The Crucial T700 vs Seagate Firecuda 540 Gen5 SSD – Which Should You Buy?

Seagate Firecuda 540 vs. Crucial T700 : A Gen5 SSD Showdown

After a wait, Gen 5 m.2 NVMe SSDs are increasingly accessible and affordable, with key players in the SSD market now introducing them. The delayed introduction of Gen 5 in the realm of solid-state drives is partly due to the repercussions of the 2020 pandemic on its production. The shift and assimilation of these drives into motherboards, especially from Gen 4 to Gen 5, has been gradual. With Gen 5, there’s an anticipation of superior performance, backed by upgraded controllers from top-tier manufacturers. Yet, there has been a slight delay in its full adoption at both motherboard and system levels. While it’s possible to acquire a Gen 5 SSD now, the extent of its optimal performance utilization remains a topic of debate. However, for those considering a purchase meant to last the next half-decade, it’s prudent to think ahead and select a future-compatible drive. As Gen 5’s affordability and prowess grow, it’s set to outshine and phase out Gen 4. So, for anyone seeking a top-tier SSD for upcoming years, a Gen 5 SSD is a wise long-term investment. In this piece, we’ll be exploring two prominent Gen 5 SSD contenders: the Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Crucial T700. At a cursory look, their similarities due to the early stage of Gen 5 might be evident, but they offer distinct advantages. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two models.

Seagate Firecuda 540 NVMe SSD Crucial T700 NVMe SSD

Check Amazon

Check Amazon

Comparing Seagate Firecuda 540 and Crucial T700 Hardware Specifications

As the world of Solid State Drives (SSDs) continually evolves, top-tier manufacturers are in a race to produce drives that offer the best balance of speed, durability, and affordability. The Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Crucial T700 are no exceptions to this trend. Both SSDs belong to the latest PCIe Gen 5×4 category and seem poised to elevate your computing experience. But which one should be your next purchase? Let’s dive deep into their specifications to help you decide. From the perspective of the average consumer, Gen 5 has been in the market for roughly 2 years, but more precisely about 18 months when considering its actual online purchase availability. Meanwhile, in the spheres of data centers and enterprise operations, Gen 5 made its debut almost 3 years ago. This extended timeline has paved the way for continuous research, refinement, and breakthroughs. As is often the case in the SSD industry, Phison was quick off the mark, revealing a Gen 5 controller in the form of the E26. This was succeeded by a couple of models aimed at enterprise needs and efficiency, including the DRAMless E31. Other industry players like Integrate and Silicon Motion weren’t far behind. This evolutionary trajectory saw many SSD manufacturers determining their Gen 5 strategies quite early, not to mention the in-house productions from giants like Samsung and WD. Alongside these developments, advancements in storage efficacy and flash technology emerged, facilitating higher layer counts and offering denser storage capacities without compromising Gen 5’s lofty performance, durability, and endurance benchmarks. Given that the Seagate Firecuda 540 and Crucial T700 are part of the initial batch of Gen 5 SSDs in the market, their performance metrics are understandably similar. Yet, when analyzing I/O measurements and robustness, certain nuances might give one an edge over the other in a direct comparison. Here’s a closer look at how the two SSDs compare in terms of hardware:

General Specifications

Specification Seagate Firecuda 540 Crucial T700
Manufacturer Seagate Crucial
Name/Series Seagate Firecuda 540 Crucial T700
Capacities 1-2-4TB 1-2-4TB
PCIe Gen PCIe Gen 5×4 PCIe Gen 5×4
Controller Phison E26 Phison E26
NVMe Rev. NVMe 2.0 NVMe 2.0
NAND Type 3D TLC Micron B58R 3D TLC Micron B58R
NAND Layer 232L 232L
Inclusive Heatsink? No (inc Heatshield) Optional
Price Per TB $148/TB (2TB) $157 per TB (4TB)
MTBF 2 Million Hours 1.6 Million Hours
Warranty 5yrs + 3yrs Data Rec 5yrs

1TB Model Comparison

Specification Seagate Firecuda 540 Crucial T700
Model ID ZP1000GM3A004 CT1000T700SSD5
Price $189 $179.99
Seq Read Speed 9.5GB/s 11.7GB/s
Seq Write Speed 8.5GB/s 9.5GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS 1.3 Million 1.35 Million
4K Random Write IOPS 1.5 Million 1.4 Million
TBW 1000TBW 600TBW

2TB Model Comparison

Specification Seagate Firecuda 540 Crucial T700
Model ID ZP2000GM3A004 CT2000T700SSD5
Price $299 $339.99
Seq Read Speed 10GB/s 12.4GB/s
Seq Write Speed 10GB/s 11.8GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS 1.5 Million 1.5 Million
4K Random Write IOPS 1.5 Million 1.5 Million
TBW 2000TBW 1200TBW

4TB Model Comparison

Specification Seagate Firecuda 540 Crucial T700
Model # N/A CT4000T700SSD5
Price N/A $599.99
Seq Read Speed N/A 12.4GB/s
Seq Write Speed N/A 11.8GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS N/A 1.5 Million
4K Random Write IOPS N/A 1.5 Million

If terms like DWPD, IOPS, and TBW sound foreign to you, the video below will be invaluable. It provides a clear breakdown of common SSD terminologies, helping you better understand the subtle contrasts between the Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Crucial T700.

Choosing between the Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Crucial T700 is no easy task. Both SSDs manifest themselves as the embodiment of cutting-edge technology, exhibiting attributes that cater to diverse preferences and purposes. Let’s break it down further to give you a clearer picture:

1. Performance: The Crucial T700 takes the lead here. Boasting faster sequential read and write speeds across the 1TB and 2TB models, users might witness marginally quicker load times, faster data transfers, and an overall enhanced performance. Especially for those involved in data-heavy tasks like video editing or large-scale simulations, those extra speeds could translate to noticeable improvements.

2. Cost-Effectiveness: For the budget-conscious consumer, the Firecuda 540 shines brighter. The attractive price per TB, particularly for the 2TB model, offers great value, allowing users to get a high-performing SSD without breaking the bank. Over time, this price difference can become significant, especially for those looking to upgrade multiple systems.

3. Durability & Reliability: Delving deeper into longevity, the Firecuda 540 edges out its competitor. A higher TBW suggests it can handle more data writes over its lifespan. Furthermore, the longer MTBF and the unique addition of a 3-year data recovery warranty underline Seagate’s confidence in its product’s durability. For users whose primary concern is a lasting investment, this might tilt the scales in Seagate’s favor.

4. Cooling Solutions: Thermal management is vital in ensuring consistent performance and prolonging the SSD’s life. While the Firecuda 540 incorporates a heat shield, the Crucial T700 offers an optional heatsink. For enthusiasts or professionals who might push their SSDs to the limit, having a dedicated cooling solution, as in the T700, could be beneficial.

5. Future Expansion: Both SSDs provide a range of capacities up to 4TB. However, it’s worth noting that, as of the data provided, Seagate hasn’t released the specifications for a 4TB model. This could be a limitation for users seeking maximum storage from the Firecuda series.

In sum, the Seagate Firecuda 540 and Crucial T700 represent the pinnacle of current SSD technology, each with its strengths. The Firecuda seems tailored for those who value durability and cost-effectiveness, while the T700 might appeal more to performance enthusiasts and those keen on optimal cooling solutions. Your final choice should align with what you prioritize most in an SSD, whether that’s speed, longevity, cooling efficiency, or cost.

Seagate Firecuda 540 NVMe SSD Crucial T700 NVMe SSD

Check Amazon

Check Amazon



Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,750 other subscribers

Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!

Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

    TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
    If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
    Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
    Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.




    ko-fi subscribe

    DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
    ASK questions to NAS community
    SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
    CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
    IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
    EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

    23 thoughts on “The Crucial T700 vs Seagate Firecuda 540 Gen5 SSD – Which Should You Buy?

    1. Thank goodness you are about the only one I’ve come across who knows how to pronounce Asus (Ace-Us). So many others annoyingly call it A-Sooos. They obviously haven’t looked up the origin of the company name.

    2. The seagulls bring a smile to my face as does your reaction. What do you think about replacing your B-roll motorway background with some metaphorical seagull footage? Landing, gliding, fighting, picking through garbage, saving small children who have drifted out to sea. (not sure, that last one might be dolphins) In any case, what you and the team do and how you do it is greatly appreciated.

    3. I’m blown away by the fact how overheating is a normal and expected behaviour of Gen5 NVMe drives. Necessity for large heatsinks and even active cooling solutions totally eliminates the whole point of having a tiny embedded storage attached directly to motherboard. What gives..?!

    4. I don’t mind the seagulls. Ever seen Jonathan Seagull (the movie)? Advise watching stoned. It’s an old hippie movie. LOL
      Yeah I’ll wait a bit for equipping my ASRock Live mixer B650 with a Gen 5. Black Friday perhaps.

    5. This is easy.
      pcie gen 3 is the way to go, espcecially due to thermals.

      gen4 and gen5 get needlessly hot for “performance” most people won’t even need

    6. Is it worth buying some nvme gen 5 to put them in a ds1621+ for example? And for example in a tvs-862x?I think the connections of these NAS are gen 3, right?

    7. I picked up two 2 TB Samsung 990 Pro PCIe 4 SSDs for $129 each during Prime Day. That will tide me over until my next platform upgrade probably.