/RX and the number of available ports combinations reflects that.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      90. Where can I find the exchange rate for the Niccah? Looks like a good price though in anyone’s money. But there always seems to be a performance bottleneck. You praise them for dedicating two lanes to the 10GbE, but then they limit each of the M.2s to one lane, so you cannot saturate the network from one SSD even though the raw performance of even the lowest spec SSD is likely to be more than sufficient. And why is Intel dragging its heals shipping PCIe 3 on its latest chips? The SSD industry is already on PCIe 4 or even 5! Each generation DOUBLES the speed per lane so if you are restricted on lane budget a generation bump is an inexpensive way to get the same benefit!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      91. Thats maybe my next nas.

        Can my understanding of 4 drives correct. Effectevly 4 hdd on 4 sata connections can fully utilise one sata3 (600mb) connection?

        Is there any more info about these extention cards? They convert, effectervly, 4 sata connections to 6 drives?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      92. It would be great if you need a basic NAS, basic I mean you don’t use this beyond basic disk and file mangement, just install a truenas or unraid, use other more powerful homelab machine(like a mac mini) to run any other services
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      93. I’d love to see you take one of those beelink nvme nas systems that’s been going round YouTube lately, but fit it out with multi-gig Ethernet m2 adapters, sas m2 adapters, etc

        I’d love to see someone take it all the way❤
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      94. After rebuilding my Unraid server three times over the last 14 years, I HIGHLY recommend using server level motherboards for your home NAS servers. Once you have a BMC, IPMI, fan control, all enabling you to run a headless server, you’ll never go back to consumer level boards. At least for Unraid, you don’t have to have the latest/greatest hardware. I just “upgraded” my Unraid server about a year ago with a used Supermicro board from Ebay that came with the processor for about 100.00. An Intel Xeon with 32 cores and I’ve put 128GB of DDR4 ECC ram in it. It came with 10 SATA ports on the board and I’ve added a card for support for up to 25 HDD. I put an add-on card in it to run NVMe drives. I also added a dual port SFP+ card and have dual DAC cables running to my aggregation switch, bonded.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      95. I had a look at these types of boards for a while but could not pull the trigger. Too many questions around warranty, bios quality/updates and hardware reliability. I ended up going with an 13-14100 and gigabyte itx mb which ended up being cheaper than a cwwk n305 solution. The i3 is far more capable and the gigiabyte mb is reliable and with some C state settings it should reduce to a reasonable power level at idle. I also looked at an i5-12450H solution which was very tempting but there was still a ? over the mb. For the most part, my NAS does not do much at all except for running a couple of VM’s so the i3 will do that without issue.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      96. Not enough PCIe lanes on the N150. 9 Gen 3 Lanes rae just atrocious.
        Build this around a good platform e.g. AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (16 Gen 4 Lanes, supports ECC RAM) and you have a winner.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      97. Brilliant coverage, thanks!

        As an additional media test, might I suggest a *direct* playback of a ‘high bitrate’ MKV? … Perhaps in Kodi? Perhaps in CoreELEC, specifically? Perhaps running on a Ugoos AM6b+ ? ????

        ( _only getting so specific because it’s largely being touted as the pinnacle of playback for media, currently … most specifically – on the right version – allowing FEL / MEL playback of Dolby Vision content_ ???? )

        ( _obviously not expecting this comment to be read, or the addition of the test to be considered … but hopefully it’s just let you know of a good media playback device for your personal times!_ )
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      98. Can you try running Powertop and check what C-state you can get to? It should be able to lower the power consumption during idle (most of the time on a server) dramatically.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      99. I am looking for something to replace my Zimablade (N3450) and a Raspberry Pi 4. This board might be what I am looking for.
        Now I just need a compact case with good ventilation for at least 6 HDDs.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      100. One thing that isn’t super clear about all these CWWK and Topton combo mobos is whether any of them have socketed / removable CPUs. I assume not. That feels like a deal-breaker, though I guess the whole thing is cheaper than a retail replacement socketed CPU alone.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      101. Perfect for DIY NAS, I’ll probably buy one
        Not it for media server with the anemic media controller, of the N category of cpus, though. Buyer beware of what they’re looking for.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      102. Unfortunately, the lack of at least PCIe x4 and only one Multi-Format Codec Engine, which Intel “tactfully” keeps silent about on its website, makes all DIY boards based on N-series processors half-meaningless for media servers like PLEX or Jellyfin.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      103. So the good news is:
        10 GbE port isn’t limited by a single 1x lane, but actually gets a 2x so the Ethernet controller is the bottleneck. (here I honestly wish Ethernet controllers had a second port or two just so we can utilize this bandwidth. A 10 + 5 would be ideal for 2x PCIe v3, or 1x PCIe v4)

        The downside is:
        6×6 Gb/s SATA being limited by 1x PCIe. I would more than happily throw away the second M.2 slot for the sata controller to have 2 lanes so it can keep up with the Ethernet.

        Except No I wouldn’t want one less M.2 port, since what I actually plan on doing when my own board shows up in the mail is add in an M.2 pcie to 6x SATA (for an example with the ASM1166), then I can split my drives into two groups such that a software RAID 5/6 won’t be limited by 1x PCIe. And thereby perhaps be able to saturate the 10 GbE connection. (since why not use all of it?)

        I can’t wait for the future when we have systems like this but with just a couple more PCIe lanes for us to work with.
        I want more lanes, not faster ones, since 12 PCIe v3 lanes is superior to 9 PCIe v4 lanes. Take this board for an example, 2 PCIe lanes are wasted to get 2x 2.5 Gb/s Ethernet, that could have been 1 lane if the Ethernet controller had 2 ports. Or better yet as already stated, been on the same controller as the 10 GbE controller since 2x 8 Gb/s of PCIe has room for it. Though that do require such network controllers to be on the market, which isn’t the case sadly… So we will inevitably waste PCIe lanes, so better waste v3 lanes and have more of them, than have fewer v4 lanes in total for us to waste. (though a compromise of 6x v3 + 4x v4 is also appealing.)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      104. Ordered my board last week, it should arrive next monday. I did notice that they revisited the board with the N100, now its only available in N150 since last week. The N305 stayed the same.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      105. I have N305 mobo in my homelab and I can say that it is a bummer. It could just randomly hang producing no any logs or clues why. It happened more than 10 times so far. I would rather buy some well known brand product instead of this chinese custom shop.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      106. I have the cwwk version of this board with 4 x Intel i226V 2.5Gbs ports, and I can’t get it below 50w at idle using TrueNAS scale and all my hdd spun down. Any help appreciated.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      107. 视频非常好! 我的OKX钱包里有USDT,并且我有恢复短语. 「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」 我该如何将它们转移到Binance?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      108. I also bought from Aliexpress and threw my money away, for those who are thinking about buying, believe me it’s better to look for another brand, I bought it and threw my money away!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      109. Great review. Sadly the idle is a dealer breaker. Perhaps if we keep saying this the manufacturers will change the sata controller.

        Some have hacked the bios and got higher c-states.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      110. I have this board in use, it’s pretty good. best price-performance ratio I could find (for my needs).
        But be careful, the installed fan seems to get louder from month to month.
        the only thing I would wish for would be a usb 3.0 port (19 pin) on the board.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      111. Debating on this board for an offsite backup. I picked up a supermicro itx xeon-d board to replace my onsite server. Curious how long it would take to transfer all 40tb of data to a board like this. Probably take quite awhile especially since I use unraid….
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      112. I’ll pay the premium for a NAS from a reputable vendor because I simply don’t want to be responsible for patching and maintaining the software. The cost for me is offset by time and that’s why I continue to use brand name NAS products. This is awesome if you’re budget conscious and a great option for most if you’re willing to tinker.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      113. At the 1:50 minute mark you stated “but it’s on die ECC” mean? More specially, the word “die”?

        Full statement at 1:50:
        “DDR5 has ECC it technically does but it’s on die ECC is not the same as ECC the way it does the correction all the way through and die hard particularly Flash users do care for the difference there so the lack of ECC is going to bother some users”
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      114. The usb 20 gbps is a messed up thing overall. The exact name is usb 3.2 gen 2×2. Emphasis on x2. It requires an exactly similar device to utilise the second set of pathways to hit that speed. Thunderbolt and usb4 don’t use that configuration and hence only use one set of connection which limits it to 10 gbps.
        TLDR: you need a device that explicitly says usb 3.2 gen2x2 to connect to that port and hit full speed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      115. Thank you so much for your ongoing commitment to the community around DIY NAS (and everything else) – your passion for what you do is contagious, and highly entertaining – good stuff, keep it coming, and f*ck those seagulls! 😀
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      116. Seems pretty disappointing – 28W idle power consumption? My *ancient* i5-3550 server with a SATA SSD and two NVMe sticks semi-idles around 35W (light amount of data from a Home Assistant Yellow constantly flowing to postgres on the server, a cloudflare tunnel etc. when it’s not actively doing other stuff). And the PCIe lanes for the NVMe on the MW-N305-NAS is just… well, this is 2024, it’s disappointing even for a cheap low-end system IMHO.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      117. Link is for N100 motherboard, not N305. And it is still too much. For 350 euros in europe you can assemble full NAS with case, i3 14100 with integrated intel HD730 GPU which is a beast transcoding gpu, and 32GB ram in dual channel, and that is with SSD for boot drive.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      118. Idk what they are doing here….But I have a 8700G with an Asrock B650M PG lightening….64 gigs of ddr5 and 8 hard drives with a PCIe SATA card and 3 NVMe SSDs. My idle power consumption is 20/30W max with 3 VMs on
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      119. great board, great video, but….

        the german “translation” of the description is total crap. Please just show the original english one.
        The translated one has no relevance for the video or product
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      120. I’m gathering parts to build my first DIY NAS, I did have the n100 version of this in my cart but I changed my mind. Should I hang on for the new n355 and n150 crop of motherboards to come out? I’m not in any rush. I’m hoping for a low power draw but with a little performance.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      121. After I get more Christmas spending money, I plan to get a Mini-ITX to replace my router host. Is it worth the $60~$100 to get this over an N100 with 4x 2.5Gbps ports? My initial plan is just to run pfSense in Proxmox, but maybe I’ll move my NAS there too ????????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      122. These little Alder Lake N CPUs are pretty starved of PCIe lanes. 9 Lanes ain’t much. I would have sacrificed a M.2 slot to add another lane to the JMB585. To give those those HDD a more room to breath.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      123. I have this board (minus the 10GB NIC) and it is running Xpenology in an N2 case. Wonderful, perfect for what I wanted/needed. Get it before tariffs hit. I use the MicroSD card to load ArcLoader for Xpenology.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      124. You do a great job within this product space, keep it going. I would love to see you improve the video quality though. It looks very compressed / recorded with low bitrate and the highlights are compressed.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      125. Another Chinese crap’y board without quality control with random defects and no support. He’ll thank you. It’s only just a curiosity for a few people who know how to deal with defective equipment.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      126. 28 watts idle with the disk powered down is way too much. Powered down HDDs consume very little, which means the other items on this board are very power hungry. A laptop with 1 NVME and in idle uses as less than 5 watts.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      127. copper rj45 10gbit is worth to me less than 2.5gbit ports 🙁
        I was convinced by people that sfp+ is the way to go, its a nas,it would be near switch in most cases, cheap DAC cables…
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      128. Those combos are insanely affordable. For a price of an underpowered off-the-shelf diskless device without integrated GPU you can build a beast NAS which can everything you want including transcoding. DIY reality
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      129. So if you want to put in 2 nvme drives what would be the best perf/price SSD to choose ? seems overkill to use like 2 Samsung 990 Pro gen4 drives even with utilizing the 10Gbe port
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      130. Ahhhhh, you had to make this video today. lol. I just picked up an Aoostar R1 for $199. It literally came in the mail today. But I don’t need the extra horsepower of the N305 atm, but still cool to have those nics and extra sata ports. I needed a small nas setup either way. Raid 1 and done.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE