How Much Does it Cost to Run a NAS 24×7? QNAP TS-453E
The growing cost of electricity and how much you need to factor this into your budget is quite a valid concern. Due to any one of about a hundred different global factors (local conflict, slow renewable energy uptake, monopolizing energy companies with powerful lobbying – take your pick!) most of us in 2022/2023 have seen increases in energy costs. In this energy-aware climate, it can be appreciated that a NAS drive (a 24×7 appliance) seemingly has its cost to the end user in terms of electricity as something of a vague number. With so many kinds of NAS available in the market, featuring a mix of CPUs, PSUs, Bays and utilities, PLUS the wide range of HDD/SSD drives in the market to choose from – there are just so many variables when trying to work out how much power your NAS drive is using and how much that is translating to in your monthly energy bill! So, today’s article is about working out how much electricity the new 2022/2023 generation QNAP TS-453E NAS and four (current maximum capacity in the NAS HDD world) WD Red Plus 4TB HDDs will consume, as well as how much that equals to you in £, $ or € per day, month and year! Let’s begin.
The QNAP TS-453E NAS
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$699+
|
The WD Red Plus 4TB HDD (x4)
Current Price/Availability on Amazon –$79
|
Intel J6412 CPU, 4-Core 2.0-2.6Ghz Celeron CPU
8GB 3200Mhz non-ECC Memory, 2.5GbE |
4 Terabyte Capacity – SATA 3.5″ Form Factor
5400RPM – 64MB Cache – 4x 1TB Platters
|
NAS Power Use Test Setup
Choosing the appropriate NAS drive for these tests was always going to be tough. I DO intend on repeating these tests with several different NAS drives after this in some follow-up articles (the larger article that I will be adding to can be found HERE), but wanted this test to be focused on one of the newest releases for home users by QNAP (and the TS-453E is their latest prosumer devices and already quite popular). This NAS has been paired with the WD Red Plus 4TB HDD, by far (even in 2022) the most popular storage tier/scale in the HDD lineup. The aim here is to identify the difference between using newer gen CPUs and Larger drives vs using older-generation devices and smaller-capacity media. This will involve 2x tests on each NAS+Media configuration. Here is a breakdown of the hardware configurations and test architectures:
- QNAP TS-453E NAS, Default Celeron+8GB Memory Setup over 1/2.5GbE
- 4x WD Red Plus 4TB (QNAP Test in RAID 5)
- During ‘ACTIVE’ 24hr Tests, the NAS was prevented from going into standby/idle. 1 VM running, 1-Core and 1GB Memory, 2x IP Cameras recording non-stop, drive S.M.A.R.T tests scheduled to be hourly
- During IDLE 24hr Tests, the VM was deleted, VM and Surveillance Software disabled, ALL S.M.A.R.T tests disabled and network cable (1GbE network, 2.5GbE Port) disconnected.
- The first day of operation (which includes initialization and RAID creation) not counted (but visible at the start of the graph).
- Power was monitored with a GOSUND SMART KIT Smart Plug, Mini 13A – Find HERE
The initial 24 hours (used for system initialization and RAID configuration) were NOT included in the power usage monitoring, as although they appear on the graph they are one-off single-event scenarios. Each test (Active vs Idle) was conducted for 24hrs and the overall electricity usage was displayed in kw (kilowatt). But what is the difference between Active and Idle activity? Why does it matter?
What is the Difference Between a NAS Drive ‘Active’ and in ‘IDLE / Standby’?
Although a NAS is designed to be in operation 24×7 and is consuming electricity when running, the actual reality of this and the extent to which it is consuming it is actually alot more nuanced. Most home users who have a NAS system will use the NAS directly for a significant;y smaller portion of time per day than it is actually powered on for. Perhaps to stream a movie or a couple of TV episodes, run a daily backup, have a couple of cameras in/outside their home that are sending recordings (or more likely just alerts and associated captures) to the NAS and that is about it. They will periodically do more than these, maybe a VM, more sophisticated backup or use some of the other services ad hoc, but the result is that in most domestic/bog standard home scenarios, a NAS will be switched internally to Idle/Standby after no pro-active use quite quickly and spend 80-90% of the time in low power modes. Business users might well be using the system 24×7 for sync’d tasks and on-going camera recording, but even then, this will be a lower % of system resources in use. So, in order to find a comparable and relative means to study the electricity use of a NAS and it’s cost, I have conducted two tests per NAS+HDD configuration. The first, a 24 Hour Active test, with the system using a decent % of it’s CPU+Memory, a swell as the HDDs not being given the chance to switch to Idle/Standy (by constantly writing AND performing S.M.A.R.T tests hourly). The idle tests involve all of those apps, services and scheduled operations being cancelled and the network cable being disconnected from the NAS (for another 24hrs). From here we can work out the cost of an hour of power usage by either setup in high activity and near-zero activity. But how can we work out the COST of the electricity used by the NAS in that time period?
How Energy Costs in these NAS Tests were Calculated?
The results of the energy usage are then cross-referenced by ‘sust-it.net’ and calculations of the cost of the used electricity per day, month and year was calculated for the UK, U.S, Germany, Australia and Canada. Now, using a select energy tariff is much harder, as there are quite literally thousands of different energy providers globally, each with their own pricing on the cost of energy per ‘kWh’. So, I used the national average calculations that were provided by ‘sust-it’ for each of those areas. Some are clearly more up-to-date than others (i.e the United Kingdom Avg Energy cost tariff is dated October 2022, whereas the Canada’s average energy cost is from way back in March 2020), however, these will still provide a good basis for understanding what a NAS drive is going to cost you in electricity when it is in operation. The national tariff averages used in this article for each region are as follows:
UK: Energy Price (October 2022) electricity rate of 34.00 pence per kWh.
USA: Average (Feb 2022) electricity rate of 14.80 cents per kWh.
Germany: Average (June 2021) electricity rate of 31.93 Eurocents per kWh.
Australia: Average (March 2022) electricity rate of 23.59 cents per kWh.
Canada: Average (2020) electricity rate of 8.50 cents per kWh.
Source – https://www.sust-it.net
There are the rates that we will be using to calculate the running costs of the QNAP NAS system (and more importantly its WD Drive setup and CPU usage).
Test #1 – QNAP TS-453E NAS and 4X 4TB WD Red Drives
I set the QNAP TS-453E NAS and WD Red 4TB Hard drives up in the following configuration for the Active tests:
- QNAP TS-453E NAS PSU = 100W External PSU, Intel Celeron J6412 Quad Core 2.0-2.6Ghz, 8GB DDR4 3200Mhz Memory
- WD Red Plus 4TB HDD, RAID 5
- QVR Pro 9 and 2x Reolink Dome IP Cameras (24hrs Active)
- QNAP Virtualization Station, 1x Windows VM, 1 Core, 1GB Memory (24hrs Active)
- QNAP Storage Manager (QTS 5.1) and S.M.A.R.T Tests per Hour (24hr Active)
- Reported Average power requirements of a WD Red Plus 4TB (Single):
- Read/Write: 4.7
- Idle: 3.1
- Standby Sleep: 0.3
Let’s see how those results translated into your potential energy bills.
QNAP TS-453E NAS and WD Red Plus 4TB HDD Test Results:
0.03125kW use per Hour in full access/use and 0.0204166kW use per Hour in idle/standby:
1hr Active Use (KW) | UK Power Use £ | U.S Power Use $ | Germany Power Use € | Australia AU$ | Canada CA$ |
Per Hour | £0.01 | 0.0046 | 0.01 | 0.0074 | 0.0027 |
1hr Idle Use (KW) | UK Power Use £ | U.S Power Use $ | Germany Power Use € | Australia AU$ | Canada CA$ |
Per Hour | £0.01 | 0.003 | 0.0065 | 0.0048 | 0.0017 |
Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF ACTIVITY (no standby time or drive hibernation)
24hr Active Use (KW) | UK Power Use £ | U.S Power Use $ | Germany Power Use € | Australia AU$ | Canada CA$ |
Cost Per Day | £0.25 | 0.1104 | 0.24 | 0.1776 | 0.0648 |
Cost per Month | 7.738 | 3.358 | 7.3 | 5.402 | 1.971 |
Cost Per Year | 92.856 | 40.296 | 87.6 | 64.824 | 23.652 |
Here are the results for 24 HOURS OF IDLE/STANDBY with no system use and ethernet/network connection disconnected
24hr Idle Use (KW) | UK Power Use £ | U.S Power Use $ | Germany Power Use € | Australia AU$ | Canada CA$ |
Cost Per Day | £0.17 | 0.072 | 0.156 | 0.1152 | 0.0408 |
Cost per Month | 5.037 | 2.19 | 4.745 | 3.504 | 1.241 |
Cost Per Year | 60.444 | 26.28 | 56.94 | 42.048 | 14.892 |
So, what about if you were to only use the NAS at active use for around 25% of the day (i.e 6hrs of active with backups, multimedia, etc) and 75% of the day as idle (i.e 18hrs unused):
6hr Active Use and 18hr Idle Use (KW) | UK Power Use £ | U.S Power Use $ | Germany Power Use € | Australia AU$ | Canada CA$ |
Cost Per Day | £0.19 | 0.0816 | 0.177 | 0.1308 | 0.0468 |
Cost per Month | 5.71225 | 2.482 | 5.38375 | 3.9785 | 1.4235 |
Cost Per Year | 68.547 | 29.784 | 64.605 | 47.742 | 17.082 |
Stay tuned, check below to see if other NAS power tests have been published and recommended to you, or watch the video version of these tests (which goes into more detail on the current predicaments in the energy crisis facing many of us in 2022, 2023 and beyond.
📧 SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER 🔔
🔒 Join Inner Circle
Get an alert every time something gets added to this specific article!
This description contains links to Amazon. These links will take you to some of the products mentioned in today's content. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Visit the NASCompares Deal Finder to find the best place to buy this device in your region, based on Service, Support and Reputation - Just Search for your NAS Drive in the Box Below
Need Advice on Data Storage from an Expert?
Finally, for free advice about your setup, just leave a message in the comments below here at NASCompares.com and we will get back to you. Need Help? Where possible (and where appropriate) please provide as much information about your requirements, as then I can arrange the best answer and solution to your needs. Do not worry about your e-mail address being required, it will NOT be used in a mailing list and will NOT be used in any way other than to respond to your enquiry.
(Early Access) M.2 to Oculink 4i Adapter - TURN £5 INTO 64Gb/s
(Early Access) Synology Active Protect - The End of Active Backup?
(Early Access) Jonsbo N5 NAS Case Build - GET IT RIGHT, FIRST TIME
(Early Access) 64TB USB Drives - How Does This SCAM Work?
(Early Access) Minisforum MGA1 7600M XT eGPU Docking Station Review
(Early Access) The Best M.2 SSD NAS To Buy Right Now
Access content via Patreon or KO-FI
8:00
Thank you
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Bougth two cruicial p5 plus m2.ssd. With already attached Heatsink. The height is about 1cm. Fits perfectly.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
O bought one in amazon this month and the RAM is upgradable !!!! Like the ts-464
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I just bought this NAS in Germany, and surprise – it has two internal RAM slots, one with a Kingston 8GB DDR4 module! No hint on the box or the written manual that it is expandable now.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I much prefer QNAP’s chassis design of the TS-453E vs. the TS-464. That ’rounded-edge’ look on the TS-464 looks like it’s trying to look more ‘cutesy’, as if it were trying to add some Apple-like flair to the hardware. It’s a NAS (Not ‘NAZ’ btw.), it not supposed to look sexy. Function over form, what does it do – how well does it do it. Since my TS-453-Pro has just died after the QTS 5.1 update with the dreaded ‘J1900 LPC-clock bug’ I’m now in the market for an upgrade, and this ticks all the right boxes for me. I plan on trying the resistor trick on the old TS453-Pro, but given it’s on it’s way out, evidently, time to look at a potential replacement.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Do you also test transfer speeds, especially with encrypted volumes? I noticed there are huge performance differences between devices
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
How is this different than the TS-464? Why is it more expensive, since it lacks PCI-E slot.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Great review. Actually returned a new NAS and bought this because of your videos.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
THANK YOU NASCompares, your reviews are valuable. I bought this NAS because of this review, couldn’t be any happier with it. It is so good on so many levels, can’t thank you enough.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Any news whether this QNAP NAS will have a slot for upgadable memory? Even old NAS as TS-451 has upgradable memory to ditch the standard 4GB to max out 16GB to help out CPU to perform.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
@nascompares when will you release a Plex test for this device?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
17:17 so glad you removed that. It was driving me crazy. ????
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Looking forward to your review of Plex Server on the TS-453E. When Might we see that?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have ordered one of these from Amazon UK for a smidge under £700, it’s coming from Qnap directly. My DS1815+ died a second time and the soldering the 1k resistor fix didn’t work for me 🙁 Will be extending warranty to 5 years..
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
In general a good package (except the non-extendable memory and again the lack of at least more USB 3.2 Gen1 ports for backup at the back of the device). But where is the sensor for the remote control? This seems to be another big downside compared to TS-451+ and TS-453pro.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Very thorough review. Wish for 10gb upgrade but all else is good
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Given all the security problems recently revealed about QNAP devices, no thanks. I would rather deal with the crappier hardware and higher prices of Synology.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Great video. Thanks. …Q: Are Qnap NAS’s “secure” if plan to keep connected to internet & accessed remotley regularly via mobile phones?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Yes, nice hardware, BUT can you boot directly off the internal 4 bays and the 2 NVMe devices?
If not, then it’s DOA and a useless door stopper.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
On a NAS you have to see the drives/trays, not that removing-cover-rubbish as on the TS-453D etc… ????
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
Very nice, thorough, review of the device.
TBH, I’m not so chuffed as you about the lack of included M.2 drive heat sinks. I’d rather go with a heatsink from the drive maker than some “one size fits all” attempt by QNAP.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
I have the QNAP 451+ and so very interesting review of its replacement. I don’t like the plastic drive trays on either NAS. I do like the chasis though of both units, so it is a personal thing.
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
что за ересь он моросит ?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE
What Synology device would be similar(hardware spec.) to this one?
REPLY ON YOUTUBE