How Much Does it Cost to Run a NAS? Synology, QNAP, WD and More

Posted on 27 Sep 2022 📧 Subscribe
Contents hide
1 How Much Electricity Does A NAS Use and How Much Does it Cost to run 24×7?
2 NAS Power Use Test Setup
3 What is the Difference Between a NAS Drive ‘Active’ and in ‘IDLE / Standby’?
4 How Energy Costs in these NAS Tests were Calculated?
4.1 Test #1 – Synology DS920+ NAS and 4X 4TB WD Red Drives
4.2 Test #2 – QNAP TS-464 NAS and 4X 22TB WD Red Drives
4.3 Test 3 – Synology DS1621+ NAS and 5x WD Ultrastar 10TB Drives
4.4 Test 4 – Synology RS422+ NAS and 4x HAT5300 16TB Drives
4.5 Test #5 – QNAP TS-453E NAS and 4X 4TB WD Red Drives
4.6 Test #6 – Synology DS1522+ NAS and 5x WD Ultrastar 10TB Drives
4.7 Test #7 – Synology DS2422+ NAS and 4x HAT5300 16TB Drives
5 Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

How Much Electricity Does A NAS Use and How Much Does it Cost to run 24×7?

Have you SEEN how much electricity costs these days? Because of any one of about a hundred different global factors (local conflict, slow renewable energy uptake, monopolizing energy companies with powerful lobbying – take your pick!) most of us in2022/2023 have seen increases in energy costs. In this energy-aware climate, it can be appreciated that a NAS drive (a 24×7 appliance) seemingly has its cost to the end user in terms of electricity as something of a vague number. With so many kinds of NAS available in the market, featuring a mix of CPUs, PSUs, Bays and utilities, PLUS the wide range of HDD/SSD drives in the market to choose from – there are just so many variables when trying to work out how much power your NAS drive is using and how much that is translating to in your monthly energy bill! So, today’s article is about working out how much electricity several popular NAS setup choices will consume, as well as how much that equals to you in £, $ or € per day, month and year! We tested two popular desktop 4-Bay NAS systems, connected them to energy monitors and worked out how much power they used in full active use and in idle. Let’s begin.

Note – this is a guide on energy use on a NAS drive. If you want to learn more about the energy consumption of your PC running 24×7, there is a great guide over on CCL Online that you can read here.

NAS Power Use Test Setup

Choosing the appropriate NAS drive for these tests was always going to be tough. I DO intend on repeating these tests with several different NAS drives after this, but wanted these first few tests to be focused on the most POPULAR NAS setups, as well as identifying the difference between using newer gen CPUs and Larger drives vs using older generation devices and smaller capacity media. All in all, there were four separate tests, with 2x tests on each NAS+Media configuration. These were a Synology DS920+ and 4x WD Red Plus HDDs (a very, VERY popular NAS setup over the last 2-2.5yrs) and a QNAP TS-464 NAS and 4x WD Red 22TB NAS HDDs (both Summer 2022 Releases and represent ‘New NAS’ with ‘High Capacity’ users in mind. Here is a breakdown of the hardware configurations and test architectures:

  • Synology DS920+ or QNAP TS-464 4-Bay Celeron Powered Desktop NAS
  • 4x WD Red WD40EFZX 4TB (Synology Test in SHR) or 4x WD Red Pro WD221KFGX 22TB Hard Drives (QNAP Test in RAID 5)
  • During ‘ACTIVE’ 24hr Tests, the NAS was prevented from going into standby/idle. 1 VM running, 1-Core and 1GB Memory, 2x IP Cameras recording non-stop, drive S.M.A.R.T tests scheduled to be hourly
  • During IDLE 24hr Tests, the VM was deleted, VM and Surveillance Software disabled, ALL S.M.A.R.T tests disabled and network cable (1GbE) disconnected.
  • The first day of operation (which includes initialization and RAID creation) not counted (but visible at the start of the graph).
  • Power was monitored with a GOSUND SMART KIT Smart Plug, Mini 13A – Find HERE

The initial 24hours (used for system initialization and RAID configuration) were NOT included in the power usage monitoring, as although they appear on the graph they are one-off single-event scenarios. Each test (Active vs Idle) was conducted for 24hrs and the overall electricity usage was displayed in kw (kilowatt). But what is the difference between Active and Idle activity? Why does it matter?

What is the Difference Between a NAS Drive ‘Active’ and in ‘IDLE / Standby’?

Although a NAS is designed to be in operation 24×7 and is consuming electricity when running, the actual reality of this and the extent to which it is consuming it is actually alot more nuanced. Most home users who have a NAS system will use the NAS directly for a significant;y smaller portion of time per day than it is actually powered on for. Perhaps to stream a movie or a couple of TV episodes, run a daily backup, have a couple of cameras in/outside their home that are sending recordings (or more likely just alerts and associated captures) to the NAS and that is about it. They will periodically do more than these, maybe a VM, more sophisticated backup or use some of the other services ad hoc, but the result is that in most domestic/bog standard home scenarios, a NAS will be switched internally to Idle/Standby after no pro-active use quite quickly and spend 80-90% of the time in low power modes. Business users might well be using the system 24×7 for sync’d tasks and on-going camera recording, but even then, this will be a lower %  of system resources in use. So, in order to find a comparable and relative means to study the electricity use of a NAS and it’s cost, I have conducted two tests per NAS+HDD configuration. The first, a 24 Hour Active test, with the system using a decent % of it’s CPU+Memory, a swell as the HDDs not being given the chance to switch to Idle/Standy (by constantly writing AND performing S.M.A.R.T tests hourly). The idle tests involve all of those apps, services and scheduled operations being cancelled and the network cable being disconnected from the NAS (for another 24hrs). From here we can work out the cost of an hour of power usage by either setup in high activity and near-zero activity. But how can we work out the COST of the electricity used by the NAS in that time period?

How Energy Costs in these NAS Tests were Calculated?

The results of the energy usage are then cross-referenced by ‘sust-it.net’ and calculations of the cost of the used electricity per day, month and year was calculated for the UK, U.S, Germany, Australia and Canada. Now, using a select energy tariff is much harder, as there are quite literally thousands of different energy providers globally, each with their own pricing on the cost of energy per ‘kWh’. So, I used the national average calculations that were provided by ‘sust-it’ for each of those areas. Some are clearly more up-to-date than others (i.e the United Kingdom Avg Energy cost tariff is dated October 2022, whereas the Canada’s average energy cost is from way back in March 2020), however, these will still provide a good basis for understanding what a NAS drive is going to cost you in electricity when it is in operation. The national tariff averages used in this article for each region are as follows:

UK: Energy Price (October 2022) electricity rate of 34.00 pence per kWh.

USA: Average (Feb 2022) electricity rate of 14.80 cents per kWh.

Germany: Average (June 2021) electricity rate of 31.93 Eurocents per kWh.

Australia: Average (March 2022) electricity rate of 23.59 cents per kWh.

Canada: Average (2020) electricity rate of 8.50 cents per kWh.

Source – https://www.sust-it.net

There are the rates that we will be using to calculate the running costs of the Synology and QNAP NAS systems (and more importantly their respective WD Drive setups and CPU usage).

Test #1 – Synology DS920+ NAS and 4X 4TB WD Red Drives

In test one, I set the Synology DS920+ NAS and WD Red 4TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

  • Synology DS920+ NAS PSU = 100W External PSU, Intel Celeron J4125 Quad Core 2.0-2.7Ghz, 4GB DDR4 2666Mhz Memory
  • WD Red Plus 4TB HDD, SHR
  • Surveillance Station 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Virtual Machine Manager, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Storage Manager (DSM 7.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a WD Red Plus 4TB (Single):
    • Read/Write: 4.7
    • Idle: 3.1
    • Standby Sleep: 0.3
The Synology DS920+ NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$550+
The WD Red Plus 4TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$79
Intel J4125 CPU, 4-Core 2.0-2.7Ghz Celeron CPU
4GB 2666Mhz non-ECC Memory, 1GbE
4 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
5400RPM – 128MB Cache – 4x 1TB Platters

Then, 24hrs later, I disabled all these processes, disconnected the RJ45 LAN and let the NAS fall into idle/standby mode. The results were as follows:

The 0.42kW that was used in the initialization of both the NAS and the drives in the RAID was NOT included in the respective Actie/Idle tests. The 24 hours of Active use energy consumption was 0.51KW

Synology DS920+ and WD Red Plus 4TB HDD Test Results:

0.51KW divided by 24 (hours) = 0.02125kW use per Hour

24hr Active Use (0.51KW) UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.1734 $0.0755 €0.1628 AU$0.1203 CA$0.0433
Cost per Month £5.27 $2.29 €4.95 AU$3.65 CA$1.31
Cost Per Year £63.29 $27.55 €59.42 AU$43.90 CA$15.80

0.18KW divided by 24 (hours) = 0.0075kW use per Hour

24hr Idle Use (0.18KW) UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.0612 $0.0266 €0.0575 AU$0.0425 CA$0.0153
Cost per Month £1.86 $0.80 €1.74 AU$1.29 CA$0.46
Cost Per Year £22.33 $9.70 €20.98 AU$15.51 CA$5.58

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

6hr Active Use / 18hr Idle UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.08925 $0.0387 €0.0838 AU$0.0618 CA$0.0222
Cost per Month £2.7146 $1.1786 €2.5496 AU$1.882 CA$0.6775
Cost Per Year £32.57 $14.14 €30.59 AU$22.58 CA$8.13

Now it is worth keeping in mind that the costs for each region have a notably different price per kW rate, so even after factoring in currency conversions between different units (eg Pounds vs Dollars), there is a significant degree of difference in the costs per day, month and year of the exact same NAS+HDD setup above. The idle power use was just 35.29% of the power use of the active testing in the same 24hr time block.

Test #2 – QNAP TS-464 NAS and 4X 22TB WD Red Drives

Now, the big thing to keep in mind when it comes to our 2nd test is that although the preliminary architecture of the QNAP TS-464 NAS may seem comparable to the DS920+, the Intel N5105 in the QNAP NAS has a higher TDP rating and general power use. It IS more efficient, but that doesn’t always translate to a lower electricity consumption – it just means that the CPU has a higher total capability when push comes to shove. Likewise, although the 4TB drives in the Synology test and 22TB drives in the QNAP test are both standard-looking WD Red 3.5″ SATA hard drive media, built of multiple platters and using Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR), the 22TB is a WD Red Por drive – which is much more industrious in design, features 10 2.2TB platters internally and have alot more mechanics inside for stable running. This all translates into the WD Red Pro 22TB Hard drives AND the QNAP TS-464 being comparatively higher in power consumption when compared against the 2020 released Synology DS920+ and WD Red Plus 4TB. Here are the makeup for the QNAP/WD Red Pro Tests:

  • QNAP TS-464 NAS PSU = 90W External PSU, Intel Celeron N5105 Quad Core 2.0-2.9Ghz, 4GB DDR4 3200Mhz Memory
  • WD Red Pro 22TB HDD, RAID 5
  • QVR Pro and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • QNAP Virtualization Station, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • QNAP Storage Manager (QTS 5.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a WD Red Pro 22TB (Single):
    • Read/Write: 6.8
    • Idle: 3.4
    • Standby Sleep: 1.2
The QNAP TS-464 NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$689+
The WD Red Pro 22TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$699
Intel N5105 CPU, 4-Core 2.0-2.9Ghz Celeron CPU
4GB 3200Mhz non-ECC Memory, 2.5GbE
22 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
7200RPM – 512MB Cache – 10x 2.2TB Platters

The initialization and RAID creation on the QNAP + WD Red Pro 22TB RAID setup took longer than the previous test and also resulted in a higher power consumption (with RAID ReSync set to High Priority) ending in 0.73kW (versus the 0.42 during the more modest Synology/WD Red Plus setup). Indeed, this continued into the 24hr active period, with this setup ending at 1.28kW use during high active use and 0.59kW during the 24hrs idle period.

The difference that a more powerful/capable CPU and the more than 5x Capacity of those WD Red Pro drives did to the power consumption is pretty clear and certain. Let’s see how those results translated into your potential energy bills.

QNAP TS-464 NAS and WD Red Pro 22TB HDD Test Results:

1.28KW divided by 24 (hours) = 0.0533kW use per Hour

24hr Active Use (1.28KW) UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.4349 $0.1893 €0.4084 AU$0.3018 CA$0.1087
Cost per Month £13.22 $5.75 €12.42 AU$9.17 CA$3.30
Cost Per Year £158.73 $69.09 €149.06 AU$110.15 CA$39.67

0.59KW divided by 24 (hours) = 0.0245kW use per Hour

24hr Idle Use (0.59KW) UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.1999 $0.087 €0.1877 AU$0.1387 CA$0.05
Cost per Month £6.08 $2.64 €5.70 AU$4.21 CA$1.52
Cost Per Year £72.96 $31.75 €68.51 AU$50.62 CA$18.25

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

6hr Active Use / 18hr Idle UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Cost Per Day £0.2586 $0.1125 €0.2428 AU$0.1794 CA$0.0646
Cost per Month £7.8665 $3.4233 €7.387 AU$5.457 CA$1.964
Cost Per Year £94.39 $41.08 €88.64 AU$65.49 CA$23.57

With the 25 % Active and 75% Idle ratio, the pricing on this high-capacity solution does seem alot more palatable. Still, there is no denying that in order to enjoy more modern large-capacity media, there can be a hidden cost as this technology becomes more industrious.

Test 3 – Synology DS1621+ NAS and 5x WD Ultrastar 10TB Drives

I set the Synology DS1621+ NAS and WD Ultrastar 4TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

  • Synology DS1621+ NAS PSU = 100W External PSU, Intel Celeron J4125 Quad Core 2.0-2.7Ghz, 4GB DDR4 2666Mhz Memory
  • WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD, SHR
  • Surveillance Station 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Virtual Machine Manager, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Storage Manager (DSM 7.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a WD Ultrastar 10TB (Single):
    • 9.2W Active
    • 8.0W Idle
The Synology DS1621+ NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$999+
The WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD (x5)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$259
AMD Ryzen V1500B CPU, 4-Core 2.2hz Celeron CPU
4GB 2400Mhz ECC Memory, 1GbE
10 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
7200RPM – 256MB Cache – 6x Platters

Then, 24hrs later, I disabled all these processes, disconnected the RJ45 LAN and let the NAS fall into idle/standby mode. The results were as follows:

The 0.80kW that was used in the initialization of both the NAS and the drives in the RAID was NOT included in the respective Actie/Idle tests.

Synology DS1621+ and WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD Test Results:

0.0479kW use per hour active and 0.0266kW use per hour idle = 

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour 0.016 0.007 0.015 0.011 0.004
           
24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use U.S Power Use Germany Power Use Australia Canada
Per Hour £0.01 0.003 0.008 0.006 0.002

1.15KW over 24 hours Active = 

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.38 0.168 0.36 0.264 0.096
Cost per Month 11.68 5.11 10.95 8.03 2.92
Cost Per Year 140.16 61.32 131.4 96.36 35.04

0.64KW over 24 hours idle = 

24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.22 0.072 0.192 0.144 0.048
Cost per Month 6.57 2.19 5.84 4.38 1.46
Cost Per Year 78.84 26.28 70.08 52.56 17.52

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

6hr Active Use / 18hr Idle UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.26 0.096 0.234 0.174 0.06
Cost per Month 7.8475 2.92 7.1175 5.2925 1.825
Cost Per Year 94.17 35.04 85.41 63.51 21.9

I will be conducting more tests with more NAS configurations in the coming months and either adding them to this article, or creating their own articles. Stay tuned, check below to see if other NAS power tests have been published and recommended to you, or watch the video version of these tests (which goes into more detail on the current predicaments in the energy crisis facing many of us in 2022, 2023 and beyond.

Test 4 – Synology RS422+ NAS and 4x HAT5300 16TB Drives

I set the Synology RS422+ NAS and HAT5300 16TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

  • Synology RS422+ NAS
  • HAT5300 16TB HDD, RAID 5
  • Surveillance Station 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Virtual Machine Manager, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Storage Manager (DSM 7.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a HAT5300 16TB (Single):
    • 4W Standby/Idle
    • 7.63W Active
The Synology RS422+ NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$799
The HAT5300 16TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$599
AMD Ryzen R1600 CPU, 2-Core 2.6-3.1hz Celeron CPU
2GB DDR4 Memory, 1GbE
16 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
7200RPM – 512MB Cache – 8 Platters

Then, 24hrs later, I disabled all these processes, disconnected the RJ45 LAN and let the NAS fall into idle/standby mode. The results were as follows:

The power that was used in the initialization of both the NAS and the drives in the RAID was NOT included in the respective Actie/Idle tests.

Synology RS422+ and HAT5300 16TB HDD Test Results:

0.03583kW use per Hour in full access/use and 0.01375kW use per Hour in idle/standby:

1hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.01 0.0053 0.0114 0.0085 0.003
           
1hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.00 0.002 0.0044 0.0032 0.0012

During 24hrs of Active/Full Use, 0.86KW:

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.29 0.1272 0.2736 0.204 0.072
Cost per Month 8.906 3.869 8.322 6.205 2.19
Cost Per Year 106.872 46.428 99.864 74.46 26.28

During idle by 24 (hours) 0.33KW:

24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.11 0.048 0.1056 0.0768 0.0288
Cost per Month 3.431 1.46 3.212 2.336 0.876
Cost Per Year 41.172 17.52 38.544 28.032 10.512

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

18hr Idle Use (KW)

6hr Active Use

 UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.16 0.0678 0.1476 0.1086 0.0396
Cost per Month 4.79975 2.06225 4.4895 3.30325 1.2045
Cost Per Year 57.597 24.747 53.874 39.639 14.454

 

 

Test #5 – QNAP TS-453E NAS and 4X 4TB WD Red Drives

I set the QNAP TS-453E NAS and WD Red 4TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

The QNAP TS-453E NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$699+
The WD Red Plus 4TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$79
Intel J6412 CPU, 4-Core 2.0-2.6Ghz Celeron CPU
8GB 3200Mhz non-ECC Memory, 2.5GbE
4 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
5400RPM – 64MB Cache – 4x 1TB Platters

QNAP TS-453E NAS PSU = 100W External PSU, Intel Celeron N5105 Quad Core 2.0-2.9Ghz, 4GB DDR4 3200Mhz Memory

  • WD Red Plus 4TB HDD, RAID 5
  • QVR Pro 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • QNAP Virtualization Station, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • QNAP Storage Manager (QTS 5.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a WD Red Plus 4TB (Single):
    • Read/Write: 4.7
    • Idle: 3.1
    • Standby Sleep: 0.3

Let’s see how those results translated into your potential energy bills.

QNAP TS-453E NAS and WD Red Plus 4TB HDD Test Results:

0.03125kW use per Hour in full access/use and 0.0204166kW use per Hour in idle/standby:

1hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.01 0.0046 0.01 0.0074 0.0027
           
1hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.01 0.003 0.0065 0.0048 0.0017

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF ACTIVITY (no standby time or drive hibernation)

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.25 0.1104 0.24 0.1776 0.0648
Cost per Month 7.738 3.358 7.3 5.402 1.971
Cost Per Year 92.856 40.296 87.6 64.824 23.652

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF IDLE/STANDBY with no system use and ethernet/network connection disconnected

24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.17 0.072 0.156 0.1152 0.0408
Cost per Month 5.037 2.19 4.745 3.504 1.241
Cost Per Year 60.444 26.28 56.94 42.048 14.892

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

6hr Active Use and 18hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.19 0.0816 0.177 0.1308 0.0468
Cost per Month 5.71225 2.482 5.38375 3.9785 1.4235
Cost Per Year 68.547 29.784 64.605 47.742 17.082

 

 

Test #6 – Synology DS1522+ NAS and 5x WD Ultrastar 10TB Drives

I set the Synology DS1522+ NAS and WD Ultrastar 10TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

The Synology DS1522+ NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$799
The WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD (x5)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$249
AMD Ryzen R1600 CPU, 2-Core 2.6-3.1hz Celeron CPU
8GB DDR4 Memory, 1GbE
10 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
7200RPM – 256MB Cache – 7 Platter
  • Synology DS1522+ NAS
  • WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD, RAID 5
  • Surveillance Station 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Virtual Machine Manager, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Storage Manager (DSM 7.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a WD Ultrastar 10TB (Single):
    • 9.2W Active
    • 8.0W Idle

Then, 24hrs later, I disabled all these processes, disconnected the RJ45 LAN and let the NAS fall into idle/standby mode. The results were as follows:

The power that was used in the initialization of both the NAS and the drives in the RAID was NOT included in the respective Actie/Idle tests.

Synology DS1522+ and WD Ultrastar 10TB HDD Test Results:

0.047083kW use per Hour in full access/use and 0.02333kW use per Hour in idle/standby:

1hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.02 0.007 0.015 0.0111 0.004
           
1hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.01 0.0035 0.0074 0.0055 0.002

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF ACTIVITY (no standby time or drive hibernation)

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.38 0.168 0.36 0.2664 0.096
Cost per Month 11.68 5.11 10.95 8.103 2.92
Cost Per Year 140.16 61.32 131.4 97.236 35.04

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF IDLE/STANDBY with no system use and ethernet/network connection disconnected

24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.19 0.084 0.1776 0.132 0.048
Cost per Month 5.767 2.555 5.402 4.015 1.46
Cost Per Year 69.204 30.66 64.824 48.18 17.52

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

6hr Active Use and 18hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.24 0.105 0.2232 0.1656 0.06
Cost per Month 7.24525 3.19375 6.789 5.037 1.825
Cost Per Year 86.943 38.325 81.468 60.444 21.9

Test #7 – Synology DS2422+ NAS and 4x HAT5300 16TB Drives

I set the Synology DS2422+ NAS and HAT5300 16TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:

The Synology DS2422+ NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$1899
The HAT5300 16TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$599
AMD Ryzen V1500B CPU, 4-Core 2.2hz Celeron CPU
2GB DDR4 Memory, 4GbE
16 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
7200RPM – 512MB Cache – 8 Platters
  • Synology DS2422+ NAS
  • HAT5300 16TB HDD, RAID 5
  • Surveillance Station 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Virtual Machine Manager, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
  • Synology Storage Manager (DSM 7.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
  • Reported Average power requirements of a HAT5300 16TB (Single):
    • 4W Standby/Idle
    • 7.63W Active

Then, 24hrs later, I disabled all these processes, disconnected the RJ45 LAN and let the NAS fall into idle/standby mode. The results were as follows:

The power that was used in the initialization of both the NAS and the drives in the RAID was NOT included in the respective Actie/Idle tests.

Synology DS2422+ and HAT5300 16TB HDD Test Results:

0.053333kW use per Hour in full access/use and 0.02625kW use per Hour in idle/standby:

1hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.02 0.0079 0.017 0.0126 0.0045
           
1hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Per Hour £0.01 0.0039 0.0084 0.0062 0.0022

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF ACTIVITY (no standby time or drive hibernation)

24hr Active Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.43 0.1896 0.408 0.3024 0.108
Cost per Month 13.213 5.767 12.41 9.198 3.285
Cost Per Year 158.556 69.204 148.92 110.376 39.42

Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF IDLE/STANDBY with no system use and ethernet/network connection disconnected

24hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.21 0.0936 0.2016 0.1488 0.0528
Cost per Month 6.497 2.847 6.132 4.526 1.606
Cost Per Year 77.964 34.164 73.584 54.312 19.272

So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):

25%/75% Active/Idle Use:

6hr Active Use and 18hr Idle Use (KW) UK Power Use £ U.S Power Use $ Germany Power Use € Australia AU$ Canada CA$
Cost Per Day £0.27 0.1176 0.2532 0.1872 0.0666
Cost per Month 8.176 3.577 7.7015 5.694 2.02575
Cost Per Year 98.112 42.924 92.418 68.328 24.309

 

 

📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔


    🔒 Join Inner Circle

    Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!


    Want to follow specific category? 📧 Subscribe

    This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below

    Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?

    Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.

      By clicking SEND you accept this Privacy Policy
      Question will be added on Q&A forum. You will receive an email from us when someone replies to it.
      🔒Private Fast Track Message (1-24Hours)

      TRY CHAT Terms and Conditions
      If you like this service, please consider supporting us. We use affiliate links on the blog allowing NAScompares information and advice service to be free of charge to you.Anything you purchase on the day you click on our links will generate a small commission which isused to run the website. Here is a link for Amazon and B&H.You can also get me a ☕ Ko-fi or old school Paypal. Thanks!To find out more about how to support this advice service check HEREIf you need to fix or configure a NAS, check Fiver Have you thought about helping others with your knowledge? Find Instructions Here  
       
      Or support us by using our affiliate links on Amazon UK and Amazon US
          
       
      Alternatively, why not ask me on the ASK NASCompares forum, by clicking the button below. This is a community hub that serves as a place that I can answer your question, chew the fat, share new release information and even get corrections posted. I will always get around to answering ALL queries, but as a one-man operation, I cannot promise speed! So by sharing your query in the ASK NASCompares section below, you can get a better range of solutions and suggestions, alongside my own.

      ☕ WE LOVE COFFEE ☕
       

       

      locked content ko-fi subscribe

      DISCUSS with others your opinion about this subject.
      ASK questions to NAS community
      SHARE more details what you have found on this subject
      CONTRIBUTE with your own article or review. Click HERE
      IMPROVE this niche ecosystem, let us know what to change/fix on this site
      EARN KO-FI Share your knowledge with others and get paid for it! Click HERE

      146 thoughts on “How Much Does it Cost to Run a NAS? Synology, QNAP, WD and More”

      1. Say 4 18TB drives active on DS920+ , how much power does it consume? To give more information say the drives are Seagate exos or WD ultrastar 18TBs. Not all drives are at full utilisation all the time.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      2. I wonder whether the power consumption is the same in different countries given the differences in mains voltage. USA and Canada uses 120V, Australia uses 220-240V, Germany and UK uses 230V.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      6. First of all, thank you for your channel. I’ve learned a lot!!! Considering DIY NAS with an SBC to replace a QNAP NAS. SBCs are affordable and customizable. They connect SATA drives and run Kodi. I’m interested in hearing your thoughts. Not sure if you covered this topic much. Thanks!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      8. Capacity is a real issue
        nowadays just pay streaming services and let them worry about all that 4k tv/movie capacity
        i’ve swapped out all my tv/movie to flac music files on my NAS lol
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      9. nowadays these iptv catch up is quite cool
        there is always great stuff in there that you can just click play and burn all your free time away
        they are usually come included with your internet subscription
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      10. Disney+ is basically free with internet plan in certain countries lol
        nobody really subscribe Netflix here
        USA market is just one small part of the world
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      13. Dude, a word of advice: your videos are interesting yet tooooooooooooo bloody long. You repeat things 3, 4, sometimes even 5 times! And not just this one with the power utilization.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      14. 26:53 And that’s what a lot of people don’t seem to understand these days.That’s literally why i don’t like this digitalization of all these mediums. Especially gaming! I still buy all of my games PHYSICALLY! (Except for those that aren’t available to buy physically of course.) That’s really important to me. Now, we can see a clear trend that this IS GOING AWAY! And like you said: If the platform is gone, your media (whether it is games, movies, music,…) WILL BE GONE TOO!

        I myself have Apple TV+ because there are a couple of good shows there and Netflix. I also have Disney+ but i pay my half with a friend of mine. But the movies i really want (in my case, movies like Harry Potter for example) i will actually buy physically.

        Anyway, it is very convenient for sure. I don’t even think that’s half of the appeal, i think that might be 80% of the appeal. I mean, as long as you have an internet connection of course, you can watch it everywhere. In most situations. On your phone/tablet when you’re in a long car/train/bus,…. drive. When you are laying in the hospital, or whatever the case may be right? The ease of use/convenience is there.

        Still though, you don’t own any of it, and that’s exactly what i have been saying for years already. Now, to each their own of course. Not everyone wants to buy their blu-rays (movies/series/music or games.) That’s absolutely fine. But i do think it is good to have options. We really need that. Once they remove that option and we are only left with streaming services. That becomes bad. Bad for us, the consumer that is. Because if you don’t own it, they can increase the price (and believe me, they will!) They can also take away those movies (for example Netflix has taken away all 7 Harry Potter movies on Netflix. At least here in Belgium.) I’m lucky enough that i own the Blu-rays. But it’s just an example. I really hope that physical media, whatever that media is, (Movies/games,…) will remain for as long as possible.

        I must admit that i did thought that movies and music would come on an SD/USB device in this day & age. But i guess that would up the cost too much. A bit like the Nintendo Switch comes on those smal cartridges. I do like that a lot to be honest.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      15. Was watching this video as well as your video on NAS Synology setup Part 1. I’m planning on buying a NAS although I haven’t yet. I’m planning on using it mainly for streaming videos to and from my Zappiti (a video media player device). On the Zappiti website they give instructions on setting up Zappiti with Synology’s Docker program. Do i need to do this or would I want to have it? Why or why not do this? thanks for any insights you may have
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      16. Why do you assume that people will subscribe to 5 streaming services? Nuts. Paid and Free streaming services killed personal collection. No need to own one locally.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      19. Today to have a private server and private media server is expensive , just the hardware ,DS synology 920 about 500.00 four Nas hard fives 800.00 , add the electricity cost , well yes it’s expensive but more expensive will be to lose all the data . Just think about it!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      20. Well, that was just FN brilliant. Thank you for your very wise words and thoughts about just buying you own media and storing it to a NAS. I think too, that owning your own media in form from DVD’s or Blurays is much better as in 20 years you can still watch the stuf or if you die someone from your familly can enjoy. You are a very nice guy, so keep up the good work you areer doing.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      21. Glad you did this, as before lots will want to buy today, people will want to know how much these things cost to run.

        Its important for many to understand before we buy what these things will cost to run.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      25. That the power consumption is neglible highly depends where you live, for Germany that statement is wrong. A device pulling 50Wh straight for the entire year will cost you about 15€/month at current prices.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      26. Unfortunately, most apps and plex on qnap prevent drives going to idle or standby. It is a pain as I only use plex some parts of the day, for example. Also, I do power down, but it is a real pain to.then schedule scans and raid scrubbing, etc, at the right times.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      29. Lower speed Nas helps. A 1gb ethernet uses less power than 10gb. Also pre-transcoding video can help reduce power, or choosing power friendly video formats.
        Most folks should have a ups with a Nas, so maintain that. Look to totally kill the power during off time to save vampire power of the Nas psu during program off time using smart switches
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      31. Maybe a nice experiment;
        Get a set of solar-panels, fair size batteries (100h?) an (1000W?) inverter and make the NAS run only on solar power.
        You probably need 400 ~ 500 Watt solar-panels to and both power the NAS and charge the batteries at the same time.
        But that’s just a mind-melting idea I’ve been thinking about if that feasible.
        (of course the solar panels might be prohibitively high)
        Makes a nice coonversation-peace over a beverage of choosing 😉
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      32. I use a dual bay Nas, on bay 1 I have an SSD where I keep frequent used files, synch mobile phone and so and a bigger HDD in bay 2 for less frequent used files and let them enter sleep mode.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      34. Also, when letting the disks spin down or the NAS to power off you put extra wear on the drives shortening their life-span. Maybe you could save a bit on electricity but more than likely the premature failure of the disks will eat that up….
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      35. I went to 2.5 HDD… They are slower, but combined with SSD caching still faster then my network. 40% down in energy consumption, but it only makes sense from an economic / ecologic point of view, if you need new drives anyway. Otherwise its spending pounds to save pennies ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      36. As always, I really carefully watched the video, because your topics are always interesting. One thing you forgot to mention for not so experienced users – WOL working only when all devices are on the same network. AFAIK (please correct me if I’m wrong) you can’t use WOL from remote location via Internet.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      37. Slightly OT… Robbie, would you consider doing a video on the economics of 4 bay vs 6 bay or 8 bay NAS ? I have a Synology DS920+ with 4 x 6 Tb drives running SHR which are getting quite full. I was planning to replace one of them with a single 16 Tb. But, using the Synology Raid calculator, I find that if I replace just one of the 6 Tb drives with a 16 Tb, the new drive will be recognized as a 6 Tb drive. So, I need to install in 2 x 16 Tb drives to get the benefit of the larger drive. And I will now have 2 x 6 Tb drives ( 12 TB total ) , which are otherwise quite serviceable, sitting on a shelf gathering dust. BUT… had I purchased a 6 or an 8 bay NAS, I could have just added the 2 x 16 TB drives AND kept 12 Tb of the old drive capacity. That is several hundred dollars / GBP’s of storage cost. I haven’t checked on the prices of said 6 and 8 bay NAS yet. And, further to the above bit of arithmetic, if I was running Raid 5 for example, I would have to replace ALL 4 of my 6 Tb drives, not just 2 of them. With a 6 or 8 bay NAS, I could have added additional 6 Tb drives until I ran out of bays. My next NAS is definitely going to be 8 bays as I would rather not use an expansion unit.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      38. BTW, stop-starting mechanical HDD’s may affect their durability. You might save on energy but might lose on the lifespan of that drive.
        Our record currently stands at 21 years uninterrupted ..
        Granted, that is walking the thin line of failure but we like a good challenge.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      39. As we have more than 1x NAS, we use them to warm-up the room and that works!
        (18 to 19 degrees centigrade at the moment)
        And don’t mind the noise, it is quite bearable unless you are sitting on top of the NASses.
        Word of caution on WoL, that is standard that is only available on 1GBe ports, normally.
        WoL is not supported on 10GBe ports (not part of the standards, I’ve checked) and possibly also not on 2.5GBe & 5GBe ports as the standards did not foresee that.
        However, some brands (of switches etc) might support WoL on 2.5GBe/5GBe, check the documentation!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      41. My drives on my 920+ never seem to hibernate. I have 2 setup on their own volume. I have a 4th disk setup with a second volume with the Surveillance Station recording to that drive, so I wouldn’t expect that one to hibernate. But I guess Surveillance Station keeps the other drives from hibernating as well?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      42. Interesting. I have 8 bay nas with 4 filled hdd. From usually i pay 30$ bill without a nas, when my nas on 24/7 nas it goes up to 50$. Almost doubling what i usually paid for.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      48. About 80% of the electricity produced in Canada is from green sources, most of it being hydroelectricity. Fossil fuel price fluctuations do not affect Canada very much. Most people I know refer to electricity as “hydro” because hydroelectricity is virtually the only source of electricity for us here in British Columbia.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      49. Thanks for the video. Obviously, the energy consumption is mainly caused by the drives. Therefore, I am asking myself whether its worthwhile to have three 4TB HDDs in my new NAS with SHR in order to speed up the system or whether I should stick to two drives with lower energy consumption. What are your thoughts? Will 3 drives vs 2 increase speed significantly?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      52. I really appreciate these tests. When I’m working the energy consumption is less a concern because I’m getting value out of the system. However the idle consumption is of great importance for a 24/7 system.
        So if my calculations are correct your tests show .59kwh *1000/24 = 24.6 watts idle power….that is not particularly good since I would hope for something more like <=10watts...maybe the Wrd reds are the way to go(maybe have to go back and look at that video)
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      53. Please test qnap ts251d, mine never stops spinning don’t know why, i end up turning it off because i worry about the cost especially now with things going crazy, also i get a bit of peace. I have a 2 bay with 2x 4tb ironwolf nas drives. Good show very interesting????????????????????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      54. If you are using a UPS, the energy used is tracked and even generates reports on utilization and costs (all APC units have the software). Just plug in your current rates and reports can be automatically generated. These reports will generate hourly, daily, monthly, and yearly data.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      56. That power meter your using, is it a proper power meter? The reason I ask, the cheap smart home plugs on show the average usage, not the actual…. It’s not showing the real value…if just a smart home plug.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      57. I’d wrongly expect a pro drive to use less power. The reason for my though… if it’s pro it should be better, not worse. All those pro drives in service, would be wasting so much power in bulk…an a business would look to reduce costs….I’m wrong ????
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      59. Would be interested to know about a QNAP TS-431X3 with 2 x WD80EFBX drives and 2 x WDS100T1R0A SSDs cheers! I have mine on 24×7 and thinking about doing some kind of scheduled power down (maybe when not in use?) and then i power on when i need them – to try and save power.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      64. Just finished a CompTIA Net+, Sec+, and CCNA courses through the VA at an IT school for Veterans. Have applied to over 115 jobs in the past 2 months. Can’t get a job anywhere. Everyone wants you to have a PHD for an entry level IT job. It’s depressing and discouraging out here! So desperate for someone in IT somewhere to give me a chance to get started. Can’t get a job without experience, can’t get experience without a job. Yay.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      68. NAS costs lot more upfront but, after that you get what you own or download torrents… Also make up email accounts and get those free or cheap trials for streaming services etc.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      71. Excellent video as always. I’ve recently stopped my service to hifi music streaming and am allocating that money to buying physical media that I own and store on my nas. I do retain one movie streaming service for reasons you mentioned, but ones that aren’t often available and I enjoy watching often I’m buying the box sets and ripping them to my nas so I always have them available to watch and I know I have them now forever. It’s almost hard justifying buying when we can just stream so much but I like the idea I own it now and it won’t just disappear once my subscription ends. When I originally bought my nas it was for a simple file server and backup until I found out how much these Synology devices are capable of. Now I can’t get enough of using it to its fullest potential. Many thanks to you for that!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      72. What I’m doing: Netflix for convenience if the movie or show not on there I’ll buy it on apple tv if it’s a good price and they have it if not then it’s Plex time baby.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      74. You mentioned average prices of media you can own… the thing that gets me is that if you DO buy something from Google play, you still don’t really own it… you can only view it through their services… talk about misleading. The only way I can see that you truly own that media is buying a physical copy of it
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      76. I think these services are amongst the cheapest in India… $8 per month for Netflix, $12 for Amazon prime for a year and about $20 per year for Disney (includes live Sports) ???? .. I still use a NAS (on raspberry pi) for the shows which are no more available in any streaming services..
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      78. Great info as usual … just one quick question … I’m quite a tech guy and over the years I have built up lots and lots of family photos / videos and films on lots of usb hard drives … I think it’s time to get a “NAS” … do I need a special type of “NAS” for all of my media ??? As it’s mainly photos / videos ???
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      79. Great video. I think you missed a good chunk of streaming by not including music streaming in this calculation. Could be another almost 20 bucks a month for streaming service.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      80. While owning physical media is great, and having those movies as part of a collection, There is the issue of disc rot, If you had discs laying around for a number of years, There’s always the possibility that the material that’s on that disc would start to deteriorate, and become unreadable, So I highly recommend you rip those discs and store them on your media server of choice as a backup, That way you have a perfectly good digital copy of your physical media. Software such as MakeMKV will allow you to rip all your DVDs and Blu-rays.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      82. We us our NAS/Plex server more as a giant DVR. We will subscribe to a premium service for a month and download everything we want from the service to Plex and then watch it at our leisure. The next month, we will pick a different service. Rinse and repeat every month. If it’s a show we like, we keep it. If not it’s deleted. I also had a huge DVD collection that I wanted to preserve.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      84. Another thing to consider is FTA (Free to air) on home theatre PC (HTPC). Our household has been using a HTPC with TV tuner card(s) since they arrived Win7 currently we can schedule recording on up to four channels in parallel. The main use is to avoid being forced into the schedule of the TV company, you can watch recordings in your own time plus occasionally archiving the interesting stuff . Another service we use it Kodi its worthwhile checking that out. How many people actually use HTPC with TV tuner cards these days? Streaming services seem to have killed them off.

        I don’t recommend using enterprise grade SATA HDDs in a media storage device because they are very noisy and run at higher temps than consumer grade HDDs. They are designed for data centres not lounge rooms.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      86. For those looking for free video content, here’s what I do. My local public library has a huge DVD movie, TV series, and documentary collection. Their collection is easy to search online and then simply click to reserve and have delivered to my local branch. I then use MakeMKV to rip the DVD to my hard drive in MKV format which is pretty much original quality. A bit redundant, but I then use Handbrake to make an MP4 copy which is far smaller and therefore a bit more portable when the need arises. Sure, the movies aren’t new releases, but there are thousands to choose from and everything is free, including MakeMKV and Handbrake. It’s all on my NAS for home viewing throughout the house. Alternatively, my local thrift stores sell movie DVD’s for around $2. I buy those occasionally, rip, and then donate to the library.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      87. In the UK and some other European countries there is potentially also the cost of a TV licence ~£159. In the UK you can not watch live programming without a TV licence. Streaming of non-live content avoids this problem but one has to be careful. If you can be 100% sure you will not watch live TV then no problem.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      88. For me, it’s convenience. I briefly thought about running a media server, and quickly decided I just don’t want to bother.

        I can browse Netflix or Prime, choose what I want, and it’s streaming.

        With physical media, I have to find and acquire the media (harder and harder to do), bring it home or wait for shipping, take the time to rip the disc, store it, worry about naming conventions and organization, back it up, figure out how to actually stream that media on the device I want to use. Yeah, I am so done with that.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      89. Apples and oranges really, considering the content is often different, streaming always being the newest (except cinema ofc in some cases) and what most people are looking for. Bought media stored on a server will always play catch-up in that regard. Unless ofc we’re talking pi**cy, plus automation etc., which is entirely different, and naturally beating everything else. Illegal ofc ????
        You rightly mention retention of your media. With streaming you have zero control, and your favorite movie/show can (and does) get yanked overnight. With a server you control it’s the opposite. Bottom line IMHO, the stuff you want to keep, get a copy you control, for everything else streaming is fine.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      91. I think the trick is to use and manage all the above so that you get the most bang for your buck. I purchase the hard to find (and seldom streamed) titles, as well as my all time favorites for my NAS. I stream Prime and HULU, but I don’t really consider Prime because I would have it even if all I did was get free two day delivery. Add the free music and videos and it’s a no brainer. HULU is getting a bit pricey but they allow you to suspend your subscription which works out great when you’ve caught up with everything. All others like Paramount+ or Britbox and Acorn I usually wait till they have a trial of a dollar a month for 2 or 3 months. A very easy and cheap way to catch up on your favorites. Bottom line is, these are tough times and you have to make the dollar (or pound) stretch especially on discretionary spending.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      93. You forgot one important consideration. Is your cable or DSL company. Sending all of that data across the internet, and if your provider has limits set on your data usage. You could get a huge surprise from them at the end of the month. Depending on your contract with them.

        No.2 Back up, Back up, Back up. Granted a NAS will run you $400.00 and up. Consider two. Why ?
        Should your power spike, local Tornado, Hurricane, system failure on one system. It’s electronics …It’s meant to fail at some point or another .
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      94. Good video; thanks! What I do (not possible everywhere): Movie pass for the local cinema; €240/year for watching unlimited new films + buy blu-rays for things I love and plan watching more than once; €200/year + occasional streaming services for binge watching series during holidays only; €40/year = €480/year (approx.) or €40/month. Next to this, for older content, I receive DVDs for free from friends or €1/each at the local thrift store.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      95. Many thanks for another really useful topic. You mention the fiddly bit of transferring physical media to a NAS and this is one I’ve found difficult. Would welcome your thoughts on how best to do it for those of us with large physical media libraries.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      96. I think that there is a point being overlooked in many of these cost calculations, and that is backups. Because when you buy physical media, not only does that give you legal access to the content, but if you are ripping it, then it is also a backup of all your content. I.e. if your NAS craps out/gets cryptoed etc, you can still re-rip from the physical media. Yes it’s a time-consuming process, but it is certainly better than just having one copy on a single NAS that you could lose. So if you do consider backups (and not everyone would otherwise have a backup, but I would, so this applies to my calculation) then you have to basically double at a minimum the cost of storage, which depending on how much media and what quality, is often the majority cost of a NAS setup.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      99. One thing I’d be curious about is how this compares to an old computer that has been set up as a NAS. One of the things that people have always suggested to do with an older computer is simply re-purpose the computer and one use is as a NAS. My expectation would be that a purpose built NAS would be more energy efficient than a general computer used as a NAS, but I would wonder how large the difference would be.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      100. I’m with e.on and the tarrif I’m on has cheap rates and standard rates through a 24 hour period, so I’d have to work out the cost on the standard rate and cheap rate per the hours.
        I’m also running a more higher end NAS, DS3617xs & DX1215 both fully populated with 16Tb drives 12 Toshiba / 12 Seagate.

        How about doing one on a PC’s PSU. I’ve got a gaming rig with a 1.2KW PSU but don’t play games much.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      101. I’ve always powered off my ds 218+ if not used for a couple of days first thing because of power consumption second because i try to avoid hdd tear. Anyway thanks for this useful information and test
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      102. So if you had a Synology multi bay NAS is it possible to run the operating system, virtual machines docker images etc on SSDs ( 1 volume) and have all your extra data on mechanical drives (2nd volume – photos, movies music, personal files) so the power consuming volumes shut down when not being used to reduce power consumption? Data you keep may be many many terabytes but data you use constantly may only be Gigabytes. A home assistant container/VM may only be 32 GB. Multiple containers/VMs etc may be able to be run successfully on a single TB SSD.

        Perhaps running all your apps/services on a Mac M1 chipped computer is the way to go. Heaps of power, low energy use for 24/7 home server. A mix of internal/external SSDs with an external HDD array for that mass storage – if energy consumption was your concern. Also has the power for everyday computing tasks as well.

        My DS1821+, router, modem, switch & ups pulls from 110-130watts depending on load. Idles along around 110. My Mac mini idles along at about 9watts with 2 SSD drives. My Pi with a single SSD idles about 5 watts from memory. The Mac gives the best bang for buck but is not as easy to setup as the Synology for multiple services. The Pi is the cheapest to run but again not as easy to run as the synology for multiple services. How much is convenience worth? In my case if the Synology saves me 5 hours of my time a year it has paid for the electricity.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      106. As someoen who’s’ avoiding paying for Cloud Storage this is a very important consideration.
        However, I would assume many of us, such as myself, Cuttting that Cord/Bill with a more affordable (DS220+ / DS420).
        It would be nice to see these more consumer levels NASs added to the mix. But for now, I’ll assume they are about the same or less than the 9+ series.

        For Ontario Canada, average price is a little over 0.10c. But with the more complicated Peak, Mid-Peak, Off-Peak fees.

        Assuming someone who’s using a NAS as I am, Photo/video storage, with the ocational evening video viewing, I’d be in idle more than 75% (honestly it’s more like 90% idle).
        That said, we are looking at about $5 a year.

        Looking forward to Eddie’s tool. that’ll be really nice 🙂

        For reference I already have 2 WD 8TB Red Plus drive. I’ll be dropping them in a DS223+ or DS423.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      110. There seems to be some confusion about units here. A watt or kilowatt is a measure of power. Power is the rate of energy consumption. A watt (power unit) is one joule (energy unit) per second. To make the numbers simple, we measure electrical energy in watt or kilowatt hours, rather than in joules or kilojoules. A device running at 10 watts for 24 hours uses 10 x 24 = 240 watt hours (or 0.24 kilowatt hours) of energy. It is incorrect to use the term watts per hour, because a watt is a power measurement, not an energy measurement. I hope that helps.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      116. In order to save some money I’m using the DSM scheduler feature to shut down a Synology DS220+ after 11H p.m. and power on from 8 a.m. every day. I wonder if this constantly power on/off cycles can stress the equipment and eventually make it less durable?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      118. Thanks for the info, very helpful. I’ve been using the DS 918+ with 4 X 4TB Ironwolf drives, along with 2 X 512 M2 cache. I live on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, most of the power in the province is generated by hydro dams. So in comparison to the rest of Canada, we have relatively the cheapest energy in the country. I have a device that monitors my usage and I receive a weekly report. Throughout the summer, my usage is between $17 to $23 per week, that’s with a heatpump/airconditioner and all the other electrical devices in my home. My home was built in 2006, modern construction, airtight, 1,800 sqft rancher. I’m currently looking at finding a device(s) that will allow me to monitor all the equipment running in my office, home-lab, along with all my POE security cameras. This way I can break the usage down, so my wife will stop saying I’m using to much….lol
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      119. on Canadian rates – while it does vary province by province, yep – our electricity costs are indeed that cheap! hydro power makes things a lot cheaper over a long period, when dam construction are done. Ontario Hydro: ~$0.113/kWH; Manitoba hydro: $0.0932/kWH; BC hydro: $0.1132/kWH and Quebec Hydro: $0.06319/kWH.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      125. I recommend to get the 5TB Seagate Barracuda 2.5 inch drives for any home NAS. These drives can be harvested from inexpensive external USB drives, have the same 600000 load unload cycles as a WD RED and have up to 140 MB/s transfer rate. I have used three of these in a SHR RAID and one of them has already over 15000 hours of use. These drives will significantly reduce the power consumption of any 4 bay NAS.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      126. Excellent job, very thorough & informative. I’m sure this will be helpful to alot of your viewers. Any possibility of this test on the TVS-872X or on the TVS-872XT which is pretty much the same system?
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      128. I’ve finally gone the DS920+ route after measuring my media server idle power over 24hrs. It’s really nice having a server to play with but it was costing me £20 per month and that is at September 2021 prices. On Saturday that becomes unafordable so my Plex library will live on the 920+
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      133. very much appreciate this video!

        only (constructive comment) is that there are so MANY variables into actual power consumption from services being used and how often…data transfers being done and how often and the physical drives being used. BUT you did demonstrate how to do this so people can figure out their own power consumption.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      134. I’d be interested to see how much lower the power consumption gets with an SSD-only NAS, it’s especially appealing because it would be completely silent AND power efficient.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      135. Thanks. I have a QNAP TS-451+ whose drives always seemed to be doing something. It got so bad I turned it off for months as I didn’t want to pay for unnecessary electricity consumption. These days I keep it in sleep mode and wake it up for when I need it then back to sleep. Meets my user case but not everyone’s user case. Having installed LED lighting throughout the house I can’t justify an appliance on 24×7.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      137. Thanks man, very helpful.
        I have been wondering how much my NAS is costing me and been powering down in the week to save el. More reassured that it is not costing a fortune and will leave it idled from now.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      139. 10:44 Time Stamp : You say that 4x4TB WD RED NAS plus Synology DS920 consumes at full load 21,25Watts
        WD Official Data Sheet for these drives give 3.8 Watt concumption (x4= 14.4 Watt for drives)
        Synology Inc. at specification sheet of Ds940+ giving:
        Power Consumption* 32.17 W (Access) 9.69 W (HDD Hibernation)
        British Thermal Unit 109.84 BTU/hr (Access) 33.09 BTU/hr (HDD Hibernation)
        Notes
        Power consumption is measured when it is fully loaded with Western Digital 1TB WD10EFRX hard drive(s).
        Noise Level Testing Environment: Fully loaded with Seagate 2TB ST2000VN000 hard drive(s) in the idle state. Two G.R.A.S. Type 40AE microphones, each set up 1 meter away from the Synology NAS at the front and rear. Background noise: 16.49-17.51 dB(A); Temperature: 24.25-25.75˚C; Humidity: 58.2-61.8%

        Power Management10 for WD10EFRX (WD Official Data Sheet)
        12VDC ±5% (A, peak) 1.75
        5VDC ±5% (A, peak) 1.00
        Average power requirements (W)
        Read/write 3.3
        Idle 2.3
        Standby and sleep 0.4

        So if we say that 4xWD10EFRX have a concumption of 13.2Watts (as mentioned from WD official data sheet), The host machine Synology DS920+ consumes for itself 32.17-13.2 = 18.97 Watt
        Now if we add the power concumption of 4x4TB WD RED NAS we take: 18.97 + 14.4 = 36.97 Watts!!! And if we multiply this number by 24 times , we have: 0.887 KWh/day whichn means 26.6KWh per month or 320KWh annualy.
        Multiplay now this number with your local charges for electrik energy to find the exactly power cost for this machine.
        Do not forget to calculate any penalties for overconcumption wich applied in some countries after a basic amaount of energy consumption.
        Higher capacity drives have higher consumptions which can touch even 10Watts per drive for 16TB 18TB 20TB and 22TB drives.
        I think that you have issue with your energy counters. The simlest and more reliable method is the usage of a “Kill a Watt” meter directly between machine`s fis and wall source.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      140. Appreciate the effort going into this, but gonna say you’ve set yourself an impossible task. At least here in the USA, per KWh pricing is all over the map, even trying to take a “national average” is not going to mean much other than a tiny slice that are at the average. Plus residential rates can vary vastly from commercial rates, even in the exact same locale. Like I’m in Virginia and pay $.10/KWh fixed, yet a friend in Boston pays $.32 and is on variable rate that changes at different times of the day.
        IMO where the value you can offer comes in you and Eddie gathering and comparing load/no-load/typical-load consumption data across a range of “typical” NAS setups, and leave it to the viewer to calculate what that means for a local “price to operate”. All caveats aside, I think you’re creating a bunch of extra work for yourself that in the end a potential NAS user is going to have to figure out on their own.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      143. Have not finished your video yet, so sorry if it is answered but can ssd cache THEORETICALLY reduce power consumption if I use services like Sonarr or Radarr that periodicaly scan and download media to my server? (Sonarr and Radarr run on my Mini pc, not synology ds920).

        Also are bigger harddrives more power hungry? I have wd red plus 8tb.

        Btw your videos are perfect, I am still watching your stuff even months after I bought my NAS and set up everything I needed, thank you for your work!
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE

      144. NAS power consumption only matters in the summer. In the winter, NAS energy just contributes to heating the house.
        Fan speed can affect power consumption. I set mine in the middle.
        REPLY ON YOUTUBE