Google WiFi Mesh Router – Speed and Coverage Test

Testing the Google WiFi Mesh Router System

The stability and connectivity of the internet in your home or office environment is a subject that is becoming an increasing concern (and cause of frustration) in many home and offices around the world. Because we rely so heavily on the internet in our everyday lives, whilst still wanting mobility and ease of access for our mobile and portable devices, the importance of a strong and healthy WiFi signal is of the utmost importance. Though many users will only ever own domestic routers for Wireless coverage that are supplied by their internet service provider (ISPs) included with a contract, these are not really suitable for the kind of coverage that we need. Out of this, many brands have popped up with their own solution and Google WiFi is a fine example. Although many users are not used to actually BUYING a router, the idea of buying multiple routers is an idea that they really want to take some time on. Who can blame them, all the popular Mesh routers from Netgear, Google, TP-Link, Synology and Fritz all make some bold promises about what their device can do? So, I am going to make my way through as many mesh routers for home and business that I can, compare the cost and see how good their coverage is. Today I am focusing on the Google WiFi mesh router and how well it can work in a multi-floor office environment, with 3 routers in a mesh network.

The Google WiFi Router- What is a Mesh Router

There are actually very few physical differences between a regular router and a mesh router, such as the Google WiFi. In Brief, the difference is to do with coverage over a greater area. In the case of any WiFi point, the further you get from the router (or if the distance between you and the router contains physical barriers like walls, furniture, etc), that signal will get weaker and with it, the strength and speed of your internet will decrease. There are many ways around there and till the arrival of the Google WiFi and other mesh devices, you could use a powerline adapter to run internet (network really, but let’s oversimplify) via your mains power to another point in the house and create a new wifi hotspot far away in your house. To learn more about the difference between Powerline adapters and mesh, watch the short video below:

Now, the biggest issue with a wifi powerline adapter is that although your coverage now potentially 2 times bigger, if your device is in an area covered by both WiFi points, your phone, laptop, TV, Tablet etc will often get confused and connecting to one of the other intermittently, or worse sticking attacked to a weaker point as you walk away from it, but not being smart enough to move to the stronger access point. THIS is the whole point of Mesh routers like the Google WiFi and why they were designed. The mesh system uses multiple smaller router points that all have their own WiFi hot spot, but also have an additional node/antenna that is ONLY used to communicate with other wifi points. With this, your connected device is moved between mesh points fats and unnoticed by you or your device. This ensures that you are ALWAYS connected to the strongest wifi point and will ensure your connectivity is uninterrupted. The speed and distance of coverage for the Google WiFi, like many mesh routers, is defined by the number of antennas and the bandwidths supporting your network, so what is the difference between the network and the internet?


The Google WiFi Mesh Router – Understanding the Difference between the Network and the Internet

Those who are new to networking devices will look at Google WiFi and it’s the use of words like ‘network’, ‘internet’ and ‘bandwidth’ and get very confused. It is actually amazingly simple to understand the difference. The Internet is the flow of data OUTSIDE of your home/office/etc. In more basic terms, think of the internet as someone who is calling your house phone. The network is the data that is being sent/received INSIDE your home/office – think of that as an intercom that allows people in a building to communicate. The network is the circle in your home/office that your devices connect onto and that Network is then connected to the internet (via a port in your home/office). That is it! So, when a mesh router promises speeds and coverage, remember that this is just affecting the strength of the connection to the NETWORK and your overall maximum speed is still governed by the internet connection from your internet service provider (general measures in Download and Upload speeds). Bandwidth is the weight of traffic on your network. The bigger the bandwidth, the more devices can use the network (for accessing the internet) as the same time for greater speed. I hope that cleared up the difference between network, the internet and bandwidth, and why this is important when considering the Google WiFi mesh router in your environment.

The Google WiFi Mesh Router- Hardware and Software Specifications

Although the technology behind Mesh routers is still relatively new, the difference in hardware between the Google WiFi and other mesh routers is surprisingly vast. The overall coverage is measures in ‘AC’ and this number is the total of all nodes/routers (once connected) available for all devices, across all frequencies (normally 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz to support new and old devices). This is further supported with a CPU and Memory (like most modern technology) as the device will need software to handle data transactions, assign device priority, maintain security and other more brand specific software tasks in the Google WiFi. The specifications that are relevant to the Google WiFi mesh test are as follows:

Model: Google WiFi

Number of Antennas: 2×2

Bandwidth/Coverage of each Node: AC1200

Frequency Supported: Dual-band 2.4GHz and 5GHz

CPU: Qualcomm IPQ4019, Quad-Core ARM-based CPU – 710MHz per Core

Memory: 512MB RAM and 4GB Flash Memory

Software: ‘Google WiFi’ Mobile Application

Protection: Google Safe Search, Google Home Support, WPA2-PSK

Power Consumption: 15W USB-C Power Adapter

Warranty: 2 Years

More Hardware Specifications at Amazon

The Google WiFi Mesh Router – Test Area

Testing the Google WiFi mesh router is something that is a lot tougher than you might think. For a start, every home or office is different and the larger the area, the more nodes you need. The thicker the walls, the more tactical you need to be with node placement. In order to get a fair test of typical day-to-day coverage offered by Google WiFi, I am using a typical office environment that covers two floors. I have used a combination of WiFi testing tools for a mobile device, as well as filming my movement in real time throughout the test.

I conducted the test in two main parts. The first part was using a single Google WiFi router, set up at the internet access point and then walked around the offices and corridors, to see how this affected the overall coverage and strength of connection to the Google WiFi. Then I set up 3 Google WiFi node points at points approximately 8-10 metres apart (with walls and doors in between), then conducted the same walk through the building. The video detailing this is below, so you can either watch this or you can read through the results a little lower down

The Google WiFi 1 Mesh Router Node Test Results

When conducting the first test using just a single Google WiFi router, without a mesh setup in place, the results were obviously very good when directly next to the router, but the decrease in coverage when I reached the 8 metres (2 walls, 1 door) was clear.

Then I headed to the furthermost point, around 8-9 metres from the Google WiFi and with 4 walls between us to see a big, big drop in coverage – as you would expect.

Then I headed to the kitchen area, which is closer to the Google WiFi, but features 4 walls again in a much tighter formation (thicker too, as one is a supporting wall) and although the signal improved, it was no-where near perfect.

Finally, I headed for the heavily concreted stairwell, as this is by far the thickest physical barrier point between me and the Google WiFi, featuring thick concrete walls and a floor/ceiling. At this point, the connection was very poor indeed, despite the fact that I was only technically 5 metres away from the Google WiFi.

All in all, the results of a single Google WiFi router access point were about what you might expect. Though you might only notice this decrease if you were consistently connected to the network (maybe downloading a large file over time), it is worth noting that it would definitely add time to loading a typical web page or social media platform. So, let us move over to the mesh network test of Google WiFi.

The Google WiFi 3 Mesh Router Nodes Test Results

In order to test the Google WiFi mesh coverage, I place two more additional node/routers into the office. The first Google WiFi from our previous test remained in place, but an additional unit was placed in the most distance office and another Google WiFi was placed in the kitchen (a central location and one that is heavily surrounded by physical walls – but the area we saw the most transitional coverage in the last test). From here, I conducted the same walkthrough as the previous Google WiFi test. I walked towards the office location found 8 metres away and in the coverage range of the 2nd Google WiFi unit. The results were immediately improved (as you would expect) but you can also see on the WiFi-Tracker the point at which my device was pushed onto the 2nd Google WiFi hot spot.

Then we made our way through and past the kitchen area, where our 3rd Google WiFi was set up and on the WiFi tracker, we can see that the high coverage was continued all the way through the mesh network, as I was passed from node to node, and as I made my way through to the furthest corridor, that was the only point in which we saw the decline in connectivity as we stepped out of the overlapping mesh network created by the Google WiFi and more than 7 metres and 3 walls from the nearest node.

At this point, I turned around and made my way back towards the kitchen Google WiFi node to see how quickly my coverage would return and if it would hold this connection as I passed and made my way towards that stairwell from the previous test. It grew quickly and connection to the node maintained right until the top of the stairwell (by a lift)

Finally, I made my way down the heavily concreted stairwell and I could see a jump in my connection as I was moved from the Kitchen node and on too the 2nd Google WiFi node that, although still through the floor, was a great deal closer to my location than the very first Google WiFi access point. The result was that the connection level was maintained well and noticeably higher than that of the first test. In fact, I ended up continuing further (as the connection held for a great deal longer in the spiralled staircase beneath the 2nd Google WiFi and I made my way to the 2nd kitchen level on the lower floor, still maintaining a connection.

The switch between each Google WiFi was not only automatic, but the connection at no point dipped to worrying levels and had I been browsing google chrome or watching YouTube, I doubt I would have noticed any difference, as the connections were always enough to provide significant video buffering collateral to cover the dips that trigger a node jump in the Google WiFi network.

The Google WiFi Mesh Router Advantages and Disadvantages

The above testing of the Google WiFi clearly showed coverage improvements in using the 3 node setup over a single mesh point, but that isn’t the whole story. Mesh has already proven to provide better coverage compared with a single router and/or most ISP routers you are given for free. The question here is whether Google WiFi is the right mesh router for you. Different manufacturers have approached the hardware and software abilities of a mesh solution in differing ways. Some focusing on lower hardware and purchase price, but providing limited software abilities and more professional and analytical abilities behind a monthly subscription. Likewise, the opposite is true for some brands and this means the base cost of a mesh outer is higher. The Pros and Cons of a Google WiFi mesh router setup are:

PROs of the Google WiFi CONs of the Google WiFi
  • Easy and User-Friendly Setup
  • Affordable
  • Good Support
  • Petite and Attractive Design
  • USB-C Power
  • Excellent Google Home Support
  • Google Safe Search Included
  • Mobile only access via App
  • Lower AC/Coverage Speed than most
  • Looking a little low spec in 2019

The Google WiFi Mesh Router Conclusion

Even though the system came out in 2016, its tech is still relevant and can give your home network a boost. Google Wifi is worth the investment if you’re looking to upgrade your home network, or even if you just want to get your network to reach that one dead spot in your house. It’s a solid and easy-to-use mesh router that stands out among other home Wifi systems because of its low entry price and streamlined simplicity.


Best Mesh Router Guide – https://nascompares.com/2018/10/23/best-mesh-router-in-2018/

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

We want to keep the free advice on NASCompares FREE for as long as we can. Since this service started back in Jan '18, We have helped hundreds of users every month solve their storage woes, but we can only continue to do this with your support. So please do choose to buy at SPAN, use links to Amazon on the articles when buying to provide advert revenue support or to donate/support the site below. Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you.
Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

I am sending this data and accepting this Privacy Policy.

Terms and Conditions

Summary
Review Date
Reviewed Item
Google WiFi Mesh Router - Speed and Coverage Test
Author Rating
41star1star1star1stargray

Leave a Reply