Seagate Firecuda 540 vs. Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Gen5 SSD

The Gigabyte Aorus 10000 vs Seagate Firecuda 540 Gen5 SSD – Which Should You Buy?

It has taken some time, but Gen 5 m.2 NVMe SSDs are becoming more available, seeing a decrease in price, and are now being launched by major players in the SSD market. The slow rollout of Gen 5 in the solid-state drive world can be attributed in part to the 2020 pandemic and its subsequent impact on the production of Gen 5. The integration into motherboards and adoption by SSDs transitioning from Gen 4 to Gen 5 has also taken its time. Gen 5 promises enhanced performance capabilities and is accompanied by improved controllers from industry leaders. However, adoption at the motherboard and system levels has lagged slightly. While you can purchase a Gen 5 SSD now, the degree to which you can harness its peak performance consistently is still under discussion. Yet, if you’re buying a drive today for use over the next 5 years, it’s wise to be forward-thinking and future-proof your choice. As Gen 5 becomes more affordable and advanced, it’s poised to surpass and replace Gen 4. Thus, if you’re eyeing a high-performance SSD for future use, investing in a Gen 5 SSD now is a long-term strategy. Today, we’re evaluating two early Gen 5 SSD releases: the Seagate Firecuda 540 and Gigabyte Aorus 10000. These two SSDs may seem similar at first glance due to Gen 5’s nascent stage, but their priorities for a Gen 5 SSD differ. Let’s dive into a comparison of these drives.

Seagate Firecuda 540 NVMe SSD Gigabyte Aorus 10000 NVMe SSD

Check Amazon

Check Amazon

Comparing Seagate Firecuda 540 and Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Hardware Specifications

When diving into the realm of SSDs, two top contenders emerge: the Seagate Firecuda 540 Gen5 and the Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Gen5. Both SSDs offer high-speed performance and are optimized for your storage needs, but there are a few notable differences. Here’s a detailed comparison to help you choose which might be right for you. From a consumer standpoint, Gen 5 has been available for just under 2 years, or closer to 18 months when considering when one could actually make a purchase online. In contrast, at the data center and enterprise levels, Gen 5 has been on the scene for nearly 3 years. This timeline has allowed for ongoing research, development, and innovation. As expected in the SSD realm, Phison was among the first to unveil a Gen 5 controller with its E26 controller and followed this with a few alternatives targeting enterprise and efficiency, like the DRAMless E31. Companies like Integrate and Silicon Motion soon joined the fray. This progression led numerous SSD brands to decide early on their Gen 5 SSD direction (and that’s without discussing in-house component brands like Samsung and WD). Concurrently, there were strides in storage efficiency and flash technology, resulting in increased layer counts and the possibility of denser storage while still upholding the high Gen 5 performance standards and expectations of durability and endurance. Given that these two Gen 5 SSDs are among the first wave in the market, their performance profiles are quite comparable. However, subtle differences in I/O metrics and durability might make some distinctions more significant than others in their head-to-head comparison. Here’s how the Seagate Firecuda 540 and Gigabyte Aorus 10000 stack up at the hardware level:

Feature Seagate Firecuda 540 Gigabyte Aorus 10000
Manufacturer Seagate Gigabyte
Capacities 1TB, 2TB, 4TB 1TB, 2TB
PCIe Gen PCIe Gen 5×4 PCIe Gen 5×4
Controller Phison E26 Phison E26
NVMe Rev. NVMe 2.0 NVMe 2.0
NAND Type 3D TLC Micron B58R 3D TLC Micron B58R
NAND Layer 232L 232L
Heatsink No (inc Heatshield) Yes (Vented + 2x heatpipe)
Price Per TB $148/TB (2TB) $148/TB (2TB)
DWPD 0.55DWPD 0.38DWPD
MTBF 2 Million Hours 1.6 Million Hours
Warranty 5yrs + 3yrs Data Rec 5yrs

1TB Model Comparison:

Feature Seagate Firecuda 540 Gigabyte Aorus 10000
Model ID ZP1000GM3A004 AG510K1TB
Price $189 $179
Seq Read Speed 9.5GB/s 9.5GB/s
Seq Write Speed 8.5GB/s 8.5GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS 1.3 Million 1.3 Million
4K Random Write IOPS 1.5 Million 1.5 Million
TBW 1000TBW 700TBW

2TB Model Comparison:

Feature Seagate Firecuda 540 Gigabyte Aorus 10000
Model ID ZP2000GM3A004 AG510K2TB
Price $299 $340
Seq Read Speed 10GB/s 10GB/s
Seq Write Speed 10GB/s 9.5GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS 1.5 Million 1.5 Million
4K Random Write IOPS 1.5 Million 1.5 Million
TBW 2000TBW 1400TBW

4TB Model Comparison:

Feature Seagate Firecuda 540 Gigabyte Aorus 10000
Model # N/A AG510K4TB
Price N/A $589
Seq Read Speed N/A 10GB/s
Seq Write Speed N/A 9.5GB/s
4K Random Read IOPS N/A 1.3 Million
4K Random Write IOPS N/A 1.5 Million
TBW N/A 3000TBW

For those unfamiliar with SSD jargon, like DWPD, IOPS, and TBW, please refer to the video below. It will acquaint you with prevalent solid-state drive terms, aiding in grasping the nuanced differences between these two drives.

Both the Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Gen5 SSDs present themselves as top-tier choices in the SSD market. At a glance, many of their specifications might appear almost identical, but certain key differences might sway consumers in one direction or the other.

Heatsink and Cooling:
One of the most noticeable distinctions is in their cooling solutions. The Gigabyte Aorus 10000 comes equipped with an inclusive heatsink that boasts both a vented design and a dual heatpipe system. This can be crucial for power users who are concerned about thermals and the longevity of their SSD, especially when pushing their drives in high-intensity tasks. The Seagate Firecuda 540, while not having a full-fledged heatsink, does include a heatshield which offers some degree of thermal dissipation.

Capacity Choices:
For those prioritizing storage space, the Seagate Firecuda 540 emerges as a more flexible option. It offers a 4TB capacity variant which the Aorus 10000 does not. This could be a deciding factor for users who require substantial storage without wanting to compromise on the speed benefits of an NVMe SSD.

Warranty and Data Recovery:
When it comes to warranty, both drives offer a 5-year period. However, Seagate adds a unique value proposition with 3 years of data recovery services. This can be a lifesaver for professionals or individuals who store critical data, offering some peace of mind that, in the event of unforeseen issues, there’s an added layer of protection.

Price Points:
Though the price per TB is the same for the 2TB models, differences emerge in the individual model pricing. The Aorus 1TB model is slightly more wallet-friendly, while the 2TB variant of the Firecuda is more competitively priced. Depending on your budget and storage needs, this could be another factor to consider.

In wrapping up, the choice between the Seagate Firecuda 540 and the Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Gen5 will largely rest on individual priorities. If you’re after larger storage capacities and value the added security of data recovery services, the Firecuda stands out. Conversely, if superior cooling and slightly lower price points (in some capacities) are more your focus, then the Aorus could be your SSD of choice. In either case, both drives promise high performance and reliability, ensuring that users will be getting a top-notch product.

Seagate Firecuda 540 NVMe SSD Gigabyte Aorus 10000 NVMe SSD

Check Amazon

Check Amazon

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      ASK YOUR QUESTIONS HERE!

      21 thoughts on “Seagate Firecuda 540 vs. Gigabyte Aorus 10000 Gen5 SSD

      1. UPDATE. The Seagate Firecuda 540 M.2 NVMe SSD Has Now Been Released. Here are the confirmed Specifications:.Pretty much every estimation of the specs was correct. To confirm them: Seagate Firecuda 540, 1/2TB Availabel at launch for $179/299, NVMe 2.0, Phison E26, 3D TLC (Micron B58R), 232L, NAND.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. I have their 530’s 2x 4TB and 2x 2TB and the only reason I went with Seagate was the endurance. It seems that they have dropped endurance in 540’s. Going from 5100TBW on 4TB to 3900TBW…I think not this time around, for the price would be better to go with 1/3 cheaper NVMe with half the endurance and replacing sooner still leaves you winning.
        I was so hoping to get new 540 , but the endurance is no go for me. I would rather them up the price, but leaving endurance the same.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      3. I cant wait until fast SSD are cheap enough to replace my NAS clunker drives. Aside from faster copying, the whole thing is going to be a lot quieter. Once they release that sort of NAS setup anyway.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. I’m taken back to summer ‘21 hearing about SSDs to add space to the PS5.

        I’m quite happy with my WD SN850, although if gen5 pushes Gen4 prices further down I might plum for a 4TB one to get me through to PS6 !
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE