compare

nasfinderheader

GENERAL NAS FEATURE COMPARISON

NAS Plex (local 4K) Plex HD (remote) Plex 4K (remote) BACKUP (MS/GOOGLE OFFICE) BACKUP (BAREBONE) PHOTOS (OBJECT AI) VIDEO EDITING (4K) VIDEO EDITING (8K) DOCKER VIRTUAL MACHINES PC MODE (QVM) 2.5GbE 10GbE 25GbE Thunderbolt NVMe Pcie Expansion HDMI Drive Mixing
TVS-h874 โœ“ โœ“ โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“
TVS-675 โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“
TS-673A โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โ“˜โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜
TVS-672XT โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โœ“โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“โœ“
TS-h886 โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“
TS-873 โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜
TS-673 โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜
DS2422+ โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“
RS2821RP+ โœ“ - -โœ“โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โ“˜โ“˜โœ“โœ“โœ“

LATEST PRICE LIST

TVS-h874
TVS-6751049 USD
TS-673A
TVS-672XT
TS-h886
TS-873
TS-673
DS2422+
RS2821RP+

BEST FOR Virtualisation

NAS CPU Cores Threads Speed (GHz) Docker/VM Score ECC
TVS-h874 Intelยฎ Coreโ„ข i5-12400 6-core/12-thread Processor, ... 6 12 2.5 (MAX:4.4) Docker/VM 19495 NO /32 GB DDR4 SODIMM (2 x 16 GB)
TVS-675 ZhaoXin KX-U6580 8-core 2.5GHz processor 8 8 2.5 Docker/VM 3227 NO /8 GB DDR4 SODIMM DDR4 (1 x 8 GB)
TS-673A AMD Ryzenโ„ข Embedded V1500B quad-core 2.2 GHz proce... 4 8 2.2 Docker/VM 4584 NO /8 GB DDR4 SO-DIMM DDR4 (1 x 8 GB)
TVS-672XT Intelยฎ Coreโ„ข i3-8100T 4-core 3.1 GHz Processor 4 4 3.1 Docker/VM 5327 NO /8 GB SODIMM DDR4 (2 x 4 GB)
TS-h886 Intelยฎ Xeonยฎ D-1622 quad-core 2.6 GHz processor (b... 4 8 2.6 (MAX:3.2) Docker/VM 6205 ECC /16 GB UDIMM DDR4 ECC (2 x 8 GB)
TS-873 AMD R-Series RX-421ND quad-core 2.1 GHz processor ... 4 4 2.1 (MAX:3.4) Docker/VM 3575 NO /4 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 (2 x 2 GB)
TS-673 AMD R-Series RX-421ND quad-core 2.1 GHz processor ... 4 4 2.1 (MAX:3.4) Docker/VM 3575 NO /4 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 (2 x 2 GB)
DS2422+ AMD Ryzen V1500B 4 8 2.2 Docker/VM 4584 ECC /4 GB DDR4 ECC SODIMM
RS2821RP+ AMD Ryzen V1500B 4 8 2.2 Docker/VM 4584 ECC /4 GB DDR4 ECC UDIMM

BEST FOR MULTIMEDIA

NAS GPU Base_GHz/Max Codec FPS Transcoding Plex
TVS-h874 Intel UHD Graphics 730 300/1.4 H.264 60 4320 4320p
TVS-675 / 0 720p
TS-673A / 0 1080p
TVS-672XT Intelยฎ UHD Graphics 630 350/1.1 H.264 60 2160 1080p
TS-h886 / 0 1080p
TS-873 / 0 720p
TS-673 / 0 720p
DS2422+ / 0 1080p
RS2821RP+ / 0 1080p

BEST FOR FILE STORAGE

NAS BAYS Bandwidth HDD storage expansion Drive mixing File System
TVS-h874 8 HDD 5Gbit (2 ports combined) 176TB โœ“ ZFS/EXT4
TVS-675 6 HDD 5Gbit (2 ports combined) 132TB โœ“ EXT4
TS-673A 6 HDD 5Gbit (2 ports combined) 132TB โœ“ EXT4
TVS-672XT 6 HDD 12Gbit (3 ports combined) 132TB โœ“ EXT4
TS-h886 6 HDD 10Gbit (4 ports combined) 132TB โœ“ ZFS/EXT4
TS-873 8 HDD 4Gbit (4 ports combined) 176TB โœ“ EXT4
TS-673 6 HDD 4Gbit (4 ports combined) 132TB โœ“ EXT4
DS2422+ 12 HDD 4Gbit (4 ports combined) 264TB โœ“ โœ“ EXT4 BTRFS
RS2821RP+ 16 HDD 4Gbit (4 ports combined) 352TB โœ“ โœ“ EXT4 BTRFS

*All NAS support multiple RAID/ volume groups, if you want to mix different size drive on non supported model.

BEST FOR BACKUP

NAS Level HA AI Google Microsoft encryption
TVS-h874 folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TVS-675 folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TS-673A folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TVS-672XT folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TS-h886 folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TS-873 folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
TS-673 folder face โœ“ โœ“ HDD/volume /folder
DS2422+ folder/barebone โœ“ face+object โœ“ โœ“ volume/folder
RS2821RP+ folder/barebone โœ“ face+object โœ“ โœ“ volume/folder

BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING

NAS MAX LAN speed Ports transcoding PCIe NVMe
TVS-h874 2.5Gbit โœ“ Slot 1: PCIe Gen 4 x16 (CPU) Slot 2: PCIe Gen 4 x4 (PCH) 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 x4 slots
TVS-675 2.5Gbit PCIe-Slot =2 Slot 1: PCIe Gen 3 x4 Slot 2: PCIe Gen 3 x4 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 x1 or SATA 6Gb/s slots
TS-673A 2.5Gbit PCIe-Slot =2 Slot 1: PCIe Gen 3 x4 Slot 2: PCIe Gen 3 x4 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen3 x1 slots
TVS-672XT 10Gbit 1X RJ452 (Thunderboltโ„ข 3) โœ“ Slot 1: PCIe Gen 3 x16 (CPU) Slot 2: PCIe Gen 3 x4 (PCH) 2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen3 x2 slots
TS-h886 2.5Gbit Slot 1: PCIe Gen3 x8 Slot 2: PCIe Gen3 x8 2 x M.2 2280/22110 NVMe Gen3 x4 slots
TS-873 1Gbit Slot 1: PCIe Gen 3 x4 Slot 2: PCIe Gen 3 x4 2 x M.2 2280/2260 SATA 6Gb/s slots
TS-673 1Gbit Slot 1: PCIe Gen 3 x4 Slot 2: PCIe Gen 3 x4 2 x M.2 2280/2260 SATA 6Gb/s slots
DS2422+ 1Gbit 1 x Gen3 x4
RS2821RP+ 1Gbit 1 x Gen3 x4

BEST FOR SURVEILLANCE (CCTV)

NAS HDMI QVM transcoding AI
TVS-h874 1, HDMIโ„ข 1.4b (up to 4096 x 2160 @ 30Hz) โœ“ โœ“ โœ“
TVS-675 1, HDMIโ„ข 2.0 (up to 3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz) โœ“ โœ“
TS-673A pcie โœ“ โœ“
TVS-672XT 1, HDMIโ„ข 2.0 (up to 3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz) โœ“ โœ“ โœ“
TS-h886 โœ“
TS-873 pcie โœ“ โœ“
TS-673 pcie โœ“ โœ“
DS2422+
RS2821RP+

BEST FOR SMART HOME/ AI

NAS Virtual switch Docker/VM HDMI S/PDIF / AUX
TVS-h874 โœ“ Docker/VM 1, HDMIโ„ข 1.4b (up to 4096 x 2160 @ 30Hz)
TVS-675 โœ“ Docker/VM 1, HDMIโ„ข 2.0 (up to 3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz)
TS-673A โœ“ Docker/VM pcie
TVS-672XT โœ“ Docker/VM 1, HDMIโ„ข 2.0 (up to 3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz)
TS-h886 โœ“ Docker/VM
TS-873 โœ“ Docker/VM pcie
TS-673 โœ“ Docker/VM pcie
DS2422+ Docker/VM
RS2821RP+ Docker/VM

LATEST VIDEOS RELATED


AVAILABILITY / RELEASE DATE

Brand Model TW USA UK Released
Qnap TVS-h874 โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2022-09
Qnap TVS-675 โ€ข โ€ข 2021-10
Qnap TS-673A โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2021-02
Qnap TVS-672XT โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2020-07
Qnap TS-h886 โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2020-07
Qnap TS-873 โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2020-07
Qnap TS-673 โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2020-07
Synology DS2422+ โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2021-10
Synology RS2821RP+ โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข 2021-03

LATEST POSTS RELATED


QNAP TVS-h874T Thunderbolt4 NAS Review
QNAP TVS-h874T Thunderbolt4 NAS Review - Editing Perfection?
QNAP Unveils New TVS-h674T and TVS-h874T Thunderbolt NAS
Best TVS-h874T price
Comparing QNAP Short-Depth Rack Mount NAS Models: TS-873AeU-RP, TS-864eU, and TS-855eU
QNAP TVS-h874T4 and TVS-h674T4 Thunderbolt 4 NAS for Autumn 2023
The QNAP TVS-h1288X vs TVS-h874X NAS -ย  Which Should You Buy?
The QNAP TVS-h874 vs TVS-h1288X NAS - Which is Better?
Qnap TVS-h874X NAS with i9 CPU, Gen4 lanes and UHD Graphics 770
QNAP TVS-h874 NAS Review - ULTIMATE Desktop NAS?


RELATED REVIEWS

SOFTWARE - 10/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 8/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.4
PROS
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปHUGE Storage Potential
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปPrioritizes Storage, whilst still providing a good CPU+Memory Server combo
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปFull access to the complete DSM Software Packages & Services
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปLots of upgrade options
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปECC Memory at this storage scale is appreciated, and 3200Mhz rated
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปExcellent ventilation throughout
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปPCIe slot is Gen 3ร—8, so plenty of bandwidth to play with
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปSurprisingly compact for 12 Bays of storage
CONS
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿป1GbE is feeling rather outdated in 2022 and for those futureproofing, seems shortsighted
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปAmbiguity in how the system operates and support when using 3rd party media
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปLiving in the shadow a bit of the enterprise DS3622xs+ NAS

SOFTWARE - 9/10
HARDWARE - 8/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 7/10
VALUE - 8/10


8.0
PROS
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปRyzen Powered Solution
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปMassive Scale Synology System at ยฃ3k
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปPCIe Gen 3 x8 PCIe Equipped
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปGreat RAID Options (inc SHR)
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปExcellent choice of Apps
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปDDR4 ECC Memory up to 32GB (UDIMM, not SODIMM too)
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปNumerous Backup Software Options
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปHuge Virtualization Support
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป3yr Warranty and Extendable to 5yrs
CONS
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿป1Gbe Ports seem a bit limited now
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿป4GB Memory by default seems a bit small
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปSynology Hard Drive Exclusivity is still an Opinion Splitter!
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปNVMe SSDs Ports not available, unlike desktop alternatives and requires a PCIe Upgrade Card

SOFTWARE - 8/10
HARDWARE - 10/10
PERFORMANCE - 10/10
PRICE - 8/10
VALUE - 9/10


9.0
PROS
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปFirst Commercial Intel Core 12th Gen i5, i7 and i9 NAS Drive
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปUpto 20 Cores, 24 Threads and High End Integrated Graphics
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปPCIe Gen 4 x16 Upgrade Slot for 10/25/100GbE Cards and 2x PCIe Gen 4 x4 M.2 NVMe Slots for 7GB SSDs
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปNo Obstinant 3rd Party Hardware Limitations on Support or Compatibility
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปMuch larger support of 3rd Party Software Services than most other NAS Brands
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป10Gb/s USB Connectivity, in Type A and Type C
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปUpto 64GB of Memory and Potential for 128GB
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปZFS or EXT 4 File System Choice
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปM.2 NVMe SSD Bays can be used for Storage or Caching
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปVolume Encryption, SED SSD Support and WORM
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปEnhanced AI Surveillance Services, with opt to upgrade with $30 Google TPU
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปAI Photo Management Tool (QuMagie) Includes Thing Recognition and works offline
๐Ÿ‘๐ŸปALL the ZFS Benefits, whilst also the GUI and App benefits of a Linux Software Platform in one
CONS
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปAvailable Versions/Configs of the 4/6/8-Bay are confusing
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปQVR Elite (not QVR Pro) only has 2 Cam Licences
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปHDMI Output is 1.4b
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿป10Gbe is ONLY included with the most expensive Intel i9 Model
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปNoisy when in operation when fully populated
๐Ÿ‘Ž๐ŸปToo Many licenses on Enterprise Tools (Drive Analyzer, Face Tiger, etc) with too few free licenses

In terms of these two brands, there is been a long-running theme all the way through that Synology has focused on FIRST-PARTY (i.e. Synology-brand) software and hardware priority, then supporting THIRD-PARTY services/hardware when they havenโ€™t got a viable alternative in-house โ€“ to mixed degrees of popularity. Whereas QNAP has been a much more level playing field where they have released their own innovative hardware/software (occasionally a little too quickly) and singing its praises, but also tried to keep customization and flexibility for 3rd parties as open as possible and shouting loud-and-proud about that too โ€“ which can be a tad overwhelming for the less tech-savvy. Both brands have done an incredible job evolve their platforms as much as they have to date, especially when Microsoft, Google and Amazon are pouring BILLIONS into the SaaS (and PaaS and IaaS โ€“ Platform and Infrastructure as a Service) in order to create entirely streamable ecosystems for businesses, with NAS brands like Synology and QNAP not only integrating with them but also thriving alongside them as a local/bare-metal failsafe. These are all very lofty ideas and ones that most home or small business users will likely have little time for right now (aside from where NAS fits in with their Google/Office 365 office tools like documents, email and spreadsheets at a pinch) and for those users, who the NAS stands on its own two feet is what is going to matter most. Synology is earning its position in the market as the complete 1st party software and hardware package, with a genuinely groundbreaking range of available services, but still managing to make NAS accessible for all in DSM 6.2/7.0/7.1. That said, the trends we are seeing in those sub-enterprise services that are slowly receding in support of popular 3rd party hardware, software and services, making using a Synology NAS alongside your own existing setup in a frictionless way cannot be ignored and leading some to think Synology is shifting their industry position towards something higher.

QNAP NAS on the other hand, although maybe trying to cover too many bases at once, is still trying to cover as much as it can to appear to their audience. Their support of considerably more 3rd party platforms/software/services, even when they have their own software available, is certainly admirable and aside from rather aggressive pricing on their QVR Pro surveillance platform, are still the better choice for those who want a much more adaptable and customizable platform. Its a pretty understandable fact that most people who buy a NAS will be arriving with an existing collection of software in their daily workflow (Office 365 for docs, Gmail for their email, Plex for their media, Chromebook for their commute, Skype/Whatsapp for their communication, TB3 for their editing, etc) and it has to be said that QNAP keeps a more open platform to adapt a NAS into this mix than Synology โ€“ occasionally less intuitively and not without a little setup-friction, but certainly to more customizable results. Unsurprisingly, I am going to tell you that both Synology and QNAP NAS are good NAS brands and have earned their place at the top of the industry (whilst both making their own respective moves to integrate into the next tier โ€“ ie SaaS providers, Hyperscale environments and Boundless cloud storage), but there is no denying that no one brand has managed to do EVERYTHING to perfection. So, if in double, below is how I would recommend QNAP and Synology NAS to you, for each user case scenario and I hope this guide and my recommendations help you with your next big data storage purchase.

Why Choose Synology NAS?

Better Surveillance Software

More Intuative and User-Friendly Design

EXCELLENT 1st Party Alternative Apps to Existing 3rd Party Tools

(including Synology Chat, Mail, Office, Drive, Calendar and more)

Greater Support/Migration with VMware & Hyper-V

Better Redundant System Options (SHA)

Greater Support on Amazon Home Hardware

Synology Hybrid RAID for flexibility in Media Upgrades

BTRFS on Most systems

Longer Warranty Available on More Systems

First Party SSD and HDDs Available

Typically Quieter Operation

Why Choose QNAP NAS?

Better 1st Party/Hosting Virtual Machines

Better Plex Media Server NAS

More Adaptable and Customizable

Wider Support of Surveillance using AI Recognition

EXCELLENT KVM Support

More Camera Licenses

ZFS or EXT4 File System Choice on many systems now

2.5Gbe Network Interfaces at 1Gbe Cost

Allows NVMe SSD Storage Pools and Volumes

Support of QTier for intelligent Data storage for Access

Greater 1st and 3rd Party Hardware Upgrade Compatibility

(including Graphics Cards, WiFi 6 and Thunderbolt)


LATEST PRICE LIST

TVS-h874
TVS-6751049 USD
TS-673A
TVS-672XT
TS-h886
TS-873
TS-673
DS2422+
RS2821RP+
DEAL WATCH - Is It On Offer Right Now?

QNAP TS-673A 6-Bay AMD Ryzen Quad-Core 2.5GbE NAS with QSW-1105-5T 5-Port 2.5GbE Amazon usa USA 111.5 OFF (WAS 1047) [LINK]
QNAP TS-673A-8G 6 Bay Desktop NAS Enclosure - 8GB RAM, AMD Ryzen Quad-core 2.2 G Amazon UK UK 21.36 OFF (WAS 949) [LINK]
QNAP TS-873A NAS Tower Ethernet/LAN Noir V1500B Amazon UK UK 62.91 OFF (WAS 1262) [LINK]
QNAP TVS-675-8G 6-Bay NAS KX-U6580 Amazon UK UK 24.2 OFF (WAS 1512) [LINK]
Synology Disk Station DS2422+ - NAS server - 12 bays - SATA 3Gb/s - RAID 0, 1, 5 Amazon UK UK 14.23 OFF (WAS 1857) [LINK]
Synology RackStation RS2821RP+ 3U 16-Bay Rackmount NAS for SMB Amazon UK UK 55.68 OFF (WAS 3425) [LINK]

These Offers are Checked Daily

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


Want to follow specific category? ๐Ÿ“ง Subscribe