CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS vPro Mobo Review

CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS Motherboard Review

The CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS motherboard is a strong contender in the ever-expanding DIY mini-server motherboard market. Priced between $239 and $250, this ITX board boasts features like PCIe Gen 5 support, DDR5 memory compatibility, and versatile storage options, catering to home lab enthusiasts and small business setups alike. It is designed for Intel’s 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen processors, offering users a robust and scalable platform for building custom NAS solutions. This motherboard succeeds its predecessor with noticeable improvements in storage and connectivity, making it more appealing to users looking for cutting-edge performance. It includes eight SATA drive connections over SFF fan out cables (available as an optional purchase), three M.2 NVMe slots, and a single PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot, all in a compact 17x17cm form factor. While it provides a solid foundation for a variety of NAS applications, it also introduces challenges, particularly around memory support, networking limitations, and lane management.

One of the key selling points of the CWWK Q670 is its modularity, allowing users to customize their builds to suit specific needs. However, this flexibility comes with a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with BIOS tuning or component compatibility. Nevertheless, the board is a worthy option for DIY enthusiasts willing to invest time and effort into creating a high-performance storage solution. This review explores the board’s design, hardware, connectivity, and performance to help you decide if the CWWK Q670 is the right choice for your next NAS project.

Note –  This is a review of the newer generation version of this NAS motherboard, you can find my review of the previous revision HERE on NASCompares, or HERE on our YouTube Channel

CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo Review – Quick Conclusion

The CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS motherboard is a versatile and feature-rich platform that caters to a wide range of NAS builders. Its support for modern processors, DDR5 memory, and extensive storage options make it an attractive choice for those seeking a balance between performance and scalability. However, its reliance on user customization and the absence of ECC memory or native 10GbE networking may limit its appeal for certain applications. For DIY enthusiasts and experienced NAS builders, the Q670 offers tremendous flexibility and value. Its compact ITX form factor, supporting 8 SATA drives, and PCIe Gen 5 support enable users to create powerful storage solutions tailored to their specific needs. The inclusion of Intel vPro adds an enterprise-grade feature, enhancing its appeal for remote management scenarios. While the board has its quirks, such as tight component placement and reliance on BIOS tuning, these are manageable for users willing to invest time and effort. For most users, the CWWK Q670 serves as a capable and cost-effective foundation for building a high-performance NAS. Bottom line, the CWWK Q670 is a compelling choice for those looking to balance advanced hardware features with affordability. It is not without its limitations, but for those willing to navigate its complexities, it delivers exceptional performance and scalability in a compact package.

BUILD QUALITY - 8/10
HARDWARE - 9/10
PERFORMANCE - 8/10
PRICE - 9/10
VALUE - 9/10


8.6
PROS
👍🏻A Gen5 M-ITX NAS Mobo...SOLD!
👍🏻8x SATA Ports (via SFF Fan out x2)
👍🏻Good scope to support 13th Gen and more CPUs
👍🏻3x M.2 at Gen 4x4 (one of the 22110)
👍🏻PCIe 5x16 Slot
👍🏻Excellent USB Outputs
👍🏻Full-Length DIMM Memory Support (i.e more memory possible)
👍🏻Very well priced at just over $200+
CONS
👎🏻CPU Cooler vs Memory slot placement is VERY tight!
👎🏻No pre-bundled (CPU/RAM) options
👎🏻1 PCIe slot (standard M-ITX build) will lead to hard choices about NIC upgrades




CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo – Design and Build

The CWWK Q670 packs an impressive array of features into its compact ITX form factor. Its 17x17cm footprint allows for installation in small cases, making it suitable for space-constrained setups. Despite its size, the board incorporates features typically found in larger motherboards, such as eight SATA drives supported, via SFF to SATA fanout cables, and support for DDR5 memory.

The off-white PCB design adds a modern aesthetic, distinguishing it from more generic black boards in the market. Not exactly a dealbreaker – but worthy of note.

Feature Details
CPU Compatibility Intel 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen processors (LGA1700)
Memory Dual-channel U-DIMM DDR5, 5600MHz (96GB max)
Storage 3 x M.2 PCIe 4.0 (1 x 22110, 2 x 2280), 8 x SATA3 (via 2 SFF-8643)
Networking 2 x 2.5GbE (Intel i226-V and i226-LM with vPro support)
Expansion Slot 1 x PCIe 5.0 x16 (bifurcation supported: 8+8)
USB Ports 1 x USB-C 3.2 (20Gbps), 3 x USB 3.2, 2 x USB 2.0
Video Outputs HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz)
Power Connector Standard 24-pin ATX
Form Factor ITX (17x17cm)

The layout is thoughtfully organized, with memory slots positioned near the CPU socket, and storage interfaces placed for easy cable management. However, the proximity of these components can create challenges when using large CPU coolers or compact NAS cases. Users should carefully consider their cooling solutions, as the board’s compact design can obstruct airflow in certain configurations.

The use of full-sized U-DIMM DDR5 slots is a notable choice, enabling higher memory capacities and speeds than SODIMM alternatives. However, the lack of ECC support may deter users looking for fault-tolerant setups.

The eight SATA connections via SFF are a standout feature, offering excellent storage expandability without the need for additional adapters, simplifying installation and minimizing compatibility issues. The previous gen of this board favoured physical SATA connections.

Overall, the CWWK Q670 strikes a fine balance between size, functionality, and scalability. Its thoughtful design and rich feature set make it a compelling option for those looking to build a high-performance NAS in a compact footprint.


CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo – Ports and Connectivity

The CWWK Q670 excels in connectivity, offering a wide range of ports and interfaces to meet diverse needs. Its dual Intel 2.5GbE Ethernet ports provide reliable networking, one of which supports Intel vPro for BIOS-level remote management. This feature is particularly beneficial for enterprise users or IT administrators who require remote access for troubleshooting or system configuration.

The rear I/O panel features HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4, capable of outputting 4K@60Hz resolution. These are useful for initial setup or troubleshooting, especially for users running graphical interfaces on their NAS. While video output is not typically essential for headless server applications, its inclusion adds flexibility for multi-purpose builds.

USB connectivity includes a single USB-C 3.2 port with 20Gbps bandwidth, three USB 3.2 Type-A ports, and two USB 2.0 ports. Additionally, the board includes internal headers for USB 3.0 and USB 2.0, allowing users to add front-panel connections or bootable storage devices. The presence of an internal USB 2.0 port is a thoughtful addition, making it ideal for booting NAS operating systems like UnRAID directly from a USB drive.

The board’s PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot offers significant expandability, enabling users to install GPUs, high-speed NICs, or storage accelerators. Bifurcation support (8+8) further enhances its versatility, allowing users to connect multiple devices simultaneously. However, the single PCIe slot requires careful planning, as it must accommodate both networking and storage upgrades in most builds.


CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo – Storage and Expandability

Storage is one of the key strengths of the CWWK Q670, 8x SATA media and three M.2 PCIe 4.0 slots offering ample capacity for large-scale data storage and high-speed applications.

The two SFF-8643 connectors simplify the integration of multiple SATA drives, eliminating the need for adapters or complex wiring setups. This makes the board particularly appealing for users planning to build RAID arrays or multi-drive setups.

The three M.2 NVMe slots are positioned strategically to maximize cooling and accessibility. One slot supports the longer 22110 form factor, ideal for high-capacity SSDs with improved heat dissipation. The other two slots support the more common 2280 size. Performance testing revealed read speeds of 5-5.6GB/s and write speeds of 3.7-3.8GB/s, which are consistent with PCIe 4.0 standards.

However, users should note that storage performance can vary significantly depending on the CPU and configuration. Lane-sharing between the PCIe and M.2 slots may lead to bottlenecks in certain setups, particularly when multiple high-speed drives are in use. Transfers between NVMe drives showed reduced throughput (~1GB/s), highlighting the need for careful resource management.

The PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot adds further storage flexibility, supporting advanced SSD expansion cards or bifurcation for multiple devices. This makes the Q670 an excellent choice for flash-based servers, provided users are prepared to invest in compatible components and optimize their configurations.


CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo – Performance Potential

Performance testing on the CWWK Q670 revealed a capable and efficient platform, capable of handling demanding workloads with ease. Using an Intel i5-12500 CPU and 16GB DDR5 memory, the board delivered consistent results across a variety of benchmarks. Idle power consumption was measured at ~30W, while load conditions with active drives peaked at 57-58W.

NVMe performance was a particular highlight, with read/write speeds reaching 5-6GB/s under optimal conditions. While these speeds are impressive, lane-sharing and resource allocation in the BIOS may limit performance in more complex setups. For example, transferring data between NVMe drives resulted in reduced speeds (~1GB/s), underscoring the need for careful configuration.

Networking performance, while reliable, may be a limiting factor for some users. The dual 2.5GbE ports provide adequate bandwidth for most home and small business applications but fall short for larger-scale deployments. Users requiring higher throughput will need to invest in a PCIe-based NIC or USB-C adapters, adding to the overall cost and complexity.

Ultimately, the CWWK Q670’s performance is highly dependent on the components selected and the time invested in BIOS optimization. While it offers a strong foundation for a high-performance NAS, its full potential can only be unlocked through careful planning and customization.


CWWK Q670 NAS Mobo – Review Verdict and Conclusion

The CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS motherboard is a versatile and feature-rich platform that caters to a wide range of NAS builders. Its support for modern processors, DDR5 memory, and extensive storage options make it an attractive choice for those seeking a balance between performance and scalability. However, its reliance on user customization and the absence of ECC memory or native 10GbE networking may limit its appeal for certain applications. For DIY enthusiasts and experienced NAS builders, the Q670 offers tremendous flexibility and value. Its compact ITX form factor, supporting 8 SATA drives, and PCIe Gen 5 support enable users to create powerful storage solutions tailored to their specific needs.

The inclusion of Intel vPro support (CPU dependant) adds an enterprise-grade feature, enhancing its appeal for remote management scenarios. While the board has its quirks, such as tight component placement and reliance on BIOS tuning, these are manageable for users willing to invest time and effort. For most users, the CWWK Q670 serves as a capable and cost-effective foundation for building a high-performance NAS. Bottom line, the CWWK Q670 is a compelling choice for those looking to balance advanced hardware features with affordability. It is not without its limitations, but for those willing to navigate its complexities, it delivers exceptional performance and scalability in a compact package.

PROs of the CWWK Q670 v.2 NAS Motherboard CONs of the CWWK Q670 v.2 NAS Motherboard
  • A Gen5 M-ITX NAS Mobo…SOLD!
  • 8x SATA Ports (via SFF Fan out x2)
  • Good scope to support 13th Gen and more CPUs
  • 3x M.2 at Gen 4×4 (one of the 22110)
  • PCIe 5×16 Slot
  • Excellent USB Outputs
  • Full-Length DIMM Memory Support (i.e more memory possible)
  • Very well priced at just over $200+
  • CPU Cooler vs Memory slot placement is VERY tight!
  • No pre-bundled (CPU/RAM) options
  • 1 PCIe slot (standard M-ITX build) will lead to hard choices about NIC upgrades

Where to Buy?

  • CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS MoBo ($203 AliExpress) HERE
  • CWWK x86 P5 NVMe NAS Board ($155 AliExpress) HERE
  • CWWK x86 P5 Barebones + Case ($239 Amazon) – HERE

 


 

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕

       
      locked content ko-fi subscribe
      Summary
      recipe image
      Review Date
      Reviewed Item
      CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS Motherboard
      Author Rating
      41star1star1star1stargray
      Product Name
      CWWK Q670 NAS Motherboard
      Price
      $ 199

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      ASK YOUR QUESTIONS HERE!

      127 thoughts on “CWWK Q670 8-Bay Gen5 NAS vPro Mobo Review

      1. After waiting months and months for Synology to disappoint me with new enterprise products, I went with a Q670 build for my first ever NAS, went over budget but am really enjoying the extra performance on tap
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. I really liked this kind of mobos until I looked at them seriously in order of purchasing one. Simply put, they make no sense. For less than half that price I bought an Asus ATX motherboard with 6 sata ports, 3 m.2 ports and more pci connectors than I can really use without reaching the pci-lanes limit for the cpu. Put on top of that an i3-12100 and still you would have some money to spare before reaching the price of that chinese motherboard with who knows how many issues.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      3. For ECC it would need a W class chipset (eg W680), but its pretty neat. Also a DTX variant with two x8 slots would be handy variation (eg. for a Node304 chassis or most of ITX enclosures made for dual-slot GPUs). Then a slight shape adjustment into the depth also would made possible the underside NVMe’s moved to the top for easier access. Not that I am happy with all three Gen4x4 sharing a bottleneck in form of the DMI .. but be it – at least it keeps the PEG slot and all its bifurcation options for expansion cards. If size would not change, then the two extra NVMe would be nice be in form of connector for cabled drives (eg SFF or slimsas) – as one just have to cool a gen4 drive anyway and the underside ones are being grilled too much in this setup imho.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      4. Sucks that you won’t get ECC support unless you use a “workstation” class chipset like W680 — even though this is just a pass through as the Intel CPUs handle memory and ECC internally. Any idea on warranty repair costs/time for these CWWK motherboards? I can’t help; but, wonder if these cheap motherboards use decent enough capacitors and other components to last long enough for ECC memory to be a worth while long term feature.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      5. One point I’d like to understand better, if anyone can help me out? It’s mentioned near the end that some wouldn’t want to use SFF to SATA breakouts – is there a reason? Besides the form factor, the SAS protocol I’m familiar with has 4 channels per connection, which should support 8 drives here the same as 8 individual connectors. Yes?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      6. Just checked their website (I know they’re Chinese but still): please correct me if I’m wrong here but no mention of a mailing address, no phone number, no way to contact them except their online form, not even a mention of the fact they’re a Chinese brand.
        Hard pass for me.
        Whatever the brand/manufacturer, I never buy anything if I don’t have the above-mentioned information.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      7. Hi all. Since the publication of this video, it was brought to my attention that this motherboard has had several issues encountered with it. Although I never encountered them, further investigation does show a decent amount of users online raising concerns with their units. (Example https://www.reddit.com/r/homelab/s/eeRCYY8wYs ). Going to do a little more digging with this board in the office, but apologies on missing this during the review.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      8. Waiting for this board to be delivered. I should’ve dig more into all the issues people are reporting because it seems there are many. Given title of this video has “Mobo Review” in it, I was hoping to see some of these issues covered. I’d say this is more of a overview of a product rather than review.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      9. I have one of these boards (I think, came via King Novy store on AliE), waiting for other bits to arrive to hook it up properly. However, while they say it supports 5600 DDR5, mine refuses to run the RAM at that speed and doesn’t offer XMP to unlock from the base 4800. “Support” in this case means, “you can plug it in and it will run at 4800”, at least for my board.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. Under the “PROs of the CWWK Q670 v.2 NAS Motherboard”, the link in “Very well priced at just over $200+” links to the older model with SATA ports, not the SFF.

        I think it’s supposed to be: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806768964435.html

      11. 跟着朋友一块交易USDT因为点事闹掰了 她给了我个OKX钱包的码 (pride)-(pole)-(obtain)-(together)-(second)-(when)-(future)-(mask)-(review)-(nature)-(potato)-(bulb) 说让我把剩下的USDT提出来 这是什么啊 怎么搞啊 求各位告知下
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      12. I don’t understand the motherboard maker obsession with ITX. I think its fairly clear that a larger board with physical x16 slots and bifurcated x8 and x4 allocation options would be a functionally superior design. If you want a gaming rig with a graphics card and some SSD slots for steam, great, but messing around with PCIE extenders feels like Apple’s dumb idea of putting only USBC on laptops. Even PCIE gen5 for a mini NAS (or gaming) seems like expensive overkill on an i5 board.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      13. Repeated misuse of “architecture” – version/generation etc is NOT architecture. Also, IO isn’t scalability in the way that it’s mostly used. Sure, you could hang a bunch of stuff off USB in various flavors, but to me the point of building a NAS thing like this would be to have the stuff internally inside one box, not having a bunch of adapters and jank hanging off USB of various flavors. Just my 2ct. This only really makes sense if you can source the rest of the parts for free or supercheap, since built up the base system gets into a category where it is competing with serious setups based on the price, like proper servers that have a lot of features this does not have, like lots of slots for network cards, storage controllers, GPUs for transcoding/AI, slots for more RAM, better and in some cases more CPU’s and so on forth. There are Dell and HP purpose built servers which can be had for not that much money that have greater potential for most uses – the one thing where they do not beat this is choice of case pretty much, so they look like they look since you can’t case swap them easily.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. the reason for the speed decrease on the ssds is the usuall: not enough pci-e lanes. only 1 m.2 and the pci-e x16 go directly to the cpu, the rest are connected to the chipset. i’ve tried a lot of those boards, it’s the same deal. they try to cram as many interfaces as possible, but they end up not working good at most.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. CWWK had a Core 8505/i5 itx board with an SFF to 4x nvme board. Is that still available? I was tempted by that. Info was scarce on their site, but i guess it would have been throttled to x1 lane per nvme.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      16. Those boards are very bad with power management as well as Bios settings and documentation. Mine always freezes up when aspm activated. I basically choose it for due to (not working) power saving features
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      17. My last cwwk mb got bricked after a „successful“ bios update, which was needed because it died during installation of we’ll basically anything I tried.

        JBAT jumper or removing the cmos battery didn’t help.

        And have fun finding a manual, the bios updates are in labeled in Chinese
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      18. Nice try. I may be wrong, but I observe that you and the Chinese manufacturer could’a mentioned that there is no such thing as 2x96GB UDIMM kit available for sale ANYWHERE. You and the manufacturer could’a also clearly specified a Bifurtication feature. Also, what iGPU does this come with? Not your fault because you tried. I believe you. Until I can see more clearly better specifications. I am just not comfortable enough yet to push the buy button. I imagine by April 2025, manufacturing and marketing kittens will open their eyes and mature this product description.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. I wonder how safe these boards are when it comes to hardware level spyware/backdoors? Have you tested it with wireshark to see if there is any unauthorized communication between it and its homebase in china?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      20. Ryzen 5800u on a mini Nuc is cheaper with 16gb ram and dual 2.5G with wifi 6 and 512 nvme. Just add 2 USB 8TB drives and install TruNas. Its 25w TDP and can do gaming with the built in gpu
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      21. I built my first NAS recently in a fractal 304 case with an old Ryzen CPU and MB I had lying around, problem is it’s only got 4 SATA ports.

        I’m trying to decide on whether I upgrade to this and a new intel with an iGPU, or I upgrade to a Micro ATX motherboard with an intel CPU and put it into a fractal 804 :/
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      22. Hi! Thanks for all your videos, I learn a lot with you. I have recently gone ahead with a Jonsbo N3 + CWWK 8505 motherboard. I have configured everything and it works great with Unraid, except fan control. I have switched all the fans in the case to PWM but regardless of whether or not I activate the dynamic control system and its thresholds in the BIOS, or even setting the fan control to a manual PWM value does not generate any change in their behavior, they continue to run at the same speed. I don’t know if I should update the BIOS or what I should do, but I can’t find any documentation or link to a more updated bios version either. If you could help me I would be very grateful. Best regards.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      23. I have been dying to build myself a decent nas for about 5 years now (not including splurging money on used servers/workstations which cannot be run 24×7).

        The motherboards that cost $200 cost $500-700 used in India. At this point I am beyond frustrated. Time to start looking for that long lost friend who settled abroad to bring back a decent MOBO on his trip back home.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      24. Hi! I assume that this board is made in China? I don’t´t trust and don´t want to support China in any way if possible. I really would like to see a video like this (or diy nas in general) but parts that don´t came from the greatest country on earth. Cheers!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. Excuse me, 3 what (hundred)? May I purchase a normal motherboard with 4 sata for $50, a normal cpu for $50, a pcie to sata for $20 into one slot, a pcie to nvme for $20 into another one, and be happy. Because 6-8 3.5″ drives require so big case, and psu, that literally any motherboard will fit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. Wanting to build a 10Gbe NAS with 2 x 2Tb NVME and 4 x 10Tb Rotating Rust. I am trying to figure out how to make the 4TB NVME as a cache fronting the older HDDs. And in the interests of low noise and low power, the 40Tb HDDs should spin down unless absolutely need for a transfer. Does such a thing exist? Thank you for reading this far.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      27. I just ordered the Board. Can you recommend some CPU coolers that won’t block the udimm slot?
        I planning to use a jonsbo n4 – since the n3 will take a month or so. Maybe i will get the n3 anyway but if the n4 is the only option i have to fit a top blower cpu cooler.
        Any recommendations?
        And did you try the intel stock cooler?

        Thanks for testing and thanks for your review post!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      28. I was interested in their 4 bay nvme but Lots of reviews saying various CWWK NAS boards & routers etc stop working soon or arrive with some chip (function) not working. This workshop should focus on quality control more, need reputation to grow, not quick bucks by any means necessary. I’ll stick with glinet products.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      29. I got this board, plus an i5 12500T from AliExpress. The board did not want to boot, it beeps when I power it on. CWWK support said that either memory is incompatible or CPU is not seated correctly. Board keeps beeping even without the memory installed.
        I am returning both the board and the CPU, even though it is more likely the board is bad.
        Anyone else had an issue like this?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      30. Thank you for the video – Newbie question – For a newbie, installing Truenas Scale on a board like this with the 3 M2.nvme slots – what would you do for the boot drive/s ? I have read it is recommended to have a mirrored config, but then I also read the boot drives can only have the os on them ..
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      31. I’d love to see a picture of how the headers hooked up. I’m trying to get one of these to work nice green light on the MB, but the switch won’t work for me to power up. 🙁
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      32. on the one hand they left the whole reference bios untouched and open to the buyer
        on the other hand, they definitely didn’t do any test all those features. or indeed any of them i suspect.
        let alone combinations of features.

        its got an attractive set of ports and slots, but you would want to do some seriously stress and fault testing if you were going to use this to store critical or irreplaceable data.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      33. Imagine it was 4xgen3 drives on the back rather than 2x gen4 drives, sure it would need a 4.0 to 3.0 multiplexer but still that’d be pretty cool.
        I wish Optane hadnt died out, would love a gen5 optane drive to go in that 5.0 slot with 7GB/s and near RAM latencies for a special metadata drive, though for special metadata you really should have 2-3 drives.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      34. Not a bad price, i remember picking up an asrock rack X470 mATX board with dual LAN and IPMI for around $260, boy was i ticked when the one with dual 10G went on sale for $299 and then shot back up to $500+ before i realized.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. Like this board! Based on you review I’ve purchased the H670 version and set it up with an i7-13700T, 96GB (2x48Gb) memory, 4x-mirror mode spinning disks, nmve SSDs and a Mellanox ConnectX-4 single 100Gbe.
        What I noticed though is that the single PCIEv5 slot shares recources with memory; when using the Mellanox NIC card (PCIEX 16x) the system will only read half of my memory and ignores the second bank. Switching to a ConnectX-3 card (PCIEX3 x8 2x10Gbe) it does work again…..
        I’m now trying to figure out how I can force the PCIe slot to work in PCIe 8x mode (as the 100Gbe Mellanox is a single 100Gbe one) but as you’ve mentoined, BIOS settings on this board are quite elaborate…. If anyone knows what settings to look at or play with I would appreciate that.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      36. I’m also interested in this tiny beast, but I’ve got two major questions. What Sata Controller does this board use? JMB or AsMedia? Want to use it with unraid and the JMB often causes problems with power efficient builds. Second: how good are the VRM, the data sheet said max 65 Watt TDP, is it usable with an 14600 or higher, or are we stuck with the “T-Series”?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      37. Ok why do all the systems you recommend have to be tiny Motherboards?
        I have room as do most people for a full sized computer do you have any videos where you recommend atx or even eatx boards?
        I find the one pci slot on these boards annoying.
        Is there a video I am missing?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. AC to SC from DC to ERf split the audio into 2hub avi channels btle the audio and jack the video using red-ultra and direct the load to local motor batt and feed generator overtick to bay field battery and garage outhaust and waste or straight down the drain pipe if ceramic with as it is service box treatment wifi over the electric over btle and red light multi accutrainable semi conduct directional ocusig and direct load energy as packets of dloadable energy. Watss son
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      39. To me THE number one limiter in “NAS” boards these days is networking. This board should ABSOLUTELY have a 10gb NIC built in and a 1gb Management port. 2.5gb is outdated AF for “do it yourself” NAS’s. Especially when the board has so much high speed storage capability and so much bandwidth available from the CPU.
        The PCIe slot should NOT be 16x. It should be 8x. PCIe 5.0×8 is more than enough bandwidth for literally anything you want to put in that slot. Including even the latest most powerful video cards. And the PCIe 5.0 M.2 is also a pointless waste on a board made for NAS’s. Should have just been another Gen4x4 or even 2 more Gen 4×4’s for the same bandwidth.
        The extra bandwidth should have been dedicated to 10gb networking and perhaps even some U.2 or Mini SAS or even both.
        The slot NEEDS to be left available for Storage, HBA’s or a GPU for compute or encoding/decoding. But with only 2.5gb, you would have to waste the PCIe5.0 slot on simple bloody networking.
        I keep seeing these boards come out and only ever be NEARLY the perfect home server board. And this is once again the case. How do manufacturers consistently continue to fail in this arena.
        This board could have been excellent if only it had friggin 10gb onboard. What a shame, what a waste.
        This board is a big “BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO” from me. Such a shame.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      40. Still planning out my NAS rebuild, I’d love to see one of these manufcturers put a 10gbe/SFP+ port and make the board a little bigger with 2 X8 slots instead of 1 X16 and all the M.2 on top. It’s hard to cool some of the hotter running gen4 drives when it’s on the bottom of the board. That said the addition of vpro is pretty huge, if you can live with the 2.5gbe this isn’t bad for the money.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. I’d guess, if you populate then gen5 M2 slot, you will lose 8 lanes on the x16 slot. Intel does not have own gen5 PCIe lanes for SSDs like AM5, so board manufactorers need to chop them of from the GPU lanes by bifurcation. Means: placing a SSD of any gen in the gen5 M2 leaves you with a x8 PCIe only slot and that is not possible to bifurcate anymore. Every other Intel 1700 board works that way because of the CPU limitation.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. This looks Great to build my N3 NAS, just a quick question, since you know the N3 and this board, what is the best/biggest CPU Cooler to get to avoid interfering with RAM or PCIe Slot?
        I’m thinking on going with i5 12500, unless you can provide a better recommendation.
        Thanks in advance for your advice and of course, looking forward to see the Build 🙂

        Cheers
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      43. The effort is nice but the result… If this could had at least 1 more PCI-E slot even x8 would be so nice. Also memory slots would be nice to be more than these 2 🙂 So for example if NAS could support at least 256 GB memory, 100Gbe NIC and 12G sas adapter all at once then it’s the working choice, otherwise no thanks 🙂
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      44. So what’s the difference between the NAS Board-Q670+vPro and the NAS Board-Q670? About 30 bucks difference but I can’t find a difference at least on the Amazon listing.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      45. Can the x16 slot do dual x8 bifurcation? Also the link on Ali for this motherboard doesn’t work for me and can’t find it anywhere searching for it manual on Ali.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      46. Been looking at this board for a Jonsbo N3-build. But that RAM-slot looks really tight by the cpu cooler. No real need for the PCI-E slot or the gen5 port. But the BIOS looks a bit intimidating for a first build. Would you still recommend this board? As for now I’m looking at Gigabyte B760I as an alternative.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      47. CWWK missed the mark. Maybe if it had a built in mobile CPU at that price it would satisfy some needs… but for $200 you might as well get a bigger motherboard and not kneecap yourself with expansion especially for 100G networking and a 16 drive HBA. ITX is great and all but if you are putting 8 drives into a case, you probably have room for a full sized motherboard.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. Probably best itx board ever made. The fact that you can get vPro on it is fantastic. The only thing they could of done to make it perfect is add 10Gb. You can use a different cooler that extends higher if are worried about not fitting everything. Plus gen5 nvme for nas really isn’t noticeable even if you had a 25Gb nic. Save some power, heat, and money using gen4.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      49. *SORRY* for the hazy lighting on this video! It was recorded JSUT before I headed to Taiepi for computex and my ‘good kit’ was all packed up and I was relying on my backup kit – which had a faulty light sensor that failed AFTER I checked everything was up and running.I plan on returning to this board for a larger video soon, and I will be double…no…TRIPLE checking the light levels on that one!!!!!! Have a great weekend all.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE